Im starting to come to the conclusion...

[Gtaghost22]

No. This is logic:

 

The plan is pefect, you drive, get there, everything goes COMPLETELY, HORRIBLY WRONG. Cause it's GTA ffs.

 

SO:

 

Either you go in and help them rob the bank, get out and lose the cops.

OR:

You drive away cause some/all of them are dead.

 

PS: You've forgetting the mission in GTA 3 where you wait for the robbers to exit the bank. So yeah.

Agree.. Thats probably what is actually going to happen

Exactly so to re-iterate my comment that only the protag is chased by police hence the protag is the Hispanic guy in the red convertible 0:22

Yeah... I'm 99.9% sure the hispanic guy is the protagonist, read my sig (i have it since a month ago)

[ll rdny ll]

RCGuys are gonna cry when real info comes out

 

Nobody seems to understand what an Undercover FBI Agent is/does. Let me break it down for you.

 

If an agent is undercover, they participate in actions that they normally wouldn't. That would involve; torture, kidnapping, selling drugs, using drugs, stealing cars, robbing banks, you get the point. So merely saying "Teh cantz be FBEYE cuz he got chussed buh cawps!" Doesn't prove anything.

[EscoLehGo]

RCGuys are gonna cry when real info comes out

 

Nobody seems to understand what an Undercover FBI Agent is/does. Let me break it down for you.

 

If an agent is undercover, they participate in actions that they normally wouldn't. That would involve; torture, kidnapping, selling drugs, using drugs, stealing cars, robbing banks, you get the point. So merely saying "Teh cantz be FBEYE cuz he got chussed buh cawps!" Doesn't prove anything.

Are you suggesting the protagonist is involved with police activity?

[ll rdny ll]

RCGuys are gonna cry when real info comes out 

 

Nobody seems to understand what an Undercover FBI Agent is/does. Let me break it down for you.

 

If an agent is undercover, they participate in actions that they normally wouldn't. That would involve; torture, kidnapping, selling drugs, using drugs, stealing cars, robbing banks, you get the point. So merely saying "Teh cantz be FBEYE cuz he got chussed buh cawps!" Doesn't prove anything.

Are you suggesting the protagonist is involved with police activity?

No, I'm just saying that just because a character is FBI doesn't mean he can't do the things we'll do in the game.

 

For all we know, The Main Character is Ned Luke, the Hispanic RCguy is undercover FBI. While we're playing the game, we grow to trust RCguy, and eventually he betrays Ned Luke, (because he's FBI)

[ryuclan]

I wouldn't debunk the FBI theory based solely clothing. Undercover maybe? I don't know just throwing it out there.

 

 

Edit:NM beat to it.

 

Also @ Atomicpunk: most people.aren't mad because hes white, they're mad because hes old.

Edited March 13, 2012 by ryuclan

[JStarr31]

RCGuys are gonna cry when real info comes out 

 

Nobody seems to understand what an Undercover FBI Agent is/does. Let me break it down for you.

 

If an agent is undercover, they participate in actions that they normally wouldn't. That would involve; torture, kidnapping, selling drugs, using drugs, stealing cars, robbing banks, you get the point. So merely saying "Teh cantz be FBEYE cuz he got chussed buh cawps!" Doesn't prove anything.

Are you suggesting the protagonist is involved with police activity?

No, I'm just saying that just because a character is FBI doesn't mean he can't do the things we'll do in the game.

 

For all we know, The Main Character is Ned Luke, the Hispanic RCguy is undercover FBI. While we're playing the game, we grow to trust RCguy, and eventually he betrays Ned Luke, (because he's FBI)

Pretty much this. It seems due to the info stated in the casting calls, it seems there will be a lot of police interaction this time around which they might or probably use this for revealing the means of this bold new direction they speak of or something

[JStarr31]

I wouldn't debunk the FBI theory based solely clothing. Undercover maybe? I don't know just throwing it out there.

 

 

Edit:NM beat to it.

 

Also @ Atomicpunk: most people.aren't mad because hes white, they're mad because hes old.

Thank you...and not liking the protag for his age is just as stupid as not liking him for his race. Solid Snake was about 60yrs old in "Sons of Patriots" and still was more bad ass in the game. Hell, he'd probably be able to kill every GTA main character in one night at the same time....

 

 

Its because these UN-tough socially awkward can act out in the video and your hardcore when your not. Just party the game when it comes out and take it for what its worth....an entertainment medium to help depict a probably intriguing story.

[Meekail]

 

No. This is logic:

 

The plan is pefect, you drive, get there, everything goes COMPLETELY, HORRIBLY WRONG. Cause it's GTA ffs.

 

SO:

 

Either you go in and help them rob the bank, get out and lose the cops.

OR:

You drive away cause some/all of them are dead.

 

PS: You've forgetting the mission in GTA 3 where you wait for the robbers to exit the bank. So yeah.

Agree.. Thats probably what is actually going to happen

Exactly so to re-iterate my comment that only the protag is chased by police hence the protag is the Hispanic guy in the red convertible 0:22

Yeah... I'm 99.9% sure the hispanic guy is the protagonist, read my sig (i have it since a month ago)

I think it is the balcony guy. Thats my opinion.

[SGT. Johnson]

That balcony dude may truly be, at most, our protagonist or atleast a strong story character. I know, I know, NOT THIS TOPIC AGAIN.... But im starting to see the evidence is speaking louder and louder. FOR THE RECORD, I AM NOT SAYING ALL THE CHARACTERS ARE THE PROTAG. I AM NOT SUPPORTING NOR BASHING THE MULTIPLE PROTAG THEORY. IM POINTING OUT IS THE PEOPLE SEEN IN THE TRAILER SEEM TO MATCH THE CASTING CALL DESCRIPTIONS.[/size=7]

 

 

 

As we all know: Albert deSilva. Age:??? Info: Albert has a son, Kevin De Silva, a FPS playing gamer who smokes a lot of weed, has anxiety issues and a card for a bad back, very soft, very opinionated. Into making racist comments while playing online. Through further analysis, Hes seems to be an ex-FIB Agent trying to "start over".

 

 

Miguel Gonzalez: 25 Young Mexican American FBI agent, caught between a few mob bosses. Very clean cut.

 

Mitch Hayes: 38 - Anynoying, wise cracking, highly successful FBI agent. In great shape. Does triathlons, drinks low cal beer, but still has a sense of humor.

 

 

 

If i were to judge a book by its cover...they kinda fit there descriptions. Especially Mitch. He looks in shape, drinks low Cal beers while his fellas drink normal "manly" beer. But Mitch doesn't care if you poke fun at him, look at him, he's Mitch for crying out loud. He'll just crack a joke back, put on his shades, walk away like nothing happened, and go jet skiing. Ohhhh yeah. Beside he's successful. Good ole Mitch.

 

As for Miguel, He seems clean cut, an all-for-the-ladies kinds guy, especially in the convertible scene during the trailer. Also being caught between mob bosses would explain the little police car chase scene with the red convertible as well.

 

As for another thing that makes it even more certain that balcony dude will the protag....is the age range of all the characters on the casting call leak. Mostly 35+ year old with the occasional young pup, but for the must part, old people. (not saying its a bad thing as this could make for a more interesting and mature game as far as story and cinematics). R* even went a far as to cast for a 56yr old role. Might as well stop complaining.

 

Feel free to comment or lock (which ever more appropriate). I want feedback.

As fur my opinion, I guess we should just suck it up and enjoy the ride!

You can't rely on the information about the casting call about RUSH because we do not know FOR SURE if those characters will appear. We can only ASSUME. In that case, I'll ASSUME that you may be right, but as of now, factually, you are incorrect on any of the characters.

 

There is a thing called "being similar/circumstantial", and this is one of those cases. The characters are matching the diescription but it can be only by circumstance or they just have similar qualities. Being similar does not equate something to be exact or alike.

 

Good theory though

[(Yakuza)]

i dont want to play as an old man the age of my parents. I will wait for the episodes or dlc whatever if thats the case.

No you wont.

[Doo]

I feel like cutting my arms every time I see a topic like these.

This sh*t has been discussed a lot of times, and unless you live in a prison without internet connection, you know that we still have to wait to know who the protagonist will be.

Stop with these stupid theories. You act like stupid kids guessing what mom will bring for the dinner today.

f*ck that sh*t.

[HydraulicWaRiOr]

RCGuys are gonna cry when real info comes out

 

Nobody seems to understand what an Undercover FBI Agent is/does. Let me break it down for you.

 

If an agent is undercover, they participate in actions that they normally wouldn't. That would involve; torture, kidnapping, selling drugs, using drugs, stealing cars, robbing banks, you get the point. So merely saying "Teh cantz be FBEYE cuz he got chussed buh cawps!" Doesn't prove anything.

You're only providing the same situation that we do, either way, one of us is going to be wrong, or we may both be wrong, but it's stupid to say that someone who has a different opinion o the subject than you is wrong, because you'll just look stupid in the end.

 

[SGT. Johnson]

anybody got a link to how the casting call was proved fake?

Matter of fact your right....Mods,, keep thus thread open until someone posts the source or link to info regarding the casting call being deemed fake/not true.

No it IS fake. Nobody believed it then, and they dont now. WHY IS THIS STILL OPEN???

 

 

 

 

So it's def the protag as only the protag gets chased by police in these games.

Your deeply retarded.

Really?

 

Eaxplain to me then how the casting call was indeed fake because there has been no evidence explaining that it was. We are referring to the FIRST one; not the SEOND one that had James Pedeaston in it. THAT ONE WAS FAKE! The other one has yet to be proven or disproven otherwise.

 

So, therefore, I await your amazing, fullproof theory or evidence supporting the so-called FACT that the FIRST casting call was indeed fake.

[HeNDo6750]

The more i hear about "we are playing as an undercover cop" or anything else along those lines, the more i'm getting dissapointed about V. The reason is that Grand Theft Auto is about being a criminal not a cop, and ever since 1997, we've always been playing as a criminal. And when did GTA become a game about undercover cops as it would be boring to play, and not alot of freedom for the character or player and unfair as well.

 

Also when you are a criminal in GTA, you get the freedom to do whatever you want freely and not restricted. That is what GTA is all about unlike COUGH LA Noire COUGH.

 

So my point is, playing as criminal in GTA, you get the freedom to do whatever you want, whenever you want.

 

But playing as a undercover cop, the less freedom you get of commiting crimes in GTA, and the less fun after awhile

Edited March 13, 2012 by HeNDo6750

[ll rdny ll]

The more i hear about "we are playing as an undercover cop" or anything else along those lines, the more i'm getting dissapointed about V. The reason is that Grand Theft Auto is about being a criminal not a cop, and ever since 1997, we've always been playing as a criminal. And when did GTA become a game about undercover cops as it would be boring to play, and not alot of freedom for the character or player and unfair as well.

 

Also when you are a criminal in GTA, you get the freedom to do whatever you want freely and not restricted. That is what GTA is all about unlike COUGH LA Noire COUGH.

 

So my point is, playing as criminal in GTA, you get the freedom to do whatever you want, whenever you want.

 

But playing as a undercover cop, the less freedom you get of commiting crimes in GTA, and the less fun after awhile

No, you'd get the same freedom. You'd have to put on a convincing show for the people you're fooling.

 

(I'm not saying we're going to play as a UC Agent.)

[SGT. Johnson]

The more i hear about "we are playing as an undercover cop" or anything else along those lines, the more i'm getting dissapointed about V. The reason is that Grand Theft Auto is about being a criminal not a cop, and ever since 1997, we've always been playing as a criminal. And when did GTA become a game about undercover cops as it would be boring to play, and not alot of freedom for the character or player and unfair as well.

 

Also when you are a criminal in GTA, you get the freedom to do whatever you want freely and not restricted. That is what GTA is all about unlike COUGH LA Noire COUGH.

 

So my point is, playing as criminal in GTA, you get the freedom to do whatever you want, whenever you want.

 

But playing as a undercover cop, the less freedom you get of commiting crimes in GTA, and the less fun after awhile

"A bold new direction..."

 

Yes, we've been playing as a criminal for years now. Perhaps the "bold, new direction" is in fact playing on the other side of the law. It would actually make things different instead of the same old, monotonous, boring criminal life. Rockstar likes to keep things fresh, which is why they've varies their criminals and their stories so much. Eventually, however, Rockstar IS GOING TO RUN OUT OF IDEAS FOR CRIMINALS. We've done just about every race, storyline, and criminal organization. After a while, gang strylines become similar and lose originality. Playing as a Mafia member, gang member for the Families/Ballas, or even an organization such as the Syndicate or the Triads/Russian Mafia eventually begins to become tiresome.

 

Ex: Drive here, kill him/her, leave.

Drive here, deal this/that, leave.

Drive here, pick up X, drive to destination.

 

Ho hum. Really am starting to get bored of the same recycled ideas. IV was good because it was about Niko trying to gain a living in Liberty City. He did not forcibly enter into the criminal underworld. Instead, he chose to. This is what made Iv interesting for me, but it also changed the whole way that we normally set up the story of GTA. That's originality; that's a new direction, which is one part of keeping the player entertained. If we play as a gang member in V, there's recycling of ideas somewhere, which means R* is losing its original, artistic touch. Playing as a cop, or an undercover, would actually be different and start a new direction in the GTA series. We've never played as anyone in any kind of Law Enforcement branch except for Vic Vance who was in the Army. That's as far as we've ever went. Now, we finally get the chance to play as an undercover cop. Let me ask you something: Did Driver ever stray from its GTA-clone menatility? Why should GTA?

[Hidaweey]

 

The more i hear about "we are playing as an undercover cop" or anything else along those lines, the more i'm getting dissapointed about V. The reason is that Grand Theft Auto is about being a criminal not a cop, and ever since 1997, we've always been playing as a criminal. And when did GTA become a game about undercover cops as it would be boring to play, and not alot of freedom for the character or player and unfair as well.

 

Also when you are a criminal in GTA, you get the freedom to do whatever you want freely and not restricted. That is what GTA is all about unlike COUGH LA Noire COUGH.

 

So my point is, playing as criminal in GTA, you get the freedom to do whatever you want, whenever you want.

 

But playing as a undercover cop, the less freedom you get of commiting crimes in GTA, and the less fun after awhile

"A bold new direction..."

 

Yes, we've been playing as a criminal for years now. Perhaps the "bold, new direction" is in fact playing on the other side of the law. It would actually make things different instead of the same old, monotonous, boring criminal life. Rockstar likes to keep things fresh, which is why they've varies their criminals and their stories so much. Eventually, however, Rockstar IS GOING TO RUN OUT OF IDEAS FOR CRIMINALS. We've done just about every race, storyline, and criminal organization. After a while, gang strylines become similar and lose originality. Playing as a Mafia member, gang member for the Families/Ballas, or even an organization such as the Syndicate or the Triads/Russian Mafia eventually begins to become tiresome.

 

Ex: Drive here, kill him/her, leave.

Drive here, deal this/that, leave.

Drive here, pick up X, drive to destination.

 

Ho hum. Really am starting to get bored of the same recycled ideas. IV was good because it was about Niko trying to gain a living in Liberty City. He did not forcibly enter into the criminal underworld. Instead, he chose to. This is what made Iv interesting for me, but it also changed the whole way that we normally set up the story of GTA. That's originality; that's a new direction, which is one part of keeping the player entertained. If we play as a gang member in V, there's recycling of ideas somewhere, which means R* is losing its original, artistic touch. Playing as a cop, or an undercover, would actually be different and start a new direction in the GTA series. We've never played as anyone in any kind of Law Enforcement branch except for Vic Vance who was in the Army. That's as far as we've ever went. Now, we finally get the chance to play as an undercover cop. Let me ask you something: Did Driver ever stray from its GTA-clone menatility? Why should GTA?

80% who play gta

 

for blowing sh*t and free roaming

 

nobody from my country and my friends play the story

 

they dont even finish it

 

just driving and killing the pedestrian

[ll rdny ll]

You're only providing the same situation that we do, either way, one of us is going to be wrong, or we may both be wrong, but it's stupid to say that someone who has a different opinion o the subject than you is wrong, because you'll just look stupid in the end.

 

[supreme]

You should read what you just said, and practice what you're preaching.

[SGT. Johnson]

The more i hear about "we are playing as an undercover cop" or anything else along those lines, the more i'm getting dissapointed about V. The reason is that Grand Theft Auto is about being a criminal not a cop, and ever since 1997, we've always been playing as a criminal. And when did GTA become a game about undercover cops as it would be boring to play, and not alot of freedom for the character or player and unfair as well.

 

Also when you are a criminal in GTA, you get the freedom to do whatever you want freely and not restricted. That is what GTA is all about unlike COUGH LA Noire COUGH.

 

So my point is, playing as criminal in GTA, you get the freedom to do whatever you want, whenever you want.

 

But playing as a undercover cop, the less freedom you get of commiting crimes in GTA, and the less fun after awhile

"A bold new direction..."

 

Yes, we've been playing as a criminal for years now. Perhaps the "bold, new direction" is in fact playing on the other side of the law. It would actually make things different instead of the same old, monotonous, boring criminal life. Rockstar likes to keep things fresh, which is why they've varies their criminals and their stories so much. Eventually, however, Rockstar IS GOING TO RUN OUT OF IDEAS FOR CRIMINALS. We've done just about every race, storyline, and criminal organization. After a while, gang strylines become similar and lose originality. Playing as a Mafia member, gang member for the Families/Ballas, or even an organization such as the Syndicate or the Triads/Russian Mafia eventually begins to become tiresome.

 

Ex: Drive here, kill him/her, leave.

Drive here, deal this/that, leave.

Drive here, pick up X, drive to destination.

 

Ho hum. Really am starting to get bored of the same recycled ideas. IV was good because it was about Niko trying to gain a living in Liberty City. He did not forcibly enter into the criminal underworld. Instead, he chose to. This is what made Iv interesting for me, but it also changed the whole way that we normally set up the story of GTA. That's originality; that's a new direction, which is one part of keeping the player entertained. If we play as a gang member in V, there's recycling of ideas somewhere, which means R* is losing its original, artistic touch. Playing as a cop, or an undercover, would actually be different and start a new direction in the GTA series. We've never played as anyone in any kind of Law Enforcement branch except for Vic Vance who was in the Army. That's as far as we've ever went. Now, we finally get the chance to play as an undercover cop. Let me ask you something: Did Driver ever stray from its GTA-clone menatility? Why should GTA?

80% who play gta

 

for blowing sh*t and free roaming

 

nobody from my country and my friends play the story

 

they dont even finish it

 

just driving and killing the pedestrian

So you play the game simply for the multiplayer and rampaging?

 

I love the mentality of some people

[Hidaweey]

 

The more i hear about "we are playing as an undercover cop" or anything else along those lines, the more i'm getting dissapointed about V. The reason is that Grand Theft Auto is about being a criminal not a cop, and ever since 1997, we've always been playing as a criminal. And when did GTA become a game about undercover cops as it would be boring to play, and not alot of freedom for the character or player and unfair as well.

 

Also when you are a criminal in GTA, you get the freedom to do whatever you want freely and not restricted. That is what GTA is all about unlike COUGH LA Noire COUGH.

 

So my point is, playing as criminal in GTA, you get the freedom to do whatever you want, whenever you want.

 

But playing as a undercover cop, the less freedom you get of commiting crimes in GTA, and the less fun after awhile

"A bold new direction..."

 

Yes, we've been playing as a criminal for years now. Perhaps the "bold, new direction" is in fact playing on the other side of the law. It would actually make things different instead of the same old, monotonous, boring criminal life. Rockstar likes to keep things fresh, which is why they've varies their criminals and their stories so much. Eventually, however, Rockstar IS GOING TO RUN OUT OF IDEAS FOR CRIMINALS. We've done just about every race, storyline, and criminal organization. After a while, gang strylines become similar and lose originality. Playing as a Mafia member, gang member for the Families/Ballas, or even an organization such as the Syndicate or the Triads/Russian Mafia eventually begins to become tiresome.

 

Ex: Drive here, kill him/her, leave.

Drive here, deal this/that, leave.

Drive here, pick up X, drive to destination.

 

Ho hum. Really am starting to get bored of the same recycled ideas. IV was good because it was about Niko trying to gain a living in Liberty City. He did not forcibly enter into the criminal underworld. Instead, he chose to. This is what made Iv interesting for me, but it also changed the whole way that we normally set up the story of GTA. That's originality; that's a new direction, which is one part of keeping the player entertained. If we play as a gang member in V, there's recycling of ideas somewhere, which means R* is losing its original, artistic touch. Playing as a cop, or an undercover, would actually be different and start a new direction in the GTA series. We've never played as anyone in any kind of Law Enforcement branch except for Vic Vance who was in the Army. That's as far as we've ever went. Now, we finally get the chance to play as an undercover cop. Let me ask you something: Did Driver ever stray from its GTA-clone menatility? Why should GTA?

80% who play gta

 

for blowing sh*t and free roaming

 

nobody from my country and my friends play the story

 

they dont even finish it

 

just driving and killing the pedestrian

So you play the game simply for the multiplayer and rampaging?

 

I love the mentality of some people

I play the game for everything

 

you know the story cant last longer ....

 

less than one week and the story will finish..

[Official General]

 

Yes, a Mexican-American FBI agent who is running from the cops. You're smart.

 

[supreme]

LOOOOL !! I laughed so hard at this comment. For real, that guy should use his brains ha ha ha ha ha!!

 

@ SGT Johnson

 

Your 'cop protagonist' ideas are terrible and a trife silly. Playing a cop in GTA will make it more interesting ? I just don't think so, it just totally defeats the concept of GTA altogether. GTFO with that bullsh*t.

 

@ Hidaweey

 

Count me out of that 80% you speak of. I play GTA for storyline, free-roaming and messing around, basically everything !!

Edited March 13, 2012 by Official General

[SGT. Johnson]

Yes, a Mexican-American FBI agent who is running from the cops. You're smart.

 

[supreme]

LOOOOL !! I laughed so hard at this comment. For real, that guy should use his brains ha ha ha ha ha!!

 

@ SGT Johnson

 

Your 'cop protagonist' ideas are terrible and a trife silly. Playing a cop in GTA will make it more interesting ? I just don't think so, it just totally defeats the concept of GTA altogether. GTFO with that bullsh*t.

NO NO NO!

 

I never said I "wanted us to play as a cop". I said "Playing from the other side of the law, even if it is a UC" would be a different appraoch to the series.

 

Please read closer next time.

 

I would want to play as a legit cop, but no one else would. Moot point. As a UC? Potential. Even a corrupt PO for the LAPD would somewhat work. There would not be as many restrictions as you people think. It's GTA after all; R* will not impose ACADEMY LAW on you; they'll let you do what you want.

[Official General]

 

Yes, a Mexican-American FBI agent who is running from the cops. You're smart.

 

[supreme]

LOOOOL !! I laughed so hard at this comment. For real, that guy should use his brains ha ha ha ha ha!!

 

@ SGT Johnson

 

Your 'cop protagonist' ideas are terrible and a trife silly. Playing a cop in GTA will make it more interesting ? I just don't think so, it just totally defeats the concept of GTA altogether. GTFO with that bullsh*t.

NO NO NO!

 

I never said I "wanted us to play as a cop". I said "Playing from the other side of the law, even if it is a UC" would be a different appraoch to the series.

 

Please read closer next time.

 

I would want to play as a legit cop, but no one else would. Moot point. As a UC? Potential. Even a corrupt PO for the LAPD would somewhat work. There would not be as many restrictions as you people think. It's GTA after all; R* will not impose ACADEMY LAW on you; they'll let you do what you want.

Ok I understand it better, but no I don't want that. I definitely want to have more detailed, dealings with corrupt cops as it suits the Los Angeles-based setting for GTA V, but I want to remain as a pure criminal. I want the options to increase my wealth, crime empire and build up my own gang. Realistically that is highly unlikely to happen as a corrupt police officer without quickly getting caught and busted first. A corrupt police officer can't build his own gang and still have his job, even if if he could it would not suit seeing it in a GTA game, it would just make things too complicated.

 

Lets just stick to the core role of a GTA protagonist, which is that of a career criminal either in the mould of a freelancer, mafioso, mobster, or gang member.

[SGT. Johnson]

@ OG What about a UC then?

[Long_Haired_Boy]

You guys know you can play as an officer of the law in GTA 4 and im pretty sure its going to be in Five with some surprises. Handcuffs

[SGT. Johnson]

You guys know you can play as an officer of the law in GTA 4   and im pretty sure its going to be in Five with some surprises. Handcuffs

The most legitimate way was in SA; you could turn the cops off and get a police uniform from Barbara.

 

I get your point though.

 

Not to the extent of SA. In IV, you'd get shot at for firing a weapon. If you are thinking of the "Street Crimes", Vigilante all the way. not truly being a cop.

 

Now, someone, I think it was MiamiVC, said that FBI/FIB was more attainable in IV due to the suits and sh*t. UC cop is somewhat attainable in IV through the FIB Buffalo and any type of clothing. Some peds (although rarely) will drive like they do in SA and VC (crazy, out of control, dangerously). Plus; I'm pretty sure you can fake prostitution stings as well (call for backup when you see someone talking to a Prostitute )

Edited March 13, 2012 by SGT. Johnson

[Obese_Tony]

The idea of being some sort of cop is not too far fetched for GTA. Especially when taken into account that the original GTA protagonist was intended to be a police officer.

 

And if its possible to become a police officer in Postal 3 (talking about the impossible) why not GTA? I for one would welcome the idea.

[SGT. Johnson]

The idea of being some sort of cop is not too far fetched for GTA. Especially when taken into account that the original GTA protagonist was intended to be a police officer.

 

And if its possible to become a police officer in Postal 3 (talking about the impossible) why not GTA? I for one would welcome the idea.

Really? Can I have a link about "the first protagonist being a cop"?

[leik oh em jeez!]

Should have posted it in this topic.

It was started specifically for discussion of ideas about the protagonist, there's no reason not to use it.

 

Please use the search function next time.

[Obese_Tony]

 

The idea of being some sort of cop is not too far fetched for GTA. Especially when taken into account that the original GTA protagonist was intended to be a police officer.

 

And if its possible to become a police officer in Postal 3 (talking about the impossible) why not GTA? I for one would welcome the idea.

Really? Can I have a link about "the first protagonist being a cop"?

Yeah, however, it was in the planning stages but they quickly disbanded that idea it seems, judging by the following quote:

 

 

The acronym GTA might suggest indiscriminate to some people, but ultimately its greatest contribution was allowing people to do what they want.” An enthused Houser handed Jones a £3.4 million publishing deal, but one problem loomed large. The player controlled a police officer, and had to avoid streams of pixellated pedestrians. What if, DMA reasoned, you were rewarded with points for running them over?

 

From that Jacked-something book they brought out recently. Link here:

 

http://www.scotsman.com/lifestyle/features...-auto-1-2165895