Jeeebuuus Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 I disagree wholeheartedly. And it's going to be 4 years in April since IV came out, not 5. Negativity like this will go away once more info comes out. You do realise they were working on 5 before GTA 4 was released, right? Oh my bad I didn't realize we were waiting for GTA V before GTA IV was even released. Don't I feel silly. Well yes you should, they had plans for GTA 5 even before GTA 4 was released making it over 5 years now. Cool, I'd like to read that article. Do you have a link? In my country news archives over 3 years are deleted, so look yourself. A: What Orwellian country do you live in? And, 2: Why did you not explain why you thought the V trailer didn't meet your standards? After 5 years I expect something better than GTA 4 graphics don't you? What they have basically done is put GTA 4 graphics and San Andreas and mashed them together. Not original and doesn't take 5 years. Either they have something bigger planned or they really fluked this time. I'm calling bullsh*t. You didn't answer my first question. And what about the graphics are not to your liking? A "sandbox" game with those graphics is not bad to put it lightly. Do you expect it to look like MP3? Don't hold your breath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccrogers15 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 IMO, i think they should not of even announced it unless they were ready to give a release date too and were closer to finishing up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slamman Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 (edited) CORRECTION: GTA 5 started a month after '4's release and RN's vacation, not before, there's no report saying otherwise. Aaron Garbut and a lot of the same Rockstar North staff are working specifically on GTA, if it were R* SD, it might look like RDR, but be GTA, get me?? I hope their influence does spill over though Edited March 10, 2012 by Slamman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonnyBlack Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 By the way, if you had any experience with the III era games, you'd have noticed that there wasn't much difference between graphics for each of those games either. So GTA V's graphics not being much better than GTA IV's isn't really a shocker, nor should it be expected for there to be a huge difference anyway. There is five years difference between GTA 4 and 5 (probably even longer maybe 6-7 years) While GTA 3 and Vice city, etc only had 1-2 years difference. You figure. Look at the difference in detail between the older games and the GTAs of today. Is it so hard to understand that it would take them longer to develop the newer games than it would in the past? It hasn't even been a full 4 years yet either, since you're unable to prove your claim of 5 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp1dell Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 I would just ignore Jace. We have evidence to support our claims, but he just keeps throwing around the "five years" crap, and can't even prove it. He is also ridiculously oblivious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gtaghost22 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 (edited) Do you have a PC?? Because as you many not know you could download that Mod (cant remember the name) for GTA IV that made the game look almost photorealistic! I'm sure it will be availabe for GTA V too shortly after the release... If you want GTA V to have amazing graphics then you probably have to buy an High-End PC and play GTA V on it, I only have a PS3 but (unlike you) i'm not that obssesed with graphics, so.. I'm not buying a High-End PC anytime soon! Tbh i think GTA graphics will be AMAZING even on consoles Edited March 10, 2012 by Gtaghost22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slamman Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 (edited) ^ iCEnhancer, the embellishment to the prior Modding effort using RAGE and expanding shader and textures of GPU cards ^^ No matter who the studio is, if you compare the drawn concepts to the video graphics, the results will clearly be different, add in motion capture effects.... You won't see art that's the same quality...or style. Edited March 10, 2012 by Slamman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CryptReaperDorian Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Rockstar Games is a studio of video game developers. They are by no means "gods" (even though some people tend to think so). They are regular people like us, but they specialize and have a degree for developing video games. You set your own expectations. Setting your expectations too high is setting yourself up for disappointment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeeebuuus Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 I've seen "gods" before. In the fields of science, art, theology, philosophy. I've even heard from a few on this forum. "gods" exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trideez Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 GTA V looks f*ckin amazing and LS is the greatest place they could have picked to set it in. Forget what this crybaby is saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koothara Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 They only cares about their shareholders.They will release the game and new info to boost share prices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PreciousWall Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluetops Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 (edited) Why you didn't complained that GTA IV was back in Liberty City and in that game we just re-explored Liberty City just in new graphics?Or you also didn't complained that Vice City is just actually working on a slightly improved GTA III engine just with a new map named Vice City?Or you didn't even complained that DMA Design shall be the actual name of Rockstar Games,or they shall have stayed in Europe and not expand to US? You also didn't complained that US is actually a British colony and shall have stayed as a British colony forever? Please,Dear God. Edited March 10, 2012 by bluetops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreene2010 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Alot of crybabies around here lately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HydraulicWaRiOr Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 If you want to complain about GTA, then tell it to Rockstar. You have no place doing it here. We don't care if you're on the rag. If you don't have anything useful to contribute to the forum, then it's best to not contribute anything at all. I think I speak for everyone when I say I don't really care about your opinion. I live in L.A. and I'm pretty happy with what I've seen in the trailer. As unbearable as it is to wait for more information, I think it's best that you put yourself to productivity rather than playing show and tell with your rockstar grudge. If you don't want to play in Los Santos, then wait until GTA VI, and if you don't like playing in America, well that's just too damn bad, cause we have a couple more games to go before Rockstar considers a location outside of our country. Other than that, chill out, it's a f*cking game. It isn't even finished yet anyways, I'm pretty sure that it will look much better once it comes out. Just play Call of Duty or something. Take GTA off of your mind and leave it to the pros to come up with their theories and speculations. As much as we've gotten out of the trailer, I don't think we've gotten the half of it anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Darko Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 (edited) The graphics are really more like Red Dead Redemption than GTA IV, which makes sense considering the timeframe. I'm sure aspects of it will be even better than RDR, as well. I'm sorry if you weren't impressed with RDR's graphics, but I consider them to be my graphical standard for current-gen games for having no major complaints. Anything less than that and I'm less impressed, but much more than that and I'm ecstatic. Though honestly, how much better did you really expect them to be? Did you watch iCEnhancer videos and think that's what GTA V was going to look like? Current-gen console hardware can't handle those kinds of graphics, especially in a large open-world game. And again, RDR's graphics (which GTA V has clearly further built upon) were a significant improvement over GTA IV's graphics, even more so than the difference between GTA: Vice City's graphics and GTA: San Andreas's graphics. And considering that R* is describing it as their "largest and most ambitious game yet," I think we have much more in store than GTA IV in Los Santos. It is just marketing keywords to get us excited, but there is always some truth behind the mumbo-jumbo. It's going to be a big game, and not just in terms of map size. Considering R*'s past work, would you really expect any less from them? It's been their project of a little over four years, going on behind the scenes while Red Dead Redemption and L.A. Noire (less so, I suppose) filled the gap. As far as I know, there's been few developmental delays, although you have to take into account that R* North has put input into other R* games during that time as well. So we're looking at a product of a long development by a competent developer. It's going to be good. Have a little faith, hmm? http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtop...st&p=1060901406 Read this and lets see you complain about GTA V's graphics. Wow, I thought that topic had been totally forgotten about. It's definitely buried, but thanks for the plug. Edited March 10, 2012 by Mr. Darko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunrise Driver Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 OK people stop this f**king crap. 1. What 5 years? It's barely been 4 years since console IV release. Learn math. 2. Were you waiting for V immediately after IV? Really? GTA fans played IV for 1-2 years then played EFLC for another year and only in 2011 they started seriously waiting for V. 1 year, not 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Algonquin Assassin Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Hey guys, I don't know about you but it's been over 5 years since GTA 4 and the only thing they have given us is a new trailer for GTA 5. Most people are too easily impressed by the graphics and so on. But I can tell you right now I am not. The game looks terrible from graphics to using an area we've already explored before.They have spent over 5 years and expect the GTA community to buy this?!? I honestly don't understand how people can like the content they have put out, its just GTA 4 with a 5 painted over it. I hope to god that first trailer is just an early design, otherwise this long awaited game is going to be a MASSIVE waste of time. Who else agrees with me? If the graphics are so bad what were they supposed to look like especially when the game's built on the same engine as GTA IV? I have seen so many people say this and not a single one of them has said what they think it should look like. Technically we've only been to LS once in the GTA universe and it wasn't that great IMO, so I don't mind going back because I believe this will be a much better map than SA. Normally I would lock a thread like this, but anyone stupid enough to start a thread like this in here and actually expect people agree with them deserves to be ridiculed. If you're not impressed by it why are you even here? Halo games don't impress me, so I do the right thing and stay away their forums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ubermacht Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Yeah, I'm pretty sure that V's LS will be about as similar to SA's LS as IV's LC was to III's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gta5PP Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Excuse me but its actually 4 years since gta iv not 5. It will be nearly or exactly 5 years from gta iv's release to V's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trideez Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Yeah, I'm pretty sure that V's LS will be about as similar to SA's LS as IV's LC was to III's. LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK Pal, sure you're right. A game based on LA is going to be as different from another game based on LA as a game based on NYC was from a game based on 6+ cities was. SURRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Sorry buddy, but LS was LA in San Andreas and LS is LA in GTA V. LC in III was generic and not based on any one city. LC IV was based on NYC. So I hate to burst your bubble, but LS V is going to be very similar to LS SA. It's just going to be BIGGERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR and more detailed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricky18 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 i must be easily pleased cuz the graphics in the gtav trailor blew me the f*ck away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rare.steak Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Hey guys, I don't know about you but it's been over 5 years since GTA 4 and the only thing they have given us is a new trailer for GTA 5. Most people are too easily impressed by the graphics and so on. But I can tell you right now I am not. The game looks terrible from graphics to using an area we've already explored before.They have spent over 5 years and expect the GTA community to buy this?!? I honestly don't understand how people can like the content they have put out, its just GTA 4 with a 5 painted over it. I hope to god that first trailer is just an early design, otherwise this long awaited game is going to be a MASSIVE waste of time. Who else agrees with me? I disagree wholeheartedly. And it's going to be 4 years in April since IV came out, not 5. Negativity like this will go away once more info comes out. You do realise they were working on 5 before GTA 4 was released, right? Oh my bad I didn't realize we were waiting for GTA V before GTA IV was even released. Don't I feel silly. Well yes you should, they had plans for GTA 5 even before GTA 4 was released making it over 5 years now. sonnyBlack just owned you there, op, and you still miss the point. Just look at the parts in bold underline and clearly you've no credibility whatsoever. Good job contradicting yourself. That and and the how you're a crybaby makes you moot here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mats17 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathdiggerswe Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 (edited) I'm impressed by the game, and i can't wait to see how enormous this city will be. The graphics aren't that beautiful, but since it doesn't lag a bit, compared to the first iv-trailer, i am really excited that maybe the rumours about 2K chzech being involved in this game's development are true (Mafia 2 didn't lag a bit although it had breathtaking graphics). U can't judge the game because of it's graphics, that u've seen in a 1:25 min long trailer. Imagine how huge this game will be with it's "1000 pages long script" (rumour) and it's big city (probably). Prepare to see the "largest and most ambitious game Rockstar has yet created". /DDSWE Edited December 12, 2012 by deathdiggerswe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeNDo6750 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Hey guys, I don't know about you but it's been over 5 years since GTA 4 and the only thing they have given us is a new trailer for GTA 5. Most people are too easily impressed by the graphics and so on. But I can tell you right now I am not. The game looks terrible from graphics to using an area we've already explored before.They have spent over 5 years and expect the GTA community to buy this?!? I honestly don't understand how people can like the content they have put out, its just GTA 4 with a 5 painted over it. I hope to god that first trailer is just an early design, otherwise this long awaited game is going to be a MASSIVE waste of time. Who else agrees with me? 5 years?, think again as its been 4 years since GTA IV back in 2008 to 2012. Maybe GTA IV is old, but i still enjoy playing the game and EFLC, as its still fun and listening to the great music. My motto for the time of waiting for GTA V to be released The more negative you are, the less positive you are. The less negative you are, the more positive you are Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PreciousWall Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Hey guys, I don't know about you but it's been over 5 years since GTA 4 and the only thing they have given us is a new trailer for GTA 5. Most people are too easily impressed by the graphics and so on. But I can tell you right now I am not. The game looks terrible from graphics to using an area we've already explored before.They have spent over 5 years and expect the GTA community to buy this?!? I honestly don't understand how people can like the content they have put out, its just GTA 4 with a 5 painted over it. I hope to god that first trailer is just an early design, otherwise this long awaited game is going to be a MASSIVE waste of time. Who else agrees with me? nobody sorry I'm impressed by the game, and i can't wait to see how enormous this city will be. The graphics aren't that beautiful, but since it doesn't lag a bit, compared to the first iv-trailer, i am really excited that maybe the rumours about 2K chzech being involved in this game's development is true (Mafia 2 didn't lag a bit although it had breathtaking graphics). U can't judge the game because of it's graphics, that u've seen in a 2,6 min long trailer. Imagine how huge this game will be with it's "1000 pages long script" (rumour) and it's big city (probably). Prepare to see the "largest and most ambitious game Rockstar has yet created". /DDSWE i agree, V doesnt have bad graphic anyway in the trailer it has huge draw distance yep, i believe R* Promised to fans GTA V is "largest and most ambitious game Rockstar has yet created" of course V will have big script as IV maybe 2x of it? here comparison image of III script & IV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kj2022 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 OP: i know how you feel, i'm kinda worried too, and theyre gonna have to dosomething massive with it to make it worth while, but after 4 years in Liberty City, its time for a new game by anyones standard, have faith in Rockstar, they have never let us down, they're doing there best, i'm certain of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeNDo6750 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 But until GTA V, play some GTA IV and EFLC in the mean time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forzum Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Hey guys, I don't know about you but it's been over 5 years since GTA 4 and the only thing they have given us is a new trailer for GTA 5. Most people are too easily impressed by the graphics and so on. But I can tell you right now I am not. The game looks terrible from graphics to using an area we've already explored before.They have spent over 5 years and expect the GTA community to buy this?!? I honestly don't understand how people can like the content they have put out, its just GTA 4 with a 5 painted over it. I hope to god that first trailer is just an early design, otherwise this long awaited game is going to be a MASSIVE waste of time. Who else agrees with me? I don't even... Why are people so freaking in love with graphics now a days? This game look GREAT & a hell lot better than IV. THEY ARE NOT BAD. Also "to using an area we've already explored before." are you stupid? Do you really think this will be EXACTLY as San Andreas? It won't even be CLOSE to look the same. GTA III areas does not look a bit like GTA IV But yet you and alot other people seem to belive that V will have the same areas as GTA SA. My god some people really can't think clearly. stupid..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now