Dr. John Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 (edited) As you can see that every Project of R* has been released in years so, if we calculate the year, we find how good/bad the game is. GTA 3 Project started: ??? GTA 3 Project ended: 2001 = Normal GTA VC Project started: 2001 GTA VC Project ended: 2002 = Bad (LOL, sorry for the Fans) GTA SA Project started: 2002 GTA SA Project ended: 2004-2005 (They needed to remove the HC) = Good GTA 4 Project started: 2005 GTA 4 Project ended: 2008-2009 (Other 4 Era Games are added) = Good GTA 5 Project started: 2009 GTA 5 Project ended: 2012 = We don't know but we can say this one will be Awesome What do you all say? [The years are the release years but not the year when those event took place.] Edited January 29, 2012 by Dr. John13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samsuxx Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Vice City? BAD?! Oh boy... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetman Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 i would say they started work on 5 as soon as 4 came out because they knew exactly what they were doing with the dlc from the start. and wouldnt need the whole team to work onm these dlc's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALMOST610 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 As you can see that every Project of R* has been released in years so, if we calculate the year, we find how good/bad the game is. GTA 3 Project started: ??? GTA 3 Project ended: 2001 = Normal GTA VC Project started: 2001 GTA VC Project ended: 2002 = Bad GTA SA Project started: 2002 GTA SA Project ended: 2004-2005 (They needed to remove the HC) = Good GTA 4 Project started: 2005 GTA 4 Project ended: 2008-2009 (Other 4 Era Games are added) = Good GTA 5 Project started: 2009 GTA 5 Project ended: 2012 = We don't know but we can say this one will be Awesome What do you all say? [The years are the release years but not the year when those event took place.] Dr . John13's Analysis Started: 2012 Dr . John13's Analysis Finished: 2012 = Poor It is only his view of each game, different people had different opinions, so you cannot calculate the quality of a game by how long the Developers took with it. But overall you have developed a good concept for analysis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
senor_huevos_benedicto Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 This is also subject to your opinion. For example, you called Vice City bad, something most would disagree with you on. Either way, I think they started the initial work around 2008, but I think they only got full-on into it in 2010. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Algonquin Assassin Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Never and I mean NEVER say VC is bad when I'm around. I'll pull your guts out of your ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetman Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Never and I mean NEVER say VC is bad when I'm around. I'll pull your guts out of your ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikillionaire ii Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 I might be reading it wrong But i think he means cus it only took a year to release VC it was bad where as a bit more time between the other games give time to play However if gta became a yearly thing and if we get a game of VC quality in the space of a year thats fine by me lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gangsta-NL Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. John Posted January 29, 2012 Author Share Posted January 29, 2012 (edited) I am sorry for the GTA VC lovers but that's the truth. They just remade GTA 3 with GTA VC and nothing else. EDIT: Explaining more- They just tweaked the map of Liberty City. Changed some music and made different missions. How do you think there will be 100s of mission in a year? Edited January 29, 2012 by Dr. John13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meson1 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 (edited) GTA VC ... = Bad I know opinions are subjective and that we should all respect each other's views, but this really is just a big, big fail. I am sorry for the GTA VC lovers but that's the truth. They just remade GTA 3 with GTA VC and nothing else. They didn't "just" remake GTA3. They transformed and polished the gameplay, the graphics, and the physics, as well as doing all the usual stuff like building a whole new map, writing a whole new script, not just for the cut scenes, but for all the radio stations too. They recorded it all, did all the motion capture, rendered the cut scenes all in an astonishing twelve months. They took every lesson learnt from GTA3 and addressed every single issue one way or another. The level of polish in GTA:VC is nothing short of amazing. They made GTA:VC completely different to GTA3 and made what is generally regarded one of the very best and iconic GTA's in the series. "Just remade", Phhhffff! Ridiculous. Edited January 29, 2012 by meson1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Algonquin Assassin Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 (edited) I am sorry for the GTA VC lovers but that's the truth. They just remade GTA 3 with GTA VC and nothing else. Not even one of those face palm pictures is enough to express how idiotic that is. Anyone who believes that isn't a real GTA fan as far as I'm corcerned. EDIT: Just tweaked LC, changed the music and missions? Sounds more like a description of LCS. meson1 summed it up the best. I'd suggest you play VC again because you REALLY have no idea what you're talking about. Edited January 29, 2012 by Miamivicecity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secura Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 I am sorry for the GTA VC lovers but that's the truth. They just remade GTA 3 with GTA VC and nothing else. Hmmm.......Bikes, Helicopters, Protagonist can talk, Completely different city, more cars, more weapons, Golf carts, boats. jet ski's, a REAL Easter Egg and one very happy skyscraper. And that's just off the top of my head, good day sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inncognitoo Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 GTA V project started in 2009? What? Dude, TBoGT wasn't a full retail game, it was a DLC. Only a small team at R* North created it, because it really did not needed over a few hundred people to work on it. My best guess was that GTA V's production started around late 2007 (Since IV was really finished by this time and planned for release on October '07, but it had problems and was delayed til April '08, but they didn't use the whole team to fix the issue either) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IAmMars Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Never and I mean NEVER say VC is bad when I'm around. I'll pull your guts out of your ass. My dad was asleep, i watched this... and wel.... he wasn't asleep anymore because i was LOL'ing him awake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommzy2 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 development for gta iv started 1 month before the release of gta sa). (there was plans for DLC for GTA SA PC but it ended up being scrapped in early stages) gta V development started in late 2007. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
senor_huevos_benedicto Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 You can't put a simple date on when a game started being developed. Sure they would've scouted a location straight after GTA IV was finished, but we don't know when they started to focus all of their efforts on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
no_chance Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 If that's accurate we can expect gtav early 2013 ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freezer89 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 (edited) Wow.. this is just ridiculous from OP. Especially the VC = bad (with arguments like "just a remade of III") To be honest, Vice City isn't really my favorite GTA.. the map and story wasn't my thing. But what the OP stated here.. dude, I can't facepalm hard enough. Wait.. what? He is using an avatar from VC? I smell a troll here.. Edited January 29, 2012 by Freezer89 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
senor_huevos_benedicto Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Wow.. this is just ridiculous from OP. Especially the VC = bad (with arguments like "just a remade of III")To be honest, Vice City isn't really my favorite GTA.. the map and story wasn't my thing. But what the OP stated here.. dude, I can't facepalm hard enough. Wait.. what? He is using an avatar from VC? I smell a troll here.. It was CJ a second ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knife Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 I don't quite know what's supposed to be discussed here, it just seems like your review scores for the past games. People are going to have completely different opinions of which games were the best so there's no link between development time and how good the game is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts