leik oh em jeez! Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 If you don't want the Army to chase you, don't get a six star wanted level. It's pretty f*cking simple. Don't try to ruin it for the rest of us because you're too pussy to fight them off. Woah, calm down, bro. I'm not trying to ruin it. Stop bitching. I'm just expressing my opinion. You're expressing your opinion by saying that the Army shouldn't be in the game because YOU don't want to deal with it and you don't like it. Instead of starting a topic about how you don't want it in the game, you have the simple option of not getting a six star wanted level. That's like saying Toyota should stop making the Prius because you don't like it. With a little common sense you could just, you know, not buy one. Lets just face it, you were more complaining about something that you have the choice to prevent than "expressing your opinion." I'm not trying to be an asshole, just pointing out your severely flawed logic and lousy excuse of a discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staten Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 It's highly unrealistic the things that people do in GTA games. Why deny something that exists? If you go around killing people like maniac, then something reletively equal to counter to that should reflect in the game - ie. The Army. If you are going to be the most insane mass murderer in a game, killing innocents, robbing fighter jets and robbing cars all in one chase then it's only right, something of equal proportion is there to counter balance the action. Rockstar always do a great job of presenting a real-world scenario with entertaining action. The army is like when you want to go to 11. It's quite hard to last long with the army too. Just cops and SWAT gets boring after a while. Its a nice achievement when you get 6 stars and you hold off for a while. Oh and if I do go on a killing spree, say for 3 days in the game, non-stop they wouldn't think of having someone from the army come take a look? It's boring to know that there'll be less authorities after you. I didn't find much difference between the Army on 6 stars and SWAT on 5, personally. They're both the same amount of challenge. If they're going to reappear, they should have more powerful weapons, like RPGs and Hand Grenades, and use tear gas too, or have Hunters with miniguns and rockets they can actually fire. That would really turn things up to 11. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllnessGTA Posted January 16, 2012 Author Share Posted January 16, 2012 umad? Uh, no. Why would I be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Pink Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 Damn, people. Stop talking sh*t about realism and all that.Grand theft Auto is not about realism, only in its last versions. I don't even care, dude. Sure, it's a bit unrealistic, but it's still fun. I hope I'm not sounding like I am a fan of realism. I'm just saying that if the game is trying to be realistic like IV, then the military should not be in the game. It'll be weird, and it will stand out. If it is much less realistic, then they should add them. I just hope they don't make them as annoying. It's a game and no. If I'm killing and killing dozens and scores of cops I want the f*cking nation to go in to a panic and wonder why the f*ck they cant kill this one motherf*cking killing machine. If someone on a hardcore rampage in GTA game existed in real life then the army wouldn't not just arrive but would be needed. Now all you uber-realism heads need to understand, if I was in a corner of a building killing scores of SWAT guys and slaughtering innocent people whilst causing 1000's of dollars worth of damage to property, why wouldn't they just blow up the building I'm in? Oh wait, the environment is not destructible. It's sooo unrealistic. It's a game. If it's done well it can believable in the world of GTA. The real worl = the real world. GTA = A interpretation of the real world with artistic licence to entertain. Dude, I'm not a uber realism head. My fav GTA game is SA, because of how wacky it is. I will find it a bit strange if tanks and helicopters would chase after one guy in a realistic setting like this. SWAT tanks (and maybe one Rhino tank) and SWAT ospreys are cool, but the whole army is a bit weird. It's never really the whole army but imagine there's a base near by. They would call out whoever is on their shift. That's the way I think of it anyway. I dunno. I'd like to see them. IF they're in it wont be like the old days anyway. I'm sure it will be some new revamped way of doing it. RUBBΣR░J♢HNNY (スオッ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikecyclexxx Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 NO !!!!!! NO,NO,NO,NO,NO,NO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE ARMY DOESN'T EXIST IN THIS ERA. NOTHING FROM THE III ERA WILL RETURN IT'S A NEW GAME IN A NEW UNIVERSE DEAL WITH IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i'm sorry guys but it had to be said. I find it annoying yet funny the same people forbiding a cj return want the army to return how the f*ck does that even work ? The army is ALOT i repeat ALOT more unrealistic than cj being in the game. So the army WONT be in the game deal with it era fanboys Are you f*cking retarded? Im so f*cking sick of c*nts that beleive so strongly in this 'era specific" bullsh*t. For all was know Rockstar could include all past protags in V, you know why? BECAUSE THEY CAN. They're making the game, they can do whatever the f*ck they want. Yes, I am aware that they are indeed different era's but that doesn't mean that anything is impossible. Especially something such as the army, thats not an individual character so how could it be killed off? Thats like saying "OMG WTFZ THERES NO PLANES IN GTA V BECUZZ DEY WEERNT IN IV SO THEY CANT B IN TIS ERAZ BRAH" f*cking spastics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllnessGTA Posted January 16, 2012 Author Share Posted January 16, 2012 If you don't want the Army to chase you, don't get a six star wanted level. It's pretty f*cking simple. Don't try to ruin it for the rest of us because you're too pussy to fight them off. Woah, calm down, bro. I'm not trying to ruin it. Stop bitching. I'm just expressing my opinion. You're expressing your opinion by saying that the Army shouldn't be in the game because YOU don't want to deal with it and you don't like it. Instead of starting a topic about how you don't want it in the game, you have the simple option of not getting a six star wanted level. That's like saying Toyota should stop making the Prius because you don't like it. With a little common sense you could just, you know, not buy one. Lets just face it, you were more complaining about something that you have the choice to prevent than "expressing your opinion." I'm not trying to be an asshole, just pointing out your severely flawed logic and lousy excuse of a discussion. Well, okay. The thing is that I like having huge shootouts with the police and SWAT. But I'll eventually get 6 stars after a while, so I can't really avoid it. I'm not really that bothered anyway. I think it's silly, but if it's in, then it is in. It won't be a game breaker for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoanCrawford Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 If you don't want the Army to chase you, don't get a six star wanted level. It's pretty f*cking simple. Don't try to ruin it for the rest of us because you're too pussy to fight them off. Woah, calm down, bro. I'm not trying to ruin it. Stop bitching. I'm just expressing my opinion. You're expressing your opinion by saying that the Army shouldn't be in the game because YOU don't want to deal with it and you don't like it. Instead of starting a topic about how you don't want it in the game, you have the simple option of not getting a six star wanted level. That's like saying Toyota should stop making the Prius because you don't like it. With a little common sense you could just, you know, not buy one. Lets just face it, you were more complaining about something that you have the choice to prevent than "expressing your opinion." I'm not trying to be an asshole, just pointing out your severely flawed logic and lousy excuse of a discussion. Well, okay. The thing is that I like having huge shootouts with the police and SWAT. But I'll eventually get 6 stars after a while, so I can't really avoid it. I'm not really that bothered anyway. I think it's silly, but if it's in, then it is in. It won't be a game breaker for me. It should not be in the game. There is not much realism in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllnessGTA Posted January 16, 2012 Author Share Posted January 16, 2012 NO !!!!!! NO,NO,NO,NO,NO,NO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE ARMY DOESN'T EXIST IN THIS ERA. NOTHING FROM THE III ERA WILL RETURN IT'S A NEW GAME IN A NEW UNIVERSE DEAL WITH IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i'm sorry guys but it had to be said. I find it annoying yet funny the same people forbiding a cj return want the army to return how the f*ck does that even work ? The army is ALOT i repeat ALOT more unrealistic than cj being in the game. So the army WONT be in the game deal with it era fanboys Are you f*cking retarded? Im so f*cking sick of c*nts that beleive so strongly in this 'era specific" bullsh*t. For all was know Rockstar could include all past protags in V, you know why? BECAUSE THEY CAN. They're making the game, they can do whatever the f*ck they want. Yes, I am aware that they are indeed different era's but that doesn't mean that anything is impossible. Especially something such as the army, thats not an individual character so how could it be killed off? Thats like saying "OMG WTFZ THERES NO PLANES IN GTA V BECUZZ DEY WEERNT IN IV SO THEY CANT B IN TIS ERAZ BRAH" f*cking spastics. Woah, dude, calm down. Go to a mental hospital or something. Your anger is pretty out there. I was hoping this thread wouldn't be attacked by uneducated low lives, but hey, what can you do.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leik oh em jeez! Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 It should not be in the game. There is not much realism in it. Have you never seen First Blood? If someone goes on a massive killing spree and Law Enforcement is unable to stop them, the armed forces WILL be brought in to deal with the situation. So if you don't want it in the game, you'll need a better excuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllnessGTA Posted January 16, 2012 Author Share Posted January 16, 2012 It should not be in the game. There is not much realism in it. Have you never seen First Blood? If someone goes on a massive killing spree and Law Enforcement is unable to stop them, the armed forces WILL be brought in to deal with the situation. So if you don't want it in the game, you'll need a better excuse. First Blood isn't a realistic film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveMediaExecutive Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 The National Guard would work, causing as much havok as you usually do in GTA V usually gets you branded as a domestic terrorist and when you have the whole city in havok it would make sense, I can also see them adding National Guard if they have terrorism as a part of the plot like in GTA IV, picture a mission where terrorists are attacking the city and everything's on lockdown and you have to whack some terrorists for a price while avoiding getting caught by the National Guard. GTA IV wasn't completely realistic, if it was it would have been unplayable but what they did was give the game movie logic rather than pure realism, everything in GTA IV was stuff that worked in the realm of gangster movies with some modern-day themes such as the Patriot Act and the decline of the Mafia to add to the atmosphere of the game, it worked and I'm sure this next one is going to take things to the next level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccrogers15 Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 It should not be in the game. There is not much realism in it. Have you never seen First Blood? If someone goes on a massive killing spree and Law Enforcement is unable to stop them, the armed forces WILL be brought in to deal with the situation. So if you don't want it in the game, you'll need a better excuse. First Blood isn't a realistic film. Dont matter. It is the truth. If some guy was running around in real life blowing up cars, and if he was able to kill all cops in his path, the higher ups would be called in. (army, navy, who knows). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leik oh em jeez! Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 First Blood isn't a realistic film. You failed to catch the sarcasm. Movies are never realistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikecyclexxx Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 NO !!!!!! NO,NO,NO,NO,NO,NO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE ARMY DOESN'T EXIST IN THIS ERA. NOTHING FROM THE III ERA WILL RETURN IT'S A NEW GAME IN A NEW UNIVERSE DEAL WITH IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i'm sorry guys but it had to be said. I find it annoying yet funny the same people forbiding a cj return want the army to return how the f*ck does that even work ? The army is ALOT i repeat ALOT more unrealistic than cj being in the game. So the army WONT be in the game deal with it era fanboys Are you f*cking retarded? Im so f*cking sick of c*nts that beleive so strongly in this 'era specific" bullsh*t. For all was know Rockstar could include all past protags in V, you know why? BECAUSE THEY CAN. They're making the game, they can do whatever the f*ck they want. Yes, I am aware that they are indeed different era's but that doesn't mean that anything is impossible. Especially something such as the army, thats not an individual character so how could it be killed off? Thats like saying "OMG WTFZ THERES NO PLANES IN GTA V BECUZZ DEY WEERNT IN IV SO THEY CANT B IN TIS ERAZ BRAH" f*cking spastics. Woah, dude, calm down. Go to a mental hospital or something. Your anger is pretty out there. I was hoping this thread wouldn't be attacked by uneducated low lives, but hey, what can you do.... lol, i'm so uneducated that i own and run my own business at 20 and have an IQ in the top 3% for my age in australia. cool story bro. Appologies for ranting but christ its frustrating when people say that something is impossible because it wasnt in IV. All us folk with common sence see that IV was the III of the HD era and was merely the base for something much muhh greater ie V. But ANYWAY! I beleive the army should return, as so many people have said; If some crazy ass motherf*cker was killing hundreds of people including police and SWAT members the govounrment would be pretty stupid to not send in the army if no one else could deal with the problem. Plus we've already seen a hydra, anyone remember having hydras chase after you in SA and shooting you out of the sky? I dare say the army will be back, and more intense than ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllnessGTA Posted January 16, 2012 Author Share Posted January 16, 2012 It should not be in the game. There is not much realism in it. Have you never seen First Blood? If someone goes on a massive killing spree and Law Enforcement is unable to stop them, the armed forces WILL be brought in to deal with the situation. So if you don't want it in the game, you'll need a better excuse. First Blood isn't a realistic film. Dont matter. It is the truth. If some guy was running around in real life blowing up cars, and if he was able to kill all cops in his path, the higher ups would be called in. (army, navy, who knows). I doubt 10 tanks and military helicopters with gatling guns will chase down one guy. That'll be embarrassing for the nation... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccrogers15 Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 NO !!!!!! NO,NO,NO,NO,NO,NO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE ARMY DOESN'T EXIST IN THIS ERA. NOTHING FROM THE III ERA WILL RETURN IT'S A NEW GAME IN A NEW UNIVERSE DEAL WITH IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i'm sorry guys but it had to be said. I find it annoying yet funny the same people forbiding a cj return want the army to return how the f*ck does that even work ? The army is ALOT i repeat ALOT more unrealistic than cj being in the game. So the army WONT be in the game deal with it era fanboys Are you f*cking retarded? Im so f*cking sick of c*nts that beleive so strongly in this 'era specific" bullsh*t. For all was know Rockstar could include all past protags in V, you know why? BECAUSE THEY CAN. They're making the game, they can do whatever the f*ck they want. Yes, I am aware that they are indeed different era's but that doesn't mean that anything is impossible. Especially something such as the army, thats not an individual character so how could it be killed off? Thats like saying "OMG WTFZ THERES NO PLANES IN GTA V BECUZZ DEY WEERNT IN IV SO THEY CANT B IN TIS ERAZ BRAH" f*cking spastics. Woah, dude, calm down. Go to a mental hospital or something. Your anger is pretty out there. I was hoping this thread wouldn't be attacked by uneducated low lives, but hey, what can you do.... lol, i'm so uneducated that i own and run my own business at 20 and have an IQ in the top 3% for my age in australia. cool story bro. Appologies for ranting but christ its frustrating when people say that something is impossible because it wasnt in IV. All us folk with common sence see that IV was the III of the HD era and was merely the base for something much muhh greater ie V. But ANYWAY! I beleive the army should return, as so many people have said; If some crazy ass motherf*cker was killing hundreds of people including police and SWAT members the govounrment would be pretty stupid to not send in the army if no one else could deal with the problem. Plus we've already seen a hydra, anyone remember having hydras chase after you in SA and shooting you out of the sky? I dare say the army will be back, and more intense than ever. I noticed theres alot of members here that tend to call people retarded or uneducated, but they dont know how the person is in real life. Kinda like how some kid who joined 2 weeks ago is trying to moderate me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stranger44 Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 It should not be in the game. There is not much realism in it. Have you never seen First Blood? If someone goes on a massive killing spree and Law Enforcement is unable to stop them, the armed forces WILL be brought in to deal with the situation. So if you don't want it in the game, you'll need a better excuse. First Blood isn't a realistic film. Dont matter. It is the truth. If some guy was running around in real life blowing up cars, and if he was able to kill all cops in his path, the higher ups would be called in. (army, navy, who knows). I doubt 10 tanks and military helicopters with gatling guns will chase down one guy. That'll be embarrassing for the nation... More embarrassing than having a ton of citizens massacred by one guy nobody seems to be able to stop? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leik oh em jeez! Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 I noticed theres alot of members here that tend to call people retarded or uneducated, but they dont know how the person is in real life. Kinda like how some kid who joined 2 weeks ago is trying to moderate me. I notice there's a lot of people claiming to have an IQ within the top 3% of wherever, yet I've seen ten year olds with better spelling and grammar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikecyclexxx Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 (edited) I noticed theres alot of members here that tend to call people retarded or uneducated, but they dont know how the person is in real life. Kinda like how some kid who joined 2 weeks ago is trying to moderate me. I notice there's a lot of people claiming to have an IQ within the top 3% of wherever, yet I've seen ten year olds with better spelling and grammar. Dude, it's an internet forum. Who gives a sh*t about spelling and grammar? I'm not writing a novel here. I could choose to use proper spelling and grammar in all posts, but what's the point? Oh, not to mention my IQ is actually 147. What's yours? 97? EDIT: Enough stupid childish games guys. Back on topic please. As I said, I beleive the army/national guard will return in V and be more intense than ever before. Edited January 16, 2012 by mikecyclexxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllnessGTA Posted January 16, 2012 Author Share Posted January 16, 2012 It should not be in the game. There is not much realism in it. Have you never seen First Blood? If someone goes on a massive killing spree and Law Enforcement is unable to stop them, the armed forces WILL be brought in to deal with the situation. So if you don't want it in the game, you'll need a better excuse. First Blood isn't a realistic film. Dont matter. It is the truth. If some guy was running around in real life blowing up cars, and if he was able to kill all cops in his path, the higher ups would be called in. (army, navy, who knows). I doubt 10 tanks and military helicopters with gatling guns will chase down one guy. That'll be embarrassing for the nation... More embarrassing than having a ton of citizens massacred by one guy nobody seems to be able to stop? Still, it shouldn't be loud tanks and such. Just bring in skilled snipers or skilled agents to take care of this guy, not an onslaught of tanks that would probably cause more damage and death than you have to their buddies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Algonquin Assassin Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 For god's sake take it to PM. Any more personal sh*t in this thread will be dealt with. I don't care who's guilty of it. Anyway as much as I enjoyed GTA IV having the army would've added more replay value. My favourite past time used to be going on rampages in the Rhino and going head to head with the other military tanks. As for realistic vs unrealistic well IMO having the army included is more realistic than not having them at all. GTA IV was a more believable game, but it still wasn't 100% realistic. You can walk around the streets with a rocket launcher and no one will pay attention unless you use it. The general impression I get from GTA V is it wont be as story dependent as GTA IV and perhaps be stuck between GTA IV, SA and maybe TBOGT. The army coming back is a possibility. Though R* could make army response a bit more realistic and rarer. Only in the most extreme case would they be called in. Like you start attacking government facilities or whatever. If the army itself doesn't come back I hope the Rhino does in its strongest and most bad ass rendition yet. I don't want the pussy APC from TBOGT to come back to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoanCrawford Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 It should not be in the game. There is not much realism in it. Have you never seen First Blood? If someone goes on a massive killing spree and Law Enforcement is unable to stop them, the armed forces WILL be brought in to deal with the situation. So if you don't want it in the game, you'll need a better excuse. First Blood isn't a realistic film. Dont matter. It is the truth. If some guy was running around in real life blowing up cars, and if he was able to kill all cops in his path, the higher ups would be called in. (army, navy, who knows). I doubt 10 tanks and military helicopters with gatling guns will chase down one guy. That'll be embarrassing for the nation... More embarrassing than having a ton of citizens massacred by one guy nobody seems to be able to stop? Still, it shouldn't be loud tanks and such. Just bring in skilled snipers or skilled agents to take care of this guy, not an onslaught of tanks that would probably cause more damage and death than you have to their buddies. Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stranger44 Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 It should not be in the game. There is not much realism in it. Have you never seen First Blood? If someone goes on a massive killing spree and Law Enforcement is unable to stop them, the armed forces WILL be brought in to deal with the situation. So if you don't want it in the game, you'll need a better excuse. First Blood isn't a realistic film. Dont matter. It is the truth. If some guy was running around in real life blowing up cars, and if he was able to kill all cops in his path, the higher ups would be called in. (army, navy, who knows). I doubt 10 tanks and military helicopters with gatling guns will chase down one guy. That'll be embarrassing for the nation... More embarrassing than having a ton of citizens massacred by one guy nobody seems to be able to stop? Still, it shouldn't be loud tanks and such. Just bring in skilled snipers or skilled agents to take care of this guy, not an onslaught of tanks that would probably cause more damage and death than you have to their buddies. Yes. And what happens when the guy kills the skilled snipers and agents? Send more so he can kill them too? Also, why did you feel the need to write "loud tanks"? When have you ever heard of a quiet tank? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple Vacuum Seal Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 Technically speaking, FBI Hostage Rescue Teams, and SWAT teams are far better trained in the apprehension of an armed threat in an urban environment (like a GTA protag.) than the standard US military infantry shown in GTA3,VC, and SA. Very small urban oriented special forces rescue teams are really the only military personnel qualified for this work. That is why R* created the paramilitary force NOOSE for GTA4 because it is like a mixture of these (FBI HRT, SWAT, Military Special Forces) elements. That being said. A more tactical, intimidating, and lethal version of NOOSE should return for law enforcement purposes (wanted star response) while the military should exist in a other roles in the story line. The military should be included GTA5 nonetheless. "shut up, sit down, relax" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoanCrawford Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 It should not be in the game. There is not much realism in it. Have you never seen First Blood? If someone goes on a massive killing spree and Law Enforcement is unable to stop them, the armed forces WILL be brought in to deal with the situation. So if you don't want it in the game, you'll need a better excuse. First Blood isn't a realistic film. Dont matter. It is the truth. If some guy was running around in real life blowing up cars, and if he was able to kill all cops in his path, the higher ups would be called in. (army, navy, who knows). I doubt 10 tanks and military helicopters with gatling guns will chase down one guy. That'll be embarrassing for the nation... More embarrassing than having a ton of citizens massacred by one guy nobody seems to be able to stop? Still, it shouldn't be loud tanks and such. Just bring in skilled snipers or skilled agents to take care of this guy, not an onslaught of tanks that would probably cause more damage and death than you have to their buddies. Yes. And what happens when the guy kills the skilled snipers and agents? Send more so he can kill them too? Also, why did you feel the need to write "loud tanks"? When have you ever heard of a quiet tank? They would keep sending more until you finally die. It wouldn't take long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllnessGTA Posted January 16, 2012 Author Share Posted January 16, 2012 It should not be in the game. There is not much realism in it. Have you never seen First Blood? If someone goes on a massive killing spree and Law Enforcement is unable to stop them, the armed forces WILL be brought in to deal with the situation. So if you don't want it in the game, you'll need a better excuse. First Blood isn't a realistic film. Dont matter. It is the truth. If some guy was running around in real life blowing up cars, and if he was able to kill all cops in his path, the higher ups would be called in. (army, navy, who knows). I doubt 10 tanks and military helicopters with gatling guns will chase down one guy. That'll be embarrassing for the nation... More embarrassing than having a ton of citizens massacred by one guy nobody seems to be able to stop? Still, it shouldn't be loud tanks and such. Just bring in skilled snipers or skilled agents to take care of this guy, not an onslaught of tanks that would probably cause more damage and death than you have to their buddies. Yes. And what happens when the guy kills the skilled snipers and agents? Send more so he can kill them too? Also, why did you feel the need to write "loud tanks"? When have you ever heard of a quiet tank? Dude, you could say that for the military, who aren't even as smart as proper skilled agents. The snipers should be tough and so should the agents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stranger44 Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 It should not be in the game. There is not much realism in it. Have you never seen First Blood? If someone goes on a massive killing spree and Law Enforcement is unable to stop them, the armed forces WILL be brought in to deal with the situation. So if you don't want it in the game, you'll need a better excuse. First Blood isn't a realistic film. Dont matter. It is the truth. If some guy was running around in real life blowing up cars, and if he was able to kill all cops in his path, the higher ups would be called in. (army, navy, who knows). I doubt 10 tanks and military helicopters with gatling guns will chase down one guy. That'll be embarrassing for the nation... More embarrassing than having a ton of citizens massacred by one guy nobody seems to be able to stop? Still, it shouldn't be loud tanks and such. Just bring in skilled snipers or skilled agents to take care of this guy, not an onslaught of tanks that would probably cause more damage and death than you have to their buddies. Yes. And what happens when the guy kills the skilled snipers and agents? Send more so he can kill them too? Also, why did you feel the need to write "loud tanks"? When have you ever heard of a quiet tank? Dude, you could say that for the military, who aren't even as smart as proper skilled agents. The snipers should be tough and so should the agents. Yeah but destroying tanks was seriously hard in old GTA's (good challenge). I can't imagine agents/snipers being more fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllnessGTA Posted January 16, 2012 Author Share Posted January 16, 2012 It should not be in the game. There is not much realism in it. Have you never seen First Blood? If someone goes on a massive killing spree and Law Enforcement is unable to stop them, the armed forces WILL be brought in to deal with the situation. So if you don't want it in the game, you'll need a better excuse. First Blood isn't a realistic film. Dont matter. It is the truth. If some guy was running around in real life blowing up cars, and if he was able to kill all cops in his path, the higher ups would be called in. (army, navy, who knows). I doubt 10 tanks and military helicopters with gatling guns will chase down one guy. That'll be embarrassing for the nation... More embarrassing than having a ton of citizens massacred by one guy nobody seems to be able to stop? Still, it shouldn't be loud tanks and such. Just bring in skilled snipers or skilled agents to take care of this guy, not an onslaught of tanks that would probably cause more damage and death than you have to their buddies. Yes. And what happens when the guy kills the skilled snipers and agents? Send more so he can kill them too? Also, why did you feel the need to write "loud tanks"? When have you ever heard of a quiet tank? Dude, you could say that for the military, who aren't even as smart as proper skilled agents. The snipers should be tough and so should the agents. Yeah but destroying tanks was seriously hard in old GTA's (good challenge). I can't imagine agents/snipers being more fun. Snipers and agents will be good challenges as well, which equals fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoanCrawford Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 It should not be in the game. There is not much realism in it. Have you never seen First Blood? If someone goes on a massive killing spree and Law Enforcement is unable to stop them, the armed forces WILL be brought in to deal with the situation. So if you don't want it in the game, you'll need a better excuse. First Blood isn't a realistic film. Dont matter. It is the truth. If some guy was running around in real life blowing up cars, and if he was able to kill all cops in his path, the higher ups would be called in. (army, navy, who knows). I doubt 10 tanks and military helicopters with gatling guns will chase down one guy. That'll be embarrassing for the nation... More embarrassing than having a ton of citizens massacred by one guy nobody seems to be able to stop? Still, it shouldn't be loud tanks and such. Just bring in skilled snipers or skilled agents to take care of this guy, not an onslaught of tanks that would probably cause more damage and death than you have to their buddies. Yes. And what happens when the guy kills the skilled snipers and agents? Send more so he can kill them too? Also, why did you feel the need to write "loud tanks"? When have you ever heard of a quiet tank? Dude, you could say that for the military, who aren't even as smart as proper skilled agents. The snipers should be tough and so should the agents. Yeah but destroying tanks was seriously hard in old GTA's (good challenge). I can't imagine agents/snipers being more fun. Snipers and agents will be good challenges as well, which equals fun. And realism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leik oh em jeez! Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 (edited) Dude, you could say that for the military, who aren't even as smart as proper skilled agents. The snipers should be tough and so should the agents. Stop the quote train. The military is well, the military. Everyone is trained. These aren't retarded battle droids or clones we're talking about. And what the hell do you mean by agents? Are we talking about The Matrix or one of the Bourne movies here? You know that's not real, right? All of this Shooter and Salt sh*t where Snipers and Assassins are infinitely knowledgeable and invincible is all just Hollywood. The snipers you're referring to could be in the Army or part of SWAT team. @JoanCrawford: Read above. I was being sarcastic about First Blood, but it's still a more realistic plot than any of the Bourne movies or any like them. If you want to talk about realism, go look for a documentary about these "agents" you speak of. Edited January 16, 2012 by leik oh em jeez! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now