Jump to content

Why there are 3 cities in GTA V...


Recommended Posts

THIS is the argument for more than one city:

 

R* have confirmed that V will take place in a re-imagined Southern California

...and this is the argument for Las Venturas and San Fierro:

 

 

re-imagined

re-imagined means a SoCal look-a-like not a LV and SF remake.

The thing I don't get about this whole argument is back in 2004 when SA was announced most people thought SA was just going to be one city, because the original SA was based on San Francisco and then R* shocked everyone by including renditions of LA, SF, LV and a bunch of countryside and desert. No one was expecting that.

 

Now if SF and LV were in GTA V wouldn't they have just said it? It's not like it would be a big secret that needs to be kept under wraps as everyone expects SF and LV, but no one would be expecting 2 new cities like San Diego and Tijuana like some have said.

 

Personally to me that's more exciting thinking they could throw a curve ball like they did back in 2004. I mean it would be great to see SF and LV , but I think they would get the excitment up more in they included 2 new cities even if they're not as big as LS.

Edited by Miamivicecity

 

THIS is the argument for more than one city:

 

R* have confirmed that V will take place in a re-imagined Southern California

...and this is the argument for Las Venturas and San Fierro:

 

 

re-imagined

re-imagined means a SoCal look-a-like not a LV and SF remake.

True.

 

This is So Cal:

 

LA, San Diego, the Inland Empire, Orange County, and the Mexican border.

 

V will be a "re-imagination" of this^. I PRAY that they include the Mexican border.

TheIntellectualz

Man. This is the same old "face it, it's only gonna be in SoCal" argument anti-SF/LV posters and to make matters worst I read that statement from rockstar at least 50 times in one thread on average. There is now right answer or wrong answer at this point because theirs only one trailer. ONE. All the OP was doing was making conclusions, only thing is he did his with more oppulence.

Remember, his opinion is no more facutal than ours

Edited by TheIntellectualz
Man. The same old "face it, it's only gonna be in SoCal" and to make matters worst I read that statement from rockstar at least 50 times in one thread on average. There is now right answer or wrong answer at this point because theirs only one trailer. ONE. All the OP was doing was making conclusions, only thing is he did his more ellequetly.

Just SoCal?

 

Just SoCal?

 

Southern California is HUGE, varied, and contains multiple cities.

 

R* have CONFIRMED: "Southern California"

I think they will do the same as they did with Gta IV

 

ony city (new york) or (liberty city)

 

just that it will be LA (los santos) this time.

 

But split up in 3 different parts, like they have (always?) done.

I agree with you. But with GTA IV they only did a recreation of Staunton Island from GTA III, they didn't do Shoreside Vale and Portland did they?

 

For me, so long as there is one good radio station (MSX or electrochoc), I can be made happy, because they usually get me through all situations!!

FiRe_OpTiKz©

so you mean to tell me they cant remake an entire game and have the game entirely different. meaning the island "cities" could be in a different positions or backwards or for the fact they are bigger so there would be more places to be named. just because san andreas' map was the way it is.. mean they cant completely move everything around?

StevenGerrardIsOverrated

 

Why can't people accept the fact that there won't be SF and LV?

They're just in denial, and desperately hanging on to any hope that it could still include San Fierro and Las Venturas. How pathetic they are.

 

 

It isn't pathetic at all, get off your high horse.

TheIntellectualz
Man. The same old "face it, it's only gonna be in SoCal" and to make matters worst I read that statement from rockstar at least 50 times in one thread on average.  There is now right answer or wrong answer at this point because theirs only one trailer. ONE. All the OP was doing was making conclusions, only thing is he did his more ellequetly.

Just SoCal?

 

Just SoCal?

 

Southern California is HUGE, varied, and contains multiple cities.

 

R* have CONFIRMED: "Southern California"

You sir must have nitpicked at what I wrote. I have no problem with it being based in SoCal. I just get tired of the Anti-SF/LV flooding threads with the same arguement. It's nerve racking. Okay, what if we do get at least SF? will They still buy the game? If we only get socal, will I not buy the game? Both answers are yes and I wish the members understand that.

 

Man. The same old "face it, it's only gonna be in SoCal" and to make matters worst I read that statement from rockstar at least 50 times in one thread on average.  There is now right answer or wrong answer at this point because theirs only one trailer. ONE. All the OP was doing was making conclusions, only thing is he did his more ellequetly.

Just SoCal?

 

Just SoCal?

 

Southern California is HUGE, varied, and contains multiple cities.

 

R* have CONFIRMED: "Southern California"

You sir must have nitpicked at what I wrote. I have no problem with it being based in SoCal. I just get tired of the Anti-SF/LV flooding threads with the same arguement. It's nerve racking. Okay, what if we do get at least SF? will They still buy the game? If we only get socal, will I not buy the game? Both answers are yes and I wish the members understand that.

Oh I pray we get SF and LV, trust me. And I'm not saying they won't be included. I am saying that there will be more than just Los Santos and some countryside.

 

See here: http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtop...st&p=1060842574

facepalm.jpg

 

People are so paranoid that its only gonna be Los Santos. Like its not gonna be big enough.

 

The press release said its gonna be the largest game they have done. Wouldnt that mean its bigger than RDR?

 

The SOCal/LS area is way big enough for it to eclipse the GTA:SA map.

 

I'm as excited as you all are, but all this paranoid crap is rediculous.

 

 

 

Just calm down!!

 

TheIntellectualz

 

Man. The same old "face it, it's only gonna be in SoCal" and to make matters worst I read that statement from rockstar at least 50 times in one thread on average.  There is now right answer or wrong answer at this point because theirs only one trailer. ONE. All the OP was doing was making conclusions, only thing is he did his more ellequetly.

Just SoCal?

 

Just SoCal?

 

Southern California is HUGE, varied, and contains multiple cities.

 

R* have CONFIRMED: "Southern California"

You sir must have nitpicked at what I wrote. I have no problem with it being based in SoCal. I just get tired of the Anti-SF/LV flooding threads with the same arguement. It's nerve racking. Okay, what if we do get at least SF? will They still buy the game? If we only get socal, will I not buy the game? Both answers are yes and I wish the members understand that.

Oh I pray we get SF and LV, trust me. And I'm not saying they won't be included. I am saying that there will be more than just Los Santos and some countryside.

 

See here: http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtop...st&p=1060842574

And I agree because I would love to fly planes from Santos to wherever the other locations are. I honestly am against putting a recreation of San Diego in V because in my mind it's just like LA. Beaches, palm trees and all.

Snake Without a Tongue
After just watching the trailer 3 more times, I just want the game NOW!!!!!!!! Regardless of where we go!

This. The last three days feel like an eternity as far as thinking about this game goes. I got a life and everything, but every thirty minutes I check this forum and/or watch the trailer again. I'm like a kid before Christmas. R* should've never released that trailer.

facepalm.jpg

 

People are so paranoid that its only gonna be Los Santos. Like its not gonna be big enough.

 

The press release said its gonna be the largest game they have done. Wouldnt that mean its bigger than RDR?

 

The SOCal/LS area is way big enough for it to eclipse the GTA:SA map.

 

I'm as excited as you all are, but all this paranoid crap is rediculous.

 

 

 

Just calm down!!

I'm a city guy, so countryside doesn't satisfy me. That's why I'm hoping there's more than one city, wherever they are located.

Great post, it put together most of the common ideas and included some I've never heard before smile.gif

 

I'm REALLY hoping they put at least one of the other three cities, but I'm satisfied as long as there is the city and countryside! I MISS THE COUNTRYSIDE smile.gifsmile.gif

 

Finally, some variety in the location again biggrin.gif

I found this on a GTA5 Linked Website.

 

Leaked Information............

 

Pinoytutorial was sent some leaked information regarding the GTA V world, which we had already reported on. However, they have added something a little more interesting. Knowing that the game will be as big as it is in terms of file size, three discs might not be enough for the Xbox 360. However, what we find strange about this story is how they forgot one simple fact; latest news suggests that Grand Theft Auto V will be digital only.

 

Let’s say for a moment that there will be a physical copy as well, this could lead to a PS3 only release, as it will not require as many discs as the 360, due to the fact that Sony use the Blue-ray whereas Microsoft went for the smaller capacity DVD.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

If this is true then it won't be on disc it'll be of the playstation network to download because its that Big, & its

Over 3 times as big, because there's 3 Cities, Desert & Countryside.

 

Just get over it, there's gona be 3 cities and more.

 

I personally think they have finished Los Santos and are now working on the other 2 cities & thats why theres No trailers of the other 2, but in time they will release more of the other 2 cities.

 

Just wait and hang in there. I think GTA 5 will not come out till Summer or Christmas 2012...

Maybe Even Later......Considering the Size of it.

 

The Evidence that there's 3 Cities:

 

1. Ocording to sources its gona be so big that you might have to download it. Because it Probably won't even fit on Blueray

Disc's and as you know they have recently figuered out how to put at least another 33% of information Data on BlueRay

Discs now, So basicaly Microsoft X-BOX 360's are f*ckED.....Because there not blueray..... PS3's Are the Best.....

 

2. GTA5 was not shown at E3, not Even a Trailer, REASON: Because there no where near done with it.

But Probably will be ready for a Short demo at E3 2012..... Probably to show of there multiplayer...

 

3. Hints all over GTA4 and GTA5 Trailer, in GTA4 the Ticket said San Andreas, an in the GTA5 Trailer it has hints

about how big Los Santos is and why would it have an Interstate Highway going just to the country side......It wouldn't...

 

4. R* Said: They wouldn't put in drivable/Flyable Planes unless they where multiple Airports.

And its not a coincidence that the Old GTA San Andreas Trailer is similar to the New GTA5 Trailer.

 

& one member said their's gona be planes but not Drivable/Flyable, & He's an Idiot.......OPEN YOUR EYES..........

 

In GTA 4 they where NO Drivable/Flyable Planes. But how many Planes did you see...in GTA4

 

Private Jet, 747 Plane.

 

& how many have we seen in GTA5

 

Hydra, Private Jet, Skimmer, Cropduster, Blimp. At the Moment.......

 

Thats More than Double the amount in GTA 4, so why would they put them in if you cant fly them, its a waist......

 

GET USED TO IT THERES 3 CITIES...

 

This will be the Biggest And Best GTA Game Ever, & I think this is the last GTA game there gona do.....

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • 0 User Currently Viewing
    0 members, 0 Anonymous, 0 Guests

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.