goldboy76 Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 What was happened then in the last 20 years in San Andreas. Bridges closed forever? How about the trains that are connected with LV and SF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Tali'0 G Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 (edited) It's a new era, it may be a completely different world. Just like III's Liberty City was totally different from IV's one, V's Los Santos will be different and maybe not connected to LV and SF. Edited November 5, 2011 by Big Tali'0 G Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tipper Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I'm one of those people who still think this discussion is not over and hope that SF and LV will be there, but that doesn't mean anything, new era, new layout for the map. IV's LC didn't feature Portland, Staunton Island or Shoreside Vale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMR2007 Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I'm one of those people who still think this discussion is not over and hope that SF and LV will be there, but that doesn't mean anything, new era, new layout for the map. IV's LC didn't feature Portland, Staunton Island or Shoreside Vale. Well Rockstar have officially confirmed that its only Los Santos; so no San Fierro or Las Venturas. The only way it's going to be there is if they've downright lied to us - which seems far-fetched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ch3vychas3 Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I think an entire new world (as in, southern california region). Good to mention the trains though - I hope they go out to the countryside etc and you can derail them again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaroSpain Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 Forget the old San Andreas guys.. GTA IV was the beginning of a new era, with new characters and new places. Maybe Rockstar will put San Fierro and Las Venturas in the next gta games Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feed Me A Lolcat Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 What has happened to Los Santos? Why does it look so different? Can't get it through my brain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ch3vychas3 Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I'm one of those people who still think this discussion is not over and hope that SF and LV will be there, but that doesn't mean anything, new era, new layout for the map. IV's LC didn't feature Portland, Staunton Island or Shoreside Vale. Well Rockstar have officially confirmed that its only Los Santos; so no San Fierro or Las Venturas. The only way it's going to be there is if they've downright lied to us - which seems far-fetched. They never confirmed that its only Los Santos. They just said GTAV will be heading to Los Santos, which is true, but it leaves many questions up in the air still. Except that they mentioned they're recreating Southern California. But hey... they didn't say they weren't creating Northern California either. They didn't deny anything really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qaisjp Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 They said "Los Santos and the surrounding areas", nobody is thinking "surrounding areas" includes LV and SF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tipper Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I'm one of those people who still think this discussion is not over and hope that SF and LV will be there, but that doesn't mean anything, new era, new layout for the map. IV's LC didn't feature Portland, Staunton Island or Shoreside Vale. Well Rockstar have officially confirmed that its only Los Santos; so no San Fierro or Las Venturas. The only way it's going to be there is if they've downright lied to us - which seems far-fetched. I know I'm playing with words but they didn't say "only" LS. And R* like playing with us, that would be brilliant from them if they had us think it's only LS and then reveal SF and LV later. But I'm not here to start this debate again, it's merely a dream I have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ratone Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 If it was the 3 cities, they would've announced, because it would make Take 2 Stocks go even higher. End of discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john blane Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 LS will be divided up in much the same way LC was. there could be three major areas of the city. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtamann123 Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 What has happened to Los Santos? Why does it look so different? Can't get it through my brain. Why does IV's LC look so different than 3's??? What happened in those 7 years! I can't get it through my head!. (Sarcastic of course. I just can't believe that people still don't understand that its a new era and a new universe) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lelouch The Zero Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 Really Evil Things Are Realizing Drugs Eat up your Damn Brain Cells Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inactive Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 R*, you better make the next call or it's going to be mayhem here Those freeways are really drawing me to the conclusion that there's more than one city Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmarn Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 Every time I see the letters SF my mind goes straight to Street Fighter! I know it's San fierro Tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jogy Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 What was happened then in the last 20 years in San Andreas. Bridges closed forever? How about the trains that are connected with LV and SF? An earthquake totally vanished the both cities away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iGrandTheftAuto Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I think a giant apocalypse happened in SF and LV, and LS is just to strong. That's just my guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EncryptedReality Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I got a feeling the map will not be fully accesible , like in RDR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lampka12 Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 They has been NUKED! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eatsleepmate Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 Why don't we all just wait for a 100% confirmation FROM R* that we only get Los Santos. Lettuce be reality here... Is LA (Los Santos) some fuggin island now cut off from any other cities or land masses? We aren't talking about GTA: Hawaii. Will we have impassable road blocks or construction sites at every possible exit? Will we have invisible walls now? All these god damn irrational speculators on this board... f*ck, half of you are worse than wall street speculators. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccrogers15 Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 it will be like this: They will rename gta 5 to: GTA: LOS SANTOS Then next game in the era GTA: SAN FIERRO finale GTA: LAS VENTURAS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAGaming1 Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I'm afraid there will no be no SF and no LV in this game however make other cites and R* have not said it will be only in one city so we just have to wait for the next trailer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikonatorbelick Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 What was happened then in the last 20 years in San Andreas. Bridges closed forever? How about the trains that are connected with LV and SF? a wizard made both SF and Las Venturas dissapear from existence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pariah87 Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 What really grinds my gears is that if its only in Los Santos, why there? We've already been to Southern Cali with San Andreas, Red Dead and LA Noire, why a fourth time?! WHY NOT VICE CITY AND SURROUNDING AREAS IF ONLY ONE CITY?!!! WHY NOT ALL THREE?! WAAAAAAAAAAAHHH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turin88 Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I'm pretty sure LV and SF are in. If they're not though, i'm sure Rockstar will come up with something to explain why parts of the map are sealed off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nihilist Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I'm afraid there will no be no SF and no LV in this game however make other cites and R* have not said it will be only in one city so we just have to wait for the next trailer They have said it's Los Santos only. http://www.gtav.net/news/4439/rockstar-rel...gta-v-statement As to why? Because with GTAV supposedly being R*'s most ambitious game yet, they're putting so much detail and depth into it, that they're supposedly pushing the PS3 and 360 to their limits. There is only so much you can do with the consoles we have now, and Rockstar wants to put it all into one detailed city, rather than 3 un-detailed and small cities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAGaming1 Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I'm pretty sure LV and SF are in. If they're not though, i'm sure Rockstar will come up with something to explain why parts of the map are sealed off. R* have no said there will be LV and SF. And in the gta SA before it came out R* even said it 3 cites SF LS LV so no or let's have hopes and see what R* say next about the LV and SF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skillz7855 Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 Let me put it in terms you guys can understand it takes place in a reconstructed Southern San Andreas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nihilist Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 What really grinds my gears is that if its only in Los Santos, why there? We've already been to Southern Cali with San Andreas, Red Dead and LA Noire, why a fourth time?! WHY NOT VICE CITY AND SURROUNDING AREAS IF ONLY ONE CITY?!!! WHY NOT ALL THREE?! WAAAAAAAAAAAHHH! RDR was not Southern California, it was the Southwestern US, that didn't include California. It was the Texas/New Mexico area for the most part. West Elizabeth was like the Rockies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now