almostrodney Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Just had a scan through recent topics and there didn't seem to be anything on this. What do you think to R* making las ventures and San ferrero (or even other cities)DLC? I can't see them making these cities separate games like vice city and San Andreas because surey they would of called this GTA: Los santos so that leads me to believe that it could possibly be an idea for DLC? Is this even possible? Would you be happy with this? How would they incorporate this? Interested in your thoughts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bomberlegend Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 You haven't looked hard enough then. But won't, ever, ever happen. Too much people would be pissed at the file size and not receiving it when they first brought the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacko427 Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 I'd rather want a GTA game that has 3 huge ass big cities than one sh*tty city. What are you gonna cruise around LS? Nothing, it's like IV with her Liberty City crap. Most of the time playing SA I always cruise around the whole SA with favorite music and most of the time I start screwing around in LV and the deserts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAknowledge Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Noo I want the FULL map in the original game. DLC for extra features and missions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qaisjp Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 DLC ONLY FOR SPECIAL SKINS, FEATURES, MISSIONS, CREATED CONTENT That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Above Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 DLC will most likely be similar to what we got in GTA IV. I don't see how they could expand the map without making it weird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArienMC Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 So many people have brought this up. And it won't ever happen. The map is going to be MASSIVE! What don't you people understand about that? God people are annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breaking Bohan Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 I will be upset if future GTA's maps are limited and can only be unlocked via DLC. First, after SONY had their client info hacked many times I'm not buying anything from them anymore for fear of having my identity stolen. Plus, after shelling out $60+ for a game, it seems unfair to intentionally make map smaller just so they can ration it out to those willing to keep paying. That said, I'm all for DLC trips to new cities if the original map is huge (like Oblivion & Shivering Isles). In Oblivion the original map was so huge that I didn't feel like I was being screwed over, and SI was fairly large and worth $10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Without a Tongue Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 SF and LV maps would be on par with an entire game map. This DLC speculation needs to stop right now. It's embarrassing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tashan Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Is this even possible? YES! BUT A FLOP ONE Would you be happy with this? NO How would they incorporate this? When the game hits the shelf, I will incorporate my thoughts on this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldboy76 Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 People are thinking "O, Los Santos is back so SF and LV too" R* never said it was San Andreas 2 so stfu and if you don't like Southern California go cry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skillz7855 Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 People must not understand its not going to be the same map as the orginal SA its going to be completely remodel and bigger. This Map will resemble more of Southern California that is really big it self. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LucasV Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJfoo Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 Just had a scan through recent topics and there didn't seem to be anything on this.What do you think to R* making las ventures and San ferrero (or even other cities)DLC? I can't see them making these cities separate games like vice city and San Andreas because surey they would of called this GTA: Los santos so that leads me to believe that it could possibly be an idea for DLC? Is this even possible? Would you be happy with this? How would they incorporate this? Interested in your thoughts! I think what you say is DEFINITELY possible, and hell, maybe even probable. It's no secret that DLC is a big time money maker. If GTAV only features Los Santos, and GTAV wants 2 pieces of DLC like with Lost and the Damned and Ballad of Gay Tony, then the very first thought they would have is San Fierro and Las Venturas. Personally though I'd like it better if it were 2 new cities like San Diego and Tijuana or something. SF and LV maps would be on par with an entire game map. This DLC speculation needs to stop right now. It's embarrassing. If you don't like it, click that button next to the glowing green light on your computer tower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenGerrardIsOverrated Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 http://i.imgur.com/HZYaC.jpg I hope you are joking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now