mikecyclexxx Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Okay so, we know rockstar has said that the game is set in "Los Santos and surrounding areas" but what exactly does that mean? It doesn't actually state that there wont be any other cities, although it hints at it. Perhaps the other cities or even just 1 will be offered as DLC? judging by how the gaming industry is going these days, every game has some form of DLC. I liked it better when you bought the game, you had the WHOLE game not just part of it and had to pay extra for the rest. That being said, this could solve the 360 issue of multiple disks, IE Los Santoas is original release and another city is added as DLC therefore, being installed on the hard-drive? Realistically i think this may be the case here. Discuss! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomern11 Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 I don't believe that they will make an entire city as a DLC. Maybe another storyline + cars + weapons. Just like EFLC. I think that R* keeps the other cities for future titles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bomberlegend Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 It would be a to big of a file to download. And lets remember, not all GTA playing countries have the access to DLC. Missions/guns/stories maybe, not entire cities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawly Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Would rather see Vice City DLC tbh, I hate San Fierro stupid ass roads that were too steep to drive up, meh I know it would be different in GTA V graphics but I hate San Francisco/San Fierro. :S Also San Fierro was probably the most boring city out of the 3 cities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedamned38 Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 I'd want too see las venturas again, but not san fierro. i dont know why people are so concerned about seeing san fierro again. R* never said this was GTA SA 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikecyclexxx Posted November 4, 2011 Author Share Posted November 4, 2011 This is true, to get around the large download they could have part of the city already on the main disk with the DLC just expanding on the basics. Just a thought, seem'd a bit strange only doing LS after all this time is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTA_NYC Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 I think that R* keeps the other cities for future titles. I dont think they will survive to see that, after IV people were not very much happy, Now just LS, i think it would be last GTA they ever made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kratos2000 Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Oooh - oohh. DLC for everyone just because one console can't have it on one disk? my god. Fine, make it downloadable for the 360. but is punishing everyone really necessary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptomex Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 An entire city as DLC? That would be massive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArienMC Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 I don't know why people keep saying they're going to add more cities in a DLC. They're not going to add another city in a DLC. That would be a massive download, and take way to much time for them. And it's completely pointless. The map is said to be the biggest GTA ever. I'm pretty sure we don't need any more cities. Please just get over the fact that it's only one city. We don't need Las Vegas in a game based on LA, and it won't happen. Rockstar has been taking the realistic approach since GTA IV, and wouldn't just slap Las Vegas onto a game in California. The map is going to be huge. Please GET OVER IT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArienMC Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 I think that R* keeps the other cities for future titles. I dont think they will survive to see that, after IV people were not very much happy, Now just LS, i think it would be last GTA they ever made. Your out of your mind if you think this game won't be successful, and will be the last GTA ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now