GTA V Trailer 1

[S1LV3R_W0LF]

Well like I said in that thread of Mollis, I found some Volcano's close to LA so if there is one it could actually be interesting because there would be a Boarder, locking a place like that at the start of the game could also be plausible because of that like it was said.

 

Well this is more speculation then anything but, crossing the boarder at the start of the game because a volcanic eruption where you can't return because of it ... well doesn't sound Rockstar style to me but would be something new and interesting.

 

 

 

[Pleasure_Pier]

Well like I said in that thread of Mollis, I found some Volcano's close to LA so if there is one it could actually be interesting because there would be a Boarder, locking a place like that at the start of the game could also be plausible because of that like it was said.

 

Well this is more speculation then anything but, crossing the boarder at the start of the game because a volcanic eruption where you can't return because of it ... well doesn't sound Rockstar style to me but would be something new and interesting.

Who cares about Volcanos!!!!!!!!

 

It's GTA!!!!!

 

You got Volcano fetish??? Go play Africa.

[Lucky Sevens]

Well like I said in that thread of Mollis, I found some Volcano's close to LA so if there is one it could actually be interesting because there would be a Boarder, locking a place like that at the start of the game could also be plausible because of that like it was said.

 

Well this is more speculation then anything but, crossing the boarder at the start of the game because a volcanic eruption where you can't return because of it ... well doesn't sound Rockstar style to me but would be something new and interesting.

Who cares about Volcanos!!!!!!!!

 

It's GTA!!!!!

 

You got Volcano fetish??? Go play Africa.

You got something against volcanoes?

 

Are you anti-volcanoes?

 

A volcano would be an awesome addition, especially if it went off. The emergency response might be a piss-take on Katrina, perhaps that's why the city appears to be in crisis (homeless people, and fighter jets overhead).

 

It's a new original way to landlock an area of the map as has been mentioned.

 

A piss-take on 2012, caused by Yellowstone erupting (although not geographically accurate) is a way they could go.

 

Subways and bridges could be busted up by subsequent quakes, and under repair.

 

Burn Hollywood Burn.

 

 

[bscutajar]

 

You got something against volcanoes?

 

Are you anti-volcanoes?

 

A volcano would be an awesome addition, especially if it went off. The emergency response might be a piss-take on Katrina, perhaps that's why the city appears to be in crisis (homeless people, and fighter jets overhead).

 

It's a new original way to landlock an area of the map as has been mentioned.

 

A piss-take on 2012, caused by Yellowstone erupting (although not geographically accurate) is a way they could go.

 

Subways and bridges could be busted up by subsequent quakes, and under repair.

 

Burn Hollywood Burn. 

While that would be awesome, it's not the style of Rockstar as has been mentioned previously. The only realistic possibility, in my eyes, is a dormant volcano. That's all. Maybe while you're on the volcano itself you could feel some tremors but that's all.

 

 

Who cares about Volcanos!!!!!!!!

 

It's GTA!!!!!

 

You got Volcano fetish??? Go play Africa.

 

You got something against volcanoes?

 

Are you anti-volcanoes?

 

I can't tell you how much I laughed at this.

Edited January 2, 2012 by bscutajar

[Pleasure_Pier]

 

Well like I said in that thread of Mollis, I found some Volcano's close to LA so if there is one it could actually be interesting because there would be a Boarder, locking a place like that at the start of the game could also be plausible because of that like it was said.

 

Well this is more speculation then anything but, crossing the boarder at the start of the game because a volcanic eruption where you can't return because of it ... well doesn't sound Rockstar style to me but would be something new and interesting.

Who cares about Volcanos!!!!!!!!

 

It's GTA!!!!!

 

You got Volcano fetish??? Go play Africa.

You got something against volcanoes?

 

Are you anti-volcanoes?

 

A volcano would be an awesome addition, especially if it went off. The emergency response might be a piss-take on Katrina, perhaps that's why the city appears to be in crisis (homeless people, and fighter jets overhead).

 

It's a new original way to landlock an area of the map as has been mentioned.

 

A piss-take on 2012, caused by Yellowstone erupting (although not geographically accurate) is a way they could go.

 

Subways and bridges could be busted up by subsequent quakes, and under repair.

 

Burn Hollywood Burn.

All the CPU would be wasted on that crap man!

 

I'd rather it be used for other things, like for example amount of detail of hookers' naked bodies.

Edited January 2, 2012 by Pleasure_Pier

[JoanCrawford]

Well like I said in that thread of Mollis, I found some Volcano\'s close to LA so if there is one it could actually be interesting because there would be a Boarder, locking a place like that at the start of the game could also be plausible because of that like it was said.

 

Well this is more speculation then anything but, crossing the boarder at the start of the game because a volcanic eruption where you can\'t return because of it ... well doesn\'t sound Rockstar style to me but would be something new and interesting.

Who cares about Volcanos!!!!!!!!

 

It\'s GTA!!!!!

 

You got Volcano fetish??? Go play Africa.

You got something against volcanoes?

 

Are you anti-volcanoes?

 

A volcano would be an awesome addition, especially if it went off. The emergency response might be a piss-take on Katrina, perhaps that\'s why the city appears to be in crisis (homeless people, and fighter jets overhead).

 

It\'s a new original way to landlock an area of the map as has been mentioned.

 

A piss-take on 2012, caused by Yellowstone erupting (although not geographically accurate) is a way they could go.

 

Subways and bridges could be busted up by subsequent quakes, and under repair.

 

Burn Hollywood Burn.

All the CPU would be wasted on that crap man!

 

I\'d rather it be used for other things.

I agree. That would take up a ton of space and it\'s something I\'d much rather leave out.

[S1LV3R_W0LF]

This is why the world is the crap place it is now, so many retards.

 

What is wrong in doing something different? Why the fact wanting something like a Volcano in a game even if its just a "reason" is a fetish?

 

Innovation who cares for innovation, lets get the same guy going around stealing cars, shot some idiots do some missions get some money buy some houses, look for some doves, seagulls, eagles whatever... spank some people, crash some poles and free roam around the place ... and its done.

 

Whats the problem of thinking out of the box?

[tenpennyisplainevil]

This is why the world is the crap place it is now, so many retards.

 

What is wrong in doing something different? Why the fact wanting something like a Volcano in a game even if its just a "reason" is a fetish?

 

Innovation who cares for innovation, lets get the same guy going around stealing cars, shot some idiots do some missions get some money buy some houses, look for some doves, seagulls, eagles whatever... spank some people, crash some poles and free roam around the place ... and its done.

 

Whats the problem of thinking out of the box?

volcanoes are just kind of over-the-top, if you ask me...

[Pleasure_Pier]

This is why the world is the crap place it is now, so many retards.

 

What is wrong in doing something different? Why the fact wanting something like a Volcano in a game even if its just a "reason" is a fetish?

 

Innovation who cares for innovation, lets get the same guy going around stealing cars, shot some idiots do some missions get some money buy some houses, look for some doves, seagulls, eagles whatever... spank some people, crash some poles and free roam around the place ... and its done.

 

Whats the problem of thinking out of the box?

Sir, Grand Theft Auto - the name says for itself.

 

 

[bscutajar]

This is why the world is the crap place it is now, so many retards.

 

What is wrong in doing something different? Why the fact wanting something like a Volcano in a game even if its just a "reason" is a fetish?

 

Innovation who cares for innovation, lets get the same guy going around stealing cars, shot some idiots do some missions get some money buy some houses, look for some doves, seagulls, eagles whatever... spank some people, crash some poles and free roam around the place ... and its done.

 

Whats the problem of thinking out of the box? 

volcanoes are just kind of over-the-top, if you ask me...

No. Eruptions are over the top. Dormant volcanoes are nothing implausible.

[tenpennyisplainevil]

This is why the world is the crap place it is now, so many retards.

 

What is wrong in doing something different? Why the fact wanting something like a Volcano in a game even if its just a "reason" is a fetish?

 

Innovation who cares for innovation, lets get the same guy going around stealing cars, shot some idiots do some missions get some money buy some houses, look for some doves, seagulls, eagles whatever... spank some people, crash some poles and free roam around the place ... and its done.

 

Whats the problem of thinking out of the box? 

volcanoes are just kind of over-the-top, if you ask me...

No. Eruptions are over the top. Dormant volcanoes are nothing implausible.

yeah, but for what use is a volcano without lava? might as well just make it a mountain

[Staten]

I know we have scraped a hole through the bottom of the barrel long ago, but I was watching the trailer the other day, and when the narrator says "So, I bought a big house, came here . . ." I started thinking: He buys the house, then goes to Los Santos? Wouldn't the normal way be to go to Los Santos then buy the house? I know it's not much, but maybe it's a hint that the game doesn't start in Los Santos? It'd be easier to bar entry into the city than to bar entry into certain parts of Los Santos from within (if it's going to be one landmass and not a set of islands).

[bscutajar]

 

yeah, but for what use is a volcano without lava? might as well just make it a mountain

 

That is a valid point. However, I'd imagine that including a volcano would inspire some fun missions. Like throwing someone out of a plane into the volcano. Would be a typical GTA mission if you ask me.

 

 

I know we have scraped a hole through the bottom of the barrel long ago, but I was watching the trailer the other day, and when the narrator says "So, I bought a big house, came here . . ." I started thinking: He buys the house, then goes to Los Santos? Wouldn't the normal way be to go to Los Santos then buy the house? I know it's not much, but maybe it's a hint that the game doesn't start in Los Santos? It'd be easier to bar entry into the city than to bar entry into certain parts of Los Santos from within (if it's going to be one landmass and not a set of islands).

 

You first buy a house, then you go live in it.

[tenpennyisplainevil]

yeah, but for what use is a volcano without lava? might as well just make it a mountain

 

That is a valid point. However, I'd imagine that including a volcano would inspire some fun missions. Like throwing someone out of a plane into the volcano. Would be a typical GTA mission if you ask me.

haha, true! i'd love to do that, but it'd still not be to much use.

[JoanCrawford]

yeah, but for what use is a volcano without lava? might as well just make it a mountain

 

That is a valid point. However, I\'d imagine that including a volcano would inspire some fun missions. Like throwing someone out of a plane into the volcano. Would be a typical GTA mission if you ask me.

 

 

I know we have scraped a hole through the bottom of the barrel long ago, but I was watching the trailer the other day, and when the narrator says \"So, I bought a big house, came here . . .\" I started thinking: He buys the house, then goes to Los Santos? Wouldn\'t the normal way be to go to Los Santos then buy the house? I know it\'s not much, but maybe it\'s a hint that the game doesn\'t start in Los Santos? It\'d be easier to bar entry into the city than to bar entry into certain parts of Los Santos from within (if it\'s going to be one landmass and not a set of islands).

 

You first buy a house, then you go live in it.

Yeah, if I were going to buy a house across the country than I would take a trip out there to look at them first. Then I would move there.

[bscutajar]

yeah, but for what use is a volcano without lava? might as well just make it a mountain

 

That is a valid point. However, I'd imagine that including a volcano would inspire some fun missions. Like throwing someone out of a plane into the volcano. Would be a typical GTA mission if you ask me.

haha, true! i'd love to do that, but it'd still not be to much use.

Yeah, guess there won't be any better use for it. But hey, it's better than a mountain and it has no cons so why not?

[tenpennyisplainevil]

yeah, but for what use is a volcano without lava? might as well just make it a mountain

 

That is a valid point. However, I'd imagine that including a volcano would inspire some fun missions. Like throwing someone out of a plane into the volcano. Would be a typical GTA mission if you ask me.

haha, true! i'd love to do that, but it'd still not be to much use.

Yeah, guess there won't be any better use for it. But hey, it's better than a mountain and it has no cons so why not?

well, remember Mount Chilliad in SA? there was a flat space at the top with a couple cars, a motor, and a parachute on it. and a ramp to have a lot of fun with. and with a volcano, at the top there'll be a giant hole in which you'll die if you jump in. see my point?

[Irrational]

 

I used to work at R* i quit in 2010. I found outa small dose of info about GTA V but not alot. They only just then started working on it. They have an updated rage engine, there will be planes, and the map is going to be 'bigger than san andreas' Thats all i know

 

sorry

Incredible.

 

You just said what everyone already knows...

Edited January 3, 2012 by ClaudeSpeedRulez

[Magic_Al]

 

I used to work at R* i quit in 2010. I found outa small dose of info about GTA V but not alot. They only just then started working on it. They have an updated rage engine, there will be planes, and the map is going to be 'bigger than san andreas' Thats all i know

 

sorry

Incredible.

 

You just said what everyone already knows...

The only thing that peaks my interest in this is the year. Not starting GTA V until 2010 would fit my theory that Rockstar North was working on Agent as its next game until Sony lost its enthusiasm for giving Rockstar the extra financial support that an exclusive requires. Sometime after Sony announced Agent in 2009, the worsening economy and the realization that nobody is going "win" this generation's "console war" made the idea of a $100 million exclusive seem not anywhere near as smart an investment as it might have seemed in 2007 when Sony was feeling butthurt about GTA IV and made the deal for Agent. I think most people now would say that if Agent is cross-platform it will do well on the PS3 but if it's exclusive it won't necessarily do a lot better, and if it doesn't do a lot better as an exclusive then what is the point of Sony paying for that when they can do just as well with a non-exclusive for free? 2010 also showed the potential for a non-GTA open-world Rockstar game in Red Dead Redemption, which showed that even if the game is kick-ass awesome, in every way as good or better than GTA and very successful, it will not sell nearly as much as GTA, and if Agent is an exclusive it might only sell half as much as Red Dead Redemption no matter how good it is. So, Sony cools off about Agent, is not giving Rockstar the advances they would have for an exclusive, and Rockstar starts thinking about the sure-fire income potential of GTA and does that instead.

[HydraulicWaRiOr]

What about an EMP or a Nuke?

[GameModder8]

Don't know, if this was postet before, but has anyone noticed this seaplane before?

 

[dc_ae]

Don't know, if this was postet before, but has anyone noticed this seaplane before?

 

A long time ago.

Last year.

[Jeeebuuus]

The seaplane has been notice before but I just thought of something. That plane, to me, would mean that there will be at least rivers running through the map since you need water in order to land the plane. So maybe we can still expect the map to be divided by waterways like in previous games and that might mean more to the map than we have been told.

[JoanCrawford]

The seaplane has been notice before but I just thought of something. That plane, to me, would mean that there will be at least rivers running through the map since you need water in order to land the plane. So maybe we can still expect the map to be divided by waterways like in previous games and that might mean more to the map than we have been told.

Or it there could be lake... I doubt a seaplane could land in a river, unless said river was very wide.

[Jeeebuuus]

The seaplane has been notice before but I just thought of something. That plane, to me, would mean that there will be at least rivers running through the map since you need water in order to land the plane. So maybe we can still expect the map to be divided by waterways like in previous games and that might mean more to the map than we have been told.

Or it there could be lake... I doubt a seaplane could land in a river, unless said river was very wide.

I was thinking of SA map. And IVs. And VC. All divided by rivers or waterways.

[Glock 18]

what's agent?.

[SocalsZHP]

what's agent?.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_(video_game)

[bscutajar]

The seaplane has been notice before but I just thought of something. That plane, to me, would mean that there will be at least rivers running through the map since you need water in order to land the plane. So maybe we can still expect the map to be divided by waterways like in previous games and that might mean more to the map than we have been told.

Or it there could be lake... I doubt a seaplane could land in a river, unless said river was very wide.

I was thinking of SA map. And IVs. And VC. All divided by rivers or waterways.

Are you suggesting that GTA5 will include VC, SA and LC altogether? If so, I'd hate to disappoint you, but I'm 100% sure that it's not going to happen. You're expecting too much.

[Zacky.V92]

^ I think what he was saying was by looking at the maps of SA, IV, and VC, all of them are divided by rivers. So possibly V's map will be too.

[tenpennyisplainevil]

The seaplane has been notice before but I just thought of something. That plane, to me, would mean that there will be at least rivers running through the map since you need water in order to land the plane. So maybe we can still expect the map to be divided by waterways like in previous games and that might mean more to the map than we have been told.

Or it there could be lake... I doubt a seaplane could land in a river, unless said river was very wide.

I was thinking of SA map. And IVs. And VC. All divided by rivers or waterways.

Are you suggesting that GTA5 will include VC, SA and LC altogether? If so, I'd hate to disappoint you, but I'm 100% sure that it's not going to happen. You're expecting too much.

he meant that those rivers close the entrance to other parts of the map. and since there are no rivers in LS, what area is beyond the rivers? another city or two, probably!