Original Light Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 I don't want it to get too serious. I know IV was, but don't start making me consider things such as marriage, taxes, bathroom breaks, eating, fueling up my car and more. Although refueling should be optional for those that still want it. I just don't want realism getting in the way of fun. In IV I fly out of my windshield way too much. It would have been fine if I had a damn seatbelt option, but apparently the game wants me to drive slow or something, which I never do. I don't want things like traffic laws. I mean, for f*cks sake I get enough stars from pedestrians struck and attack on a vehicle as is, I don't want to have to use the wanted down code even more. Speaking of attack on a vehicle, when I set a pile of wood or a desk in my house on fire with a molotov, those things are generally not considered vehicles, therefore I SHOULD NOT GET A STAR FOR ATTACK ON A VEHICLE. At least make it say "Arson" because I know a cupboard is NOT A f*ckING VEHICLE. Oh, just for a double negative so I can still get away with a wish, I don't want not to be able to base jump. I like base jumping. We also don't wan't GTA to turn into sims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secura Posted August 17, 2011 Author Share Posted August 17, 2011 I don't want it to get too serious. I know IV was, but don't start making me consider things such as marriage, taxes, bathroom breaks, eating, fueling up my car and more. Although refueling should be optional for those that still want it. I just don't want realism getting in the way of fun. In IV I fly out of my windshield way too much. It would have been fine if I had a damn seatbelt option, but apparently the game wants me to drive slow or something, which I never do. I don't want things like traffic laws. I mean, for f*cks sake I get enough stars from pedestrians struck and attack on a vehicle as is, I don't want to have to use the wanted down code even more. Speaking of attack on a vehicle, when I set a pile of wood or a desk in my house on fire with a molotov, those things are generally not considered vehicles, therefore I SHOULD NOT GET A STAR FOR ATTACK ON A VEHICLE. At least make it say "Arson" because I know a cupboard is NOT A f*ckING VEHICLE. Oh, just for a double negative so I can still get away with a wish, I don't want not to be able to base jump. I like base jumping. We also don't wan't GTA to turn into sims. Please don't just post seven word posts. This topic is for debates and discussions about V and its features. I think he already coverd the sims aspect of the game. You need not have posted what you did. If however you wish to discuss this in further detail i would be perfectly fine with that, It's just that your post seems rather spammy in this topic considering what it's intended for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitrho5 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 Things I DON'T wanna see in GTA 5: -Liberty City (starting to get bored playing in the same environment over & over again) -needing to refuel cars, like some people have suggested (I can see this getting tedious and expensive, if implemented) -less than 70 hrs. of gameplay (I beat the GTA 4 story in 2 days, I want more!) -a time setting before 2010 (I want a smartphone, GPS, & in-game Internet in GTA 5) -having to enter a Pay & Spray UNSEEN to remove wanted level (seriously! How am I supposed to get rid of a 6* wanted level at a Pay & Spray in GTA 4!?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Light Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 I don't want it to get too serious. I know IV was, but don't start making me consider things such as marriage, taxes, bathroom breaks, eating, fueling up my car and more. Although refueling should be optional for those that still want it. I just don't want realism getting in the way of fun. In IV I fly out of my windshield way too much. It would have been fine if I had a damn seatbelt option, but apparently the game wants me to drive slow or something, which I never do. I don't want things like traffic laws. I mean, for f*cks sake I get enough stars from pedestrians struck and attack on a vehicle as is, I don't want to have to use the wanted down code even more. Speaking of attack on a vehicle, when I set a pile of wood or a desk in my house on fire with a molotov, those things are generally not considered vehicles, therefore I SHOULD NOT GET A STAR FOR ATTACK ON A VEHICLE. At least make it say "Arson" because I know a cupboard is NOT A f*ckING VEHICLE. Oh, just for a double negative so I can still get away with a wish, I don't want not to be able to base jump. I like base jumping. We also don't wan't GTA to turn into sims. Please don't just post seven word posts. This topic is for debates and discussions about V and its features. I think he already coverd the sims aspect of the game. You need not have posted what you did. If however you wish to discuss this in further detail i would be perfectly fine with that, It's just that your post seems rather spammy in this topic considering what it's intended for. That was 9 words, count next time before you accuse someone of something. No need to get rude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secura Posted August 17, 2011 Author Share Posted August 17, 2011 I don't want it to get too serious. I know IV was, but don't start making me consider things such as marriage, taxes, bathroom breaks, eating, fueling up my car and more. Although refueling should be optional for those that still want it. I just don't want realism getting in the way of fun. In IV I fly out of my windshield way too much. It would have been fine if I had a damn seatbelt option, but apparently the game wants me to drive slow or something, which I never do. I don't want things like traffic laws. I mean, for f*cks sake I get enough stars from pedestrians struck and attack on a vehicle as is, I don't want to have to use the wanted down code even more. Speaking of attack on a vehicle, when I set a pile of wood or a desk in my house on fire with a molotov, those things are generally not considered vehicles, therefore I SHOULD NOT GET A STAR FOR ATTACK ON A VEHICLE. At least make it say "Arson" because I know a cupboard is NOT A f*ckING VEHICLE. Oh, just for a double negative so I can still get away with a wish, I don't want not to be able to base jump. I like base jumping. We also don't wan't GTA to turn into sims. Please don't just post seven word posts. This topic is for debates and discussions about V and its features. I think he already coverd the sims aspect of the game. You need not have posted what you did. If however you wish to discuss this in further detail i would be perfectly fine with that, It's just that your post seems rather spammy in this topic considering what it's intended for. That was 9 words, count next time before you accuse someone of something. No need to get rude. I was speaking in Genral and you fail to comment on the rest of my post. All i asked was why you posted something that had we had clearly gone over minutes before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Light Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 I don't want it to get too serious. I know IV was, but don't start making me consider things such as marriage, taxes, bathroom breaks, eating, fueling up my car and more. Although refueling should be optional for those that still want it. I just don't want realism getting in the way of fun. In IV I fly out of my windshield way too much. It would have been fine if I had a damn seatbelt option, but apparently the game wants me to drive slow or something, which I never do. I don't want things like traffic laws. I mean, for f*cks sake I get enough stars from pedestrians struck and attack on a vehicle as is, I don't want to have to use the wanted down code even more. Speaking of attack on a vehicle, when I set a pile of wood or a desk in my house on fire with a molotov, those things are generally not considered vehicles, therefore I SHOULD NOT GET A STAR FOR ATTACK ON A VEHICLE. At least make it say "Arson" because I know a cupboard is NOT A f*ckING VEHICLE. Oh, just for a double negative so I can still get away with a wish, I don't want not to be able to base jump. I like base jumping. We also don't wan't GTA to turn into sims. Please don't just post seven word posts. This topic is for debates and discussions about V and its features. I think he already coverd the sims aspect of the game. You need not have posted what you did. If however you wish to discuss this in further detail i would be perfectly fine with that, It's just that your post seems rather spammy in this topic considering what it's intended for. That was 9 words, count next time before you accuse someone of something. No need to get rude. I was speaking in Genral and you fail to comment on the rest of my post. All i asked was why you posted something that had we had clearly gone over minutes before. Oh, by the way it not spelled Genral, it's spelled General. Next time you dis someone out, use proper spelling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Pink Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 (edited) you asked for opinions, here's mine. the basis of GTA IS money murder and mayhem, but you can easily tell, that GTA went into another direction, a more serious one. actions have consequences and you see that in GTA IV, no happy ending at all. well ok, I'll be more specific, I easily see Niko's and Johnny's motivation. But not Luis's. The weapons are optional, so I can choose myself to walk into a mission with only a pistol. But the setting? He kills over 1000 guys ane somehow stays sane, runs a legitimate business, but kills hundreds of cops because Yusuf wants a train? It didn't fit. If you remember the conversations between Luis and his friends, they said Luis was always a violent, cold, killer and that he wont change. This is in reference to him wanting to go straight and run clubs. Of course, his friends see this as a betrayal of of his gangster/thug upbringing. *Potential Spoiler* Gay Tony, gave Luis the opportunity to run the clubs as he thought he was just dumb muscle and Luis was very grateful to him as he gave him an opportunity to get out of the hood and do a legitimate job even though he had a criminal record. Gay Tony was a father figure to Luis and Luis was going to do anything to keep his bond with Tony. Although, there's one mission where we nearly think Luis has had enough of Tony but you know what happens. So, you see it all fits. I think you didn't quite get it. EDIT: To contribute to the topic, If it's set modern day, I don't want friends calling you. We can ring them. Also, everything in the game should evolve around getting some reward bet in fun, material in-game things like new cars/safehouses/clothes/skills or money. I like 'serious' things like dramas etc in film and t.v. In a game, yes some seriousness is good when needed but we can have a super-fun, believable and over-the-top (whoah that was crazy but they made it believeable/plausible etc) in a thoughtful and skilful manner. Basically what K2 said in his post about realism etc Edited August 17, 2011 by ThePinkFloydSound ＲＵＢＢΣＲ░Ｊ♢ＨＮＮＹ （スオッ） Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr quick Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 (edited) - Edited April 27, 2016 by Marwin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Light Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 I want 100 crapy missions rather than 20 good missions. GTA is all about replay value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coin-god Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 High system requirements. You guys should be lucky you still get a GTA for pc! It's a pure consolegame now. I don't even want to think about playing GTA on a pc. Like Rockstar is gonna hold back on the requirements for you pc-gamers. lol, the reason it works like crap in PC's it's because of the crappy job they did on porting it. It should work much better than on consoles. It actually does on good computers. Consoles are the reason they hold back on features and graphics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secura Posted August 17, 2011 Author Share Posted August 17, 2011 I don't want it to get too serious. I know IV was, but don't start making me consider things such as marriage, taxes, bathroom breaks, eating, fueling up my car and more. Although refueling should be optional for those that still want it. I just don't want realism getting in the way of fun. In IV I fly out of my windshield way too much. It would have been fine if I had a damn seatbelt option, but apparently the game wants me to drive slow or something, which I never do. I don't want things like traffic laws. I mean, for f*cks sake I get enough stars from pedestrians struck and attack on a vehicle as is, I don't want to have to use the wanted down code even more. Speaking of attack on a vehicle, when I set a pile of wood or a desk in my house on fire with a molotov, those things are generally not considered vehicles, therefore I SHOULD NOT GET A STAR FOR ATTACK ON A VEHICLE. At least make it say "Arson" because I know a cupboard is NOT A f*ckING VEHICLE. Oh, just for a double negative so I can still get away with a wish, I don't want not to be able to base jump. I like base jumping. We also don't wan't GTA to turn into sims. Please don't just post seven word posts. This topic is for debates and discussions about V and its features. I think he already coverd the sims aspect of the game. You need not have posted what you did. If however you wish to discuss this in further detail i would be perfectly fine with that, It's just that your post seems rather spammy in this topic considering what it's intended for. That was 9 words, count next time before you accuse someone of something. No need to get rude. I was speaking in Genral and you fail to comment on the rest of my post. All i asked was why you posted something that had we had clearly gone over minutes before. Oh, by the way it not spelled Genral, it's spelled General. Next time you dis someone out, use proper spelling. I could say the same about you in multiple topics. But i have not because i am not a grammar natzi. Also stop spamming this damn topic and remind me at what point during this disccusion did i Diss you? Yet you still continue to harrass me and this damn topic with pointless rebuttles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAglezga Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 Belgians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkpile Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 So, you see it all fits. I think you didn't quite get it. I got it alright there but just mentioning how Luis is cold and you, the player himself CAN be cold and ruthless, killing lots of peds, doesn't go hand in hand with the rest of the cutscenes and story. he always acts like he wants to stay away from this past violent life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secura Posted August 17, 2011 Author Share Posted August 17, 2011 Belgians. Do not spam this thread. Not only is it short and pointless but it is also Racist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niall Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 Why can't people use the search? As soon as a topic is off pg 1 another is almost always made. What things in GTA4 should NOT return in GTA (5) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secura Posted August 17, 2011 Author Share Posted August 17, 2011 Something that i hope we won't have GTA V is a location we've already been to such as SA and VC. I would at least in my opinion love to see a GTA set in London i just think it would be interesting espcially with that new London spire building. However revisting Miami or LA especially after LA Noire doesn't appeal to me in the slightest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GamerShotgun Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 Belgians. Do not spam this thread. Not only is it short and pointless but it is also Racist. So Belgian is a race? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deli2000 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 Belgians. Do not spam this thread. Not only is it short and pointless but it is also Racist. it was a refrence to a thread about belgians shown a few days ago, which went crazy moving around the board, before it turned out the mods were messing with us. try and search the topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mokrie Dela Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 Why can't people use the search? As soon as a topic is off pg 1 another is almost always made.What things in GTA4 should NOT return in GTA (5) the key word there being return. as in things that were in GTA that we dont want back. this theads more general. However this thread is decending into spam, it will be locked soon. Mods have the ability to merge topics. That may be a good idea. The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. Click here to view my Poetry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrellmonks Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 Something that i hope we won't have GTA V is a location we've already been to such as SA and VC. I would at least in my opinion love to see a GTA set in London i just think it would be interesting espcially with that new London spire building. However revisting Miami or LA especially after LA Noire doesn't appeal to me in the slightest. Ive been to both new york and london in the past year. Both are great cities but London just felt like New York except a much smaller version. I think they need to use different types of cities. Chicago and New York feel like the same types of cities but Miami, Vegas, francisco all feel like different types of cities. I think the next GTA has to have a different feel to it than Liberty. I understand you dont want to see vice or la again buy i think theyre going to use a city that feel different to Liberty. The only ones i can think of that hasnt been used yet that would be suitable for a gta game are Paris, Madrid, san diego and houston. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckberry04 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 High system requirements. You guys should be lucky you still get a GTA for pc! It's a pure consolegame now. I don't even want to think about playing GTA on a pc. Like Rockstar is gonna hold back on the requirements for you pc-gamers. lol, the reason it works like crap in PC's it's because of the crappy job they did on porting it. It should work much better than on consoles. It actually does on good computers. Consoles are the reason they hold back on features and graphics. Then why are they complaining? Not everyone has the money for a kickass-pc. And besides, GTA just is a game you HAVE to play on a television with a controller in your hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 What I don't want to see in the next GTA is how guns handled in GTA IV. I don't want to see a Glock knock a man down, but an M16 will only him stumble. Reason: Common Sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
floof Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 (edited) High system requirements. You guys should be lucky you still get a GTA for pc! It's a pure consolegame now. I don't even want to think about playing GTA on a pc. Like Rockstar is gonna hold back on the requirements for you pc-gamers. lol, the reason it works like crap in PC's it's because of the crappy job they did on porting it. It should work much better than on consoles. It actually does on good computers. Consoles are the reason they hold back on features and graphics. Then why are they complaining? Not everyone has the money for a kickass-pc. And besides, GTA just is a game you HAVE to play on a television with a controller in your hand. The series originally started on PC. There is nothing wrong with Rockstar putting in extra effort to make PC gamers a little more comfortable. @OP: Something I would not like to see is a repeat of TBOGT multiplayer. Everyone running around with explosive guns and instant kill helicopters was unbearable. Although I loved playing it online it could get a little annoying dying every couple of seconds to a buzzard. @aceofhicks: Seems like your more angry will the physics rather than then weapon combat. Those things seem to be a little more random with Europhia. I don't know if they have the technology to improve without using some crappy ragdoll physics like Saints Row has. Edited August 17, 2011 by The Grove Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mokrie Dela Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 What I don't want to see in the next GTA is how guns handled in GTA IV. I don't want to see a Glock knock a man down, but an M16 will only him stumble. Reason: Common Sense. doesnt it depend where you aim? I've killed people with headshots, one shot, with both, and dozens of body shots with others. Or are you saying an M16 (i think IV s the M4) would kill in less shots due to higher caliber? The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. Click here to view my Poetry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 What I don't want to see in the next GTA is how guns handled in GTA IV. I don't want to see a Glock knock a man down, but an M16 will only him stumble. Reason: Common Sense. doesnt it depend where you aim? I've killed people with headshots, one shot, with both, and dozens of body shots with others. Or are you saying an M16 (i think IV s the M4) would kill in less shots due to higher caliber? I'm saying that If you shot someone, Center of Mass, in GTA IV with a Glock or a Desert Eagle they will fall to the ground and get back up. If you shoot someone (again, center of mass) with an M4 or AK, they'll stumble, but they wont fall to the ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secura Posted August 17, 2011 Author Share Posted August 17, 2011 What I don't want to see in the next GTA is how guns handled in GTA IV. I don't want to see a Glock knock a man down, but an M16 will only him stumble. Reason: Common Sense. doesnt it depend where you aim? I've killed people with headshots, one shot, with both, and dozens of body shots with others. Or are you saying an M16 (i think IV s the M4) would kill in less shots due to higher caliber? I'm saying that If you shot someone, Center of Mass, in GTA IV with a Glock or a Desert Eagle they will fall to the ground and get back up. If you shoot someone (again, center of mass) with an M4 or AK, they'll stumble, but they wont fall to the ground. I think that RDR handled guns and physics ALOT better than GTA IV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mokrie Dela Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 What I don't want to see in the next GTA is how guns handled in GTA IV. I don't want to see a Glock knock a man down, but an M16 will only him stumble. Reason: Common Sense. doesnt it depend where you aim? I've killed people with headshots, one shot, with both, and dozens of body shots with others. Or are you saying an M16 (i think IV s the M4) would kill in less shots due to higher caliber? I'm saying that If you shot someone, Center of Mass, in GTA IV with a Glock or a Desert Eagle they will fall to the ground and get back up. If you shoot someone (again, center of mass) with an M4 or AK, they'll stumble, but they wont fall to the ground. Ah right i see. Ive had them stumble all over the place and fall but cant remember whether it was weapon specific. I would like to see the ability to disarm people in V - both with your hands and via shooting their arms. Then their arms woudlnt work so they couldnt shoot back. The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. Click here to view my Poetry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAWithStyle Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 GTA is all about having fun because the very reason games exist is to produce enjoyment or in other more commonly used words FUN. let me tell you, I enjoy GTA IV, I have lots of fun. And guess what, I don't do killing sprees or randomly shoot people, roll over them etc. GTA could be even funnier to me, if missions would include much more car chases, non scripted ones, and none you end with lots of explosions, but simple car crashes. lol GTA really ain't the game for you then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikt Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 What I don't want to see in the next GTA is how guns handled in GTA IV. I don't want to see a Glock knock a man down, but an M16 will only him stumble. Reason: Common Sense. doesnt it depend where you aim? I've killed people with headshots, one shot, with both, and dozens of body shots with others. Or are you saying an M16 (i think IV s the M4) would kill in less shots due to higher caliber? I'm saying that If you shot someone, Center of Mass, in GTA IV with a Glock or a Desert Eagle they will fall to the ground and get back up. If you shoot someone (again, center of mass) with an M4 or AK, they'll stumble, but they wont fall to the ground. Ah right i see. Ive had them stumble all over the place and fall but cant remember whether it was weapon specific. I would like to see the ability to disarm people in V - both with your hands and via shooting their arms. Then their arms woudlnt work so they couldnt shoot back. You can disarm in IV by meleeing or shooting at the weapon. Since there isn't auto-aim on weapons it's a bit hard, but it's totally possible. As for melee disarming, keep hitting and if you're lucky you'll contact the weapon and it drops. Enemies can't pick up weapons anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shayan Shaffey Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 There is a topic about this, but I'll just play along: I don't want it to have a difficulty level (like most FPSs) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now