ENB Screenshots and Artwork Thread (Part 1)

[DuPz0r]

gionight, you must do a HD video some time. I'd love to see this in motion.

[icelaglace]

 

Nyan.

[gionight]

 

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

[icelaglace]

I really need to redo the motion blur

 

 

[gionight]

 

gionight, you must do a HD video some time. I'd love to see this in motion.

I already did compromise on a quality and i won't do another one with fraps and youtube restrictions . I just thinking maybe it will be better just stop posting inferior quality screenshots at all i don't like the result at jpg format . Painter inside me just died and i'm a gouache and graphic painter in real life.

 

 

Thank you! And I am curious, have you tried capturing in PNG then using the Automate function in Adobe CS2 to convert to jpg? I think there might be less quality loss / more quality loss control?

 

I don't know man, first of all i haven't Adobe CS2 installed and if i have one , i think it will be another loose in quality , it's pointless.

Anyway thank you for trying to help .

Edited July 14, 2011 by gionight

[napoleonic]

Fooking jpg , it definitely worser , stupid internet bandwidth

Lets start with Lady Liberty's back than.

that will be dependent on the size of the JPG itself, a jpg larger than 250KB (for a 1080p screenshot) will have almost no difference with png

[PacketOverload_x64bit]

 

Thank you! And I am curious, have you tried capturing in PNG then using the Automate function in Adobe CS2 to convert to jpg? I think there might be less quality loss / more quality loss control?

 

I don't know man, first of all i haven't Adobe CS2 installed and if i have one , i think it will be another loose in quality , it's pointless.

Anyway thank you for trying to help .

It actually isn't pointless.

 

Here's two screens capture in IV from FRAPS, Photoshop CS2.0 saved in quality 12 jpg compression = 1.34MB's JPG vs. 2.97MB's PNG = No loss in quality (or almost indistinguishable loss).

 

It's very easy to capture in PNG from FRAPS and in Photoshop go to File>Scripts>Image Processor>Browse for Directory>Click Run. You just set the quality once and it will stay that way.

 

All screens in the folder will be converted creating a "JPG" copy in a folder in that directory. All done. You can always upload your PNG's in a rar and I'll add 'em to the first post if you really want the PNG's out there too

 

JPG

 

PNG

Edited July 15, 2011 by PacketOVerload_x64Bit

[icelaglace]

PNG is heavy because of carrying alpha channels ... Nothing else.

JPG can be good too with high quality. Nothing can beat the BMP though

Nice DOF here Packet.

[killpeople]

Thank you! And I am curious, have you tried capturing in PNG then using the Automate function in Adobe CS2 to convert to jpg? I think there might be less quality loss / more quality loss control?

 

I don't know man, first of all i haven't Adobe CS2 installed and if i have one , i think it will be another loose in quality , it's pointless.

Anyway thank you for trying to help .

It actually isn't pointless.

 

Here's two screens capture in IV from FRAPS, Photoshop CS2.0 saved in quality 12 jpg compression = 1.34MB's JPG vs. 2.97MB's PNG = No loss in quality (or almost indistinguishable loss).

 

It's very easy to capture in PNG from FRAPS and in Photoshop go to File>Scripts>Image Processor>Browse for Directory>Click Run. You just set the quality once and it will stay that way.

 

wow after seeing the jaggies in ur screens i guess it is what it is...i'll have to deal with em...screens look horrid get a new pc man its 2011

 

wow after seeing the jaggies in ur screens i guess it is what it is...i'll have to deal with em...screens look horrid get a new pc man its 2011

[Eiswolfi]

@icelaglace your enb has to much bloom i think =) would be good if you fix it...

[icelaglace]

 

@icelaglace your enb has to much bloom i think =) would be good if you fix it...

I know right?

I'll fix that soon

Bloom is too high ATM.

^^

Edited July 15, 2011 by icelaglace

[PacketOverload_x64bit]

 

wow after seeing the jaggies in ur screens i guess it is what it is...i'll have to deal with em...screens look horrid get a new pc man its 2011

 

Do you understand what the hell the post was demonstrating? No you don't. That's at 1920x1080 with NO AA, NOT EVEN A SHARPEN EFFECT. THERE IS NO ANTIALIASING CONVERTING FROM PNG TO JPG so jaggies won't make a difference as long as the images are accurate to one another.

 

And in your case, JUST LIKE CARMODS, despite you two having these supposed "SUPER AWESOME $5,000 1337 COMPUTARRRS" my screens STILL SMOKE yours. You can barely even get ENB working.

Edited July 15, 2011 by PacketOVerload_x64Bit

[icelaglace]

Calm down Packet.

It's a friend of Carmods or Carmods itself.

EDIT : It's Carmods, Video links to his profile..

Which just popped out of nowhere just after the ban.

He spitted on my settings but I see him asking some help on Youtube but whatever. lol

 

Edited July 15, 2011 by icelaglace

[j3smoove]

3rd pic very nice ICE (^,^)

[PacketOverload_x64bit]

 

It's a friend of Carmods or Carmods itself.

EDIT : It's Carmods, Video links to his profile..

Which just popped out of nowhere just after the ban.

 

Yeah, killpeople and Carmods = one in the same. Here's to wishful thinking

Edited July 15, 2011 by PacketOVerload_x64Bit

[icelaglace]

 

Sorry for the HUD. Just screenies during playtime.

[johnnywcw]

DenDi333, those photo's look nice and lovely. i like that.

[j3smoove]

Special for ICE

 

 

 

[stphy]

[johnnywcw]

 

 

 

[Vinz005]

can sum1 plz tell me how do i post my screens????????

[gionight]

 

Thank you! And I am curious, have you tried capturing in PNG then using the Automate function in Adobe CS2 to convert to jpg? I think there might be less quality loss / more quality loss control?

 

I don't know man, first of all i haven't Adobe CS2 installed and if i have one , i think it will be another loose in quality , it's pointless.

Anyway thank you for trying to help .

It actually isn't pointless.

 

Here's two screens capture in IV from FRAPS, Photoshop CS2.0 saved in quality 12 jpg compression = 1.34MB's JPG vs. 2.97MB's PNG = No loss in quality (or almost indistinguishable loss).

 

It's very easy to capture in PNG from FRAPS and in Photoshop go to File>Scripts>Image Processor>Browse for Directory>Click Run. You just set the quality once and it will stay that way.

 

All screens in the folder will be converted creating a "JPG" copy in a folder in that directory. All done. You can always upload your PNG's in a rar and I'll add 'em to the first post if you really want the PNG's out there too

 

 

I already tried it and it works not such a loose like native jpg had , but there is less blur in converted image it's more sterile and sharp and more aliasing in comparison, or maybe it's ImageShack.us fault

Thank you for good advise.

small example :

 

 

 

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Edited July 15, 2011 by gionight

[j3smoove]

@Vinz005

try FRAPS

 

.............

[Damian989121]

@johnnywcw, thanks mate

@DenDi, awesome !

[Omarock]

@stphy: Holy smokes the 2nd picture is amazing ! what sets are you using ?

[Dpeasant3]

@stphy: Holy smokes the 2nd picture is amazing ! what sets are you using ?

Lol, everytime people see screenshot with that house they start asking for settings and textures also. This is just the texture, almost all settings look the same in this place.

[napoleonic]

@stphy: Holy smokes the 2nd picture is amazing ! what sets are you using ?

Lol, everytime people see screenshot with that house they start asking for settings and textures also. This is just the texture, almost all settings look the same in this place.

tru dat but I can't seem to remember where in the game is that

[icelaglace]

 

@stphy: Holy smokes the 2nd picture is amazing ! what sets are you using ?

Lol, everytime people see screenshot with that house they start asking for settings and textures also. This is just the texture, almost all settings look the same in this place.

Haha yeah.

And the shadows are always the same because it's a texture

 

 

Little screenie just like that.

[j3smoove]

@napoleonic

alderney map maybe near real italian pizza

 

IKT Nano

Edited July 15, 2011 by j3smoove

[fondlemyballs]

I like the new settings but is it only me that got a noticeable fps drop with 1.25 compared to 1.2?

 

I'm running at 28fps with 1.25 wheres I run 1.2 at 35fps. Also one thing that I really liked about 1.2 where the dark nights, now it's not as dark anymore which looks less appealing imo.

 

1.25

 

1.2

 

The two night shots are taken at the same time of day.

Edited July 15, 2011 by fondlemyballs