AnthMUFC-Champs Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 Rockstar would simply not even consider this idea tbh i dont like it either. A mean what would be to look forward too if there was a sequel . you dont want them to make the best game possible on the grounds that they might not be able to beat it next time round? If it was the last ever GTA then yes of course, but for now Rockstar would not touch that idea in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tempz1992 Posted June 22, 2011 Author Share Posted June 22, 2011 There would still be content for new game's storie's character's as the world developes the Way people interact, 20gig would not touch my console and for me personally would download in 20mins or so, But thats just me and i realise alot of people cannot do that, still was a spur of the moment idea, and its always nice to get feedback negative or positive, and i thank all of you for not turning this into a rage QQ thread and acually talking about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyger16 Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 Rockstar would simply not even consider this idea tbh i dont like it either. A mean what would be to look forward too if there was a sequel . you dont want them to make the best game possible on the grounds that they might not be able to beat it next time round? If it was the last ever GTA then yes of course, but for now Rockstar would not touch that idea in my opinion. I don't understand that logic. Personally I think Rockstar, as one of the world's leading game developers, should be constantly striving to make their next title the best they possibly can. They way I see it, the quicker they crack the genre, having every possible type of gameplay feature, the more experimental they can get with their stories and character development. I'm not interested in holding back material because I don't want a game to be too awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kwandilibro Posted June 23, 2011 Share Posted June 23, 2011 I'm not interested in holding back material because I don't want a game to be too awesome. That's what R* decided against with SA, and as a result, people were spoiled and thus disappointed with IV, expecting SA 2.0 or something. You've got to hold something back so fans have something to look forward to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d0mm2k8 Posted June 23, 2011 Share Posted June 23, 2011 Personally I think Rockstar, as one of the world's leading game developers, should be constantly striving to make their next title the best they possibly can. They ignore the PC platform so I doubt they would do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now