One character from the III era

[NotoriousKiller]

CJ or Caesar from SA.

 

I name both of them because either one of them could of been eliminated by now but the one who survives will have a big impact on Los Santos and even San Andreas.

[Sgt_Tricore]

i think ur mum she was a goood character

[King Of Monra]

None. I want the GTA III era to be left alone.

You seem to have missed the point... Bad.

If I could choose one character from the GTA III era, I wouldn't, understand?

Yeah, I understand. I understand that you missed the entire point of the topic.

Whatever helps you sleep at night.

So you're just here to get your post count up?

[Banks.]

Tricore, HAHA your banned and don't come back (I hope your reading this)

 

King Of Monra, just leave It. You may not of seen my last post but I'm warning you three to take It to PM and not to spam the topic with this arguement.

 

It's like separating a three way brawl...

[mrpain]

Tricore, HAHA your banned and don't come back (I hope your reading this)

 

King Of Monra, just leave It. You may not of seen my last post but I'm warning you three to take It to PM and not to spam the topic with this arguement.

 

It's like separating a three way brawl...

More like a three-way catfight. Cause you all them bitches argue over the slightest things.

 

One more thing I would like to see return is another Love Fist. Not the actual band from Vice City but maybe a similar band like them. Sure there were some original music in IV but nothing beats Love Fist classic 80s rock.

[King Of Monra]

 

Tricore, HAHA your banned and don't come back (I hope your reading this)

 

King Of Monra, just leave It. You may not of seen my last post but I'm warning you three to take It to PM and not to spam the topic with this arguement.

 

It's like separating a three way brawl...

I didn't take part in the argument that those two were having, I was stating the obvious.

 

Regardless of that, I'll keep on topic so I don't piss off more people, or worse, moderators.

You do know that you're not a mod right?

 

Back to topic (By the way, you are off topic.)

 

 

Another person I'd like to have an apperence would perhaps be Lance vance dance (Yes I know that you kill him) But I want to kill him one more time.

 

I don't see why we have to only chose people who didn't die in the game.

[Jimmarn]

Tommy Vercetti

 

Because he was awesome

[TrevorSpeed914]

I'm a Claude fan. Personally, I'd like to see all the III era protagonists in a game together with the IV ones.

 

And I love how people are so quick to dismiss 3 era from returning just because Rockstar has denied it. As I recall, lying is a frequent act of all human beings.

[Banks.]

Tricore, HAHA your banned and don't come back (I hope your reading this)

 

King Of Monra, just leave It. You may not of seen my last post but I'm warning you three to take It to PM and not to spam the topic with this arguement.

 

It's like separating a three way brawl...

I didn't take part in the argument that those two were having, I was stating the obvious.

 

Regardless of that, I'll keep on topic so I don't piss off more people, or worse, moderators.

You do know that you're not a mod right?

 

Back to topic (By the way, you are off topic.)

 

 

Another person I'd like to have an apperence would perhaps be Lance vance dance (Yes I know that you kill him) But I want to kill him one more time.

 

I don't see why we have to only chose people who didn't die in the game.

Yeah I know and this is my topic. I wanted people to post there views but no you had to step In even though it's not your argument.

 

 

So leave this topic if you don't have anything to say that is on topic.

[King Of Monra]

 

Tricore, HAHA your banned and don't come back (I hope your reading this)

 

King Of Monra, just leave It. You may not of seen my last post but I'm warning you three to take It to PM and not to spam the topic with this arguement.

 

It's like separating a three way brawl...

I didn't take part in the argument that those two were having, I was stating the obvious.

 

Regardless of that, I'll keep on topic so I don't piss off more people, or worse, moderators.

You do know that you're not a mod right?

 

Back to topic (By the way, you are off topic.)

 

 

Another person I'd like to have an apperence would perhaps be Lance vance dance (Yes I know that you kill him) But I want to kill him one more time.

 

I don't see why we have to only chose people who didn't die in the game.

Yeah I know and this is my topic. I wanted people to post there views but no you had to step In even though it's not your argument.

 

 

So leave this topic if you don't have anything to say that is on topic.

It's quite ironic how you say you want to keep on topic, but you keep arguing over this, and I've also stayed on topic with my posts, unlike you just did here.

 

And back to topic now shall we?

 

 

[Banks.]

Yeah whatever

[Ryan]

If you guys want to argue, take it to PM's, otherwise shut up and move on.

[Banks.]

If you guys want to argue, take it to PM's, otherwise shut up and move on.

Yeah It's what I've been telling him for ages. It's a topic that I want to actually have disscusion

 

 

jimmarn, I expected a lot to say Tommy Vercetti. He Is an awesome character and he would be In my top 10 definitely

[Kwandilibro]

I'm a Claude fan. Personally, I'd like to see all the III era protagonists in a game together with the IV ones.

 

And I love how people are so quick to dismiss 3 era from returning just because Rockstar has denied it. As I recall, lying is a frequent act of all human beings.

Yeah, we dismiss the III era because R* sad so. We're not making the game, so R* has the first and final say. Anyway, what would be the point of creating a whole new era with different characters, stories and such to revert back to something old. And merging the two? Yeah right.

[TrevorSpeed914]

I'm a Claude fan. Personally, I'd like to see all the III era protagonists in a game together with the IV ones.

 

And I love how people are so quick to dismiss 3 era from returning just because Rockstar has denied it. As I recall, lying is a frequent act of all human beings.

Yeah, we dismiss the III era because R* sad so. We're not making the game, so R* has the first and final say. Anyway, what would be the point of creating a whole new era with different characters, stories and such to revert back to something old. And merging the two? Yeah right.

There's a reason you have Beiber for an avatar. It says something about your reasoning process, buddy.

[GTA_stu]

There's a reason you think that, it's called not being on the forums around the time of E3, bucky.

[Kwandilibro]

I'm a Claude fan. Personally, I'd like to see all the III era protagonists in a game together with the IV ones.

 

And I love how people are so quick to dismiss 3 era from returning just because Rockstar has denied it. As I recall, lying is a frequent act of all human beings.

Yeah, we dismiss the III era because R* sad so. We're not making the game, so R* has the first and final say. Anyway, what would be the point of creating a whole new era with different characters, stories and such to revert back to something old. And merging the two? Yeah right.

There's a reason you have Beiber for an avatar. It says something about your reasoning process, buddy.

I'll tell you what: you go ahead expecting R* to resurrect the III era, which they clearly ended. I'll take the rational route and assume that when R* says it's over, it's over. While you're at it, you can pull your head out of your ass and maybe pay attention every now and then.

[Banks.]

I'm a Claude fan. Personally, I'd like to see all the III era protagonists in a game together with the IV ones.

 

And I love how people are so quick to dismiss 3 era from returning just because Rockstar has denied it. As I recall, lying is a frequent act of all human beings.

Yeah, we dismiss the III era because R* sad so. We're not making the game, so R* has the first and final say. Anyway, what would be the point of creating a whole new era with different characters, stories and such to revert back to something old. And merging the two? Yeah right.

There's a reason you have Beiber for an avatar. It says something about your reasoning process, buddy.

It doesn't matter if he has Bieber avatar because it was a bet.

 

III era characters will not return and I can guarantee it.

[hu6]

I want to see Truth from SA or at least a character similar to him, or maybe his son

[Filip]

III era characters will not return and I can guarantee it.

 

I can guarantee that Claude will die in GTA V

[GTA_stu]

 

III era characters will not return and I can guarantee it.

 

I can guarantee that Claude will die in GTA V

 

 

You can guarantee no III era characters to return, but you can also guarantee that Claude (a III era character) will die?

Contradiction win.

[pdbq]

IMO, the chances of niko returning are high, especially after the plane ticket Easter egg thing was found, same goes for packie, so if my predictions are correct then it is unlikely to be GTA V? more likely GTA:(IV)<location>?

[Kwandilibro]

IMO, the chances of niko returning are high, especially after the plane ticket Easter egg thing was found, same goes for packie, so if my predictions are correct then it is unlikely to be GTA V? more likely GTA:(IV)<location>?

He also pledged to end his life of crime and lead a normal life.

[TrevorSpeed914]

I'm a Claude fan. Personally, I'd like to see all the III era protagonists in a game together with the IV ones.

 

And I love how people are so quick to dismiss 3 era from returning just because Rockstar has denied it. As I recall, lying is a frequent act of all human beings.

Yeah, we dismiss the III era because R* sad so. We're not making the game, so R* has the first and final say. Anyway, what would be the point of creating a whole new era with different characters, stories and such to revert back to something old. And merging the two? Yeah right.

There's a reason you have Beiber for an avatar. It says something about your reasoning process, buddy.

I'll tell you what: you go ahead expecting R* to resurrect the III era, which they clearly ended. I'll take the rational route and assume that when R* says it's over, it's over. While you're at it, you can pull your head out of your ass and maybe pay attention every now and then.

It amazes me how worked up you Beibers get over a game, and whenever someone mentions the possibility of a 3 era character returning.

 

I suppose if Coke said there's no difference between American Coke (Which has Corn Syrup) and Mexican Coke (Which has real sugar), you'd believe them.

[Kwandilibro]

I'm a Claude fan. Personally, I'd like to see all the III era protagonists in a game together with the IV ones.

 

And I love how people are so quick to dismiss 3 era from returning just because Rockstar has denied it. As I recall, lying is a frequent act of all human beings.

Yeah, we dismiss the III era because R* sad so. We're not making the game, so R* has the first and final say. Anyway, what would be the point of creating a whole new era with different characters, stories and such to revert back to something old. And merging the two? Yeah right.

There's a reason you have Beiber for an avatar. It says something about your reasoning process, buddy.

I'll tell you what: you go ahead expecting R* to resurrect the III era, which they clearly ended. I'll take the rational route and assume that when R* says it's over, it's over. While you're at it, you can pull your head out of your ass and maybe pay attention every now and then.

It amazes me how worked up you Beibers get over a game, and whenever someone mentions the possibility of a 3 era character returning.

 

I suppose if Coke said there's no difference between American Coke (Which has Corn Syrup) and Mexican Coke (Which has real sugar), you'd believe them.

What the hell are you talking about?

[TrevorSpeed914]

I'm a Claude fan. Personally, I'd like to see all the III era protagonists in a game together with the IV ones.

 

And I love how people are so quick to dismiss 3 era from returning just because Rockstar has denied it. As I recall, lying is a frequent act of all human beings.

Yeah, we dismiss the III era because R* sad so. We're not making the game, so R* has the first and final say. Anyway, what would be the point of creating a whole new era with different characters, stories and such to revert back to something old. And merging the two? Yeah right.

There's a reason you have Beiber for an avatar. It says something about your reasoning process, buddy.

I'll tell you what: you go ahead expecting R* to resurrect the III era, which they clearly ended. I'll take the rational route and assume that when R* says it's over, it's over. While you're at it, you can pull your head out of your ass and maybe pay attention every now and then.

It amazes me how worked up you Beibers get over a game, and whenever someone mentions the possibility of a 3 era character returning.

 

I suppose if Coke said there's no difference between American Coke (Which has Corn Syrup) and Mexican Coke (Which has real sugar), you'd believe them.

What the hell are you talking about?

Look, I certainly respect the idea of "if Rockstar says so," but some of us don't believe that. You need to check your medication, because people are allowed to have differing opinions than you Beiber fans.

 

I suppose I'm not a normal poster here, because I'm over eighteen, spend more time working on college work than playing video games, and don't have a Beiber avatar. I guess not having a life makes you feel the need to relinquish yourself on a GTA board.

[darkplague]

I'm a Claude fan. Personally, I'd like to see all the III era protagonists in a game together with the IV ones.

 

And I love how people are so quick to dismiss 3 era from returning just because Rockstar has denied it. As I recall, lying is a frequent act of all human beings.

Yeah, we dismiss the III era because R* sad so. We're not making the game, so R* has the first and final say. Anyway, what would be the point of creating a whole new era with different characters, stories and such to revert back to something old. And merging the two? Yeah right.

There's a reason you have Beiber for an avatar. It says something about your reasoning process, buddy.

I'll tell you what: you go ahead expecting R* to resurrect the III era, which they clearly ended. I'll take the rational route and assume that when R* says it's over, it's over. While you're at it, you can pull your head out of your ass and maybe pay attention every now and then.

It amazes me how worked up you Beibers get over a game, and whenever someone mentions the possibility of a 3 era character returning.

 

I suppose if Coke said there's no difference between American Coke (Which has Corn Syrup) and Mexican Coke (Which has real sugar), you'd believe them.

you're tellin me they have a better tasting, healthier coke drink, and they still flee their country for this bull sh*t? ...amazing....

[darkplague]

IMO, the chances of niko returning are high, especially after the plane ticket Easter egg thing was found, same goes for packie, so if my predictions are correct then it is unlikely to be GTA V? more likely GTA:(IV)<location>?

He also pledged to end his life of crime and lead a normal life.

Didn't Niko plan to come to America to "live the American Dream?" ...and Tommy was supposed to make a simple drug deal......Cj just wanted to bury his moms....yeah, they were still criminals, but the circumstances made them worse....I'm not saying you're wrong...im just saying, GTA characters have a way of not making good on their plans for the straight and narrow....

[Mister Pink]

 

Mike Toreno. The greatest GTA character of all time. James Woods for the win!

This

 

Or... Ken Rosenberg.

 

 

Yeah, we dismiss the III era because R* sad so. We're not making the game, so R* has the first and final say. Anyway, what would be the point of creating a whole new era with different characters, stories and such to revert back to something old. And merging the two? Yeah right.

 

You dismiss the III era?

 

Your logic is not sound. Creating a new era? Every GTA is a new era and with your logic, why should any of the GTAs have intertwining stories with reoccurring characters?

Edited June 24, 2011 by ThePinkFloydSound

[Filip]

You can guarantee no III era characters to return, but you can also guarantee that Claude (a III era character) will die?

Contradiction win.

 

 

SRY, that was supposed to be as quote :E