Timed exclusive for nintendo feel/cafe/2

[diablo440]

GTA main-franchise on a cell-phone chip, I still get a laugh out of this BS ^^

You do realize that only the DS line of Nintendo products has EVER used ARM right? Gamecube and Wii both use PowerPC processors, just like the 360 and PS3, and the Café is rumored to have the same or a better version of the 360's PowerPC CPU.

 

I don't know where your information comes from, but it is false and misleading.

730Mhz PPC and a ARM chip with a ATI GPU all clocked around 200Mhz. This is why people knew all the Wii claims were BS, and the next Nintendo unit is still going to be based around ARM and efficiency.

 

I'm sure you know all about it though..

[Rent>A<Line99]

GTA main-franchise on a cell-phone chip, I still get a laugh out of this BS ^^

You do realize that only the DS line of Nintendo products has EVER used ARM right? Gamecube and Wii both use PowerPC processors, just like the 360 and PS3, and the Café is rumored to have the same or a better version of the 360's PowerPC CPU.

 

I don't know where your information comes from, but it is false and misleading.

730Mhz PPC and a ARM chip with a ATI GPU all clocked around 200Mhz. This is why people knew all the Wii claims were BS, and the next Nintendo unit is still going to be based around ARM and efficiency.

 

I'm sure you know all about it though..

You have Nintendo's next system in your hands?

[UserCommenter]

GTA main-franchise on a cell-phone chip, I still get a laugh out of this BS ^^

You do realize that only the DS line of Nintendo products has EVER used ARM right? Gamecube and Wii both use PowerPC processors, just like the 360 and PS3, and the Café is rumored to have the same or a better version of the 360's PowerPC CPU.

 

I don't know where your information comes from, but it is false and misleading.

730Mhz PPC and a ARM chip with a ATI GPU all clocked around 200Mhz. This is why people knew all the Wii claims were BS, and the next Nintendo unit is still going to be based around ARM and efficiency.

 

I'm sure you know all about it though..

You have Nintendo's next system in your hands?

The last thing Nintendo did was the N64... That will forever be their greatest creation an sadly nothing they will do would be correct anymore... Weirdly enough even though they make a crap arse console they sell more of it then the competitors. -_- Though look at what sony did, the ps2 is still the most played console of all. If not the console itself the games are. I'm replaying all the PS2 GTA games right now for 100% on my ps3. lol

[jnzooger]

GTA main-franchise on a cell-phone chip, I still get a laugh out of this BS ^^

You do realize that only the DS line of Nintendo products has EVER used ARM right? Gamecube and Wii both use PowerPC processors, just like the 360 and PS3, and the Café is rumored to have the same or a better version of the 360's PowerPC CPU.

 

I don't know where your information comes from, but it is false and misleading.

730Mhz PPC and a ARM chip with a ATI GPU all clocked around 200Mhz. This is why people knew all the Wii claims were BS, and the next Nintendo unit is still going to be based around ARM and efficiency.

 

I'm sure you know all about it though..

No, its a PPC CPU and an ATI videocard with an ARM-based sub processor for controlling wireless functions ONLY. (WiFi, Bluetooth...) You need to get your facts straight before you start posting BS. (And stop giving ARM so little credit, Windows 8 is going to run on ARM, and we all know how much of a CPU hog Windows is.)

 

The claims about the next Nintendo console say that it will be a 3 core PPC CPU at the same or higher clock as the 360, with ATI video as well, and that it will have a Wii built in just like the Wii had a Gamecube built in. So the only thing ARM based on it would likely be for the WiFi, Bluetooth, or the touchscreen in the controller.

[Finn 7 five 11]

 

GTA main-franchise on a cell-phone chip, I still get a laugh out of this BS ^^

You do realize that only the DS line of Nintendo products has EVER used ARM right? Gamecube and Wii both use PowerPC processors, just like the 360 and PS3, and the Café is rumored to have the same or a better version of the 360's PowerPC CPU.

 

I don't know where your information comes from, but it is false and misleading.

730Mhz PPC and a ARM chip with a ATI GPU all clocked around 200Mhz. This is why people knew all the Wii claims were BS, and the next Nintendo unit is still going to be based around ARM and efficiency.

 

I'm sure you know all about it though..

You have Nintendo's next system in your hands?

The last thing Nintendo did was the N64... That will forever be their greatest creation an sadly nothing they will do would be correct anymore... Weirdly enough even though they make a crap arse console they sell more of it then the competitors. -_- Though look at what sony did, the ps2 is still the most played console of all. If not the console itself the games are. I'm replaying all the PS2 GTA games right now for 100% on my ps3. lol

They sell more because they stood out from the crowd, motion sensors instead of controllers, games for everyone, and it was cheap.

 

I prefer my PS3...but each to their own, you obviously are not interested in the wii's game selection. define sh*tness? Is a PS2 sh*t? No it isn't, even though it isn't as powerful as wii so i don't know what you mean by that.

 

@jnzooger, i am with you on people spouting bullsh*t, most have no clue what they are talking about and decide they will troll about it, its ridiculous.

I have faith in Nintendo, even though these buffoons are quick to put it down without actually knowing much about it.

I also fail to see whats wrong with ARM whether or not it is implemented in Nintendos next installment, which it supposedly isn't.

[UserCommenter]

 

GTA main-franchise on a cell-phone chip, I still get a laugh out of this BS ^^

You do realize that only the DS line of Nintendo products has EVER used ARM right? Gamecube and Wii both use PowerPC processors, just like the 360 and PS3, and the Café is rumored to have the same or a better version of the 360's PowerPC CPU.

 

I don't know where your information comes from, but it is false and misleading.

730Mhz PPC and a ARM chip with a ATI GPU all clocked around 200Mhz. This is why people knew all the Wii claims were BS, and the next Nintendo unit is still going to be based around ARM and efficiency.

 

I'm sure you know all about it though..

You have Nintendo's next system in your hands?

The last thing Nintendo did was the N64... That will forever be their greatest creation an sadly nothing they will do would be correct anymore... Weirdly enough even though they make a crap arse console they sell more of it then the competitors. -_- Though look at what sony did, the ps2 is still the most played console of all. If not the console itself the games are. I'm replaying all the PS2 GTA games right now for 100% on my ps3. lol

They sell more because they stood out from the crowd, motion sensors instead of controllers, games for everyone, and it was cheap.

 

I prefer my PS3...but each to their own, you obviously are not interested in the wii's game selection. define sh*tness? Is a PS2 sh*t? No it isn't, even though it isn't as powerful as wii so i don't know what you mean by that.

 

@jnzooger, i am with you on people spouting bullsh*t, most have no clue what they are talking about and decide they will troll about it, its ridiculous.

I have faith in Nintendo, even though these buffoons are quick to put it down without actually knowing much about it.

I also fail to see whats wrong with ARM whether or not it is implemented in Nintendos next installment, which it supposedly isn't.

They stood out because it was family orientated like others said before. There is a few good reasons to have a wii, but they are not to use its motion sensors. I don't really think I need to define "crap arse" (didn't say sh*tness) as you should know what someone means when they say a console is crap. >_> I wasn't calling the PS2 sh*t if thats what you mean. I was simply stating that a console released in 2000 is still the most played console.

Edited May 18, 2011 by UserCommenter

[Kratos2000]

I didn't even think about buying GTA V at all. I could get the same entertainment from GoW:Portable Collection/RDR/U3.

Especially if they decide to go with Nintendo.

[Capricornus]

It's cute yet funny how everyone likes to diss the Wii/Nintendo when it's the best selling console out of the three. Me owning all 3 consoles, I find a certain joy in this.

 

Now, as for a GTA game being exclusive to a Nintendo console (after China Town Wars of course), hey, I wouldn't mind getting it. But at the same time I can't really see it happening because of Nintendo's rep for supposedly being able to only make "kiddy games", and R*/T2 may look at that.

 

Either way I'll be getting the Wii 2 or whatever it'll be called.

[jnzooger]

But at the same time I can't really see it happening because of Nintendo's rep for supposedly being able to only make "kiddy games", and R*/T2 may look at that.

Rockstar have talked about loving working with Nintendo a few times in the past, most notably when Manhunt 2 and Chinatown Wars were announced.

[WhistleBlower]

I don't think GTA will ever cross Nintendo's lips. Nor any other mature game.

GTA: Chinatown Wars, Red Steel, Resident Evil 4 etc.

 

But yeah, the simple fact is that GTA games are almost always marketed to the Sony, Microsoft, and PC crowds. They will never go down the exclusive route again. No self-respecting company out there wants to lose money.

[Finn 7 five 11]

They stood out because it was family orientated like others said before. There is a few good reasons to have a wii, but they are not to use its motion sensors.

Now days the motion controller is outdated, but when it was released it was pretty new tech to the public, if it isn't a reason to buy a wii then why did PS3 and Xbox move down the same route? The Motion controller was definitely a big selling point of the wii (not so much now)

[SheHePaedo]

Why are some people saying "if" Wii 2 is more powerful than 360 and PS3.......of course it will. It'll blow both away put together. If not then why bother?

 

I have a funny feeling that GTA V will be on Wii 2 first. Just take the controller for example. The screen could be used for map, phone, weapon and other information without detracting from what's happening on screen.

 

Maybe RS after marking RDR had bigger ideas for doing the next GTA and were looking to the next generation? With MS & Sony not putting forward anything for a couple of years, Nintendo is RS's viable option.

 

If this happened it would be a strange world we live in wouldn't it?

[Long_Haired_Boy]

GTA V is not going to be exclusive to the Wii 2(Project Cafe).

 

[UserCommenter]

They stood out because it was family orientated like others said before. There is a few good reasons to have a wii, but they are not to use its motion sensors.

Now days the motion controller is outdated, but when it was released it was pretty new tech to the public, if it isn't a reason to buy a wii then why did PS3 and Xbox move down the same route? The Motion controller was definitely a big selling point of the wii (not so much now)

From my understanding, sony and microsoft had already were in the process of creating their motion crap. I think they had ideas made up the around the sametime the WII was created. It just took them this long to get them out to the public. Like you said, the wii was new tech and people thought it was cool. It was the cheapest console so people went for it. Then they bought over 50 games because its so damn boring. You compare that to xbox or ps3, nintendo won that, but their popularity sucks compared to ps3 and xbox. To people who know much about gaming will say the wii is only good for games such as smash bros.

 

I doubt the Cafe or w/e they want to call it will blow away the competitors at all because nintendo knows not to make an expensive console. I sure their max for their new console will be 300$ and that won't get them much further then the ps3 and xbox is because they still have to think about their motion crap they need to upgrade to make better then it is. Its like the 3ds... Not much of an improvement what so ever except the 3d that gives everyone headaches. Nintendo is going for uniqueness as microsoft and sony are going for gaming. Ds - 3ds not much of an improvement. Psp1000 - ngp. Ngp supposedly can play ps3 games lol. So I really doubt nintendo will out do xbox360 and the ps3.

[gtaftw69]

 

They stood out because it was family orientated like others said before. There is a few good reasons to have a wii, but they are not to use its motion sensors.

Now days the motion controller is outdated, but when it was released it was pretty new tech to the public, if it isn't a reason to buy a wii then why did PS3 and Xbox move down the same route? The Motion controller was definitely a big selling point of the wii (not so much now)

I may just be being pedantic but the kinect is not a motion controller as such, there is no controller!!!!

 

sorry for being so anal!

 

hahahah i said anal

[jnzooger]

They stood out because it was family orientated like others said before. There is a few good reasons to have a wii, but they are not to use its motion sensors.

Now days the motion controller is outdated, but when it was released it was pretty new tech to the public, if it isn't a reason to buy a wii then why did PS3 and Xbox move down the same route? The Motion controller was definitely a big selling point of the wii (not so much now)

From my understanding, sony and microsoft had already were in the process of creating their motion crap. I think they had ideas made up the around the sametime the WII was created. It just took them this long to get them out to the public. Like you said, the wii was new tech and people thought it was cool. It was the cheapest console so people went for it. Then they bought over 50 games because its so damn boring. You compare that to xbox or ps3, nintendo won that, but their popularity sucks compared to ps3 and xbox. To people who know much about gaming will say the wii is only good for games such as smash bros.

 

I doubt the Cafe or w/e they want to call it will blow away the competitors at all because nintendo knows not to make an expensive console. I sure their max for their new console will be 300$ and that won't get them much further then the ps3 and xbox is because they still have to think about their motion crap they need to upgrade to make better then it is. Its like the 3ds... Not much of an improvement what so ever except the 3d that gives everyone headaches. Nintendo is going for uniqueness as microsoft and sony are going for gaming. Ds - 3ds not much of an improvement. Psp1000 - ngp. Ngp supposedly can play ps3 games lol. So I really doubt nintendo will out do xbox360 and the ps3.

Nintendo announced the Wii, then Sony said a week or so later, "Oh, our controller is motion control too! But we had to change the boomerang shape." It is 100% clear that the SIXAXIS was a last minute addon to the PS3 to compete with the Wii's motion control.

[abottig]

This has been brought up before all over the web.

 

Rockstar is talking to Nintendo about releasing GTAV on the Wii2(?). That doesn't mean it will be exclusive.

 

I predict GTAV will be released for all three platforms(360/ps3/wii2) simultaneously, with the Wii2 version being the superior version... Until PC is released and patched like hell.

[SheHePaedo]

This has been brought up before all over the web.

 

Rockstar is talking to Nintendo about releasing GTAV on the Wii2(?). That doesn't mean it will be exclusive.

 

I predict GTAV will be released for all three platforms(360/ps3/wii2) simultaneously, with the Wii2 version being the superior version... Until PC is released and patched like hell.

I don't want a new GTA held back by the old tech of the 360 & PS3 if it is going to appear on the Wii 2 as well. Ok that sucks for present 360 & PS3 owners - but wouldn't you prefer to play a vastly superior game?

[UserCommenter]

They stood out because it was family orientated like others said before. There is a few good reasons to have a wii, but they are not to use its motion sensors.

Now days the motion controller is outdated, but when it was released it was pretty new tech to the public, if it isn't a reason to buy a wii then why did PS3 and Xbox move down the same route? The Motion controller was definitely a big selling point of the wii (not so much now)

From my understanding, sony and microsoft had already were in the process of creating their motion crap. I think they had ideas made up the around the sametime the WII was created. It just took them this long to get them out to the public. Like you said, the wii was new tech and people thought it was cool. It was the cheapest console so people went for it. Then they bought over 50 games because its so damn boring. You compare that to xbox or ps3, nintendo won that, but their popularity sucks compared to ps3 and xbox. To people who know much about gaming will say the wii is only good for games such as smash bros.

 

I doubt the Cafe or w/e they want to call it will blow away the competitors at all because nintendo knows not to make an expensive console. I sure their max for their new console will be 300$ and that won't get them much further then the ps3 and xbox is because they still have to think about their motion crap they need to upgrade to make better then it is. Its like the 3ds... Not much of an improvement what so ever except the 3d that gives everyone headaches. Nintendo is going for uniqueness as microsoft and sony are going for gaming. Ds - 3ds not much of an improvement. Psp1000 - ngp. Ngp supposedly can play ps3 games lol. So I really doubt nintendo will out do xbox360 and the ps3.

Nintendo announced the Wii, then Sony said a week or so later, "Oh, our controller is motion control too! But we had to change the boomerang shape." It is 100% clear that the SIXAXIS was a last minute addon to the PS3 to compete with the Wii's motion control.

Thats what I said. Sony was in the process of creating it around the same time the Wii was created. -_- Unless you consider a week an eternity.

 

Anyways the PS3 has already been being held back by the xbox 360. No I'm not saying because the xbox360 is worse blah blah blah. Its because game creators keep porting the sh*t and the port is so horrible it just works like crap on the other console.

[jnzooger]

 

They stood out because it was family orientated like others said before. There is a few good reasons to have a wii, but they are not to use its motion sensors.

Now days the motion controller is outdated, but when it was released it was pretty new tech to the public, if it isn't a reason to buy a wii then why did PS3 and Xbox move down the same route? The Motion controller was definitely a big selling point of the wii (not so much now)

From my understanding, sony and microsoft had already were in the process of creating their motion crap. I think they had ideas made up the around the sametime the WII was created. It just took them this long to get them out to the public. Like you said, the wii was new tech and people thought it was cool. It was the cheapest console so people went for it. Then they bought over 50 games because its so damn boring. You compare that to xbox or ps3, nintendo won that, but their popularity sucks compared to ps3 and xbox. To people who know much about gaming will say the wii is only good for games such as smash bros.

 

I doubt the Cafe or w/e they want to call it will blow away the competitors at all because nintendo knows not to make an expensive console. I sure their max for their new console will be 300$ and that won't get them much further then the ps3 and xbox is because they still have to think about their motion crap they need to upgrade to make better then it is. Its like the 3ds... Not much of an improvement what so ever except the 3d that gives everyone headaches. Nintendo is going for uniqueness as microsoft and sony are going for gaming. Ds - 3ds not much of an improvement. Psp1000 - ngp. Ngp supposedly can play ps3 games lol. So I really doubt nintendo will out do xbox360 and the ps3.

Nintendo announced the Wii, then Sony said a week or so later, "Oh, our controller is motion control too! But we had to change the boomerang shape." It is 100% clear that the SIXAXIS was a last minute addon to the PS3 to compete with the Wii's motion control.

Thats what I said. Sony was in the process of creating it around the same time the Wii was created. -_- Unless you consider a week an eternity.

 

Anyways the PS3 has already been being held back by the xbox 360. No I'm not saying because the xbox360 is worse blah blah blah. Its because game creators keep porting the sh*t and the port is so horrible it just works like crap on the other console.

No what I am saying is when they saw the Wii's motion controller, they said to themselves, "Oh crap, we gotta do that too!" So a week later they announced that they now have the same thing, without actually showing it. It wasn't til just before launch that they actually had it finalized.

 

And in that regard, the PS3 is holding the 360 back. If everything was console exclusive, everything would be up to its fullest potential. (Not being a fanboy here, just turning the argument around the other way, cause both sides are equally true.)

[Sean_R_LFC]

If GTA 5 or whatever else wasnt on the PC R* would go Bankrupt in a instance.

Don't talk sh*te, GTAIV wasn't released for a good while on the PC did R* go bankrupt? did they f*ck

[creat3d22]

 

People were buying X360 just for IV and episodes and it was OK for them. So what's the problem with buying Wii 2 just for next GTA?

Well, for starters, that would involve buying a ******* Wii...

 

Anyone buying this "Nintendo exclusive" BS probably gets excited every time some financial analyst magically predicts that R* will release the game "next quarter".

And how many of these Wall Streeters have made such claims about the next GTA, already? How many of them turned out to be right? How many of them knew a goddamn thing about how far along the development of the game is, or anything about the game industry?

 

 

 

 

If GTA 5 or whatever else wasnt on the PC R* would go Bankrupt in a instance.

Where have you been for the past decade?! The number of publishers giving a damn about PCs is now slim to none.

Edited May 20, 2011 by creat3d22

[creat3d22]

Double post, sorry.

[Finn 7 five 11]

People were buying X360 just for IV and episodes and it was OK for them. So what's the problem with buying Wii 2 just for next GTA?

Well, for starters, that would involve buying a ******* Wii...

 

Anyone buying this "Nintendo exclusive" BS probably gets excited every time some financial analyst magically predicts that R* will release the game "next quarter".

And how many of these Wall Streeters have made such claims about the next GTA, already? How many of them turned out to be right? How many of them knew a goddamn thing about how far along the development of the game is, or anything about the game industry?

 

 

 

 

If GTA 5 or whatever else wasnt on the PC R* would go Bankrupt in a instance.

Where have you been for the past decade?! The number of publishers giving a damn about PCs is now slim to none.

I doubt an exclusive but it is possible that it would be released on the Nintendo NeXt console before reaching other platforms, i think i would buy the platform just for that.

[creat3d22]

I can see it being released on any platform strong enough to handle it. If Nintendo's next console fits the bill, there's no reason not to release the game for it.

I really don't see an exclusive with Nintendo happening though.

[UserCommenter]

They stood out because it was family orientated like others said before. There is a few good reasons to have a wii, but they are not to use its motion sensors.

Now days the motion controller is outdated, but when it was released it was pretty new tech to the public, if it isn't a reason to buy a wii then why did PS3 and Xbox move down the same route? The Motion controller was definitely a big selling point of the wii (not so much now)

From my understanding, sony and microsoft had already were in the process of creating their motion crap. I think they had ideas made up the around the sametime the WII was created. It just took them this long to get them out to the public. Like you said, the wii was new tech and people thought it was cool. It was the cheapest console so people went for it. Then they bought over 50 games because its so damn boring. You compare that to xbox or ps3, nintendo won that, but their popularity sucks compared to ps3 and xbox. To people who know much about gaming will say the wii is only good for games such as smash bros.

 

I doubt the Cafe or w/e they want to call it will blow away the competitors at all because nintendo knows not to make an expensive console. I sure their max for their new console will be 300$ and that won't get them much further then the ps3 and xbox is because they still have to think about their motion crap they need to upgrade to make better then it is. Its like the 3ds... Not much of an improvement what so ever except the 3d that gives everyone headaches. Nintendo is going for uniqueness as microsoft and sony are going for gaming. Ds - 3ds not much of an improvement. Psp1000 - ngp. Ngp supposedly can play ps3 games lol. So I really doubt nintendo will out do xbox360 and the ps3.

Nintendo announced the Wii, then Sony said a week or so later, "Oh, our controller is motion control too! But we had to change the boomerang shape." It is 100% clear that the SIXAXIS was a last minute addon to the PS3 to compete with the Wii's motion control.

Thats what I said. Sony was in the process of creating it around the same time the Wii was created. -_- Unless you consider a week an eternity.

 

Anyways the PS3 has already been being held back by the xbox 360. No I'm not saying because the xbox360 is worse blah blah blah. Its because game creators keep porting the sh*t and the port is so horrible it just works like crap on the other console.

No what I am saying is when they saw the Wii's motion controller, they said to themselves, "Oh crap, we gotta do that too!" So a week later they announced that they now have the same thing, without actually showing it. It wasn't til just before launch that they actually had it finalized.

 

And in that regard, the PS3 is holding the 360 back. If everything was console exclusive, everything would be up to its fullest potential. (Not being a fanboy here, just turning the argument around the other way, cause both sides are equally true.)

Uh no I'm quite sure that sony didn't just add all of the because of the Wii. It was just a last minute thing to add to the experience of gaming and the idea for move came around when the wii was released. Its obvious from IV that the ps3 didn't hold xbox back at all. Considering rockstar made it for the xbox the ported it over to the ps3. Same with all multi-platform games. Its always ported straight from xbox to the ps3 because its easier that way. Worse for ps3 players.

[jnzooger]

Its obvious from IV that the ps3 didn't hold xbox back at all. Considering rockstar made it for the xbox the ported it over to the ps3. Same with all multi-platform games. Its always ported straight from xbox to the ps3 because its easier that way. Worse for ps3 players.

Have a look at LA Noire before you say that. They did that one on the PS3 and then ported it to the 360, and the 360 version suffers because of it. The fact is, any exclusive is going to have a better chance than a port will, no matter which way it goes.

[Finn 7 five 11]

 

Its obvious from IV that the ps3 didn't hold xbox back at all. Considering rockstar made it for the xbox the ported it over to the ps3. Same with all multi-platform games. Its always ported straight from xbox to the ps3 because its easier that way. Worse for ps3 players.

Have a look at LA Noire before you say that. They did that one on the PS3 and then ported it to the 360, and the 360 version suffers because of it. The fact is, any exclusive is going to have a better chance than a port will, no matter which way it goes.

Yeah i am getting a little bugged by your incorrectness.

I suppose you learn from your mistakes.

I am with jnzooger that PS3 added the motion controller to help compete with the wii, who was and still is leaps and bounds ahead in terms of sales.

I have a PS3 but i am still pretty sure that it was a last minute add-on.

[UserCommenter]

 

Its obvious from IV that the ps3 didn't hold xbox back at all. Considering rockstar made it for the xbox the ported it over to the ps3. Same with all multi-platform games. Its always ported straight from xbox to the ps3 because its easier that way. Worse for ps3 players.

Have a look at LA Noire before you say that. They did that one on the PS3 and then ported it to the 360, and the 360 version suffers because of it. The fact is, any exclusive is going to have a better chance than a port will, no matter which way it goes.

Yeah i am getting a little bugged by your incorrectness.

I suppose you learn from your mistakes.

I am with jnzooger that PS3 added the motion controller to help compete with the wii, who was and still is leaps and bounds ahead in terms of sales.

I have a PS3 but i am still pretty sure that it was a last minute add-on.

I'm not incorrect at all. Sorry I don't care too much about LA Noire and didn't at all read up on it. Just now seen and ps3 did make the lead. Though from I just read it came out for the better and the problems xbox might be experiencing are not from the porting. If you did not know, the ps3 is harder to create games for and way easier to create on the xbox. Its why porting from xbox to ps3 never turns out good. You can't just make something hard instantly easy by doing it that way. So problems with the xbox I highly doubt is because of the porting. Though I'm sure if xbox does have a problem the ps3 does as well and its most likely a game error more then being a porting issue.

 

Sixaxis did come around towards the end of the wii but it was implanted into the controllers before the wii was released. sony wanted to have some motion in the controller. The move idea came shortly after the wii was created though... So no my "incorrectness" is not incorrect. It is a fact.

Edited May 21, 2011 by UserCommenter

[Finn 7 five 11]

Its obvious from IV that the ps3 didn't hold xbox back at all. Considering rockstar made it for the xbox the ported it over to the ps3. Same with all multi-platform games. Its always ported straight from xbox to the ps3 because its easier that way. Worse for ps3 players.

Have a look at LA Noire before you say that. They did that one on the PS3 and then ported it to the 360, and the 360 version suffers because of it. The fact is, any exclusive is going to have a better chance than a port will, no matter which way it goes.

Yeah i am getting a little bugged by your incorrectness.

I suppose you learn from your mistakes.

I am with jnzooger that PS3 added the motion controller to help compete with the wii, who was and still is leaps and bounds ahead in terms of sales.

I have a PS3 but i am still pretty sure that it was a last minute add-on.

I'm not incorrect at all. Sorry I don't care too much about LA Noire and didn't at all read up on it. Just now seen and ps3 did make the lead. Though from I just read it came out for the better and the problems xbox might be experiencing are not from the porting. If you did not know, the ps3 is harder to create games for and way easier to create on the xbox. Its why porting from xbox to ps3 never turns out good. You can't just make something hard instantly easy by doing it that way. So problems with the xbox I highly doubt is because of the porting. Though I'm sure if xbox does have a problem the ps3 does as well and its most likely a game error more then being a porting issue.

 

Sixaxis did come around towards the end of the wii but it was implanted into the controllers before the wii was released. sony wanted to have some motion in the controller. The move idea came shortly after the wii was created though... So no my "incorrectness" is not incorrect. It is a fact.

I still find it too much of a coincidence also i wouldn't say the PS3 would be harder to code, just different