Jesus'En'Hitler420 Posted May 9, 2011 Share Posted May 9, 2011 Dude just squirt some of your sterilized wank goo in to your moms mouth she'll probably remember why she regretted having you in the first place and kill herself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle F Posted May 9, 2011 Share Posted May 9, 2011 Dude just squirt some of your sterilized wank goo in to your moms mouth she'll probably remember why she regretted having you in the first place and kill herself And that's even more retarded and childish than GTAVideoGamer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nlitement Posted May 9, 2011 Share Posted May 9, 2011 The internet is so bad! It's full of perverts and should be shut off! Are you retarded? You can't "shut off" the Internet you fool. The Internet is a global system of interconnected computer networks that use the standard Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP) to serve billions of users globally. It'd take years to fully disconnect and shut down the Internet. Years if not generations... I shut down all root nameservers. What now? HAH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Scratch Posted May 9, 2011 Share Posted May 9, 2011 So your mom actually pays 7 bucks a month for this sh*t?.....Wait if i remember well which i probably don't if your using Vista maybe 7 and create another account on your PC some programs won't be carried over to the other account.At least that's what happend to me when using another account i couldn't find Mozilla at all.Might work for Xwatch.....maybe....probably not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGTAGamer Posted May 9, 2011 Share Posted May 9, 2011 You're 18 and your mother is treating you like you're 7? Sheesh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vercetti27 Posted May 9, 2011 Share Posted May 9, 2011 The internet is so bad! It's full of perverts and should be shut off! we aren't that bad..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasperHQ Posted May 9, 2011 Share Posted May 9, 2011 Erm .. buy your own computer/Laptop , then tell her not to touch it because its yours or cant you just uninstall it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobsEpicFret Posted May 9, 2011 Share Posted May 9, 2011 my mother or father do not put programs in my computer to see what i am doing because they trust me,and thats what good parents do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlackProject Posted May 9, 2011 Share Posted May 9, 2011 Dude just squirt some of your sterilized wank goo in to your moms mouth she'll probably remember why she regretted having you in the first place and kill herself All of your posts reminded me of why you're a f*cking sick bastard. I'm not even kidding, it's 100% of all the posts you ever made in this forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmlwin.1996 Posted May 10, 2011 Share Posted May 10, 2011 I think pornography is sometimes important for us. It is important for reproduction system. Tell your parents about that man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moth Posted May 10, 2011 Share Posted May 10, 2011 The internet is so bad! It's full of perverts and should be shut off! If you believe this, why the f*ck are you on the f*cking internet? A simple solution is for you to get the f*ck off! Chances are I'm replying to a troll or a f*cking dumb ass, so I have to ask myself, why the f*ck am I replying to bullsh*t like this. Formerly known as The General Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmlwin.1996 Posted May 10, 2011 Share Posted May 10, 2011 The internet is so bad! It's full of perverts and should be shut off! If you believe this, why the f*ck are you on the f*cking internet? A simple solution is for you to get the f*ck off! Chances are I'm replying to a troll or a f*cking dumb ass, so I have to ask myself, why the f*ck am I replying to bullsh*t like this. So, why you use so f*cks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moth Posted May 10, 2011 Share Posted May 10, 2011 The internet is so bad! It's full of perverts and should be shut off! If you believe this, why the f*ck are you on the f*cking internet? A simple solution is for you to get the f*ck off! Chances are I'm replying to a troll or a f*cking dumb ass, so I have to ask myself, why the f*ck am I replying to bullsh*t like this. So, why you use so f*cks? Why do you care? Are you are you a member of the don't cuss club? Because I really don't f*cking care, I really f*cking don't. Formerly known as The General Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scharkey Posted May 10, 2011 Share Posted May 10, 2011 Get out of the house as soon as possible and don't look back. Forget school! You can always go to college later when you have a stable job and place to live. Grants and scholarships are your friend! It seems like if she is this protective over your internet 'privileges' she must be just as bad in other areas as well. Do you even get to have fresh air more than an hour a day that isn't restricted to your back yard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle F Posted May 10, 2011 Share Posted May 10, 2011 The internet is so bad! It's full of perverts and should be shut off! If you believe this, why the f*ck are you on the f*cking internet? A simple solution is for you to get the f*ck off! Chances are I'm replying to a troll or a f*cking dumb ass, so I have to ask myself, why the f*ck am I replying to bullsh*t like this. So, why you use so f*cks? Why do you care? Are you are you a member of the don't cuss club? Because I really don't f*cking care, I really f*cking don't. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*MURDOC* Posted May 10, 2011 Share Posted May 10, 2011 The internet is so bad! It's full of perverts and should be shut off! If you believe this, why the f*ck are you on the f*cking internet? A simple solution is for you to get the f*ck off! Chances are I'm replying to a troll or a f*cking dumb ass, so I have to ask myself, why the f*ck am I replying to bullsh*t like this. So, why you use so f*cks? Why do you care? Are you are you a member of the don't cuss club? Because I really don't f*cking care, I really f*cking don't. Agreed. Try to post more than one word bro, it's considered spam if you don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam998 Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 About the whole it's her house arguement... Since she chose to have him, unless she was raped which I find unlikely, she has to be willing to share some resources. I think the arguement should be is the internet, and the internets contents, one of those resources? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlackProject Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 The internet is so bad! It's full of perverts and should be shut off! If you believe this, why the f*ck are you on the f*cking internet? A simple solution is for you to get the f*ck off! Chances are I'm replying to a troll or a f*cking dumb ass, so I have to ask myself, why the f*ck am I replying to bullsh*t like this. He's getting that line from one of the radio stations in GTA: LCS. Of course he's not for real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unopescio Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 1. Hide pornos amongst your mothers boyfriends possessions 2. Stand back and watch the sh*t hit the fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clem Fandango Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 About the whole it's her house arguement... Since she chose to have him, unless she was raped which I find unlikely, she has to be willing to share some resources. I think the arguement should be is the internet, and the internets contents, one of those resources? If she is morally opposed to porn, he shouldn't watch it in her house. I think porn is degrading to women, I would be absolutely disgusted if I had a child who watched porn at seventeen, and certainly wouldn't want them doing it in my house. Think of it this way, if she was a vegetarian, would it be unreasonable for her not to let you cook stake in the kitchen? That said, the internet is an important resource, as people rely on it for socialising (facebook), news etc. and those programs that block "filth" often block websites that contain dick jokes, but are otherwise informative and even educational - nanny programs don't really work IMO and taking it away altogether is totally unreasonable. Tell her that if she takes it away it would be incredibly hard to socialise since you don't know when and where your friends are going out, and say your friends are constantly debating political topics that you have no idea about because you can't get any news, and it's making you distant from them. That also applies to the nanny programs - tell her it blocks satirical news sources, which is the only news sources kids read, and you therefore have nothing to talk about with your friends. Even if none of that applies to you, it will still sound like a more reasonable argument than "omg you guys are soooo uptight!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam998 Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 (edited) If she is morally opposed to porn, he shouldn't watch it in her house. I think porn is degrading to women, I would be absolutely disgusted if I had a child who watched porn at seventeen, and certainly wouldn't want them doing it in my house. Think of it this way, if she was a vegetarian, would it be unreasonable for her not to let you cook stake in the kitchen? Why? Men are in porn too, no one ever says its degrading to them. Furthermore everyone who is in porn (unless it's illegal or something) chose to be there. IF she was a vegetarien it would be very unreasonable to not let him eat meat in their house, that is a decision he should be allowed to make, and it's abhorrent not to let him. Some moral questions should be left up to individuals, in some cases not only if they're adults. I think both examples are one of those cases. 1. Hide pornos amongst your mothers boyfriends possessions 2. Stand back and watch the sh*t hit the fan Actually a really great idea... (he deserves it too) Edited May 11, 2011 by Sam998 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clem Fandango Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 Men are in porn too, no one ever says its degrading to them. Well that's because they're the ones doing the dominating and humiliating. But that's inconsequential, because I think all objectification is wrong anyway - even if they're men. Whether they chose to be there or not doesn't matter, it's not the individuals involved that I care about, it's the very idea of it. I'm not saying it should be banned or anything, just that I know where she's coming from because I share her moral objection: I think it's wrong and I won't watch it, and I'm going tell my kids it's wrong and hopefully they won't watch it. That said, if they do decide to watch it as adults (at 13-16 it can't really be helped) then obviously I've failed to pass on my moral code to them, and even if I stop them from watching it, they would still think it's sexy and acceptable, so it really doesn't matter if they watch it or not. But let's not get sidetracked by this debate, if you can't see what's wrong with porn when you watch it, me simply telling you about what I see when I watch it won't convince you, and vice versa. There's probably a lot of feminist literature out there, and if you'd like to look into that and you disagree with it, there's a topic about pornography in D&D where we can discuss it. IF she was a vegetarien it would be very unreasonable to not let him eat meat in their house, that is a decision he should be allowed to make, and it's abhorrent not to let him It would be abhorrent not to let him go out for a burger with his own money, in his own time, but why should someone let their money and kitchen equipment assist in a practise that they are extremely opposed to? Likewise, if she pays for the internet that he uses to watch porn, she's giving porn sites more hits, which means more money from advertising, and therefore more porn, thereby contributing to a practise she finds despicable. Leave it up to the individual, by all means, but no one should be expected to accommodate something they don't agree with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robinski Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 1. Hide pornos amongst your mothers boyfriends possessions 2. Stand back and watch the sh*t hit the fan Actually a really great idea... (he deserves it too) Don't f*cking do this. If you're prepared to f*ck up your mother's relationship with what could be her future husband just to get your fix of skin I don't know what to say. If she's as vehemently against pornography as this topic has lead me to believe there may be no coming back from a "betrayal" like that. So you'll probably get to watch porn, but enjoy making both your mother and some guy who probably thinks he's just looking out for you miserable, all for no reason other than you have a lacklustre imagination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam998 Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 Men are in porn too, no one ever says its degrading to them. Well that's because they're the ones doing the dominating and humiliating. But that's inconsequential, because I think all objectification is wrong anyway - even if they're men. Whether they chose to be there or not doesn't matter, it's not the individuals involved that I care about, it's the very idea of it. I'm not saying it should be banned or anything, just that I know where she's coming from because I share her moral objection: I think it's wrong and I won't watch it, and I'm going tell my kids it's wrong and hopefully they won't watch it. That said, if they do decide to watch it as adults (at 13-16 it can't really be helped) then obviously I've failed to pass on my moral code to them, and even if I stop them from watching it, they would still think it's sexy and acceptable, so it really doesn't matter if they watch it or not. But let's not get sidetracked by this debate, if you can't see what's wrong with porn when you watch it, me simply telling you about what I see when I watch it won't convince you, and vice versa. There's probably a lot of feminist literature out there, and if you'd like to look into that and you disagree with it, there's a topic about pornography in D&D where we can discuss it. IF she was a vegetarien it would be very unreasonable to not let him eat meat in their house, that is a decision he should be allowed to make, and it's abhorrent not to let him It would be abhorrent not to let him go out for a burger with his own money, in his own time, but why should someone let their money and kitchen equipment assist in a practise that they are extremely opposed to? Likewise, if she pays for the internet that he uses to watch porn, she's giving porn sites more hits, which means more money from advertising, and therefore more porn, thereby contributing to a practise she finds despicable. Leave it up to the individual, by all means, but no one should be expected to accommodate something they don't agree with. Well I think "humiliating" only takes place in uh...certain fetishes....As you said objectification may be wrong, but if it's consensual then neither person is objectifying themselves. Some people may think they represent a whole gender or something, but that also is a flawed theory, if I see a black person shooting someone, I don't assume all black people shoot people, so if I see a women performing some sexual act, I shouldn't assume that all women perform that sexual act. Not sure how much it has to do with the topic, but I thought I should address your points before dropping it. Children do not have to have the same ideas as their parents, in fact it often shows some intelligence for children or "teenagers" to form their own opinions. So failing to pass on a moral code may not be that bad because at the very least the child understood the topic enough to form their own opinion. Well maybe he lives in a rural area where he can't just walk out and get a burger? This may not be the case but for all we know it is. It may be her house, but because at this point he most likely has had no oppurtunity to get his own house, and because he is her child, the "It's her house" argument doesn't seem fair. About the hits to porn sites, those make very little difference. I believe some porn sites get more activity then CNN, which I actually find a little sad, but it means no one person visiting will do very much. If a site gets... 10,000,000 hits they will pay for the same amount of advertising as if they had 10,000,001 hits, so his effect on their finances is so close to zero that it might as well be considered zero, and she wouldn't really be assisting the material in any way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clem Fandango Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 Well maybe he lives in a rural area where he can't just walk out and get a burger? Then tough luck. Like I said, it's totally unreasonable to expect someone to accommodate something they don't agree with. Like, I'm sure if your kids became skinheads and put swastikas up on the wall of their room (to borrow Robinski's example), you'd tell them not to, because it's your wall and you don't want it adorned with deplorable symbolism. Tolerance is obviously very important, but being tolerant doesn't require you to be accommodating, because that is contributing. The vegetarian parallel becomes more appropriate if she's the one buying the meat... and you can't expect her to do that. It may be her house, but because at this point he most likely has had no oppurtunity to get his own house Well too bad, he can stomach jerking off to his own imagination out of respect. About the hits to porn sites, those make very little difference. If you're against something then you don't want to make even the slightest contribution. to go back to the vegetarian (I am one myself btw) example, if I bought one pack of bacon it wouldn't make that much difference, but you can't claim to be against something if you're contributing, that's hypocritical. If people were accessing porn with the internet she pays for, she would be a hypocrite for letting it happen IMO. so his effect on their finances is so close to zero that it might as well be considered zero Yeah, just like how throwing one little punch doesn't make a difference to violence being acceptable overall, but if you're non violent you still shouldn't do it. It's about having moral standards, and if you deviate from them, you are writing yourself and everyone around you, an ethical blank cheque. I'll respond to that porn stuff in the porn topic as not to detract from the discussion here... and to stop our posts being so long that no one reads them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam998 Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 Well maybe he lives in a rural area where he can't just walk out and get a burger? Then tough luck. Like I said, it's totally unreasonable to expect someone to accommodate something they don't agree with. Like, I'm sure if your kids became skinheads and put swastikas up on the wall of their room (to borrow Robinski's example), you'd tell them not to, because it's your wall and you don't want it adorned with deplorable symbolism. Tolerance is obviously very important, but being tolerant doesn't require you to be accommodating, because that is contributing. The vegetarian parallel becomes more appropriate if she's the one buying the meat... and you can't expect her to do that. It may be her house, but because at this point he most likely has had no oppurtunity to get his own house Well too bad, he can stomach jerking off to his own imagination out of respect. About the hits to porn sites, those make very little difference. If you're against something then you don't want to make even the slightest contribution. to go back to the vegetarian (I am one myself btw) example, if I bought one pack of bacon it wouldn't make that much difference, but you can't claim to be against something if you're contributing, that's hypocritical. If people were accessing porn with the internet she pays for, she would be a hypocrite for letting it happen IMO. so his effect on their finances is so close to zero that it might as well be considered zero Yeah, just like how throwing one little punch doesn't make a difference to violence being acceptable overall, but if you're non violent you still shouldn't do it. It's about having moral standards, and if you deviate from them, you are writing yourself and everyone around you, an ethical blank cheque. I'll respond to that porn stuff in the porn topic as not to detract from the discussion here... and to stop our posts being so long that no one reads them. Well Swastikas are things that-at least in reference to Nazism- are inherently hateful. Pornography isn't hateful however. Accomadating and contributing imply that you are adding to the habit. Like if she was downloading videos to his hardrive that would be contributing. But tolerating is just not stopping, as opposed to actually adding to it it's just not taking part. Maybe she shouldn't buy him say...bacon, but she should allow him to buy it himself. She shouldn't stop him from buying bacon, which is a rough parellel to cutting off the internet to stop him from viewing pornography. "Well too bad?" How about well too bad she's the one that got pregnant in the first place? It's not just a slightest difference it's no difference. Not a single thing would change to a porn website if he accessed it. The company wouldn't make a cent more, the actors wouldn't get a cent more nothing would happen outside the sphere of his household. If the mother didn't make something happen in that household nothing would happen anywhere. The difference with the violence example, is that if you punch someone they will be effected. If you look at porn no one but you will be effected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clem Fandango Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 The difference with the violence example, is that if you punch someone they will be effected. If you look at porn no one but you will be effected. That's true, it was a sh*t example. But my point about moral standards still stands, even if punching someone didn't make a difference (let's say "shoving" instead), you still couldn't claim to be against violence. To quote South Park "either it's all okay or none of it is" - I'm very much a moral absolutist. You can't claim to be against eating meat if you let it in your household, and you can't claim to be against pornography if you make any contribution no matter how minuscule it is in the long run. It's not "no difference" because it still makes the tiniest, tiniest difference, and if everyone who was against it took the attitude you're saying his mother should take, that would add up and make at least a noticeable difference. If you're against something and you're in the minority, the only way for that minority to make a difference is with rigid devotion, or else you're writing a moral blank cheque and things will never, ever change. She shouldn't stop him from buying bacon, which is a rough parellel to cutting off the internet to stop him from viewing pornography. But she's the one paying for the internet, a perfect parallel would be her punishing him for eating meat at a restaurant or a friend's house. Well Swastikas are things that-at least in reference to Nazism- are inherently hateful. Pornography isn't hateful however. If you accept that pornography is wrong, then it's inherently wrong, at least to you, just like if you accept hate to be wrong, promoting hate is inherently wrong. F*ck, I'll bet at least one person reading this is getting extremely confused by all these similes . It should be noted that--as far as we know--playindahood is not a nazi and his mother is not a vegetarian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dingleman Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 My suggestion would be to follow your mother around the house everywhere she goes, even the toilet. When she complains about her privacy being invaded then BAM, lay the f*cking world on her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam998 Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 That's true, it was a sh*t example. But my point about moral standards still stands, even if punching someone didn't make a difference (let's say "shoving" instead), you still couldn't claim to be against violence. To quote South Park "either it's all okay or none of it is" - I'm very much a moral absolutist. You can't claim to be against eating meat if you let it in your household, and you can't claim to be against pornography if you make any contribution no matter how minuscule it is in the long run. It's not "no difference" because it still makes the tiniest, tiniest difference, and if everyone who was against it took the attitude you're saying his mother should take, that would add up and make at least a noticeable difference. If you're against something and you're in the minority, the only way for that minority to make a difference is with rigid devotion, or else you're writing a moral blank cheque and things will never, ever change. I think that just because something is in your household doesn't mean that you are for it. If her son had pornography in the house, it doesn't mean she's endorsing porn, or even that he is, it just means that he is viewing pornography in a place where he lives. She might be letting it happen, but that's just a part of letting him make his own choices. To use the vegetarien example, she won't stop him from eating meat if he wants to eat meat, and she won't stop him from watching porn if he wants to watch porn. Accepting other peoples moral choices is something that has to be done. You aren't going to convince everyone not to watch porn just like you aren't going to convince everyone not to eat meat. This would be tolerating it, something that I think should be done. ^This above paragraph didn't address your points as much as I had hoped but I'm not done yet! "The tiniest, tiniest difference" in this case, is no difference. Yes if a huge group did it there would be a difference, but just him doing it wouldn't matter. Yes if everyone felt that way nothing would change but...not everyone thinks that way. Of course groups of people make differences, but indviduals (in this case) don't. Unless he has some severe impact on groups of people somehow (i.e. he becomes a legendary public speaker for porn/bacon) his viewing sites or buying meat won't. But she's the one paying for the internet, a perfect parallel would be her punishing him for eating meat at a restaurant or a friend's house. I agree that that would be a perfect parellel. This kind of goes back to the difference arguement, as long as he doesn't influence a bunch of people with his porn viewing, his difference is no difference. His viewing won't even make a tiny difference, unless he makes it so that thousands of people do the same. If you accept that pornography is wrong, then it's inherently wrong, at least to you, just like if you accept hate to be wrong, promoting hate is inherently wrong. Well to begin with I don't think pornography is wrong, just to be clear. I think that unless someone is watching him jerkoff (weird) then he's not promoting anyone, he's just doing it in private. F*ck, I'll bet at least one person reading this is getting extremely confused by all these similes . It should be noted that--as far as we know--playindahood is not a nazi and his mother is not a vegetarian Lmao, best thing I've read in a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ska Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 The internet is so bad! It's full of perverts and should be shut off! If you believe this, why the f*ck are you on the f*cking internet? A simple solution is for you to get the f*ck off! Chances are I'm replying to a troll or a f*cking dumb ass, so I have to ask myself, why the f*ck am I replying to bullsh*t like this. So, why you use so f*cks? Why do you care? Are you are you a member of the don't cuss club? Because I really don't f*cking care, I really f*cking don't. You are such a rebel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now