Sup3rman 63 Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 At a normal cinema yes, because we dont have fancy IMAX cinemas here. Link to post Share on other sites
visionist 143 Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 That's a great shame. I'm not even watching my copy till I get a better TV. Ain't half tempted mind... Link to post Share on other sites
fridaynightscream 30 Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 I own two Blu-Ray players so I got two HDTV's as well and I watched this movie on Blu-Ray in HD last night, lucky me Link to post Share on other sites
Domeux 0 Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 My lord, the picture on blu-ray is...it's just...beautiful Link to post Share on other sites
Sup3rman 63 Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 I havent even seen it on DVD because i still dont have a copy of the film on DVD. It suck to be so poor that i cant even buy a f*cking DVD. Link to post Share on other sites
fridaynightscream 30 Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 f*ck blu ray, aint nobody got money for a blu ray player. And i dont have an HD TV...expensive crap. Your just jealous. Just because you can't afford something doesn't mean you should hate it. I have an HDTV and 2D Blu-Ray and I want a 3DHDTV and a 3D Blu-Ray player doesn't mean I go around saying "f*ck 3D Blu-Ray, aint nobody got money for a 3D blu-ray player. And I don't have a 3D HD TV... expensive crap" Seriously dude, calm down. Link to post Share on other sites
Sup3rman 63 Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 f*ck blu ray, aint nobody got money for a blu ray player. And i dont have an HD TV...expensive crap. Your just jealous. Just because you can't afford something doesn't mean you should hate it. I have an HDTV and 2D Blu-Ray and I want a 3DHDTV and a 3D Blu-Ray player doesn't mean I go around saying "f*ck 3D Blu-Ray, aint nobody got money for a 3D blu-ray player. And I don't have a 3D HD TV... expensive crap" Seriously dude, calm down. Learn how to understand sarcasm dude... I would have all the great stuff, IF i had money. But i dont.... Link to post Share on other sites
visionist 143 Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 I couldn't resist testing it before my new TV arrives; well the Bluray doesn't look as impressive as The Dark Knight's did. That's probably just because the film's cinematography is generally less beautiful or even interesting. The entire Joker truck scene in TDK looks stunning with it's gorgeous interplay of deep shadows and amber lights. There's little that striking here. Or maybe we're too used to such high quality. Bring on 4K! Neither Blu obviously has even 1% of the impact the films did in fullscreen 15/70mm. Link to post Share on other sites
Rebel 1,261 Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 I have to say I enjoyed this way more on my Blu Ray player (with blu ray disc) rather than sitting watching it at the cinema - probably because I didn't go see it at an IMAX but they are a tad too far/expensive. I kind of wish they had made it all again in 3D so I could watch that at home. Link to post Share on other sites
Waddy 481 Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I watched it on DVD at the weekend and to be honest I didnt think it was a patch on the previous film, it was okay, but for me it wasnt great. The effects were great and the action was good but in some parts I was a little bored with it. Link to post Share on other sites
Mr JoeStalin 1,985 Posted September 30, 2020 Share Posted September 30, 2020 Sorry for the bump Just wondering, they teased Robin but never continued Link to post Share on other sites
Girish 3,800 Posted October 3, 2020 Share Posted October 3, 2020 On 9/30/2020 at 2:25 PM, NileshKumar said: Sorry for the bump Just wondering, they teased Robin but never continued Why would they? It was made pretty clear that this was going to be a trilogy and Rises was definitely the end. Also, I don't even think Robin would have been in the movie if they had gotten to do the original plot of Joker being in jail and Harvey running wild in Gotham. Ledger's death changed a lot of things. Link to post Share on other sites
Nicole 1 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 why does everyone hate the title so much? lol Link to post Share on other sites
wise_man 727 Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 Dark Knight Rises is such a good way to end Nolan's trilogy. But few things really bothers me, like the war sequence near the end (the polices just run forward straight away into armed criminals) or how Bruce returns to Gotham so quickly. Link to post Share on other sites
TwistOfLime21 308 Posted November 18, 2020 Share Posted November 18, 2020 (edited) After The Dark Knight, it was always going to be an uphill battle with the sequel. Tom Hardy done an awesome job as Bane. The size difference between comic book Bane and movie Bane was never an issue to me. It was more the little things that annoyed me, like the constant use of “hothead”. The awful first fight between Bane and Batman too. He’s getting his ass handed to him and he uses those pathetic little smoke bombs? I’m all for suspending my disbelief in movies but while Gotham is being held hostage and waiting for Batman to make his return and save them, he’s busy covering the bridge in petrol in the shape of a bat? Come on. Edited November 19, 2020 by TwistOfLime21 Link to post Share on other sites
Girish 3,800 Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 20 hours ago, TwistOfLime21 said: I’m all for suspending my disbelief in movies but while Gotham is being held hostage and waiting for Batman to make his save them, he’s busy covering the bridge in petrol in the shape of a bat? Come on. I always assumed he outsourced all the bat related shenanigans to someone else... like he has a discreet contract with a media agency that handles all of Batman's advertising campaigns. 😛 Link to post Share on other sites
