Did Niko ever come off as slightly crazy?

[Branimir202]

Did he seem a little crazy? or was it more scarred than anything? with his total obsession over Darko and Florian at first, as well as what happened in the war and everything he's pretty jacked up mentally. With that huge violent streak to him did anyone think Niko was a bit on the insane side? Its GTA sure, the main character isn't going to be a tree hugging saint, but with some of the murders he made they didn't make alot of sense. Killing Ray was a good example, he wasn't that bad

Edited December 3, 2010 by Branimir202

[cidamelo]

Hi I agree with you, there wasn't reason for Niko to kill Ray, he was very helpful to Niko

[Mati]

Niko did everything to survive.

[MyDog]

Hi I agree with you, there wasn't reason for Niko to kill Ray, he was very helpful to Niko

People who played the DLC's told you he's a bastard and you still insist that Ray's good because he's handsome.

[TommyMufc-Champs]

Niko did everything to survive.

Yeah exactly. Oh and help his cousin too

[AlexGTAGamer]

Niko had to do what he had to to survive and help his cousin in Liberty City. But to me Niko seemed a little more depressed than crazy.

[Ferddy987]

Hi I agree with you, there wasn't reason for Niko to kill Ray, he was very helpful to Niko

Niko was a freelancer meaning that he gone to other people to look for jobs and doesn't get on that "tribute stuff".

 

He was going to die anyway.

[MostOfAll]

Niko is a pessimist. He always thinks negatively about the world. How many times have you witnessed him smile or laugh? Sure, he does try to make the right decisions, but there are times when he's clearly greedy for more and more money in the storyline. He can come off as a hypocrite, too. Look at how he robs the bank with the McRearies and kills cops. There are several tasks of murder that he could have backed out from, but he didn't. For example, Tom Goldberg, the lawyer in "Final Interview," never really did anything wrong. He was just a lawyer who minded his own business. Yet, Niko chose to kill him as part of Francis McReary's desire. Francis is a CORRUPT police officer who would do anything just to keep people from knowing his true identity. Niko could have easily chose not to kill Goldberg, but he did. Clearly, Niko seems to have poor judgment.

 

Another incident:

During "Flatline," Jimmy Pegorino wanted Niko to kill Anthony Corrado, Pegorino's guard, because of suspicion he (Anthony) might be an undercover agent for the government. Niko doesn't even question if Pegorino is sure about his accusation, but kills Anthony without any hesitation. Even if Anthony was an agent working for the government, it's still wrong to kill him.

[AceRay]

Niko is a pessimist. He always thinks negatively about the world. How many times have you witnessed him smile or laugh? Sure, he does try to make the right decisions, but there are times when he's clearly greedy for more and more money in the storyline. He can come off as a hypocrite, too. Look at how he robs the bank with the McRearies and kills cops. There are several tasks of murder that he could have backed out from, but he didn't. For example, Tom Goldberg, the lawyer in "Final Interview," never really did anything wrong. He was just a lawyer who minded his own business. Yet, Niko chose to kill him as part of Francis McReary's desire. Francis is a CORRUPT police officer who would do anything just to keep people from knowing his true identity. Niko could have easily chose not to kill Goldberg, but he did. Clearly, Niko seems to have poor judgment.

 

Another incident:

During "Flatline," Jimmy Pegorino wanted Niko to kill Anthony Corrado, Pegorino's guard, because of suspicion he (Anthony) might be an undercover agent for the government. Niko doesn't even question if Pegorino is sure about his accusation, but kills Anthony without any hesitation. Even if Anthony was an agent working for the government, it's still wrong to kill him.

agreed, Niko can be a little hypocritical, but thats completely the choice of the player, becuase if the player plays carefully and never causes Ped damage, he's not hypocritical.

So what if there are missions where you have to kill cops? there are in every game. Thats just something that has to happen.

1. Yes, but Francis is a cop. he could easily put Niko in prison if he didn't do what he wants. Niko didn't have a choice

2. when you(Niko) sees all the cops at Westdyke hospital, I think you (he) knows that he's a rat. He may have had suspicions, but I think that confirms it.

anyway, he's a hitman, he kills for money, he doesn't care who.

[MostOfAll]

Niko is a pessimist. He always thinks negatively about the world. How many times have you witnessed him smile or laugh? Sure, he does try to make the right decisions, but there are times when he's clearly greedy for more and more money in the storyline. He can come off as a hypocrite, too. Look at how he robs the bank with the McRearies and kills cops. There are several tasks of murder that he could have backed out from, but he didn't. For example, Tom Goldberg, the lawyer in "Final Interview," never really did anything wrong. He was just a lawyer who minded his own business. Yet, Niko chose to kill him as part of Francis McReary's desire. Francis is a CORRUPT police officer who would do anything just to keep people from knowing his true identity. Niko could have easily chose not to kill Goldberg, but he did. Clearly, Niko seems to have poor judgment.

 

Another incident:

During "Flatline," Jimmy Pegorino wanted Niko to kill Anthony Corrado, Pegorino's guard, because of suspicion he (Anthony) might be an undercover agent for the government. Niko doesn't even question if Pegorino is sure about his accusation, but kills Anthony without any hesitation. Even if Anthony was an agent working for the government, it's still wrong to kill him.

agreed, Niko can be a little hypocritical, but thats completely the choice of the player, becuase if the player plays carefully and never causes Ped damage, he's not hypocritical.

So what if there are missions where you have to kill cops? there are in every game. Thats just something that has to happen.

1. Yes, but Francis is a cop. he could easily put Niko in prison if he didn't do what he wants. Niko didn't have a choice

2. when you(Niko) sees all the cops at Westdyke hospital, I think you (he) knows that he's a rat. He may have had suspicions, but I think that confirms it.

anyway, he's a hitman, he kills for money, he doesn't care who.

1. Can't Niko just kill Francis?

2. True. You do have a point.

 

Again, Niko is a hitman who gets paid for his assassinations, but that's very hypocritical. That really defeats the purpose of his quest to find Darko.

[MyDog]

Niko is a pessimist. He always thinks negatively about the world. How many times have you witnessed him smile or laugh? Sure, he does try to make the right decisions, but there are times when he's clearly greedy for more and more money in the storyline. He can come off as a hypocrite, too. Look at how he robs the bank with the McRearies and kills cops. There are several tasks of murder that he could have backed out from, but he didn't. For example, Tom Goldberg, the lawyer in "Final Interview," never really did anything wrong. He was just a lawyer who minded his own business. Yet, Niko chose to kill him as part of Francis McReary's desire. Francis is a CORRUPT police officer who would do anything just to keep people from knowing his true identity. Niko could have easily chose not to kill Goldberg, but he did. Clearly, Niko seems to have poor judgment.

 

Another incident:

During "Flatline," Jimmy Pegorino wanted Niko to kill Anthony Corrado, Pegorino's guard, because of suspicion he (Anthony) might be an undercover agent for the government. Niko doesn't even question if Pegorino is sure about his accusation, but kills Anthony without any hesitation. Even if Anthony was an agent working for the government, it's still wrong to kill him.

agreed, Niko can be a little hypocritical, but thats completely the choice of the player, becuase if the player plays carefully and never causes Ped damage, he's not hypocritical.

So what if there are missions where you have to kill cops? there are in every game. Thats just something that has to happen.

1. Yes, but Francis is a cop. he could easily put Niko in prison if he didn't do what he wants. Niko didn't have a choice

2. when you(Niko) sees all the cops at Westdyke hospital, I think you (he) knows that he's a rat. He may have had suspicions, but I think that confirms it.

anyway, he's a hitman, he kills for money, he doesn't care who.

1. Can't Niko just kill Francis?

2. True. You do have a point.

 

Again, Niko is a hitman who gets paid for his assassinations, but that's very hypocritical. That really defeats the purpose of his quest to find Darko.

1. Do you think he really could kill a guy on Francis' position?

 

2. Do you even know what hypocritical means? Why is he hypocritical?

[Drujba_Dreptatii]

Well not necesairly crazy but as any assasin/hitman/killer/murderer must be at least a sociopat.

[AceRay]

if he killed Francis then he would get a 6 star wanted level, and that would be a hard level. especially as its only the middle of the game.

[Whitesteve98]

Niko came off as kind of heartless to me. It made me feel sorry for him after I spared Darko and what he said afterwards. I guess what happened to him made him this way. But killing Ray was stupid I'd rather kill Packie or someone else. I personally enjoyed the mafia missions and Phil and Ray.. I wish pegorino didn't die. He was so cool.. Anyways Niko kind of a heartless bastard. He doesn't seem to care about anything he just follows orders, kills who he wants, does what ever he wants for a payment he never seems to use.

[cidamelo]

Allen14n I didn't understand, in GTA we play as a criminal, criminals do bad things, so what? Niko was a mercenary. But I think it was wrong when he killed Ray, because Ray helped him a lot. But for example, Tom Goldberg, he didn't even knew him, so kill him "wasn't a problem".

[MostOfAll]

 

Niko is a pessimist. He always thinks negatively about the world. How many times have you witnessed him smile or laugh? Sure, he does try to make the right decisions, but there are times when he's clearly greedy for more and more money in the storyline. He can come off as a hypocrite, too. Look at how he robs the bank with the McRearies and kills cops. There are several tasks of murder that he could have backed out from, but he didn't. For example, Tom Goldberg, the lawyer in "Final Interview," never really did anything wrong. He was just a lawyer who minded his own business. Yet, Niko chose to kill him as part of Francis McReary's desire. Francis is a CORRUPT police officer who would do anything just to keep people from knowing his true identity. Niko could have easily chose not to kill Goldberg, but he did. Clearly, Niko seems to have poor judgment.

 

Another incident:

During "Flatline," Jimmy Pegorino wanted Niko to kill Anthony Corrado, Pegorino's guard, because of suspicion he (Anthony) might be an undercover agent for the government. Niko doesn't even question if Pegorino is sure about his accusation, but kills Anthony without any hesitation. Even if Anthony was an agent working for the government, it's still wrong to kill him.

agreed, Niko can be a little hypocritical, but thats completely the choice of the player, becuase if the player plays carefully and never causes Ped damage, he's not hypocritical.

So what if there are missions where you have to kill cops? there are in every game. Thats just something that has to happen.

1. Yes, but Francis is a cop. he could easily put Niko in prison if he didn't do what he wants. Niko didn't have a choice

2. when you(Niko) sees all the cops at Westdyke hospital, I think you (he) knows that he's a rat. He may have had suspicions, but I think that confirms it.

anyway, he's a hitman, he kills for money, he doesn't care who.

1. Can't Niko just kill Francis?

2. True. You do have a point.

 

Again, Niko is a hitman who gets paid for his assassinations, but that's very hypocritical. That really defeats the purpose of his quest to find Darko.

1. Do you think he really could kill a guy on Francis' position?

 

2. Do you even know what hypocritical means? Why is he hypocritical?

1. He killed multiple people of high positions without anyone else being able to know it was him who did the work.

2. He would come off as hypocritical because his search for Darko was motivated by getting revenge for the twelve men Darko betrayed and killed. Darko killed them just for a small amount of money to pay for his drug addiction. Darko even called Niko a hypocrite, which seemed to really hit Niko, especially if you choose the spare option. How is this hypocritical? Niko killed people just for money before.

 

To AceRay: He wouldn't necessarily get a six-star wanted level. If you chose to kill Francis in "Blood Brothers," you wouldn't get a wanted level because there's no one else except Derrick around.

 

Niko is heartless at times, but what happened to him in the past made him this way. Besides, he had no choice but to work for the ULP; he was being blackmailed, and it may have been the only way for him to find Darko. One of the missions assigned by the ULP is to locate a man who knows of the organization. For all we know, this man may actually be an innocent man who didn't do anything wrong. Regardless of how heartless that is, Niko had no choice but to do it. Killing men who are funding terrorism is more for a good cause, so that's not as wrong as killing innocent people just for knowing about the organization. At other times, Niko killed people whose crimes were so petty just for money. Brucie ordered Niko to kill Tom Rivas just for not paying up his debt. Niko still killed him, but Tom was really just an innocent man who didn't do anything wrong.

Edited December 6, 2010 by Allen14n

[yonkers749]

Slightly crazy?!?! The dude was nutz, next time you go on a killing spree, listen to some of the stuff he shouts, dudes got issues, but you cant expect anything else from him, hes seen a lot of crazy stuff in his lifetime!

[AceRay]

Niko is a pessimist. He always thinks negatively about the world. How many times have you witnessed him smile or laugh? Sure, he does try to make the right decisions, but there are times when he's clearly greedy for more and more money in the storyline. He can come off as a hypocrite, too. Look at how he robs the bank with the McRearies and kills cops. There are several tasks of murder that he could have backed out from, but he didn't. For example, Tom Goldberg, the lawyer in "Final Interview," never really did anything wrong. He was just a lawyer who minded his own business. Yet, Niko chose to kill him as part of Francis McReary's desire. Francis is a CORRUPT police officer who would do anything just to keep people from knowing his true identity. Niko could have easily chose not to kill Goldberg, but he did. Clearly, Niko seems to have poor judgment.

 

Another incident:

During "Flatline," Jimmy Pegorino wanted Niko to kill Anthony Corrado, Pegorino's guard, because of suspicion he (Anthony) might be an undercover agent for the government. Niko doesn't even question if Pegorino is sure about his accusation, but kills Anthony without any hesitation. Even if Anthony was an agent working for the government, it's still wrong to kill him.

agreed, Niko can be a little hypocritical, but thats completely the choice of the player, becuase if the player plays carefully and never causes Ped damage, he's not hypocritical.

So what if there are missions where you have to kill cops? there are in every game. Thats just something that has to happen.

1. Yes, but Francis is a cop. he could easily put Niko in prison if he didn't do what he wants. Niko didn't have a choice

2. when you(Niko) sees all the cops at Westdyke hospital, I think you (he) knows that he's a rat. He may have had suspicions, but I think that confirms it.

anyway, he's a hitman, he kills for money, he doesn't care who.

1. Can't Niko just kill Francis?

2. True. You do have a point.

 

Again, Niko is a hitman who gets paid for his assassinations, but that's very hypocritical. That really defeats the purpose of his quest to find Darko.

1. Do you think he really could kill a guy on Francis' position?

 

2. Do you even know what hypocritical means? Why is he hypocritical?

1. He killed multiple people of high positions without anyone else being able to know it was him who did the work.

2. He would come off as hypocritical because his search for Darko was motivated by getting revenge for the twelve men Darko betrayed and killed. Darko killed them just for a small amount of money to pay for his drug addiction. Darko even called Niko a hypocrite, which seemed to really hit Niko, especially if you choose the spare option. How is this hypocritical? Niko killed people just for money before.

 

To AceRay: He wouldn't necessarily get a six-star wanted level. If you chose to kill Francis in "Blood Brothers," you wouldn't get a wanted level because there's no one else except Derrick around.

 

Niko is heartless at times, but what happened to him in the past made him this way. Besides, he had no choice but to work for the ULP; he was being blackmailed, and it may have been the only way for him to find Darko. One of the missions assigned by the ULP is to locate a man who knows of the organization. For all we know, this man may actually be an innocent man who didn't do anything wrong. Regardless of how heartless that is, Niko had no choice but to do it. Killing men who are funding terrorism is more for a good cause, so that's not as wrong as killing innocent people just for knowing about the organization. At other times, Niko killed people whose crimes were so petty just for money. Brucie ordered Niko to kill Tom Rivas just for not paying up his debt. Niko still killed him, but Tom was really just an innocent man who didn't do anything wrong.

1. Francis is the commissioner of the whole LCPD. I don't think they'd let that slip.

2. That still doesn't make him a hypocritical. It shows he holds grudges. I still don't get your point :\

 

Maybe he wanted some one on one time with Derrick before he died?

 

I think that guy's name was Oleg Minkov. We really don't know enough about this guy to come to any comparisons. And, BAM!, He was bad. About Lyle Rivas; Niko didn't know that Lyle Rivas was innocent at the time, he only found out in No.1 that he was innocent. He thought he was a scum bag at that time. He was still bad too!!

[CryptReaperDorian]

@AceRay: I'm pretty sure Niko is hypocritical. Niko got pissed off at Darko for getting a dozen people killed for a thousand dollars, but Niko would do the exact same thing in the story. How is that not hypocritical? I know that Darko got Niko into the trouble he went through, but that still doesn't change Niko's actions at all.

[MyDog]

@AceRay: I'm pretty sure Niko is hypocritical. Niko got pissed off at Darko for getting a dozen people killed for a thousand dollars, but Niko would do the exact same thing in the story. How is that not hypocritical? I know that Darko got Niko into the trouble he went through, but that still doesn't change Niko's actions at all.

That dozen of people were Niko's best friends he grew with. Wouldn't you be pissed?

[MostOfAll]

 

@AceRay:  I'm pretty sure Niko is hypocritical.  Niko got pissed off at Darko for getting a dozen people killed for a thousand dollars, but Niko would do the exact same thing in the story.  How is that not hypocritical?  I know that Darko got Niko into the trouble he went through, but that still doesn't change Niko's actions at all.

That dozen of people were Niko's best friends he grew with. Wouldn't you be pissed?

I agree with CryptReaperDorian.

 

MyDog, your reasoning is extremely flawed. Obviously, if you have any common sense, you would be pissed off if a guy is responsible for killing twelve of your friends. However, that doesn't give you the excuse to kill anyone else just for money. In other words, being pissed off at a guy for something doesn't mean you should do pretty much the same thing he did. That's not very wise at all. That's probably the most hypocritical thing you can do -- doing the exact same thing you hate a person for.

 

What does being pissed have anything to do how Niko is not a hypocrite? Sorry, but you should think more before replying to what others say.

 

 

1. Francis is the commissioner of the whole LCPD. I don't think they'd let that slip.

2. That still doesn't make him a hypocritical. It shows he holds grudges. I still don't get your point :\

 

Maybe he wanted some one on one time with Derrick before he died?

 

1. AceRay, how would anyone know it was Niko who killed Francis? Of course they would be searching for suspects, but Niko seems to be able to get away with things very easily. If you don't get a six-star wanted level if you choose to kill Francis in "Blood Brothers," wouldn't it be possible to get away with killing him at another certain point in the storyline? After all, if you kill Francis in "Blood Brothers," it's not like police officers are going to come after you at a random time in the game or anything like that.

 

2. Holding a grudge doesn't give you the right to do the same thing as the person you have the grudge on did. Darko was responsible for killing twelve of Niko's friends just for a thousand dollars or so, but Niko shouldn't be a hypocrite by killing people he barely knew about just for money! If you played the game, you would know that Niko said things like:

"You owe my friend some money! I'm going to kill you!"

 

All this just for money? Hell, how can you even be sure these people really did owe anyone some money? Roman DID owe people money and didn't pay up, too. If Niko really believed anyone in debt should be killed, he should kill Roman along with the others he killed. This just comes to show that Niko killed these people only for the money.

Edited December 8, 2010 by Allen14n

[AceRay]

ahh, but where Niko grew up, people died all the time. People kill and were killed. There was a war on, the only thing to do for him was (probably) kill people. When so many people you care about are betrayed by their own friend, of course your going to exact this behavior. All Niko knows is violence, he wants to change, but he can't

And also, Niko wasn't a hitman immediately after this, he was a trafficker, I think. I'm pretty sure he was only a hit man in GTA4.

 

He killed Francis in a desolate park, but all his missions take place in the police office. you'd definitively get a 6 star then. ANd even if you escaped, some other crooked guy called Fred would show up and try to kill Niko every chance he had.

 

Niko didn't BELIEVE that people who were in debt should be killed, he only did that for money. Never in the story did he ever say that they did. He only got orders from people who believed that.

[Branimir202]

 

ahh, but where Niko grew up, people died all the time. People kill and were killed. There was a war on, the only thing to do for him was (probably) kill people. When so many people you care about are betrayed by their own friend, of course your going to exact this behavior. All Niko knows is violence, he wants to change, but he can't

And also, Niko wasn't a hitman immediately after this, he was a trafficker, I think. I'm pretty sure he was only a hit man in GTA4.

 

He killed Francis in a desolate park, but all his missions take place in the police office. you'd definitively get a 6 star then. ANd even if you escaped, some other crooked guy called Fred would show up and try to kill Niko every chance he had.

 

Niko didn't BELIEVE that people who were in debt should be killed, he only did that for money. Never in the story did he ever say that they did. He only got orders from people who believed that.

He still went along with it though lol, sure he never said he agreed with it but that dosen't change the fact that he did it. Say my friend wants me to help him jump someone who owes him money, I don't agree with jumping someone that owes my friend money, but just because he's my friend and says he'll cut me in on the money after he takes it back from the guy we go to jump I go along with it. Sure I might have not agreed with it but I still did it and that dosen't make what I did any better t all. I'll admit thats probably a crappy comparison but you get the point i'm sure lol

 

 

After reading Allen14n's post the more and more I think about it, Niko is totally hypocritical he gets angry at the fact that people are trying to kill Roman due to his debt even though Niko does the same exact thing to other people

Edited December 8, 2010 by Branimir202

[AceRay]

actually, its not him whose killing them, its his boss. Niko is just a pawn. He's just a tool. He did it for money. Not a hypocrite. sot of.

 

and yes, thats a crap comparison.

[Branimir202]

actually, its not him whose killing them, its his boss. Niko is just a pawn. He's just a tool. He did it for money. Not a hypocrite. sot of.

 

and yes, thats a crap comparison.

Pawn or not, like I just told you he did what he did. Followed orders he's quite hypocritical

 

He's got no problem mouthing off to his bosses, he could have found work for someone else if he didn't wanna do it

 

Crap comparison or not, its super easy to understand that its the same exact concept

[meson1]

... 1. Francis is the commissioner of the whole LCPD. I don't think they'd let that slip. ...

Tiny detail. Francis wasn't commissioner yet. But he was in line for the promotion to commissioner.

 

[MostOfAll]

Niko didn't BELIEVE that people who were in debt should be killed, he only did that for money. Never in the story did he ever say that they did. He only got orders from people who believed that.

That's exactly my point. He did it for money. Darko? Heroine addiction? Selling off info for money? Twelve guys killed? Anything familiar here?

 

Obviously, Niko is a hypocrite. Not "sort of." Niko is a straight-up hypocrite.

[AceRay]

oh.

I see your point

[pepikJS]

 

# Taoism: sh*t happens.

# Confucianism: Confucius say, "sh*t happens."

# Buddhism: If sh*t happens, it isn't really sh*t.

# Zen Buddhism: sh*t is, and is not.

# Zen Buddhism #2: What is the sound of sh*t happening?

# Hinduism: This sh*t has happened before.

# Islam: If sh*t happens, it is the will of Allah.

# Islam #2: If sh*t happens, kill the person responsible.

# Islam #3: If sh*t happens, blame Israel.

# Catholicism: If sh*t happens, you deserve it.

# Protestantism: Let sh*t happen to someone else.

# Presbyterian: This sh*t was bound to happen.

# Episcopalian: It's not so bad if sh*t happens, as long as you serve the right wine with it.

# Methodist: It's not so bad if sh*t happens, as long as you serve grape juice with it.

# Congregationalist: sh*t that happens to one person is just as good as sh*t that happens to another.

# Unitarian: sh*t that happens to one person is just as bad as sh*t that happens to another.

# Lutheran: If sh*t happens, don't talk about it.

# Fundamentalism: If sh*t happens, you will go to hell, unless you are born again. (Amen!)

# Fundamentalism #2: If sh*t happens to a televangelist, it's okay.

# Fundamentalism #3: sh*t must be born again.

# Judaism: Why does this sh*t always happen to us?

# Calvinism: sh*t happens because you don't work.

# Seventh Day Adventism: No sh*t shall happen on Saturday.

# Creationism: God made all sh*t.

# Secular Humanism: sh*t evolves.

# Christian Science: When sh*t happens, don't call a doctor - pray!

# Christian Science #2: sh*t happening is all in your mind.

# Unitarianism: Come let us reason together about this sh*t.

# Quakers: Let us not fight over this sh*t.

# Utopianism: This sh*t does not stink.

# Darwinism: This sh*t was once food.

# Capitalism: That's MY sh*t.

# Communism: It's everybody's sh*t.

# Feminism: Men are sh*t.

# Chauvinism: We may be sh*t, but you can't live without us...

# Commercialism: Let's package this sh*t.

# Impressionism: From a distance, sh*t looks like a garden.

# Idolism: Let's bronze this sh*t.

# Existentialism: sh*t doesn't happen; sh*t IS.

# Existentialism #2: What is sh*t, anyway?

# Stoicism: This sh*t is good for me.

# Hedonism: There is nothing like a good sh*t happening!

# Mormonism: God sent us this sh*t.

# Mormonism #2: This sh*t is going to happen again.

# Wiccan: An it harm none, let sh*t happen.

# Scientology: If sh*t happens, see "Dianetics", p.157.

# Jehovah's Witnesses: >Knock< >Knock< sh*t happens.

# Jehovah's Witnesses #2: May we have a moment of your time to show you some of our sh*t?

# Jehovah's Witnesses #3: sh*t has been prophesied and is imminent; only the righteous shall survive its happening.

# Moonies: Only really happy sh*t happens.

# Hare Krishna: sh*t happens, rama rama.

# Rastafarianism: Let's smoke this sh*t!

# Zoroastrianism: sh*t happens half on the time.

# Church of SubGenius: BoB sh*ts.

# Practical: Deal with sh*t one day at a time.

# Agnostic: sh*t might have happened; then again, maybe not.

# Agnostic #2: Did someone sh*t?

# Agnostic #3: What is this sh*t?

# Satanism: SNEPPAH TIHS.

# Atheism: What sh*t?

# Atheism #2: I can't believe this sh*t!

# Nihilism: No sh*t.

 

[LuisLopezLover]

Hmmm...Well i guess seeing all those crazy things in the war really messed him up! But I loove Niko. He is the best protaganist. I said Luis earlier but I change my mind, their tied. Niko has a great story and is hilarious. But yes he is crazy. But he seems to have a god heart. PRETTY CLICHE IF YOU ASK ME.