AlfieWilRus Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 I was going through the III era forum sections and I have noticed that rarely someone would post a topic or even reply to one. Its almost as if they are dead. San Andreas still has some life while Vice City is struggling but gta III seems to be almost dead. Its like a ghost town. Every time I look down to see who is viewing this forum its only me or 2 other people or just one other people! Is III and VC really dying? I mean no one seems to go to that section any more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Aye it happens. People have moved on. We keep the area as it's a treasure trove of information. Pretty much anything you want to know about the games can be found in there. Not to mention people do post in there if there's a need to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Scratch Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 We need to bring the III era back,Motherf*ckers and Stoners unite!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uNi Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 It's pretty normal, it gave a lot of fight in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobgtafan Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 The games been out since 2001, a lot of people on here probably havn't even played it (Which is a shame). Believe it or not almost everything that needs to be said about GTA 3 has been said... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lithium Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 The games been out since 2001, a lot of people on here probably havn't even played it (Which is a shame). Believe it or not almost everything that needs to be said about GTA 3 has been said... I would hope that almost 90% percent of the people here have played it. Hell, I never even owned a PS2 and beat all the GTA games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyGanteks Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 So, we're going to have a topic about every forum being less active or ''dead' now? Yeah, its inactive, nothing you can do about it. It's days have passed, but the forums still serve and got usefull pinned topics for those who first start off with GTA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmyJones Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 I have a copy for pc, i might install it and go through it. it's been ages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emotion98.3 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Think that's bad? Go on IV multiplayer and see which is one is more alive... >.> I got IV at the WRONG time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanzant Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 One reason I quit looking at the forum was because a while back there was this trend of new people who were new to the game posting topics with other members having nothing to add other than smart ass replies like "OMFG THIZ WUZ FOUND LEIK 1,893 YEARS AGO" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_bungle Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Yeah I don't go to those fourms anymore due to the fact of all the annoying 10 year old fanboy fags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otter Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 fanboy fags. NOT cool. I don't give a sh*t if it's against the rules or not, I will NOT abide this bigoted, idiotic, and ignorant hatred towards fanboys. gays either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weirdo. Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Yeah I don't go to those fourms anymore due to the fact of all the annoying 10 year old fanboy fags. And Cidamelo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HolyGrenadeFrenzy Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 (edited) fanboy fags. NOT cool. I don't give a sh*t if it's against the rules or not, I will NOT abide this bigoted, idiotic, and ignorant hatred towards fanboys. gays either Oh, yeah. I'm with the elegant sea mammal. To take it a step further, according to my personal definition of the terms "Fags & Fagots", I don't think the kindling we send the witches off with to fan the fires of hell and all should be treated so abruptly, either. (Be they gay despicable or just someone you hate, and desire to be consumed by flame at the next witch burning, regardless.) I mean, damn, isn't it enough that they are going to burn, burn, burn with someone that is made of wood that weighs as much as a duck? Edited August 3, 2010 by HolyGrenadeFrenzy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QwertyAAA Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Actually, III is a bit less inane and more alive than the VC section. SA is just as full of f*cktarded fanboys who can't put together a phrase, much less a sentence, as always. Cidamelo constantly posting about Claude being hot still disturbs me somewhat, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bartleby Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Cidamelo constantly posting about Claude being hot still disturbs me somewhat, though. Yeah, though her intentions seem to be anything but malicious, so I don't mind it too much. However, it is disappointing to see most of the conversation in the section revolving around vehement debates about Claude's voice/nationality/blood type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lithium Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Cidamelo constantly posting about Claude being hot still disturbs me somewhat, though. Yeah, though her intentions seem to be anything but malicious, so I don't mind it too much. However, it is disappointing to see most of the conversation in the section revolving around vehement debates about Claude's voice/nationality/blood type. "San Fierro has a great atmosphere and is the city of Claude Speed! I love it"- cidamelo Point Proven. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoječ Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Actually she makes III era forums a bit more lively Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IVSA_Guy Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 What the f*ck is all wrong with you?!?! 10 years old fanboys fags? f*cktarded fanboys?! Wtf is going here on about? Its all about GTA 3. No need to be such an asshole like that. Its about GTA 3 is dying in that section. What you think?! Of course its dying, most people enjoy the game GTA IV. Alot better than III. I myself quit playing SA and moved on IV. I must say, IV is a great GTA. So no wonder why old games are dying except SA and IV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QwertyAAA Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Cidamelo constantly posting about Claude being hot still disturbs me somewhat, though. Yeah, though her intentions seem to be anything but malicious, so I don't mind it too much. Of course. It's just the non-sequiturs, i suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HolyGrenadeFrenzy Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Yes, all GTAs deserve their division of respect in these here parts. New generations of GTA gamers, gaming and game play owe a debt to the previous games else the "new and improved" games don't have a legacy to build on or from for that matter. Without the previous games there are no future games. It is best to be wise about this lest, watch thy words, there come and end to the series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riquenunes Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 What the f*ck is all wrong with you?!?!10 years old fanboys fags? f*cktarded fanboys?! Wtf is going here on about? Its all about GTA 3. No need to be such an asshole like that. Its about GTA 3 is dying in that section. What you think?! Of course its dying, most people enjoy the game GTA IV. Alot better than III. I myself quit playing SA and moved on IV. I must say, IV is a great GTA. So no wonder why old games are dying except SA and IV. Dope freestyle, bro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IVSA_Guy Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Yes, all GTAs deserve their division of respect in these here parts. New generations of GTA gamers, gaming and game play owe a debt to the previous games else the "new and improved" games don't have a legacy to build on or from for that matter. Without the previous games there are no future games It is best to be wise about this lest, watch thy words, there come and end to the series. If there was no GTA 3, then we didnt have GTA IV. So in general, its all thanks to GTA 3 wich araised GTA IV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riquenunes Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 If there was no GTA 1, then we didnt have GTA 3. So in general, its all thanks to GTA 1 wich araised GTA 3 wich araised GTA IV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coin-god Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 If there was no GTA 1, then we didnt have GTA 3.So in general, its all thanks to GTA 1 wich araised GTA 3 wich araised GTA IV. If it wasnt for Pong, we wouldnt have computer games at all. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riquenunes Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 If there was no GTA 1, then we didnt have GTA 3.So in general, its all thanks to GTA 1 wich araised GTA 3 wich araised GTA IV. If it wasnt for Pong, we wouldnt have computer games at all. lol If it wasn't for ENIAC we wouldn't have computers at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claude Speed. Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 If it wasnt for Pong, we wouldnt have computer games at all. Pong wasn't the first video game: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_video_game And GTA III era forums are still active. Saying stuff like 'I don't go to those fourms anymore due to the fact of all the annoying 10 year old fanboy fags' sounds like a f*cking excuse to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xboxless Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 (edited) I don't go there because I never played III. I only played VC, SA, and IV. Only finished the storyline for IV, but VC will have a special place in my heart, mainly because of the HotRing races in the stadium, that stuff was the bomb. Yes, I know, I am a gtanoob. Hell, I don't go to the IV section anymore, and that was the section I joined the forums for... Edited August 4, 2010 by Xboxless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gundog Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 You have to realize that III and VC are nearly 10 years old. Some games don't get remembered after a single year, so, in my opinion, they put up a fight against aging, which, unfortunately, nobody can beat. It's no surprising matter that those games have died off, I mean, they had 6 damn sequels. SA forums will always be raided by stupid wiggers that can't spell their own names, so... yeah. I still check those forums, since I feel obligated to. They're still my favourite in the series. I bet Cidamelo is a guy who watches gay porn You are an aperture through which the universe is looking at and exploring itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HolyGrenadeFrenzy Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 (edited) Yes, all GTAs deserve their division of respect in these here parts. New generations of GTA gamers, gaming and game play owe a debt to the previous games else the "new and improved" games don't have a legacy to build on or from for that matter. Without the previous games there are no future games It is best to be wise about this lest, watch thy words, there come and end to the series. If there was no GTA 3, then we didnt have GTA IV. So in general, its all thanks to GTA 3 wich araised GTA IV. Actually, it went from III to the rest of the III incarnation of games and then to IV, young lad. "GTAs" is in plural form and it also assumes the understanding of how a series of sets are connected. This is especially true of anything that has a significant financial investment expenditure yet is even more so of those that have this in addition to more research and development. *edit out encyclopedic account of the history of the forum and the gta game track of changes and improvements, by suggestion, thanks to this forum. To the rest of you whom miss my point. This GTAForums is for all of the GTA games and it shall remain so. Are we concerned about people forgetting about the older games? Sometimes, but after so many changes and transitions we have become used to it. Is GTAIII important to our history of This Forums? Absolutely. The games before GTAIII? Sure, respectively. Is the GTAIII section going to survive and continue? Yes. Claude Speed will never really die and I am tempted to start a new game for the sake of nostalgia. Edited August 4, 2010 by HolyGrenadeFrenzy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now