Female genitalia

[Alazerum]

 

There are a lot of games which show more EXPLICIT materials, so what's your excuse? It'd make the game more realistic, the huge leap from the previous game.

Oh come on, I bet more than half of the players would agree with me in adding this thing in the next game. Come on, do the game more realistic!

[TheIncredibleMrGQ]

 

@ this thread

[GTA_getaway_driver]

Your one of the many people I laugh at for wanting sexually explict material in video games. It is Grand Theft Auto, an action/sandbox game, not "Playboy Mansion: The Video Game".

Things like this are utterly pointless and put an AO rating on the game, thus R* loosing a sh*t-load of money in the process.

[krashdown]

I'd love for video games to stop being kids toys... but gta cannot do it alone and this isn't really the direction that i want my favorite game to go down

[Alazerum]

GTA_getaway_driver, What makes you think so? The game is designed not for the elderly, but for the young.

 

And how exactly it will make obstacles to selling? If it wouldn't vary greatly from the previous selling and there would be an opportunity to sell, then who of the players would give a damn?

Edited March 28, 2010 by Alazerum

[ToughMan69]

Is it the lack of pubic hair what's been bothering you ?

[Oddsock]

GTA_getaway_driver, What makes you think so? The game is designed not for the elderly, but for the young.

 

And how exactly it will make obstacles to selling? If it wouldn't vary greatly from the previous selling and there would be an opportunity to sell, then who of the players would give a damn?

AO games can only be purchased by people 18 and up (going by American ESRB ratings, not European PEGI ratings) and there is a stigma attached to the title "Adults Only." It is much more likely that parents will not grant permission for their children to buy games that are AO, and that is how R* would lose quite a bit of its consumer base.

 

I don't understand your desire to have more detailed and present genitals in the game.

[Alazerum]

 

AO games can only be purchased by people 18 and up (going by American ESRB ratings, not European PEGI ratings) and there is a stigma attached to the title "Adults Only." It is much more likely that parents will not grant permission for their children to buy games that are AO, and that is how R* would lose quite a bit of its consumer base.

 

I don't think majority of the players will ask their parents for a permission to play this game.

 

I don't understand your desire to have more detailed and present genitals in the game.

It actually must be -not understandable- the unwillingness of having it in the game

[TheIncredibleMrGQ]

AO games can only be purchased by people 18 and up

Meaning the parent of a 14 year old isn't gonna buy a game for their child that says "Adults Only" in big bold letters..."AO" is the equivalent of buying porn

[The_Mario_Man]

Not to mention most retailers won't even carry AO rated games.

[Jordy.]

I bet they could get away with adding discrete genitalia underneith ped's skirts (Unless the censors obviously discover it). I mean, I bet if FAUX NEWS found out that it's possible to go to the airport and fire an RPG at one of the moving passenger jets, they'd make a f*cking stir out of it. But it's just one of those things which aren't publicised, like Saints Row, that has some pretty hardcore themes that no one complained about.

[The_Mario_Man]

...Wait, I think we've actually missed the important question here... which is why you're shooting video game women just to stare up their skirts?

[Garrison64]

Personally I don't get the lack of nudity in the strip clubs. It is a strip club after all so it seem rather pointless that they have it all covered up. They can show a man's penis in TLatD but somehow nipples are off limits and that really doesn't make any sense at all especially considering the context they would be shown in. It's not that it bothers me or that I would spend more time in the strip clubs. It's just that with so much adult material in the game already I don't get why that is such a sticking point especially after seeing what they got away with in TLatD with virtually no public outcry at all.

 

As far as the rest of the game goes there would be no point in it. There's no need to show sexual acts or nudity just for the sake of having them in the game. But if your going to have a strip club, at least have the balls to put some actual stripping in them.

[Oddsock]

I don't think majority of the players will ask their parents for a permission to play this game.

(quoted for you because they support my points)

 

Meaning the parent of a 14 year old isn't gonna buy a game for their child that says "Adults Only" in big bold letters..."AO" is the equivalent of buying porn

 

Not to mention most retailers won't even carry AO rated games.

 

Alazerum, you seem to be completely unaware of the fact that a very significant percentage of the video gamer demographic is under the age of eighteen, and The_Mario_Man brings up a great point in that some retailers won't carry AO games, so even the players who are 18+ may have difficulty buying the game compared to M for Mature/PEGI 16 games that can be bought in stores.

 

 

It actually must be -not understandable- the unwillingness of having it in the game

 

Please don't wink at me, because that's weird and I'm not your buddy here. Why you have the intention of playing a game to stare at virtual vaginas, breasts, penises, or otherwise is beyond me. You can find the real stuff easy as can be on the internet with even a quick Google search. You know why we don't care about virtual pussy in games? Because we shouldn't care. It's pointless, it's immature, and I am spending my money on a game for its gameplay and storyline, not because there's some kind of crotch shot minigame.

 

You want that in a game, go play Leisure Suit Larry or Dead Or Alive: Extreme, because this is Grand Theft Auto, not Microsoft Porn Simulator 2008.

[DjMiikkii]

I don't care for dirty perverted loners sitting at home wanting to see a vagina on GTA. Go out and get a girlfriend.

[TonyClifton]

I would rather have glimpse of a box of grenades in the game, than a lady's winkle.

[Alazerum]

 

I don't think majority of the players will ask their parents for a permission to play this game.

(quoted for you because they support my points)

 

Meaning the parent of a 14 year old isn't gonna buy a game for their child that says "Adults Only" in big bold letters..."AO" is the equivalent of buying porn

It's not like every 14 y/o boy can't help himself to buy a game from a shop. But maybe you have an investigated research.

 

Not to mention most retailers won't even carry AO rated games.

Demand creates supply, but I won't argue with you, maybe you're right.

 

Alazerum, you seem to be completely unaware of the fact that a very significant percentage of the video gamer demographic is under the age of eighteen, and The_Mario_Man brings up a great point in that some retailers won't carry AO games, so even the players who are 18+ may have difficulty buying the game compared to M for Mature/PEGI 16 games that can be bought in stores.

Generations is changing fast, you would be surprised but already majority of these kids know about "it" more than you think they could know. I mean come on, don't you think at least more than half of them would welcome it in the game? It was a rhetoric question, though.

 

 

It actually must be -not understandable- the unwillingness of having it in the game

 

Please don't wink at me, because that's weird and I'm not your buddy here.

Why so mean? It's the internet. Relax, baby.

 

 

Why you have the intention of playing a game to stare at virtual vaginas, breasts, penises, or otherwise is beyond me. You can find the real stuff easy as can be on the internet with even a quick Google search. You know why we don't care about virtual pussy in games? Because we shouldn't care. It's pointless, it's immature, and I am spending my money on a game for its gameplay and storyline, not because there's some kind of crotch shot minigame.

Why do you take all this so serious? I mean what is bad of having a more realistic game, as it's our basic instincts.. and hey don't tell me you don't like explicit materials...

 

You want that in a game, go play Leisure Suit Larry or Dead Or Alive: Extreme, because this is Grand Theft Auto, not Microsoft Porn Simulator 2008.

I'm not playing these games, and not going to, thx for advice anyway.

 

 

I don't care for dirty perverted loners sitting at home wanting to see a vagina on GTA. Go out and get a girlfriend.

Did you know how closely you captured the true essence of yourself?

nah, just joking, and take it easier, mate

Edited March 31, 2010 by Alazerum

[spike88]

You know if you really want to see some Vagina in GTA just get the PC version and mod it.

 

Also I doubt most Europe markets would allow a GTA with Genitalia, as most of them have censored out the hookers, and the Penis, in the Lost and Damned.

 

And the last thing the series needs in America is more people getting on the anti-gta/video game bandwagon just for some pixel-ated cooch.

 

 

 

Generations is changing fast, you would be surprised but already majority of these kids know about "it" more than you think they could know. I mean come on, don't you think at least more than half of them would welcome it in the game? It was a rhetoric question, though.

Of course half of the kids would accept it, It's an easy way for them to look at porn.

 

If they get caught, they can just say they didn't know it was there and they were just interested. Which then leads to the parents suing Rockstar/ Take-Two, with the same story of "I'm not a Bad parent! How was I supposed to know there was Nudity in this Mature/AO game! Now give me Half a million dollars in damages that you have caused to my family!"

Edited March 31, 2010 by spike88

[TheIncredibleMrGQ]

 

Meaning the parent of a 14 year old isn't gonna buy a game for their child that says "Adults Only" in big bold letters..."AO" is the equivalent of buying porn

It's not like every 14 y/o boy can't help himself to buy a game from a shop. But maybe you have an investigated research.

 

they ask for I.D., genius.

Edited April 1, 2010 by TheIncredibleMrGQ

[Arkangel]

it's just a matter of waiting for the "female genitalia MOD"

 

gta for PC: everything is possible

 

 

[dukee152]

Does the united states government control video game ratings?

[Alazerum]

 

You know if you really want to see some Vagina in GTA just get the PC version and mod it. 

But won't be able to play via mp.

 

 

Generations is changing fast, you would be surprised but already majority of these kids know about "it" more than you think they could know. I mean come on, don't you think at least more than half of them would welcome it in the game? It was a rhetoric question, though.

 

Of course half of the kids would accept it, It's an easy way for them to look at porn. 

 

If they get caught, they can just say they didn't know it was there and they were just interested. Which then leads to the parents suing Rockstar/ Take-Two, with the same story of "I'm not a Bad parent! How was I supposed to know there was Nudity in this Mature/AO game! Now give me Half a million dollars in damages that you have caused to my family!"

But doesn't the game would have a warning in the sticker? So parents may know about it in advance.

 

I mean there are games where you can tear the enemies off, look at beheaded head, limbs

but you just can't look at simple vagina...

Edited April 4, 2010 by Alazerum

[G#O$TR!D3R - 133457]

I don't care about having cooch in the game, but isn't it a bit silly that it's entirely fine to shoot cops in the face with a shotgun but a cooch is totally inappropriate and has no place in entertainment? Taking human life is ok, but the human body is off limits? Makes no sense.

[DjMiikkii]

"Did you know how closely you captured the true essence of yourself?

nah, just joking, and take it easier, mate"

 

Lol wut? I have been with my girlfriend for just over 3 years now. If your looking for some pussy on a video game then you really need to get out more.

[TonyClifton]

I did a quick poll amongst female friends in the pub about this, and after I had picked myself up off the floor of the bar and extracted beer mats from my ass, they all said: "Eugh!"

[DennyFrontier]

The Getaway Black Monday pulled off having naked women in the game and it was a great game all around no big deal, it was in 1 mission though, but if they tried rockstar could pull it off just fine

[kristjankalev]

I think, that if Rokstar Games would add this feature, then hundreds of people will start to shoot women with skirts and peeking whats under the skirt with a sniper!

Dont add this feature, if you dont want players to become imbecils!

[Alazerum]

Too bad that because of the people like ^ that we will have to have a game with double standard, on the one hand it's ok to behead enemies (other games apart) on the other hand it's not ok for people to have what they MUST have, even in the game. It's not like a big deal, anyone who has access to the internet can open wikipedia and look the article for it along with the illustration. But no, we had to follow someone's foolish thoughts. At least there could be different releases for certain countries. (that which is uncensored and that which isn't)

[roryhynes]

Vaginas just don't go with R*'s style, the first time anyone saw the penis in TLAD I bet they were ROFLing lots because of how tounge-in-cheek it all was, how you saw his ass and you had several close encounters before all was revealed.

 

To get a shotgun, go up to a civilian woman and blast them with it in the head, equip a sniper rifle and zoom in on the gap between their legs to see a pixellated crotch wouldn't really go with the light-heartedness that Rockstar want when it comes to nudity.

[cultivator]

I get the feeling you've never seen a real vagina.