GTA V Graphics

[bestmodder]

What Graphics would you like for the new GTA V

[Weirdo.]

Why would anyone want it to look like any of the sixth generation games?

 

I voted, 'Better then IV', even though the inevitable truth is that in terms of graphics, the game won't improve much because of the limitations of home consoles. It would be nice if GTA V on the PC gets Direct X11 though.

 

*EDIT*: Did the poll just disappear?

 

Forget I said that.

Edited March 16, 2010 by Weirdo.

[bestmodder]

 

*EDIT*: Did the poll just disappear?

lol fix it

[Weirdo.]

Oh wait, it's back now. But I have a pic for anyone who missed out:

 

http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/7898/huhs.png

[Vecceti]

Yes, it dissapeared

 

Obviously I want the graphics to improve. I don't want them too real though

[mubd]

Get rid of the poll, it's useless.

[bestmodder]

Get rid of the poll, it's useless.

shut up.

[bestmodder]

i heard a rumer that the graphics are going to be like gta sa

[Weirdo.]

Where did you hear this rumor?

[bestmodder]

Where did you hear this rumor?

in one of the forums dont know what one lol

[The Guru]

I strongly doubt that. R* improved the graphics by loads and I don't think they would go back to that pixel sh*t. Even though SA was a great game, the graphics sucked when you compare it to IV.

 

I hope they can make some improvements, but like Vecetti said, I don't want them too real.

[bestmodder]

I strongly doubt that. R* improved the graphics by loads and I don't think they would go back to that pixel sh*t. Even though SA was a great game, the graphics sucked when you compare it to IV.

 

I hope they can make some improvements, but like Vecetti said, I don't want them too real.

but if they make it to graficel the game will lag so much

[Grand Theft Auto Dude]

What? They will make the graphics as good as they can with the current hardware. The console versions will look a bit better than IV, and the PC version will look as good as the best gaming rigs will allow.

 

And who would say that they would go back 6 years graphically? And why would you believe them?

[The Guru]

Here's another point why R* wouldn't go back to SA graphics:

 

The GTA fans are expecting something at the level of IV graphics and better. Not worse. It would be a disappointment for the fans and the game might would not sell well.

[bestmodder]

And who would say that they would go back 6 years graphically? And why would you believe them?

ok yeah true

[ViceCity09]

Well Red Dead Redemption looks better than GTA IV so I voted for better than IV.

[Andrew]

The poll has been removed, again. It's useless and pointless not every topic warrants a poll, it encourages spammy posts.

[maxopower]

Stop this failed discussion, of cures GTA V’s Graphics are going to be better. This is the stupidest topic yet, you might as well ask, if GTA V is going to have cars or guns.

 

Every time a developer releases a game, they tell they pussed the engine and hardware to the limit, and every time the make a sequel or another game, it’s bigger, better looking and take even better use of the engine.

 

I hope this topic is a joke, why would Rockstar go back. The poll is useless and so are the entire topic.

 

No we won’t se a Graphical improved, like we did from SA to IV, but off cures it will be better. Just look at GTA III, at the time it came out, it was the most advanced game Rockstar could produce. Then only two years after GTA VC came out.

 

And most important, Look at RDR, look how much better it looks!

 

Excuse the misspelling, in a hurry.

Edited March 16, 2010 by maxopower

[RomanViking]

GTA IV has good graphics. Texture quality and attention to detail is phenomenal.

 

What needs to be improved is the amount of stuff on-screen at once.

 

Rockstar should focus on increasing the amount of traffic and people that can be going about, on-screen at the same time.

[SmC12]

GTA IV has good graphics. Texture quality and attention to detail is phenomenal.

 

What needs to be improved is the amount of stuff on-screen at once.

 

Rockstar should focus on increasing the amount of traffic and people that can be going about, on-screen at the same time.

Good point, that would be a good improvement in the next GTA.

[Squishybubs]

Hopefully somewhat better than IV. I don't think they can go that far without stretching the limits of consoles, though.

 

When the 720 (and maybe the PS4 (nothing has been said yet)) is released (rumored around 2012), chances are that VI will be developed to fit it's graphical capabilities. That, my friends, will be AMAZING.

Edited March 16, 2010 by Squishybubs

[Knife]

The only thing they need to do is make it so the game runs smooth and without the horrible filter on distant objects.

[Shaunr]

I don't think our consoles can handle any more than what GTA 4 was like. And it can't handle it well now. the popins are terrible, especially in TBOGT. If anything will happen, the graphics might get worse, that way the popins aren't so bad.

 

And don't say youve never noticed them, because that would be impossible, unless youve never driven a car or flown a heli or stuff like that.

[Algonquin Bridge]

Strange. In our neighbourhood, trees pop up out of nowhere, as do buildings. Drives the insurers crazy, though!

[SmC12]

 

Strange. In our neighbourhood, trees pop up out of nowhere, as do buildings. Drives the insurers crazy, though!

It does it in BoGT too i think but.....wait..what...oh lol i get what you meant AB^^. (never read it properly)

 

The texture pop-ins are annoying in (BOGT) but only when you're driving fast. I've gotten used to them TBH, i don't think R* knew what would happen if the just removed the blur filter completely, so next time they should make sure they fix it first.

[Vertibirdy]

Rockstar, meet Umbra.

 

I doubt they will improve the graphics. As seen in previous GTA's, they probably won't improve the graphics, they'll just make them different. (Ala III to Vice City, Vice City to SA.)

 

IV's graphics were stunning. Instead of focusing on the graphics, however, R* needs to work on improving the smoothness of the game engine. They can polish everything as much as they'd like, but if the FPS drops and stuff starts popping in and out like crazy, it ain't gonna matter.

[gamefarter]

I think they might make it look as good as Midnight Club Graphics, but without the "cleanliness"that game had, at least that's what I'm hoping for.

[ikt]

IV's graphics are sweet. If R* would improve the blur filter (No gaussian blur, only motion blur and depht of Field), disables the pixelating of the shadows, the game's engine would be awesome. Oh, and improving the framerate is also an important thing. More destructable environments are also welcome. But their game engine right now is already awesome. If they could reach the lighting ENB Series for IV achieves, even better!

[Zer0w5]

R* should hire boris for the graphics job

[ZayDaGawd]

I strongly doubt that. R* improved the graphics by loads and I don't think they would go back to that pixel sh*t. Even though SA was a great game, the graphics sucked when you compare it to IV.

 

I hope they can make some improvements, but like Vecetti said, I don't want them too real.

captain obvious is obvious