Jigglyass Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Sounds Sizzling !! zzzz If you got it stable @ 4ghz. all youll gain is about 2 nano seconds on loading times and about 3-5 frames in game With every oc attempt make sure u test performance . Use 3DMark06. what i mean is higher clocks doesnt always mean better performance. ex. with my system ive found that running my AMD 955 @ 3.9ghz~1.55v max load @ 60c and running 3.7ghz~1.42v max load @ 45c, there was very little performance increase if any at all. just hotter temps. reading all these ocing forums, i believe people buy pcs just to oc them. and thats all they do. if you oc for bragging rights, then be ready to buy new hardware 1. find the cpu sweet spot 2. try uping the volts on your RAM and tighten the timings 3. buy a $10 4gig Flashdrive and dedicate it to readyboost--nice performance for ten bucks. Dont get mad when your SHlT dont boot. lol Readyboost is worse than pagefile. Rather allocate more pagefile than have readyboost. Well readyboost and a pagefile(virtual memory) are the samething. With a pagefile, "Windows Search" has to find the virtual memory in your huge HD or it can look for it on a tiny USB Flashdrive. hence faster No... Bandwidth and latency wise pagefile is a clear winner. Yeah, M$ didnt invent Readyboost cause its slower than the pagefile ? I noticed a difference. You keep telling yourself that you saw a difference, ready boost was invented for laptops with limited drive space. Look at some benchmarks and get it right the next time. Dont try it then. smart asss Readyboost + Pagefile is better than just a Pagefile Who said Ive tried it? When did it say it? I'm a smartass? Its not my fault that my claims are far more superior than yours because i tend to look up things before going and telling people my personal opinion on a claim such as you have made "i saw a performance increase", when in benchmarks ready boost shows no advantage accept on very low end machines. I'm not a smartass, you are. I'm just trying to get the facts straight from your "claims" that are based on your personal opinion. Microsoft invented ready boost for low end computers. Get it right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truehighroller Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 No one said thank you for helping?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoOopiD Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Sounds Sizzling !! zzzz If you got it stable @ 4ghz. all youll gain is about 2 nano seconds on loading times and about 3-5 frames in game With every oc attempt make sure u test performance . Use 3DMark06. what i mean is higher clocks doesnt always mean better performance. ex. with my system ive found that running my AMD 955 @ 3.9ghz~1.55v max load @ 60c and running 3.7ghz~1.42v max load @ 45c, there was very little performance increase if any at all. just hotter temps. reading all these ocing forums, i believe people buy pcs just to oc them. and thats all they do. if you oc for bragging rights, then be ready to buy new hardware 1. find the cpu sweet spot 2. try uping the volts on your RAM and tighten the timings 3. buy a $10 4gig Flashdrive and dedicate it to readyboost--nice performance for ten bucks. Dont get mad when your SHlT dont boot. lol Readyboost is worse than pagefile. Rather allocate more pagefile than have readyboost. Well readyboost and a pagefile(virtual memory) are the samething. With a pagefile, "Windows Search" has to find the virtual memory in your huge HD or it can look for it on a tiny USB Flashdrive. hence faster No... Bandwidth and latency wise pagefile is a clear winner. Yeah, M$ didnt invent Readyboost cause its slower than the pagefile ? I noticed a difference. You keep telling yourself that you saw a difference, ready boost was invented for laptops with limited drive space. Look at some benchmarks and get it right the next time. Dont try it then. smart asss Readyboost + Pagefile is better than just a Pagefile Who said Ive tried it? When did it say it? I'm a smartass? Its not my fault that my claims are far more superior than yours because i tend to look up things before going and telling people my personal opinion on a claim such as you have made "i saw a performance increase", when in benchmarks ready boost shows no advantage accept on very low end machines. I'm not a smartass, you are. I'm just trying to get the facts straight from your "claims" that are based on your personal opinion. Microsoft invented ready boost for low end computers. Get it right. Post these Holy Readyboost Benchmarks then. I want to see the same system with and without readyboost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireItUp Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 I gained a huge boost in performance when overclocking. When IV came out I took my E6600 c2d from 2.4ghz to 3.4ghz and it's been like that ever since. Even running with the stock heatsink and fan I've never had any problems with the overclock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikt Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Cut the crap about ReadyBoost and try/bench it yourself. My specs: 2.5GHz Core 2 Quad Q8300 4GB DDR2 RAM @ 333MHz Sapphire Radeon HD4830 512MB OC'd (700/1020) Windows 7 64bit GTA IV settings: EVERYTHING maxed out at 1280*1024 res (max my screen supports) @ 75Hz Memory usage: 1577 MB Commandlines: -availablevidmem 3.5-memrestrict 781574400 Results: Readyboost OFF StatisticsAverage FPS: 21.11Duration: 37.85 secCPU Usage: 50%System memory usage: 71%Video memory usage: 61%Graphics SettingsVideo Mode: 1280 x 1024 (75 Hz)Texture Quality: HighTexture Filter Quality: HighestView Distance: 100Detail Distance: 100HardwareMicrosoft Windows 7 Ultimate Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Video Adapter: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series Video Driver version: 8.14.10.716Audio Adapter: Speakers (High Definition Audio Device)Intel® Core2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHzFile ID: Benchmark.cli Readyboost ON StatisticsAverage FPS: 20.97Duration: 37.63 secCPU Usage: 52%System memory usage: 72%Video memory usage: 61%Graphics SettingsVideo Mode: 1280 x 1024 (75 Hz)Texture Quality: HighTexture Filter Quality: HighestView Distance: 100Detail Distance: 100HardwareMicrosoft Windows 7 Ultimate Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Video Adapter: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series Video Driver version: 8.14.10.716Audio Adapter: Speakers (High Definition Audio Device)Intel® Core2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHzFile ID: Benchmark.cli DIFFERENCE: Less than 1 FPS -> insignificant change -> same FPS It's a fact, 4GB RAM = no readyboost needed/improvement for GTA IV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truehighroller Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Ding Ding Ding round 7 folks. . I'm not promoting fighting in here juet so the mods know. I just had to say it. @ OverTheBelow the OP. Do what I said here, http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtop...st&p=1059793114 and you should be good and yes overclocking helps allot. Don't be surprised if you hit another bottleneck with that CPU though. I wouldn't think your CPU would be a bottleneck but, you never know with this game man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luceberg Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Readyboost is a gimmick, if you need more memory buy some RAM. Also "windows search" has nothing to do with the pagefile. Quad cores aren't going to get much of a performance boost in games beyond about 3.6 ghz but a synthetic benchmark like 3dmark should show increased performance beyond that so you must have had something else going on like slower RAM speed or the OC not being 100% stable. A dual core CPU on the other hand will show performance increases in many games beyond 3.6 ghz. That's interesting. I have a Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz. I doesnt want to go higher without upping the voltage more than I would like to. I have thought of getting one that will clock higher. So, people who have quad cores up to 4Ghz, would I see any performance increase? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigglyass Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 Sounds Sizzling !! zzzz If you got it stable @ 4ghz. all youll gain is about 2 nano seconds on loading times and about 3-5 frames in game With every oc attempt make sure u test performance . Use 3DMark06. what i mean is higher clocks doesnt always mean better performance. ex. with my system ive found that running my AMD 955 @ 3.9ghz~1.55v max load @ 60c and running 3.7ghz~1.42v max load @ 45c, there was very little performance increase if any at all. just hotter temps. reading all these ocing forums, i believe people buy pcs just to oc them. and thats all they do. if you oc for bragging rights, then be ready to buy new hardware 1. find the cpu sweet spot 2. try uping the volts on your RAM and tighten the timings 3. buy a $10 4gig Flashdrive and dedicate it to readyboost--nice performance for ten bucks. Dont get mad when your SHlT dont boot. lol Readyboost is worse than pagefile. Rather allocate more pagefile than have readyboost. Well readyboost and a pagefile(virtual memory) are the samething. With a pagefile, "Windows Search" has to find the virtual memory in your huge HD or it can look for it on a tiny USB Flashdrive. hence faster No... Bandwidth and latency wise pagefile is a clear winner. Yeah, M$ didnt invent Readyboost cause its slower than the pagefile ? I noticed a difference. You keep telling yourself that you saw a difference, ready boost was invented for laptops with limited drive space. Look at some benchmarks and get it right the next time. Dont try it then. smart asss Readyboost + Pagefile is better than just a Pagefile Who said Ive tried it? When did it say it? I'm a smartass? Its not my fault that my claims are far more superior than yours because i tend to look up things before going and telling people my personal opinion on a claim such as you have made "i saw a performance increase", when in benchmarks ready boost shows no advantage accept on very low end machines. I'm not a smartass, you are. I'm just trying to get the facts straight from your "claims" that are based on your personal opinion. Microsoft invented ready boost for low end computers. Get it right. Post these Holy Readyboost Benchmarks then. I want to see the same system with and without readyboost. I'm not your errand boy, get your ass on google and find all the information you need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoOopiD Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 (edited) It's a fact, 4GB RAM = no readyboost needed/improvement for GTA IV. Its a usb flashdrive not a video card. So after your bench, did u leave the readyboost or did you take it out? Honestly. Im not saying its the Miracle Fix. All im saying is that i noticed Windows responds a little faster and GTA4 doesnt stutter has much U all can easily try ReadyBoost and make up your own decision or for those of you who dont want to try it based on their techie sites and factitious benchmarks and want to come on this forum and debate can ETADIK ! Theres a ocing tip. Edited February 24, 2010 by StoOopiD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heat84 Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 ETADIK What does that mean? Did you make that up? Google doesn't even know about it. And I just love the quote pyramid above. Keep it going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebernanut Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 U come across as a complete douche bag! Sorry thats how i see it. what r u waiting for mommy to buy u some more ram with the correct vdimm & vtt lol ? or u can tell your mommy to buy u a $10 flashdrive. Dont try it either, your mystery system is much too uber for Readyboost. the cookies show that u r retarded. So plz STFD & STFU ! First off that comment wasn't directed towards you, secondly if you have to resort to personal attacks it's obvious that you have lost the debate. I'm an adult and "mommy" hasn't bought my computer parts for over a decade. I could afford to buy whatever memory I want but those of us that work for our money often like to spend it wisely. Also I didn't say that my memory wouldn't run at the "correct vdimm & vtt", I said that it requires a higher VDIMM and VTT voltage than I would like. I have to run it with 1.66v VDIMM and 1.5v VTT to get over 1400 mhz even though it's rated for 1866 mhz. Since these are outside of Intel recommended voltages I guess "correct" would work as well though. Below are links to the benchmarks I quickly found before responding to this topic since I hadn't read any reviews on it in a while and wanted to confirm what I thought to be true before responding. Neither of these tech sites are one of my favorites but I trust them a lot more than anecdotal evidence from a random person in a forum. Notice that readyboost shows the biggest improvements with only 512 mb of RAM and that adding more RAM is a much bigger improvement. Anandtech Toms Hardware Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebernanut Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 That's interesting. I have a Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz. I doesnt want to go higher without upping the voltage more than I would like to. I have thought of getting one that will clock higher. So, people who have quad cores up to 4Ghz, would I see any performance increase? Thanks. You would probably see a small increase in performance with some games but not enough that I would worry about it too much. Those q6600 have been good overclockers and a great bang for the buck CPU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoOopiD Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 U come across as a complete douche bag! Sorry thats how i see it. what r u waiting for mommy to buy u some more ram with the correct vdimm & vtt lol ? or u can tell your mommy to buy u a $10 flashdrive. Dont try it either, your mystery system is much too uber for Readyboost. the cookies show that u r retarded. So plz STFD & STFU ! First off that comment wasn't directed towards you, secondly if you have to resort to personal attacks it's obvious that you have lost the debate. I'm an adult and "mommy" hasn't bought my computer parts for over a decade. I could afford to buy whatever memory I want but those of us that work for our money often like to spend it wisely. Also I didn't say that my memory wouldn't run at the "correct vdimm & vtt", I said that it requires a higher VDIMM and VTT voltage than I would like. I have to run it with 1.66v VDIMM and 1.5v VTT to get over 1400 mhz even though it's rated for 1866 mhz. Since these are outside of Intel recommended voltages I guess "correct" would work as well though. Below are links to the benchmarks I quickly found before responding to this topic since I hadn't read any reviews on it in a while and wanted to confirm what I thought to be true before responding. Neither of these tech sites are one of my favorites but I trust them a lot more than anecdotal evidence from a random person in a forum. Notice that readyboost shows the biggest improvements with only 512 mb of RAM and that adding more RAM is a much bigger improvement. Anandtech Toms Hardware Nice benchmarks. every bench shows a slight performance increase as i stated. Definitly worth a CHEAP USB2.0 Flashdrive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigglyass Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 U come across as a complete douche bag! Sorry thats how i see it. what r u waiting for mommy to buy u some more ram with the correct vdimm & vtt lol ? or u can tell your mommy to buy u a $10 flashdrive. Dont try it either, your mystery system is much too uber for Readyboost. the cookies show that u r retarded. So plz STFD & STFU ! First off that comment wasn't directed towards you, secondly if you have to resort to personal attacks it's obvious that you have lost the debate. I'm an adult and "mommy" hasn't bought my computer parts for over a decade. I could afford to buy whatever memory I want but those of us that work for our money often like to spend it wisely. Also I didn't say that my memory wouldn't run at the "correct vdimm & vtt", I said that it requires a higher VDIMM and VTT voltage than I would like. I have to run it with 1.66v VDIMM and 1.5v VTT to get over 1400 mhz even though it's rated for 1866 mhz. Since these are outside of Intel recommended voltages I guess "correct" would work as well though. Below are links to the benchmarks I quickly found before responding to this topic since I hadn't read any reviews on it in a while and wanted to confirm what I thought to be true before responding. Neither of these tech sites are one of my favorites but I trust them a lot more than anecdotal evidence from a random person in a forum. Notice that readyboost shows the biggest improvements with only 512 mb of RAM and that adding more RAM is a much bigger improvement. Anandtech Toms Hardware Nice benchmarks. every bench shows a slight performance increase as i stated. Definitly worth a CHEAP USB2.0 Flashdrive. Dohoho, get it through your thick skull, it does not help GTA 4, unless you have a super low end computer. God f*cking dammit you are a reject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoOopiD Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 ETADIK What does that mean? Did you make that up? Google doesn't even know about it. And I just love the quote pyramid above. Keep it going. sound it out yeah i love QQQQQQQQQQ too.lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoOopiD Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 U come across as a complete douche bag! Sorry thats how i see it. what r u waiting for mommy to buy u some more ram with the correct vdimm & vtt lol ? or u can tell your mommy to buy u a $10 flashdrive. Dont try it either, your mystery system is much too uber for Readyboost. the cookies show that u r retarded. So plz STFD & STFU ! First off that comment wasn't directed towards you, secondly if you have to resort to personal attacks it's obvious that you have lost the debate. I'm an adult and "mommy" hasn't bought my computer parts for over a decade. I could afford to buy whatever memory I want but those of us that work for our money often like to spend it wisely. Also I didn't say that my memory wouldn't run at the "correct vdimm & vtt", I said that it requires a higher VDIMM and VTT voltage than I would like. I have to run it with 1.66v VDIMM and 1.5v VTT to get over 1400 mhz even though it's rated for 1866 mhz. Since these are outside of Intel recommended voltages I guess "correct" would work as well though. Below are links to the benchmarks I quickly found before responding to this topic since I hadn't read any reviews on it in a while and wanted to confirm what I thought to be true before responding. Neither of these tech sites are one of my favorites but I trust them a lot more than anecdotal evidence from a random person in a forum. Notice that readyboost shows the biggest improvements with only 512 mb of RAM and that adding more RAM is a much bigger improvement. Anandtech Toms Hardware Nice benchmarks. every bench shows a slight performance increase as i stated. Definitly worth a CHEAP USB2.0 Flashdrive. Dohoho, get it through your thick skull, it does not help GTA 4, unless you have a super low end computer. God f*cking dammit you are a reject. Read the Holy Benchmarks ,you dumb arsh-hole. Dont get mad cause your cheap arsh cant afford a usb flashdrive.lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebernanut Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 Nice benchmarks. every bench shows a slight performance increase as i stated. Definitly worth a CHEAP USB2.0 Flashdrive. Please show me where I said that there was NO increase in performance, I simply said that the performance increase was much smaller than the increase you get from adding more RAM. Those benchmarks also show that performance was decreased sometimes when launching a program for the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigglyass Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 U come across as a complete douche bag! Sorry thats how i see it. what r u waiting for mommy to buy u some more ram with the correct vdimm & vtt lol ? or u can tell your mommy to buy u a $10 flashdrive. Dont try it either, your mystery system is much too uber for Readyboost. the cookies show that u r retarded. So plz STFD & STFU ! First off that comment wasn't directed towards you, secondly if you have to resort to personal attacks it's obvious that you have lost the debate. I'm an adult and "mommy" hasn't bought my computer parts for over a decade. I could afford to buy whatever memory I want but those of us that work for our money often like to spend it wisely. Also I didn't say that my memory wouldn't run at the "correct vdimm & vtt", I said that it requires a higher VDIMM and VTT voltage than I would like. I have to run it with 1.66v VDIMM and 1.5v VTT to get over 1400 mhz even though it's rated for 1866 mhz. Since these are outside of Intel recommended voltages I guess "correct" would work as well though. Below are links to the benchmarks I quickly found before responding to this topic since I hadn't read any reviews on it in a while and wanted to confirm what I thought to be true before responding. Neither of these tech sites are one of my favorites but I trust them a lot more than anecdotal evidence from a random person in a forum. Notice that readyboost shows the biggest improvements with only 512 mb of RAM and that adding more RAM is a much bigger improvement. Anandtech Toms Hardware Nice benchmarks. every bench shows a slight performance increase as i stated. Definitly worth a CHEAP USB2.0 Flashdrive. Dohoho, get it through your thick skull, it does not help GTA 4, unless you have a super low end computer. God f*cking dammit you are a reject. Read the Holy Benchmarks ,you dumb arsh-hole. Dont get mad cause your cheap arsh cant afford a usb flashdrive.lol Oh look a dick waiving contest. You are right, i cant afford a flash drive. YOU GOT ME. Man hes 12 and what the f*ck is this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoOopiD Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 Nice benchmarks. every bench shows a slight performance increase as i stated. Definitly worth a CHEAP USB2.0 Flashdrive. Please show me where I said that there was NO increase in performance, I simply said that the performance increase was much smaller than the increase you get from adding more RAM. Those benchmarks also show that performance was decreased sometimes when launching a program for the first time. Were not talking RAM , were talking ReadyBoost. I like the 2gb of Ram with readyboost bench. since a system with 2gb of ram is more stable and typical than a system with only 512mb of ram. Of course the 512mb of ram bench going to be all over the place. its slow. 512mb cant run vista properly let alone another program. Look at it again. the smaller the graph bar the faster it loads. Would u like to continue this useless debate. or do u all want to keeping digging your DUMB hole. As the Holy Benchmark states. ITS A FACT that Readyboost as a slight performance increase. So plz Jiggly dumbass plz STFU !! and next time u have something superior to say u might want to get your facts straight first. U lose . Debate over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikt Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 It's a fact, 4GB RAM = no readyboost needed/improvement for GTA IV. Its a usb flashdrive not a video card. So after your bench, did u leave the readyboost or did you take it out? Honestly. Im not saying its the Miracle Fix. All im saying is that i noticed Windows responds a little faster and GTA4 doesnt stutter has much U all can easily try ReadyBoost and make up your own decision or for those of you who dont want to try it based on their techie sites and factitious benchmarks and want to come on this forum and debate can ETADIK ! Theres a ocing tip. It doesn't help for GTA IV. I assume you still somehow are talking about GTA IV. Someone brought up 'GTA IV Runs better with ReadyBoost' and I just busted that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigglyass Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 Nice benchmarks. every bench shows a slight performance increase as i stated. Definitly worth a CHEAP USB2.0 Flashdrive. Please show me where I said that there was NO increase in performance, I simply said that the performance increase was much smaller than the increase you get from adding more RAM. Those benchmarks also show that performance was decreased sometimes when launching a program for the first time. Were not talking RAM , were talking ReadyBoost. I like the 2gb of Ram with readyboost bench. since a system with 2gb of ram is more stable and typical than a system with only 512mb of ram. Of course the 512mb of ram bench going to be all over the place. its slow. 512mb cant run vista properly let alone another program. Look at it again. the smaller the graph bar the faster it loads. Would u like to continue this useless debate. or do u all want to keeping digging your DUMB hole. As the Holy Benchmark states. ITS A FACT that Readyboost as a slight performance increase. So plz Jiggly dumbass plz STFU !! and next time u have something superior to say u might want to get your facts straight first. U lose . Debate over. Go back to school and learn how to properly build a sentence. Furthermore, your spelling ability equals of a a man who tries to walk with all of his limbs broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaudevillian Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 With my dual core, for every 200mhz overclock I get 2 frames. Which in my book means that the game has a weird stack going into the pipeline and it causes data dependency stalls from the execution of the data stack. When you check the Benchmark after the overclock the game reports using a touch less processor resource as well. To me it looks like after an instruction set finishes in the pipeline it clears it then accepts the next instruction set into the pipeline. So the more threads/cores the better the overclock outcome. Thus, overclocking say an i7 processor by 200 mhz should show amazing results. If any of my post seems weird im just waking up, I will fix it later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truehighroller Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 With my dual core, for every 200mhz overclock I get 2 frames. Which in my book means that the game has a weird stack going into the pipeline and it causes data dependency stalls from the execution of the data stack. When you check the Benchmark after the overclock the game reports using a touch less processor resource as well. To me it looks like after an instruction set finishes in the pipeline it clears it then accepts the next instruction set into the pipeline. So the more threads/cores the better the overclock outcome. Thus, overclocking say an i7 processor by 200 mhz should show amazing results. If any of my post seems weird im just waking up, I will fix it later. Your a f*cking genious. Where were you like 3 moths ago when all this started for you my genious freind for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoOopiD Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 (edited) It's a fact, 4GB RAM = no readyboost needed/improvement for GTA IV. Its a usb flashdrive not a video card. So after your bench, did u leave the readyboost or did you take it out? Honestly. Im not saying its the Miracle Fix. All im saying is that i noticed Windows responds a little faster and GTA4 doesnt stutter has much U all can easily try ReadyBoost and make up your own decision or for those of you who dont want to try it based on their techie sites and factitious benchmarks and want to come on this forum and debate can ETADIK ! Theres a ocing tip. It doesn't help for GTA IV. I assume you still somehow are talking about GTA IV. Someone brought up 'GTA IV Runs better with ReadyBoost' and I just busted that. the only thing that u busted is that your a idiot. If you want to turn down positive advice and be butt buddys with jigglydik go right ahead. Edited February 24, 2010 by StoOopiD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigglyass Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 It's a fact, 4GB RAM = no readyboost needed/improvement for GTA IV. Its a usb flashdrive not a video card. So after your bench, did u leave the readyboost or did you take it out? Honestly. Im not saying its the Miracle Fix. All im saying is that i noticed Windows responds a little faster and GTA4 doesnt stutter has much U all can easily try ReadyBoost and make up your own decision or for those of you who dont want to try it based on their techie sites and factitious benchmarks and want to come on this forum and debate can ETADIK ! Theres a ocing tip. It doesn't help for GTA IV. I assume you still somehow are talking about GTA IV. Someone brought up 'GTA IV Runs better with ReadyBoost' and I just busted that. the only thing that u busted is that your a idiot. If you want to turn down positive advice and be butt buddys with jigglydik go right ahead. "the only thing that u busted is that your a idiot. " This proves that you are 12 and you have no idea what you are talking about. Aren't you supposed to be in school? Its Jigglyass, not jigglydik. Get it right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoOopiD Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 It's a fact, 4GB RAM = no readyboost needed/improvement for GTA IV. Its a usb flashdrive not a video card. So after your bench, did u leave the readyboost or did you take it out? Honestly. Im not saying its the Miracle Fix. All im saying is that i noticed Windows responds a little faster and GTA4 doesnt stutter has much U all can easily try ReadyBoost and make up your own decision or for those of you who dont want to try it based on their techie sites and factitious benchmarks and want to come on this forum and debate can ETADIK ! Theres a ocing tip. It doesn't help for GTA IV. I assume you still somehow are talking about GTA IV. Someone brought up 'GTA IV Runs better with ReadyBoost' and I just busted that. the only thing that u busted is that your a idiot. If you want to turn down positive advice and be butt buddys with jigglydik go right ahead. "the only thing that u busted is that your a idiot. " This proves that you are 12 and you have no idea what you are talking about. Aren't you supposed to be in school? Its Jigglyass, not jigglydik. Get it right. Sticking up for your butt buddy now? thats sweet Your credibility went out the window like 2 pages back. So for the good of the GTA forums, Please sit the fuuck down and shut the fucck UP !! jigglydik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigglyass Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 It's a fact, 4GB RAM = no readyboost needed/improvement for GTA IV. Its a usb flashdrive not a video card. So after your bench, did u leave the readyboost or did you take it out? Honestly. Im not saying its the Miracle Fix. All im saying is that i noticed Windows responds a little faster and GTA4 doesnt stutter has much U all can easily try ReadyBoost and make up your own decision or for those of you who dont want to try it based on their techie sites and factitious benchmarks and want to come on this forum and debate can ETADIK ! Theres a ocing tip. It doesn't help for GTA IV. I assume you still somehow are talking about GTA IV. Someone brought up 'GTA IV Runs better with ReadyBoost' and I just busted that. the only thing that u busted is that your a idiot. If you want to turn down positive advice and be butt buddys with jigglydik go right ahead. "the only thing that u busted is that your a idiot. " This proves that you are 12 and you have no idea what you are talking about. Aren't you supposed to be in school? Its Jigglyass, not jigglydik. Get it right. Sticking up for your butt buddy now? thats sweet Your credibility went out the window like 2 pages back. So for the good of the GTA forums, Please sit the fuuck down and shut the fucck UP !! jigglydik "Your credibility went out the window like 2 pages back" - Nah, yours did. "So for the good of the GTA forums, Please sit the fuuck down and shut the fucck UP !! jigglydik" -First of all you would not know what is good for the GTA, after all you mislead people wit your personal opinion which is untrue. Second of all, no i will not shut the f*ck up because dipsh*ts like you need to be TOLD. Its jigglyass, get it right. "Sticking up for your butt buddy now?" ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaudevillian Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 Your a f*cking genious. Where were you like 3 moths ago when all this started for you my genious freind for you. Are you being sarcastic? I am not sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverTheBelow Posted February 24, 2010 Author Share Posted February 24, 2010 @ OverTheBelow the OP. Do what I said here, http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtop...st&p=1059793114 and you should be good and yes overclocking helps allot. Don't be surprised if you hit another bottleneck with that CPU though. I wouldn't think your CPU would be a bottleneck but, you never know with this game man. Thanks mate. -- In this image, Jigglyass is Terminator and StoOopiD is the kid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoOopiD Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 -First of all you would not know what is good for the GTA, after all you mislead people wit your personal opinion which is untrue. Thats not the case now, is it? Ebernanaut has Proven to the GTA world that u r a stupid, stubborn, arrogant, dumbasss douche bag!!! ITS A FACT ! READYBOOST IMPROVES LOADING TIMES. U LOSE!! GET OVER IT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now