Quantcast
Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
    1. Welcome to GTAForums!

    1. GTANet.com

    1. GTA Online

      1. The Diamond Casino Heist
      2. Find Lobbies & Players
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Vehicles
      5. Content Creator
      6. Help & Support
    2. Red Dead Online

      1. Frontier Pursuits
      2. Find Lobbies & Outlaws
      3. Help & Support
    3. Crews

      1. Events
    1. Red Dead Redemption 2

      1. PC
      2. Gameplay
      3. Missions
      4. Help & Support
    2. Red Dead Redemption

    1. Grand Theft Auto Series

    2. GTA 6

    3. GTA V

      1. PC
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support
    4. GTA IV

      1. The Lost and Damned
      2. The Ballad of Gay Tony
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Help & Support
    5. GTA Chinatown Wars

    6. GTA Vice City Stories

    7. GTA Liberty City Stories

    8. GTA San Andreas

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
    9. GTA Vice City

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
    10. GTA III

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
    11. Top Down Games

      1. GTA Advance
      2. GTA 2
      3. GTA
    1. GTA Mods

      1. GTA V
      2. GTA IV
      3. GTA III, VC & SA
      4. Tutorials
    2. Red Dead Mods

      1. Documentation
    3. Mod Showroom

      1. Scripts & Plugins
      2. Maps
      3. Total Conversions
      4. Vehicles
      5. Textures
      6. Characters
      7. Tools
      8. Other
      9. Workshop
    4. Featured Mods

      1. DYOM
      2. OpenIV
      3. GTA: Underground
      4. GTA: Liberty City
      5. GTA: State of Liberty
    1. Rockstar Games

    2. Rockstar Collectors

    1. Off-Topic

      1. General Chat
      2. Gaming
      3. Technology
      4. Movies & TV
      5. Music
      6. Sports
      7. Vehicles
    2. Expression

      1. Graphics / Visual Arts
      2. GFX Requests & Tutorials
      3. Writers' Discussion
      4. Debates & Discussion
    3. Gangs

    1. Announcements

    2. Support

    3. Suggestions

Sign in to follow this  
spdrlfc

mistake of the decade

Recommended Posts

spdrlfc

WHO ELSE HATES THIS MAN?

 

War on terrorism ... bullsh*t he needed oil and couldnt get it spoilt prick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

this is the most discusting most pathetic video ive ever seen f*ck this man

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mike Tequeli

This all seems a bit done. Although I don't actually think Iraq was for oil, I mean they sure as hell didn't get much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
General Goose

I think the only way they can justify Iraq that doesn't make em look stupid (the WMD, terrorist arguments all were bullsh*t and the dictatorship argument is invalid as the US ignores and even helps most dictators when it suits them), but it makes em look like heartless pricks.

 

So, WMD it is then.

 

I think they were just deluded into believing the existence of WMDs so much they rushed stupidly and even illegally into war.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shaboobala

I hardly think that this deserves discussion mate. Because:

 

A) It's been done. A lot.

 

B) Even if this dead horse hadn't been beaten already: You have no structured point(s). Debate means that some kind of 'thesis' must be provided in order to give context to the discussion.

 

Sorry. But yea.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mad Tony

We all knew this was gonna turn into a discussion about the Iraq war and George Bush and not the topic title right from the start.

 

Mistake of the decade? Some would say the AOL and Time Warner deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Leftcoast

Yah, I see some of that latter points..... but as for mistake of the decade, in a fair world, it would go to Dubya and his minions. In fact, those jokers would have 9 of the top 10 worst mistakes of the decade.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jimmy.

I usually strongly dislike whomever is president. Ideally you should dislike them for their policies, and the policies don't change a whole lot from term to term, so neither should your level of indignation. So I'm a bit tired of ragging on Bush for now after a lively 8 years that made Bush-bashing a cottage industry. I'm pretty sure he'll go down in history as an awful president, among the worst, and he obviously should. This is unless there is a huge PR blitz that forces some collective amnesia over the populace, to forget how bad of a president he was, and whitewash his record, ala the deification of Ronald Reagan. We'll have to wait and see. turn.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
General Goose

Russia is whitewashing Stalin for reasons of patriotism and whatnot, but I don't see how the governments in the future would rewrite text books in the future for Bush....

 

Unless you Americans get another flipping Bush in the Oval Office...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
spdrlfc
I hardly think that this deserves discussion mate. Because:

 

A) It's been done. A lot.

 

B) Even if this dead horse hadn't been beaten already: You have no structured point(s). Debate means that some kind of 'thesis' must be provided in order to give context to the discussion.

 

Sorry. But yea.

dont think you quite get the meaning of this thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jimmy.
I hardly think that this deserves discussion mate. Because:

 

A) It's been done. A lot.

 

B) Even if this dead horse hadn't been beaten already: You have no structured point(s). Debate means that some kind of 'thesis' must be provided in order to give context to the discussion.

 

Sorry. But yea.

dont think you quite get the meaning of this thread

I'm guessing it's possibly satire then? If not, what is the meaning, then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lt. Dan

Why exactly was war declared on Iraq in the first place? I was wondering this. The main reason was the presence of WMD's in Saddam hussein's arsenal. However, it was a known fact for decades that Saddam had chemical/biological weapons. This seems totally irrelevant to the goal in Afghanistan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
General Goose
I hardly think that this deserves discussion mate. Because:

 

A) It's been done. A lot.

 

B) Even if this dead horse hadn't been beaten already: You have no structured point(s). Debate means that some kind of 'thesis' must be provided in order to give context to the discussion.

 

Sorry. But yea.

dont think you quite get the meaning of this thread

Despite the title (which can be interpretated to be a discussion about mistakes or a discussion about a specific mistake) I didn't notice anything implying he wanted us to share our views.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • 1 User Currently Viewing
    0 members, 0 Anonymous, 1 Guest

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.