JohnnyTheJew Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I explained in post above. He did not say anythint mean too me. But I took my time and explained why I liked TBOGT more and all he says is that it's not enough...... Why should there even be "enough" if I like it more I like it more, I even stated WHY I like it more and he says I'm like incorrect about that, wtf? lolz, he obviously can't have enough of your awesome posts. Give it to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgrogfefji82 Posted November 3, 2009 Author Share Posted November 3, 2009 I explained in post above. He did not say anythint mean too me. But I took my time and explained why I liked TBOGT more and all he says is that it's not enough...... Why should there even be "enough" if I like it more I like it more, I even stated WHY I like it more and he says I'm like incorrect about that, wtf? lolz, he obviously can't have enough of your awesome posts. Give it to him. Didnt' really get this post. But it was wrong of me to call him asshole and such. But what kind of person says you're incorrect after you've just explained why you like one thing over the other. How is that even possible, it's not like I'm lying, lol. If I state WHY I like one thing over the other someone shouldn't say "sorry that isn't enough of a reason, try again" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FearTheLiving Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I explained in post above. He did not say anythint mean too me. But I took my time and explained why I liked TBOGT more and all he says is that it's not enough...... Why should there even be "enough" if I like it more I like it more, I even stated WHY I like it more and he says I'm like incorrect about that, wtf? lolz, he obviously can't have enough of your awesome posts. Give it to him. Didnt' really get this post. But it was wrong of me to call him asshole and such. But what kind of person says you're incorrect after you've just explained why you like one thing over the other. How is that even possible, it's not like I'm lying, lol. If I state WHY I like one thing over the other someone shouldn't say "sorry that isn't enough of a reason, try again" I never said you were incorrect or wrong with your opinion in one of my posts I even clearly said I was asking for your opinion and when I gave my opinion stating I liked Yusuf as a character better you put me down for it there too. I was looking for a more detailed reason and to me you were dancing around it. I tried to explain my best as to what I was asking but you took offense to it I even said "Just saying "they are better" doesn't explain why you like them. I appreciate you trying though." meaning you could stop trying to tell me and I would wait for more people to give their opinion. You feel me now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgrogfefji82 Posted November 3, 2009 Author Share Posted November 3, 2009 I explained in post above. He did not say anythint mean too me. But I took my time and explained why I liked TBOGT more and all he says is that it's not enough...... Why should there even be "enough" if I like it more I like it more, I even stated WHY I like it more and he says I'm like incorrect about that, wtf? lolz, he obviously can't have enough of your awesome posts. Give it to him. Didnt' really get this post. But it was wrong of me to call him asshole and such. But what kind of person says you're incorrect after you've just explained why you like one thing over the other. How is that even possible, it's not like I'm lying, lol. If I state WHY I like one thing over the other someone shouldn't say "sorry that isn't enough of a reason, try again" I never said you were incorrect or wrong with your opinion in one of my posts I even clearly said I was asking for your opinion and when I gave my opinion stating I liked Yusuf as a character better you put me down for it there too. I was looking for a more detailed reason and to me you were dancing around it. I tried to explain my best as to what I was asking but you took offense to it I even said "Just saying "they are better" doesn't explain why you like them. I appreciate you trying though." meaning you could stop trying to tell me and I would wait for more people to give their opinion. You feel me now? You said and I quote "I guess it doesn't matter apparently no one is going to tell me how exactly this game is better and actually explain why." That's what you said after I explained why I like it more. How is that not saying that my reason for liking it is basically not enough of a reason, lol And you said Yusuf Amir is a better developted character, but he isn't. Because he isn't supposed to be that, he's just supposed to be funny and a loyal guy too you. I mean you've played the game after all. I don't feel like I should have to explain what Tony goes through the game, I'm not so good at doing stuff like that. All I know is that Gay Tony is better developted and the game is actually about him. The game is titled Ballad of Gay Tony afterall. Yusuf is a funny guy that has crazy things for you too do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmm chocolate Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 ^can't believe you ruined the thread...with you 2 quoting eachother back n forth...you'd think you were giving eachother virtual handjobs.... anyway...as far as Tony as a character...I wasn't too hyped on him... If I was gay, and bought the game...I would be bummed that the main gay character was such a pussy and a lightweight. I know he shot a few guns, and went on a few missions, but he f*cking fell to the ground trying to walk away from the bar in one scene. I still think they should've kept Tony around at the end, atleast to call and hang with...get drunk, etc... Yusef was awesome though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FearTheLiving Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 You said and I quote "I guess it doesn't matter apparently no one is going to tell me how exactly this game is better and actually explain why." Meaning explain the detail of why how I was expecting. That wasn't directed to you but rather to the people who knew what I meant and didn't reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leo Colt Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 (edited) Tony is awesome because he is a very well developed character, he's terrifically written, acted, and he is extremely likable. Tony and Luis' relationship is very real and it is very believable. This ENTIRE episode is about Tony, and you actually built up the nerve to say that a side character is more DEVELOPED? XD. This, this and this. I find Tony so interesting. I just kept listening intently when he went on about his life in Dukes, during his childhood. He's not even a real person, yet I could sit there and listen to his life story all day long. I also like the fact that they did not exaggerate or overplay Tony's homosexuality. The opposite was clearly the original intention, as you can see in the crossover missions. It's quite weird when Tony suddenly goes from his regular voice to the extremely camp one. I think they made a wise choice in abandoning that approach to his character. Edited November 3, 2009 by Leo Colt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhus Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Regrettably, I cannot play this game. But is Tony really a good character then? It would be nice if Rockstar did not make the homosexual guy a camp stereotype again. Bernie Crane, the Bosnian War veteran, was a f*cking embarrassment. But Tony is actually a well-rounded character who is not defined by his sexuality? If so it shows a lot of maturity from Rockstar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
problem_child2099 Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I thought Tony was a great character, I thought he was a lot like Roman. It seemed like his heart was in the right place but he made some F*CKED up choices Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rucke Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 (edited) Great character! He felt very well developed and had both good and bad sides. He was much more symphatic that I first though. Tony's only problem was that he always got involved with bad people who constantly were dragging him down. Unlike many other characters, he remained a true friend. His background story at the end about how he grew up as a nobody in Dukes was pretty touching too. Edited November 3, 2009 by Rucke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dukee152 Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 i would have rather killed gay tony because he apparently doesnt know how to do business i would rather have rocco and his uncle run the clubs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machida Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I thought Gay Tony was a fantastic character, but at the same time I'm rather certain that he sucked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EduardKoeleJuck Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Yeah, sucked dick... Just joking ofcourse... He was kinda cool, but his character was kinda exaggerated, you know? I mean, why would he stick bombs on planes, just because Rocco tells him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrisseythehappyguy Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 He ruled, and was one of my favorite Grand Theft Auto non-protagonist characters ever. This, but i liked armando and henrique more Armando and Henrique are meant to be Luis' closest friends but spend half the time putting him down?! Don't even get me started on how annoying they are in Drug Wars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dukee152 Posted November 11, 2009 Share Posted November 11, 2009 also i think gay tony really needs to take a class in micro economics if he wants to keep massonette 9 alive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoungBreezy Posted November 12, 2009 Share Posted November 12, 2009 He ruled, and was one of my favorite Grand Theft Auto non-protagonist characters ever. This, but i liked armando and henrique more Armando and Henrique are meant to be Luis' closest friends but spend half the time putting him down?! Don't even get me started on how annoying they are in Drug Wars. Don't tell me you don't joke around with your friends. Besides Armando usually put Luis and Henrique down and then Henrique would pull Luis up and Armando down. Henrique was a true friend and Armando is the jerk of the group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royal3 Posted November 12, 2009 Share Posted November 12, 2009 Gay Tony is/was a great character. One of the best in IV, but Armando and Henrique... hmm, I liked them a bit more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hove Beach Posted November 12, 2009 Share Posted November 12, 2009 Gay Tony is/was a great character. One of the best in IV, but Armando and Henrique... hmm, I liked them a bit more. Tony great but A and H naaahh. They pretty much sucked. Too bad you can't meet tony after the story is completed.( Yusuf should be avaible as a friend as well!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now