Spaghetti Cat Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 And then of course there’s all the other conspiracies, the most popular being: San Andreas (again), London, Europe (multiple cities), America (multiple cities) and Tokyo. Excuse any grammar or spelling mistakes, English is not my first language. 1. 2. 3. Wait...what??? How are these conspiracies? According to the link, San Andreas and London are second and third. This would be well above Italy or France, just because some tear looks like france, or a Volcano is in Italy. These would be the conspiracy theories. IMO the Europe game, and cities, will be used in the upcoming game AGENT. R* will keep GTA in America, leaving the new game to have a European vibe. Again, this is pure speculation, but it feels right. That would lead the neXt city to be a toss up between Vice City, San Andreas (my personal fav), or city X. I don't think that R* would go for a totally new city (say Carson City or AnyWhere City) so that would leave Vice or San Andreas. The case for VC hasn't been made IMO, and there are just enough hints that it could be San Andreas. Not to mention that there are no volcano's in Florida, which is a huge flaw in the theory. If R* wanted to do something totally different, they would go West. Open the space up and let the player go out to the countryside. Something that Vice couldn't do, unless they open the whole state up. There are a couple of threads that deal with this topic (New Vice and San Juarez off the top of my head) so it could be done. But all of this is speculation until March when they announce something. Happy 60 pages!! No Image Available Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EncryptedReality Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 There is a volcano near Los Angeles though, so yeah Los Santos which is in San Andreas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxopower Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 How are these conspiracies? According to the link, San Andreas and London are second and third. This would be well above Italy or France, just because some tear looks like france, or a Volcano is in Italy. These would be the conspiracy theories. I’m just trying to recap, this is not my personal opinions, it’s just a helper for newcomers to the topic. And if the word “conspiracies” bugs you, I can changes it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX2069 Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 Look what I found!Billboard Location yeah there are bilboards for all the citys in san andreas too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaghetti Cat Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 How are these conspiracies? According to the link, San Andreas and London are second and third. This would be well above Italy or France, just because some tear looks like france, or a Volcano is in Italy. These would be the conspiracy theories. I’m just trying to recap, this is not my personal opinions, it’s just a helper for newcomers to the topic. And if the word “conspiracies” bugs you, I can changes it. How about just theory's since we're just guessing anyways. Conspiracies make it sound like were looking for big foot or something. Anyways nice job w/ the re-cap. No Image Available Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
08LasVenturas Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 Look what I found!Billboard Location This is old news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirPsychoSexy Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 (edited) Look what I found!Billboard Location This is old news. That comment is probably even more old news. Just don't think that it's necessary to point out the same things for people over and over again. The Irony is on all of us. Edited November 29, 2009 by SirPsychoSexy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grope_4_that_date Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 (edited) these hints are not hints this isnt the da vinci code Edited November 29, 2009 by grope_4_that_date Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supermortalhuman Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 (edited) *smh is excited* IV was BUILT TO LAST, right? On MORE than a technical level perhaps! WHEN you play Vice CIty you will STILL remember IV because it is connected in the ways we have been discovering together. WHEN you play San Andreas, the same will be true. LC was built to last because it is part of a trilogy. Where San Andreas and Vice City made Liberty look weakly connected and only forced last time around, this time, Liberty comes with all kinds of connections to the new Vice and San - including plane ticket prices, billboards, key moments in the story, missions alluding to Vice City, Roman hinting at moving there, and so on. They are not just little nods at the old series, they are purposefully put there so that Liberty lasts, as it was built to, on more levels than technically another of my ten cents The Realms OF Hyrule are always The Realms Of Hyrule - but whenever u see the same realm of hyrule, it is changed... GTA is like that. The realm of GTA is LC, VC, SA- and LC is definitely not just a "rehash", and in that, Vice and San and even a NEW LC would never be just a rehash either, because of how much they add to it each new time... Compare VIce to GTA 1's vice. Now imagine new vice It all really does make sense, even if we have yet to put it ALL together in a huge list nor have we investigated further possibilities of people we've already met in Liberty being in Vice (I am almost sure we will kill that bum who found the diamonds - we will kill him, and that is how we will have a weapons stock like Jacob in IV (more like Luis' free weapons, really) compared to buying them in a store, and in San Andreas, we will race Johnny on motorcycles in LV) Edited November 29, 2009 by supermortalhuman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keybladekyle Posted November 30, 2009 Share Posted November 30, 2009 I get what you mean SMH, i haven't really been a follower of the idea that they will return to VC or SA but the fact alone that they included these cities in the game that was supposed to be a "fresh start" leads me to believe that they will almost definitely be returning to them next. Especially because they purposefully don't mention any characters from the previous games, purely because they're not the from the "same place" anymore. Fresh start, for all the cities, not just Liberty. However, there's one thing that i still can't figure out. What time period they will set the next games in? Because they cant do a modern Vice City, they can't do an 80's Vice City, they only one i can come up with is San Andreas in the 70's, and that doesn't sound particularly exciting to me. That's why i thought they would do Vice City again in the 80's, but add in Cuba and Jamaica and maybe even a bit of Columbia. It would be like the original Vice City Just more expansive, this is the only way i can see them ever re-doing Vice City. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnzooger Posted November 30, 2009 Share Posted November 30, 2009 I get what you mean SMH, i haven't really been a follower of the idea that they will return to VC or SA but the fact alone that they included these cities in the game that was supposed to be a "fresh start" leads me to believe that they will almost definitely be returning to them next.Especially because they purposefully don't mention any characters from the previous games, purely because they're not the from the "same place" anymore. Fresh start, for all the cities, not just Liberty. This is not totally true. Stuff on TV and the Radio are linked to the III era cities. Heck, Lazlow talks about his time on Chatterbox, even though that is a completely different LC. And the stuff on the TV has graphics directly "filmed" in III's VC and SA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CryptReaperDorian Posted November 30, 2009 Share Posted November 30, 2009 @keybladekyle: I don't see why VC can't be a modern Miami. If CSI (whether you like the show or not) can do it, can't GTA? Miami still does play quite a large part in the media today in the U.S. I find Miami to be just as popular today as it was in the eighties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supermortalhuman Posted November 30, 2009 Share Posted November 30, 2009 I get what you mean SMH, i haven't really been a follower of the idea that they will return to VC or SA but the fact alone that they included these cities in the game that was supposed to be a "fresh start" leads me to believe that they will almost definitely be returning to them next.Especially because they purposefully don't mention any characters from the previous games, purely because they're not the from the "same place" anymore. Fresh start, for all the cities, not just Liberty. This is not totally true. Stuff on TV and the Radio are linked to the III era cities. Heck, Lazlow talks about his time on Chatterbox, even though that is a completely different LC. And the stuff on the TV has graphics directly "filmed" in III's VC and SA. but thats just because it is tiny resolution tv shorts anyway and they used them for source footage - it's not like they'd do all the work they plan on doing later right now just for the little TV thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTA_getaway_driver Posted November 30, 2009 Share Posted November 30, 2009 I have seen the whole pics, its a mountian. I think it may be Mid-U.S. based? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keybladekyle Posted November 30, 2009 Share Posted November 30, 2009 @keybladekyle: I don't see why VC can't be a modern Miami. If CSI (whether you like the show or not) can do it, can't GTA? Miami still does play quite a large part in the media today in the U.S. I find Miami to be just as popular today as it was in the eighties. Yea, but modern Miami would still have to be better than 80's Miami for them to even bother doing it, Rockstar make their games with the average player in mind, and i don't think the average player is going to get excited about the idea of a modern Miami. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnzooger Posted November 30, 2009 Share Posted November 30, 2009 I get what you mean SMH, i haven't really been a follower of the idea that they will return to VC or SA but the fact alone that they included these cities in the game that was supposed to be a "fresh start" leads me to believe that they will almost definitely be returning to them next.Especially because they purposefully don't mention any characters from the previous games, purely because they're not the from the "same place" anymore. Fresh start, for all the cities, not just Liberty. This is not totally true. Stuff on TV and the Radio are linked to the III era cities. Heck, Lazlow talks about his time on Chatterbox, even though that is a completely different LC. And the stuff on the TV has graphics directly "filmed" in III's VC and SA. but thats just because it is tiny resolution tv shorts anyway and they used them for source footage - it's not like they'd do all the work they plan on doing later right now just for the little TV thing. That's not the point. The point is that they haven't completely thrown away the old era for the new. Not saying it means anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foohy Posted November 30, 2009 Share Posted November 30, 2009 I get what you mean SMH, i haven't really been a follower of the idea that they will return to VC or SA but the fact alone that they included these cities in the game that was supposed to be a "fresh start" leads me to believe that they will almost definitely be returning to them next.Especially because they purposefully don't mention any characters from the previous games, purely because they're not the from the "same place" anymore. Fresh start, for all the cities, not just Liberty. This is not totally true. Stuff on TV and the Radio are linked to the III era cities. Heck, Lazlow talks about his time on Chatterbox, even though that is a completely different LC. And the stuff on the TV has graphics directly "filmed" in III's VC and SA. but thats just because it is tiny resolution tv shorts anyway and they used them for source footage - it's not like they'd do all the work they plan on doing later right now just for the little TV thing. That's not the point. The point is that they haven't completely thrown away the old era for the new. Not saying it means anything. No one ever said that IV doesn't acknowledge past games. I believe he was just trying to point out that past cities/characters don't really exist in IV save for an occasional reference. Just because Lazlow talks about his time on chatterbox, doesn't mean that all the old cities/characters exist. Lazlow is, simply, a DJ in this 'universe' as well as in the III 'universe'. Apparently Chatterbox exists/existed as a radio station in both 'universes' too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckasper502 Posted November 30, 2009 Share Posted November 30, 2009 I get what you mean SMH, i haven't really been a follower of the idea that they will return to VC or SA but the fact alone that they included these cities in the game that was supposed to be a "fresh start" leads me to believe that they will almost definitely be returning to them next.Especially because they purposefully don't mention any characters from the previous games, purely because they're not the from the "same place" anymore. Fresh start, for all the cities, not just Liberty. This is not totally true. Stuff on TV and the Radio are linked to the III era cities. Heck, Lazlow talks about his time on Chatterbox, even though that is a completely different LC. And the stuff on the TV has graphics directly "filmed" in III's VC and SA. but thats just because it is tiny resolution tv shorts anyway and they used them for source footage - it's not like they'd do all the work they plan on doing later right now just for the little TV thing. That's not the point. The point is that they haven't completely thrown away the old era for the new. Not saying it means anything. No one ever said that IV doesn't acknowledge past games. I believe he was just trying to point out that past cities/characters don't really exist in IV save for an occasional reference. Just because Lazlow talks about his time on chatterbox, doesn't mean that all the old cities/characters exist. Lazlow is, simply, a DJ in this 'universe' as well as in the III 'universe'. Apparently Chatterbox exists/existed as a radio station in both 'universes' too. yeah i can see your point cause in this universe OG Loc must be good cause every one and there momma has an OG Loc CD in there house Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnzooger Posted November 30, 2009 Share Posted November 30, 2009 I get what you mean SMH, i haven't really been a follower of the idea that they will return to VC or SA but the fact alone that they included these cities in the game that was supposed to be a "fresh start" leads me to believe that they will almost definitely be returning to them next.Especially because they purposefully don't mention any characters from the previous games, purely because they're not the from the "same place" anymore. Fresh start, for all the cities, not just Liberty. This is not totally true. Stuff on TV and the Radio are linked to the III era cities. Heck, Lazlow talks about his time on Chatterbox, even though that is a completely different LC. And the stuff on the TV has graphics directly "filmed" in III's VC and SA. but thats just because it is tiny resolution tv shorts anyway and they used them for source footage - it's not like they'd do all the work they plan on doing later right now just for the little TV thing. That's not the point. The point is that they haven't completely thrown away the old era for the new. Not saying it means anything. No one ever said that IV doesn't acknowledge past games. I believe he was just trying to point out that past cities/characters don't really exist in IV save for an occasional reference. Just because Lazlow talks about his time on chatterbox, doesn't mean that all the old cities/characters exist. Lazlow is, simply, a DJ in this 'universe' as well as in the III 'universe'. Apparently Chatterbox exists/existed as a radio station in both 'universes' too. I'm always the first one to point out that the III and IV cannons are different universes... However, what I'm saying in that post is that IV's LC isn't as much a "fresh start" as keybladekyle is thinking. There are plenty of possible links that show that the only variance in the IV universe is LC itself. Unless another III era city is released in the IV cannon, we can assume this is true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruscris2 Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 (edited) I think I found The Truth !!! Liberty's.......... Nice Over............... Overly Observent....... Open Serect............. Sexxi Employees....... Erections If you see the hints that we are searching or The Hints are made by us, not by them !!!!!!1111oneoneone http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=283985&st=0 http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=283985&st=100 They see EVERYTHING ! deepthroatgta4 posted there Edited December 1, 2009 by Ruscris2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foohy Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 I get what you mean SMH, i haven't really been a follower of the idea that they will return to VC or SA but the fact alone that they included these cities in the game that was supposed to be a "fresh start" leads me to believe that they will almost definitely be returning to them next.Especially because they purposefully don't mention any characters from the previous games, purely because they're not the from the "same place" anymore. Fresh start, for all the cities, not just Liberty. This is not totally true. Stuff on TV and the Radio are linked to the III era cities. Heck, Lazlow talks about his time on Chatterbox, even though that is a completely different LC. And the stuff on the TV has graphics directly "filmed" in III's VC and SA. but thats just because it is tiny resolution tv shorts anyway and they used them for source footage - it's not like they'd do all the work they plan on doing later right now just for the little TV thing. That's not the point. The point is that they haven't completely thrown away the old era for the new. Not saying it means anything. No one ever said that IV doesn't acknowledge past games. I believe he was just trying to point out that past cities/characters don't really exist in IV save for an occasional reference. Just because Lazlow talks about his time on chatterbox, doesn't mean that all the old cities/characters exist. Lazlow is, simply, a DJ in this 'universe' as well as in the III 'universe'. Apparently Chatterbox exists/existed as a radio station in both 'universes' too. I'm always the first one to point out that the III and IV cannons are different universes... However, what I'm saying in that post is that IV's LC isn't as much a "fresh start" as keybladekyle is thinking. There are plenty of possible links that show that the only variance in the IV universe is LC itself. Unless another III era city is released in the IV cannon, we can assume this is true. Oh, yeah. I know what you're saying. Obviously things that existed in the III era exist in the IV era (even characters). What's probably going on is that R* makes IV this 'alternate universe' without confirming everything that is different about it. That way, they can make a new canon but still bring back old characters/places if they decide to. That way, they don't have to abandon everything from past games, yet they can still do things that contradict with III's timeline if they decide/need/want to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirPsychoSexy Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 I think I found The Truth !!! Liberty's.......... Nice Over............... Overly Observent....... Open Serect............. Sexxi Employees....... Erections If you see the hints that we are searching or The Hints are made by us, not by them !!!!!!1111oneoneone http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=283985&st=0 http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=283985&st=100 They see EVERYTHING ! deepthroatgta4 posted there I don't get it, what do you mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RYO_91 Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cartoonlyon Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 Heh, I really didn't mean to imply that GTA Paris would be next... but that would be cool. could work, remeber that Paris is a pretty rowdy city, lots of housing projects, run down areas and a f*ckload of rioting! La Haine anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAIV-NewYork Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 I really think you guys need to calm down, and stop looking for little clues. Rockstar aren't going to hide a little clue, if they did, they'd make it obvious. Why would they let a bunch of GTA nerds find out first so they can then spread it on to the media? Seriously, this is the kind of thing Rockstar would mock, a bunch of people so dedicated to a game that they look for every single clue they can wrap their hands around on a forum. The picture behind the poster was of another in-game advertisement. It doesn't mean anything, it's just treating that area of the advertisement as a real poster placed on a wall that has a rip on it, and has another poster that was previously positioned behind it. They are not going to have any volcanos in the next GTA. Ok guys? I'm not trying to tell anyone what to do, but to all of you who are looking around for clues, I seriously think you need to just stop and wait for any legit information about the next game released by Rockstar themselves, or stuff that's been leaked and seems legit. The less you hype a game and find out everything about it before it's released, the better it is when you actually start playing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnzooger Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 I really think you guys need to calm down, and stop looking for little clues. Rockstar aren't going to hide a little clue, if they did, they'd make it obvious. Why would they let a bunch of GTA nerds find out first so they can then spread it on to the media? Seriously, this is the kind of thing Rockstar would mock, a bunch of people so dedicated to a game that they look for every single clue they can wrap their hands around on a forum. The picture behind the poster was of another in-game advertisement. It doesn't mean anything, it's just treating that area of the advertisement as a real poster placed on a wall that has a rip on it, and has another poster that was previously positioned behind it. They are not going to have any volcanos in the next GTA. Ok guys? I'm not trying to tell anyone what to do, but to all of you who are looking around for clues, I seriously think you need to just stop and wait for any legit information about the next game released by Rockstar themselves, or stuff that's been leaked and seems legit. The less you hype a game and find out everything about it before it's released, the better it is when you actually start playing it. There are 3 types of people that spoilers apply to: those that want to know every little thing about a movie/game/book before its released, those that don't seek spoilers but will read/listen to them if they come across them, and those that do not want to know anything at all about it until they play/watch/read it. (This is well documented in the movie Star Wait) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grope_4_that_date Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 I really think you guys need to calm down, and stop looking for little clues. Rockstar aren't going to hide a little clue, if they did, they'd make it obvious. Why would they let a bunch of GTA nerds find out first so they can then spread it on to the media? Seriously, this is the kind of thing Rockstar would mock, a bunch of people so dedicated to a game that they look for every single clue they can wrap their hands around on a forum. The picture behind the poster was of another in-game advertisement. It doesn't mean anything, it's just treating that area of the advertisement as a real poster placed on a wall that has a rip on it, and has another poster that was previously positioned behind it. They are not going to have any volcanos in the next GTA. Ok guys? I'm not trying to tell anyone what to do, but to all of you who are looking around for clues, I seriously think you need to just stop and wait for any legit information about the next game released by Rockstar themselves, or stuff that's been leaked and seems legit. The less you hype a game and find out everything about it before it's released, the better it is when you actually start playing it. You are wrong! Rockstar did put that there for a reason. Why wouldn't they just use a white/black background, instead of the mollis thing? However, I doubt the message was anything more than 'prepare for the explosion.' Thats it, nothing more. They put the 'Next Stop' and the rip there for a reason. They wanted to keep us guessing/interested. Then, they put a little easteregg in there (the mollis advertisement). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubA_iLL_BrothA Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 I really think you guys need to calm down, and stop looking for little clues. Rockstar aren't going to hide a little clue, if they did, they'd make it obvious. Why would they let a bunch of GTA nerds find out first so they can then spread it on to the media? Seriously, this is the kind of thing Rockstar would mock, a bunch of people so dedicated to a game that they look for every single clue they can wrap their hands around on a forum. The picture behind the poster was of another in-game advertisement. It doesn't mean anything, it's just treating that area of the advertisement as a real poster placed on a wall that has a rip on it, and has another poster that was previously positioned behind it. They are not going to have any volcanos in the next GTA. Ok guys? I'm not trying to tell anyone what to do, but to all of you who are looking around for clues, I seriously think you need to just stop and wait for any legit information about the next game released by Rockstar themselves, or stuff that's been leaked and seems legit. The less you hype a game and find out everything about it before it's released, the better it is when you actually start playing it. You are wrong! Rockstar did put that there for a reason. Why wouldn't they just use a white/black background, instead of the mollis thing? However, I doubt the message was anything more than 'prepare for the explosion.' Thats it, nothing more. They put the 'Next Stop' and the rip there for a reason. They wanted to keep us guessing/interested. Then, they put a little easteregg in there (the mollis advertisement). or maybe just to have half you heads depressing each other Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mokrie Dela Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 GTA V will start, literally, with a huge bang. a Massive explosion that kick starts the next story with an epic kick up the ass! well, i hope! The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. Click here to view my Poetry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX2069 Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 well like i said before i still belive that were going back to san andreas just because there a to many hints in that direction...and another thing why is everyone so against going back there? everyone thinks that there is gonna be like the whole gang story again (which wasnt bad in my opinion) or the whole green goo thing haha ( i thought that was good too) i mean there really is alien sightings out that way all the time whats wrong with talking about that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts