Nudity is back

[PearlHarborPants]

bump for proof of this being an already existing topic.

I'm already embarrassed by starting this topic and you had to bump it

You better be you pervert.

 

Itll be like seeing Luis moms tits or something. Completely funny and tottally non sexual

 

*SAMUELLA 93 puts game in*

 

Oooooh yes time for me to see some hardcore pixelated nudity and jack to it. What Luis mom Eeeeew

 

*SAMUELLA 93 crys and walks out*

 

sorry but it had to be said.

Thanks for bloody rubbing it in

[The Notorious MOB]

I don't know wether I speak for everyone here (which I probably don't) but the inclusion of tits for me would be purely for the realism and tone of the game. I don't know how many action/gangster films I've seen where a pair of tits was included for no apparent reason but if done right it gives the movie a more gangster vibe. Criminals need to be portrayed as being into every illegal and sordid practice thats allowed to be shown on the screen.. it just makes them seem more legit. It's like people look at it and think whoa that'd be so cool to be surrounded by all of that excess... It's why half the people that win the lottery spend it on sex silly hats and cocaine and are broke in a matter of years... Like Mike Tyson.

 

In a strip club you pay money to have some titties rubbed in your face. There's no way you'd pay 10 dollars let alone 1,000 to get a dance off of a woman with bits of sticky tape over her nipples.. you can see that sh*t on the VMAs for free!!

 

So that by with them two paragraphs of rambling what I'm basicly trying to say is Video game tits aren't meant for sexual gratification they're meant to inject more believability into the story that's all. If we can mow people down for fun and blow people's face off with a shotgun then why aren't we allowed see a pair of nipples in a strip club that has two girls imitating f*cking each other doggystyle? It's like buying a cheeseburger with no cheese on it. It's just silly IMO

[Insane Kane]

I don't know wether I speak for everyone here (which I probably don't) but the inclusion of tits for me would be purely for the realism and tone of the game. I don't know how many action/gangster films I've seen where a pair of tits was included for no apparent reason but if done right it gives the movie a more gangster vibe. Criminals need to be portrayed as being into every illegal and sordid practice thats allowed to be shown on the screen.. it just makes them seem more legit. It's like people look at it and think whoa that'd be so cool to be surrounded by all of that excess... It's why half the people that win the lottery spend it on sex silly hats and cocaine and are broke in a matter of years... Like Mike Tyson.

 

In a strip club you pay money to have some titties rubbed in your face. There's no way you'd pay 10 dollars let alone 1,000 to get a dance off of a woman with bits of sticky tape over her nipples.. you can see that sh*t on the VMAs for free!!

 

So that by with them two paragraphs of rambling what I'm basicly trying to say is Video game tits aren't meant for sexual gratification they're meant to inject more believability into the story that's all. If we can mow people down for fun and blow people's face off with a shotgun then why aren't we allowed see a pair of nipples in a strip club that has two girls imitating f*cking each other doggystyle? It's like buying a cheeseburger with no cheese on it. It's just silly IMO

I certainly agree, it makes no sense to me really. They are basically already showing the titties but just covering the nipple

[sam33]

 

I don't know wether I speak for everyone here (which I probably don't) but the inclusion of tits for me would be purely for the realism and tone of the game. I don't know how many action/gangster films I've seen where a pair of tits was included for no apparent reason but if done right it gives the movie a more gangster vibe. Criminals need to be portrayed as being into every illegal and sordid practice thats allowed to be shown on the screen.. it just makes them seem more legit. It's like people look at it and think whoa that'd be so cool to be surrounded by all of that excess... It's why half the people that win the lottery spend it on sex silly hats and cocaine and are broke in a matter of years... Like Mike Tyson.

 

In a strip club you pay money to have some titties rubbed in your face. There's no way you'd pay 10 dollars let alone 1,000 to get a dance off of a woman with bits of sticky tape over her nipples.. you can see that sh*t on the VMAs for free!! 

 

So that by with them two paragraphs of rambling what I'm basicly trying to say is Video game tits aren't meant for sexual gratification they're meant to inject more believability into the story that's all. If we can mow people down for fun and blow people's face off with a shotgun then why aren't we allowed see a pair of nipples in a strip club that has two girls imitating f*cking each other doggystyle? It's like buying a cheeseburger with no cheese on it. It's just silly IMO

Cos GTA is so realistic in the first place isn't it. Tits will just bring censorship and lose R* money. Hell mainland Maruader, a f*cking mod even said this. It shouldnt bother you so much that the nipples are covered. I mean seriously its not going to give off that realistic a feel anyway. Oh tits...thats realistic therefore its realistic I kill a thousand cops, DIE and wake up at a hospital alive again six hours later.

 

You might call it realism but I just say its sad and pointless and will lose R* money as it will bring ALOT of scandal at least (not to mention the possibility of an AO rating)

Edited September 24, 2009 by sam33

[foohy]

Nice. You made a clone of an already retarded topic...

Stick to this one:

http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=415814

[shinsta312]

 

Nice. You made a clone of an already retarded topic...  

Stick to this one:

http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=415814

Add another for people ignoring the last two reminders in the earlier posts by both me and playaindahood.

 

 

There's already another discussion somewhere involving this.

 

 

there is already a topic like this: http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=415814

[sam33]

Nice. You made a clone of an already retarded topic...  

Stick to this one:

http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=415814

Add another for people ignoring the last two reminders in the earlier posts by both me and playaindahood.

 

 

There's already another discussion somewhere involving this.

 

 

there is already a topic like this: http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=415814

The guy who created the original wanted it to die due to embarresment. Dont force it on him.

[numdmind]

Sorry for causing such a mahem for making the thread, I didn't realize people went apesh*t over it. I mean why is a pair of titties so bad in a cutscene but a cock ins't? But I agree the cock thing was sort of a funny thing, if they use titties for sexual purpose I suppose it's "wrong?"

 

So I apologize for making this thread.

You made the thread, we told you why the penis was acceptable in this instance. Don't get upset about it. It's the same reason they have pictures of naked tribal women in National Geographic. There's nothing arousing about it. Maybe I shouldn't have told you about that, you'll probably run to the library and get all the National Geographics all sticky.

 

Apparently, in this christian society, sex is unacceptable unless it's in a missionary position with someone you're married to. Violence is more accepted because, let's face it, that's what christianity is all about, hypocrisy.

 

However you want to look at it, it's unnecessary to be as vulgar as you can be when making a topic like this.

[Shaunr]

there will probably be no titties because there will be no way to fit that in the game without the girl being seen as a slut, and because of that people would complain.

[blahblah1212]

If Rockstar North fails to comply, I recommend http://images.google.com/ for all your pixelated glory needs. Really, you can find anything.

[Insane Kane]

If Rockstar North fails to comply, I recommend http://images.google.com/ for all your pixelated glory needs. Really, you can find anything.

its just not the shame lol we arnt the only ones who wants em, Roman does to

[Shaunr]

If Rockstar North fails to comply, I recommend http://images.google.com/ for all your pixelated glory needs. Really, you can find anything.

its just not the shame lol we arnt the only ones who wants em, Roman does to

you're that desperate for animated tits. wow. i can't imagine what would happen if you saw a real ones. perhaps you would jizz in your pants.

[cornedbeefsandwich]

If Rockstar North fails to comply, I recommend http://images.google.com/ for all your pixelated glory needs. Really, you can find anything.

its just not the shame lol we arnt the only ones who wants em, Roman does to

you're that desperate for animated tits. wow. i can't imagine what would happen if you saw a real ones. perhaps you would jizz in your pants.

i agree, real ones are better. i can go for pixelated though. to OP: wanna see titez? lookie at my sig, pervo.

[iDon]

 

Burning people with flamethrowers, cutting their heads of with chainsaws, stabbing people to death, kicking them to death...this is all acceptable. But if you see one tit, GOD FORBID, the game will get an instant AO rating!

 

Jesus holy f*ck, this world is so twisted.

 

Anyways, I'd like to see this girl naked in the game:

She looks quite hot to me...

Same thing i'm gonna be doing...and i'm talking about the champagne, lol (just kidding). Seriously though, I doubt the game will get the AO rating. But because it's GTA, it's a possibility that it will.

[numdmind]

 

Same thing i'm gonna be doing...and i'm talking about the champagne, lol (just kidding). Seriously though, I doubt the game will get the AO rating. But because it's GTA, it's a possibility that it will.

If it gets an AO rating, then you can kiss it goodbye because no console manufacturer will allow an AO game on their machine. How do you people keep missing that?

 

Besides, how has this topic stayed open while legitimate ones get closed left and right? Oh that's right, the mods play favorites. Seriously, this little f*cker (the TC, not you iDon) obviously has no respect for anything, especially women, yet you allow his idiotic topic to stay open. Even with the fact that there is another topic (there's probably 50) already like this. I've seen you mods shut down topics with much more substance to them in one post. I would really like to know what you're reasoning is for allowing this to stay open. This topic needs to be closed. You can't do anything to me for saying what I'm saying if you let it stay open. Well, you can, but then you'd be proving my point even more.

 

 

 

 

[aChaChaCha]

if TBoGT gets an AO rating, so gonna hurl a few thousand copies of leasure suit Larry through BBFC exec's car windows

[iDon]

Same thing i'm gonna be doing...and i'm talking about the champagne, lol (just kidding). Seriously though, I doubt the game will get the AO rating. But because it's GTA, it's a possibility that it will.

If it gets an AO rating, then you can kiss it goodbye because no console manufacturer will allow an AO game on their machine. How do you people keep missing that?

 

Besides, how has this topic stayed open while legitimate ones get closed left and right? Oh that's right, the mods play favorites. Seriously, this little f*cker (the TC, not you iDon) obviously has no respect for anything, especially women, yet you allow his idiotic topic to stay open. Even with the fact that there is another topic (there's probably 50) already like this. I've seen you mods shut down topics with much more substance to them in one post. I would really like to know what you're reasoning is for allowing this to stay open. This topic needs to be closed. You can't do anything to me for saying what I'm saying if you let it stay open. Well, you can, but then you'd be proving my point even more.

Unless, of course, it's on the PC.

[foohy]

Nice. You made a clone of an already retarded topic...  

Stick to this one:

http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=415814

Add another for people ignoring the last two reminders in the earlier posts by both me and playaindahood.

 

 

There's already another discussion somewhere involving this.

 

 

there is already a topic like this: http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=415814

Nice. You made a clone of an already retarded topic...

Stick to this one:

http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=415814

[cornedbeefsandwich]

 

Nice. You made a clone of an already retarded topic...  

Stick to this one:

http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=415814

Add another for people ignoring the last two reminders in the earlier posts by both me and playaindahood.

 

 

There's already another discussion somewhere involving this.

 

 

there is already a topic like this: http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=415814

Nice. You made a clone of an already retarded topic...

Stick to this one:

http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=415814

stop it. please. we would like to talk about titties in peace.

 

BTW: until a mod or an admin locks this sh*t, you can shut the f*ck up about going to the other topic. stop playing mr. forum police man.

Edited September 27, 2009 by cornedbeefsandwich

[Exkabewbikadid]

BTW: until a mod or an admin locks this sh*t, you can shut the f*ck up about going to the other topic. stop playing mr. forum police man.

Don't flame others.

 

Topics merged. Have fun.

[DrAnomalous]

Yay! dame tetas

[XAF226]

So how detailed would the breasts be? I would like to see each breast have about 8000 polygons with parallax mapping, complete with 1024x1024 textures and Euphoria physics.

[PearlHarborPants]

OH GAWD...

 

MODS! Please close this sh*t

[XAF226]

I think the breasts should be able to shoot milk too. Now there's no doubt that we would see the vulva, but would we see the clitoris? I would also think that Euphoria physics could be applied to the "flaps" of the female organs. Although they might need some tweaks to work differently then regular bodies, I think it would work out just fine. The skin of the breasts wouldn't need to be as detailed as the skin of the clitoris. So I would expect to have a 2048x2048 for the inner workings and definitely A LOT of parallax mapping in use. The "flaps" should be at least above 2000 polygons for some nice detail.

 

Overall I think it would work out better then the penis in TLAD.

[cornedbeefsandwich]

BTW: until a mod or an admin locks this sh*t, you can shut the f*ck up about going to the other topic. stop playing mr. forum police man.

Don't flame others.

 

Topics merged. Have fun.

thank you.

[XAF226]

Hmmm... No discussion seems to be going on. I'll make it more interesting.

 

Surely nudity from the back can't be any worse, right? So let's discuss how detailed the buttocks should be. Now the buttocks could be created the same way as the breasts but could be over 1000 polygons less detailed based on the size. Only a small amount of bump mapping should be used, maybe more for the older women. Now for the anus it would work different then the clitoris. With it's "tube" like shape it should be much easier to create along with a low quality 256x256 as we won't be seeing much of the inside. To spice up the detail though, a little bit of fecal matter should be included. I would expect that it would use a lot of parallax mapping for a good amount of detail. Euphoria need not be applied to the fecal matter, but would work well for the buttocks.

[The Capone]

so they can show a penis but no boobs lol

[XAF226]

If Rockstar decides to show no breasts, then the penis definitely deserves a graphical update. Now it might be a bad decision but instead of models for the pubic hair, sprites should be used. The reasoning is that the rest of the testicles are already highly detailed and a mass of testicles and penises could potentially slow down the game. The testicles could receive a 2048x2048 texture update, but that's about it. Now the penis would definitely need a better update. I would say to give a large amount of bump mapping on the main part and a definite 2048x2048 update. As everyone has their own special looking penis, I think Rockstar should include a "random penis generator" in game. Similar to how peds use different parts (faces, clothing, textures etc.). It would be split up into three parts, the glans, the "shaft", and the testicles. There would be about 22-25 models and textures for each part, giving each penis a unique look. These type of ideas can have a large benefit towards Rockstar, and could possibly boost their sales 80%!

 

Then we need Rockstar to throw on a sh*tload of HDR and Bloom for fantastic graphics!

[Profesh]

Since game characters still look like a cross between paintings, puppets, and kabuki actors, I don't think the point is looking for a turn-on so much as seeing Rockstar break a stupid taboo in a game series that's otherwise adult-oriented. It's always been one of Rockstar's goals to prove that games can be as grown-up as novels or movies, and that means proving the world doesn't end if games push the same boundaries.

 

Based on how male nudity was introduced I'd bet the first time we see a naked woman she won't be doing anything intentionally sexual. On the other hand there are so many double standards Rockstar might say to hell with it and let it be a sexual situation, because somebody will complain no matter what they do.

 

What I mean by double standards is that a guy taking a shower can be just a guy taking a shower, and showing his junk on camera is usually being gross or funny and isn't porn (unless the guy is too handsome, because then it's gay, but that's never the guy's fault because he's just being himself); if you substitute the naked man with a naked woman it's automatically porn no matter what she's doing. Women have been so sexually objectified in media, if a woman is shown naked it's a statement that she is also horny. It's total stereotyping: a naked man is an asexual laughingstock (or if he's handsome, a gay fantasy object who can't help it), and a naked woman is always a slut.

Indeed.

[Profesh]

^Not even R* would do that, it would be far too controversial and I'm sure they don't want to spend millions getting a decent rating like they did with manhunt.

Not really: the Fallout series has been killing kids since 1997. So to speak.