drakic Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 That dead guy on the hook is someone from Leone or Sindacco gang, and I know that R* said that's Victor Vance, but it looks nothing like him. Rockstar is wrong indeed, through. They can say what they want, but Vic is NOT dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owl95 Posted October 20, 2009 Author Share Posted October 20, 2009 That dead guy on the hook is someone from Leone or Sindacco gang, and I know that R* said that's Victor Vance, but it looks nothing like him. Rockstar is wrong indeed, through. They can say what they want, but Vic is NOT dead. Sure. Why should we believe the game developer? Isn't that really stupid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drakic Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 That game developer make many mistakes in theirs games, like missing voices for peds, disabling cars, re-designing beta characters... How does that bold latin guy look like Vic, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forcefield Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 That game developer make many mistakes in theirs games, like missing voices for peds, disabling cars, re-designing beta characters... How does that bold latin guy look like Vic, huh? Be grateful for that Epsilon thread in the SA section, if not for that this would be the most pathetic thing I'd ever read on GTAF. As I said, people will go into denial over literally anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drakic Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Guys, you don't understand sarcasm, don't you? I know that Vic is dead, I just can't take it (you know what I mean?). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bgile5 Posted November 12, 2009 Share Posted November 12, 2009 Lance in the helicopter, SOMEONE ELSE gets shot, and VIC is the DEAD GUY on the damn MEAT HOOK. PLEASE just LOOOOOOOK at it LOLOLOLOL Calm down man...Sorry your wrong. Lance wanted revenge on Diaz because he ambushed the deal and killed his brother which Rockstar confirmed is Vic. Lance is crazy but I dont think we would join Sonny at the end if he was the one who killed vic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emotion98.3 Posted November 15, 2009 Share Posted November 15, 2009 alright everybody, it was pete. You guy's happy now. --- But yeah, it does feel weird to play VCS as a person you know is going to be dead 2 years later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vercetti27 Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 Vic isn't dead. Pete is dead. They are completley different. Just take a effin look. And it's not official. Gimmie a official ROckstar site stating that and then I will believe 1- Take 2 and Rockstar have admitted he is dead 2- He's just a video game character, does it matter? 3- We never got to see pete in VC or VCS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lpgunit Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 So I assume that Vic just pulled off a silly accent when he appeared in VC, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vercetti27 Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 It doesn't matter what accent he used. Rockstar have confirmed this, and I think most people here have too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WingedWarrior Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 I love how people think they are so above Rockstar and continue to let their arrogance blind them from what has already been officially confirmed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CryptReaperDorian Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 R* confirmed it's Vic so you can't argue with that, BUT R* are again making excuses to shut fans up. It's nothing new really. Claude Speede from GTA2 and Claude from GTA III are confirmed as the same person. However, in GTA III it was originally meant to be able name the protagonist. Claude was just the default name. Somewhat the same thing goes here for Vic. If R* really meant for it to be Vic in GTA VC why didn't they make Vic in GTA VCS look like and have the same voice as the "Vic" in GTA VC? I know the voice actor part isn't always the easiest to bring back, but the character model wouldn't of been any hassle. Obviously, R* didn't think this through so they made up an excuse type of response. I'm in no way denying it's Vic as it's been confirmed, but doesn't anyone else see what R* does? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now