A DODO! JUST ONE MEASLY DODO!

[Carnage1120]

i dont think planes would work very well unless there was more then one Airport. Pretty pointless otherwise, allthough they'd open some intersting multiplayer oppertunities. Maybe a mission where u "unlock" the airport and the dodo. Fitting with the post 9/11-armed-police-guarding-the-subways theme, a plane might be slightly contradictory. Too easy to crash it into a street or something. i dont know. Personally i think no, dont inclue the dodo untill the next full game, where the feature can be done properly, with uses such as traverseing the country etc.

If we were to see planes of any type, it probably would have to be in a big state like San Andreas, if R* ever decided to put their next game there.

Shut the f*ck up dick. Plaanes can land evrwhere and i wanna 9/11 some fools in free mode

It's no wonder why nobody takes you seriously, especially when you tried to post that fake trailer up.

And it's no wonder everyone here says your an ass kisser with Rockstars 30 inch cock up your ass

this guy is just begging to get kicked out of here. good

And you're begging to get raped by a donkey

get a life.

I second that

Whats with the quote pyramid?

[Nillus]

If 9/11 is really holding them from implementing planes in the game... they need to grow up then.

Nice sign of respect R* but we just want a small flyable plane in the game, who cares if sad people are gonna collide it with a skyscraper or something.

It's just a f*cking game, nobody cares about getting points for killing as much people as you can aswell?

 

'duh map is too small!' - what about GTA Vice City?

It atleast had the Skimmer and I remember modding it to become an F16 with sounds and awesome handling. <3

[Mokrie Dela]

 

Whats with the quote pyramid?

oh dear lord what have i started!?

haha. Nah, on a serious note, i think we'll see them again, but not untill the next game. The dodo in III sucked. The seaplane in VC was pretty pointless, but in SA the planes felt like they had a purpose.

With games like Just Cause and Fuel showing us how big games can be, maybe future GTAs can be bigger (ok not quite as big as JC and Fuel) and introduce planes....

[shinsta312]

i dont understand it

 

whats so unrealistic about a freaking plane?

whats so unrealistic about a freaking parachute?

 

if this game is so realistic then why can you still run around after you get shot 5times in the leggs?

why can you run thu a red light without getting a ticket?

 

my point is that i think it ok for a little realism

but it still gotta be fun

There's nothing unrealistic about flying planes and riding on parachute. It's just that it doesn't fit the protagonists and their background story (I know you could care less, but R* does, apparently.)

 

 

Niko mentioned that he flew helicopters when was in the war (that mission where you had to steal that helicopter for UL Paper.) I wouldn't expect a 34 year old biker and a 25-year-old bodyguard/dealer to have any prior experience to riding a plane, unless there was flying school.

 

On the other hand, there was no explanation as to how Johnny can fly helicopters, so I guess anything goes.

[skateordie985]

tbh, i dont see the point of an airplaine in LC. the only reason they were useful in SA was because san andreas had a ton of pointless space (countryside, desert, etc) and it was a pain in the donkey to drive through all of that. it also had 4 small cities with an airport for each city. Liberty City is just one HUGE city, so it only has one airport. theres no where to land but the airport. it would just be pointless. helicopters, on the other hand, are much more agile. land on almost every building. a plane cant land on a building.

 

anyways, all i want from TBoGT is a few new sports cars, some new weapons, and of course the new story line. maybe a new helicopter, but i dont know what. RPG copter? they pretty much added that in TLaD, so Im not sure.

[skateordie985]

 

On the other hand, there was no explanation as to how Johnny can fly helicopters, so I guess anything goes.

None of the TLaD missions had Johnny flying a helicopter.

 

you can only acquire a helicopter in TLaD if you

 

a) find one at one of the spawn points

 

b) spawned one with cheats

[CryptReaperDorian]

tbh, i dont see the point of an airplaine in LC. the only reason they were useful in SA was because san andreas had a ton of pointless space (countryside, desert, etc) and it was a pain in the donkey to drive through all of that. it also had 4 small cities with an airport for each city. Liberty City is just one HUGE city, so it only has one airport. theres no where to land but the airport. it would just be pointless. helicopters, on the other hand, are much more agile. land on almost every building. a plane cant land on a building.

 

anyways, all i want from TBoGT is a few new sports cars, some new weapons, and of course the new story line. maybe a new helicopter, but i dont know what. RPG copter? they pretty much added that in TLaD, so Im not sure.

I still don't see how people consider countryside and the desert useless space. I mean, imo, skyscrapers are more useless if you can't go in them. A skyscraper gets more in the way of places to be able to drive than a tree.

[bobgtafan]

tbh, i dont see the point of an airplaine in LC. the only reason they were useful in SA was because san andreas had a ton of pointless space (countryside, desert, etc) and it was a pain in the donkey to drive through all of that. it also had 4 small cities with an airport for each city. Liberty City is just one HUGE city, so it only has one airport. theres no where to land but the airport. it would just be pointless. helicopters, on the other hand, are much more agile. land on almost every building. a plane cant land on a building.

 

anyways, all i want from TBoGT is a few new sports cars, some new weapons, and of course the new story line. maybe a new helicopter, but i dont know what. RPG copter? they pretty much added that in TLaD, so Im not sure.

I still don't see how people consider countryside and the desert useless space. I mean, imo, skyscrapers are more useless if you can't go in them. A skyscraper gets more in the way of places to be able to drive than a tree.

Finally someone relizes this! Those buildings you can't enter are just as useless as countryside.

[skateordie985]

I still don't see how people consider countryside and the desert useless space.  I mean, imo, skyscrapers are more useless if you can't go in them.  A skyscraper gets more in the way of places to be able to drive than a tree.

 

at least you can land a helicopter on a skyscraper get out and jump off, or spawn a car or bike and drive off (epic). or, spawn a boat, throw a grenade 10 feet away, get in, the grenade will launch the boat over the edge, but wont destroy it if it is far enough away. : )

 

btw this is WAY more fun with the new physics/damage engine.

[Carnage1120]

I still don't see how people consider countryside and the desert useless space.  I mean, imo, skyscrapers are more useless if you can't go in them.  A skyscraper gets more in the way of places to be able to drive than a tree.

 

at least you can land a helicopter on a skyscraper get out and jump off, or spawn a car or bike and drive off (epic). or, spawn a boat, throw a grenade 10 feet away, get in, the grenade will launch the boat over the edge, but wont destroy it if it is far enough away. : )

 

btw this is WAY more fun with the new physics/damage engine.

Quality over quantity.

[CryptReaperDorian]

I still don't see how people consider countryside and the desert useless space.  I mean, imo, skyscrapers are more useless if you can't go in them.  A skyscraper gets more in the way of places to be able to drive than a tree.

 

at least you can land a helicopter on a skyscraper get out and jump off, or spawn a car or bike and drive off (epic). or, spawn a boat, throw a grenade 10 feet away, get in, the grenade will launch the boat over the edge, but wont destroy it if it is far enough away. : )

 

btw this is WAY more fun with the new physics/damage engine.

Quality over quantity.

It's still stupid if there is like a hundred buildings you can do that on and not much open space to drive (driving on the beaches and Middle Park isn't that good). I'd like to have countryside anyways. It would be funny to have the cops after you, and while zipping through trees cops are crashing into them thus launching them out of their windshields.

[LittleJacobRESPECT]

I still don't see how people consider countryside and the desert useless space. I mean, imo, skyscrapers are more useless if you can't go in them. A skyscraper gets more in the way of places to be able to drive than a tree.

Yeah that is a great point. Or how about how you can go into some buildings on missions but they are blocked off otherwise? i know it can't be a performance issue, because you can go into the hotel rooms if you use a chopper but you cant from the ground floor. That to me is dead space to the extreme. As of now the only "countryside" you can get is the dirt road that starts at the airport and finishes a few miles further.

[bobgtafan]

I still don't see how people consider countryside and the desert useless space.  I mean, imo, skyscrapers are more useless if you can't go in them.  A skyscraper gets more in the way of places to be able to drive than a tree.

 

at least you can land a helicopter on a skyscraper get out and jump off, or spawn a car or bike and drive off (epic). or, spawn a boat, throw a grenade 10 feet away, get in, the grenade will launch the boat over the edge, but wont destroy it if it is far enough away. : )

 

btw this is WAY more fun with the new physics/damage engine.

O yes because thier is a big difference from this skyscaper jumping off that one. Look until skyscapers have interners they are technailly empty space also. AND why can't the countryside have mouantions so you can do the same thing? I'm not saying skyscapers or cities are bad. Far from it they are great. I'm just saying I deserts, hills, mouantions, plains, valleys, forest, swamps, snowy areas to expolre also in between the cities or around one city.

[skateordie985]

im a city person. i hate countryside. if you wreck your car in the middle of the desert, your f***ed. you gotta walk. even if you cant go into the buildings, they still look amazing and add to the environment to me. btw, were talking about (basically) new york here! theres no country side! atleast not near new york city

[bobgtafan]

im a city person. i hate countryside. if you wreck your car in the middle of the desert, your f***ed. you gotta walk. even if you cant go into the buildings, they still look amazing and add to the environment to me. btw, were talking about (basically) new york here! theres no country side! atleast not near new york city

Alderney State, Long Island, Upsate Liberty...

[Emotion98.3]

...You guys do know if they make the "dodo" plane you guys will be complaining that it cannot fly for a long time and that rockstar "STINKZ AND SHULD NVR MKE GAMES AGAN". So for that, please put in a "Plane" and not a "Dodo"

 

 

Im out ,

Emotion98.3

[bobgtafan]

...You guys do know if they make the "dodo" plane you guys will be complaining that it cannot fly for a long time and that rockstar "STINKZ AND SHULD NVR MKE GAMES AGAN". So for that, please put in a "Plane" and not a "Dodo"

 

 

Im out ,

Emotion98.3

Dodo's can fly for as long as you have gas...what are you talking about?

[LittleJacobRESPECT]

...You guys do know if they make the "dodo" plane you guys will be complaining that it cannot fly for a long time and that rockstar "STINKZ AND SHULD NVR MKE GAMES AGAN". So for that, please put in a "Plane" and not a "Dodo"

 

 

Im out ,

Emotion98.3

San Andreas had a fully functioning Dodo.

[XAF226]

He's talking about the GTA III Dodo.

 

Some people will still want a Hydra or some other SA sh*t.

[Slomojoe]

 

I still don't see how people consider countryside and the desert useless space.  I mean, imo, skyscrapers are more useless if you can't go in them.  A skyscraper gets more in the way of places to be able to drive than a tree.

 

at least you can land a helicopter on a skyscraper get out and jump off, or spawn a car or bike and drive off (epic). or, spawn a boat, throw a grenade 10 feet away, get in, the grenade will launch the boat over the edge, but wont destroy it if it is far enough away. : )

 

btw this is WAY more fun with the new physics/damage engine.

O yes because thier is a big difference from this skyscaper jumping off that one. Look until skyscapers have interners they are technailly empty space also. AND why can't the countryside have mouantions so you can do the same thing? I'm not saying skyscapers or cities are bad. Far from it they are great. I'm just saying I deserts, hills, mouantions, plains, valleys, forest, swamps, snowy areas to expolre also in between the cities or around one city.

BECAUSE THIS IS NEW YORK CITY. THERE ARE NO MOUNTAINS AND COUNTRYSIDE IN NEW YORK CITY.

 

And how exactly would you skydive off of a mountain? Mountains aren't steep enough for that

 

Maybe in GTA V

[d0mm2k8]

Didn't R* have planes handling in GTA IVs files such as ANDROM and FIGHTER ?

I also think they left in some stuff from TLAD.

 

 

And how exactly would you skydive off of a mountain?

Did you ever visit Mount Chiliad?

[shinsta312]

 

I still don't see how people consider countryside and the desert useless space.  I mean, imo, skyscrapers are more useless if you can't go in them.  A skyscraper gets more in the way of places to be able to drive than a tree.

 

at least you can land a helicopter on a skyscraper get out and jump off, or spawn a car or bike and drive off (epic). or, spawn a boat, throw a grenade 10 feet away, get in, the grenade will launch the boat over the edge, but wont destroy it if it is far enough away. : )

 

btw this is WAY more fun with the new physics/damage engine.

O yes because thier is a big difference from this skyscaper jumping off that one. Look until skyscapers have interners they are technailly empty space also. AND why can't the countryside have mouantions so you can do the same thing? I'm not saying skyscapers or cities are bad. Far from it they are great. I'm just saying I deserts, hills, mouantions, plains, valleys, forest, swamps, snowy areas to expolre also in between the cities or around one city.

BECAUSE THIS IS NEW YORK CITY. THERE ARE NO MOUNTAINS AND COUNTRYSIDE IN NEW YORK CITY.

 

And how exactly would you skydive off of a mountain? Mountains aren't steep enough for that

 

Maybe in GTA V

 

The only major cities that have a huge population (over a million) and has mountains and hills in the area is Los Angeles (Los Santos), San Francisco (San Fierro), and Las Vegas (Las Venturas). And We might see one of them as a potential city for "V", but I don't think we'll ever see San Andreas as a whole in the next-gen sequels, because it was technically as big as GTA IV's Liberty City.

Edited August 29, 2009 by shinsta312

[shinsta312]

 

I still don't see how people consider countryside and the desert useless space.  I mean, imo, skyscrapers are more useless if you can't go in them.  A skyscraper gets more in the way of places to be able to drive than a tree.

 

at least you can land a helicopter on a skyscraper get out and jump off, or spawn a car or bike and drive off (epic). or, spawn a boat, throw a grenade 10 feet away, get in, the grenade will launch the boat over the edge, but wont destroy it if it is far enough away. : )

 

btw this is WAY more fun with the new physics/damage engine.

O yes because thier is a big difference from this skyscaper jumping off that one. Look until skyscapers have interners they are technailly empty space also. AND why can't the countryside have mouantions so you can do the same thing? I'm not saying skyscapers or cities are bad. Far from it they are great. I'm just saying I deserts, hills, mouantions, plains, valleys, forest, swamps, snowy areas to expolre also in between the cities or around one city.

They're not going to have interiors for everything. It takes too much disk space. Plus, you can't deserts, hills, mountains, plains, valleys, forest, swamps, snowy areas all at the same time. It depends on the city and the regions in it. I'm sorry, but it's too unrealistic.

 

If you want all of that in the next game, might as we'll make the 360 version quadruple layered.

Edited August 29, 2009 by shinsta312

[LittleJacobRESPECT]

Without turning this into a GTA:NEXT thread, i would love GTA5 to be a remake of SA with all the cars and weapons from GTA4 added in + interiors for every house and building. Or maybe a reimagining of the cities, like how liberty city is different in 4 than in III.

[shinsta312]

 

Without turning this into a GTA:NEXT thread, i would love GTA5 to be a remake of SA with all the cars and weapons from GTA4 added in + interiors for every house and building. Or maybe a reimagining of the cities, like how liberty city is different in 4 than in III.

"IV" version of Liberty City was almost as big as San Andreas in the last game. If we add San Andreas (3x as big as Liberty City) + Every Interior to every house and building, that's more than enough to fill the entire disk space. Again, we might as well make the 360 version quadruple layered.

[d0mm2k8]

 

Or maybe a reimagining of the cities, like how liberty city is different in 4 than in III.

The only reason R* remade LC was because GTA III LC didn't feel at all like NY.

They have no reason to remake LV, LS, SF or even VC - they got the feel of those cities right.

 

Anyways, SA is hinted at been the same in IV cannon. On the in-game TV, places such as the Visage and Vinewood are the same as they were in III cannon (mostly because it's just short clips of actual SA).

 

Sorry for going off topic

 

[LittleJacobRESPECT]

Or maybe a reimagining of the cities, like how liberty city is different in 4 than in III.

The only reason R* remade LC was because GTA III LC didn't feel at all like NY.

They have no reason to remake LV, LS, SF or even VC - they got the feel of those cities right.

 

Anyways, SA is hinted at been the same in IV cannon. On the in-game TV, places such as the Visage and Vinewood are the same as they were in III cannon (mostly because it's just short clips of actual SA).

 

Sorry for going off topic

Trust me on this one, they aren't just going to do a direct port. The old trilogy is over, none of the characters are returning so why should the cities?