PerebruM Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 I have only one question, are the Hangman's NOOSE TIME leaderboards reset? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john88z Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 (edited) Celebration Time!!!! Edited March 21, 2009 by john88z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noz38 Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 This patch disables trainers and suchlike. Great news! There won't be many people online today... =) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neon25 Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Great, I have been waiting for this. Hope to see a changelog soon. Also, can some of you please run a benchmark, if possible? Woot! I've got an increase of over 7 FPS. Statistics Average FPS: 39.37 Duration: 37.16 sec CPU Usage: 93% System memory usage: 57% Video memory usage: 98% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1440 x 900 (75 Hz) Texture Quality: High Texture Filter Quality: Highest View Distance: 15 Detail Distance: 30 Hardware Microsoft Windows XP Professional Dodatek Service Pack 3 Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Video Driver version: 185.20 Audio Adapter: SoundMAX HD Audio Intel® Core2 CPU 6420 @ 2.13GHz File ID: Benchmark.cli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcrysis02 Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Guys,does making Niko wear his gloves count as a mod or something bad?Because i only modded that into the game...thx for the answer(s). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hungryforthepower Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 My game is still working after the update, but mods/scripts and skins aren't working, neither in singleplayer nor in the multiplayer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcin6 Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Great, I have been waiting for this. Hope to see a changelog soon. Also, can some of you please run a benchmark, if possible? Woot! I've got an increase of over 7 FPS. Statistics Average FPS: 39.37 Duration: 37.16 sec CPU Usage: 93% System memory usage: 57% Video memory usage: 98% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1440 x 900 (75 Hz) Texture Quality: High Texture Filter Quality: Highest View Distance: 15 Detail Distance: 30 Hardware Microsoft Windows XP Professional Dodatek Service Pack 3 Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Video Driver version: 185.20 Audio Adapter: SoundMAX HD Audio Intel® Core2 CPU 6420 @ 2.13GHz File ID: Benchmark.cli How it possible that you can get 40 fps with high textures and this size and with this graphic card and processor ? I`ve gut better PC that you and i get 20-25 fps with medium textures :| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Enemy Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Ok apart from some stupid error on my part, the game will run just fine (when I remove all mods and scripts). A couple of things are suprising to me though. First: "You cannot access multiplayer with modified files. You must restore the original files in order to access multiplayer" - That's great Rockstar, at least an effort has been made to implement some sort of anti-cheating protocol, as Freezer89 pointed out in a previous post. Second: Every time a patch is released, I always test graphical tweaks including SLI. So, with a neutral attitude I enabled SLI. I was suprised. Below are the results: WITH SLI ENABLED Average FPS: 52.94 Duration: 37.25 sec CPU Usage: 76% System memory usage: 53% Video memory usage: 84% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1152 x 864 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: High Texture Filter Quality: Highest View Distance: 67 Detail Distance: 100 Hardware Microsoft® Windows Vista" Ultimate Service Pack 1 Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Video Driver version: 182.08 Audio Adapter: Headset Earphone (Logitech USB Headset) AMD Phenom II X4 940 Processor WITH SLI DISABLED Statistics Average FPS: 53.95 Duration: 37.13 sec CPU Usage: 78% System memory usage: 51% Video memory usage: 89% Same Graphics Settings, Same Hardware As you can see, there is not much notable difference between ENABLED and DISABLED. Before this patch (1.0.1.0 and 1.0.2.0), there was always a NOTICEABLE fps drop with SLI enabled (usually 20). But this time, I could hardly tell the difference. SLI did still have a slight lag at times (loading the inner city) but, if the results are this good, perhaps this will help some people still struggling to run this game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john88z Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 LOST FPS Patch 3 Statistics Average FPS: 51.06 Duration: 37.17 sec CPU Usage: 75% System memory usage: 53% Video memory usage: 95% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Texture Filter Quality: Highest View Distance: 45 Detail Distance: 90 Hardware Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ Video Driver version: 185.20 Audio Adapter: Speakers (High Definition Audio Device) AMD Phenom II X4 805 Processor File ID: benchmark.cli This is patch 2 Statistics Average FPS: 65.91 Duration: 36.97 sec CPU Usage: 67% System memory usage: 51% Video memory usage: 96% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: Very High Water Quality: Medium Shadow Quality: High View Distance: 50 Detail Distance: 90 Definition: Off VSync: On Hardware Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ Video Driver version: 185.20 Audio Adapter: Speakers (High Definition Audio Device) AMD Phenom II X4 805 Processor File ID: Benchmark.cli Im taking off the link of celebration Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Enemy Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwEMxYggoKQ +1 ^10 char Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C06alt Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 This patch disables trainers and suchlike. However... The clocktower and the ticker signs in Times Square are working!! Thats great i thought i was the only one that noticed them missing having played the ps3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ishan23 Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 my update bar again freezes at the end.happened with the last update too. i guess i have to wait for a direct link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyPepper Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 (edited) my update bar again freezes at the end.happened with the last update too.i guess i have to wait for a direct link. same happens to me. edit: got it working, but my mods don't work now Edited March 21, 2009 by JohnnyPepper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neon25 Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Great, I have been waiting for this. Hope to see a changelog soon. Also, can some of you please run a benchmark, if possible? Woot! I've got an increase of over 7 FPS. Statistics Average FPS: 39.37 Duration: 37.16 sec CPU Usage: 93% System memory usage: 57% Video memory usage: 98% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1440 x 900 (75 Hz) Texture Quality: High Texture Filter Quality: Highest View Distance: 15 Detail Distance: 30 Hardware Microsoft Windows XP Professional Dodatek Service Pack 3 Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Video Driver version: 185.20 Audio Adapter: SoundMAX HD Audio Intel® Core2 CPU 6420 @ 2.13GHz File ID: Benchmark.cli How it possible that you can get 40 fps with high textures and this size and with this graphic card and processor ? I`ve gut better PC that you and i get 20-25 fps with medium textures :| Well, I've got 640mb on my graphic card. Dunno really, in first patch my FPS was like 25-27, with the second- 32-35, now it reached 40. I'm really surprised to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzbegone Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Patch 3Statistics Average FPS: 51.06 Duration: 37.17 sec CPU Usage: 75% System memory usage: 53% Video memory usage: 95% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Texture Filter Quality: Highest View Distance: 45 Detail Distance: 90 This is patch 2 Statistics Average FPS: 65.91 Duration: 36.97 sec CPU Usage: 67% System memory usage: 51% Video memory usage: 96% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: Very High Water Quality: Medium Shadow Quality: High View Distance: 50 Detail Distance: 90 Definition: Off VSync: On View distance is 5 off in each comparison Also, where's the Definition, Vsync, Reflection Resolution Water Quality and Shadow Quality options for patch 3? Makle sure you make duplicate your settings for an accurate comparison Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john88z Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Patch 3Statistics Average FPS: 51.06 Duration: 37.17 sec CPU Usage: 75% System memory usage: 53% Video memory usage: 95% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Texture Filter Quality: Highest View Distance: 45 Detail Distance: 90 This is patch 2 Statistics Average FPS: 65.91 Duration: 36.97 sec CPU Usage: 67% System memory usage: 51% Video memory usage: 96% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: Very High Water Quality: Medium Shadow Quality: High View Distance: 50 Detail Distance: 90 Definition: Off VSync: On View distance is 5 off in each comparison Also, where's the Definition, Vsync, Reflection Resolution Water Quality and Shadow Quality options for patch 3? Makle sure you make duplicate your settings for an accurate comparison Yes in patch 3 it was 5 lower that should improve fps. It doesnt save water quality and that stuff in the bm. Everything else thou is exactly the same I assure you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juscal Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Mad! Patch 3. Let's see if this baby works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john88z Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Here it is. Pitiful Bm. I added the extra 5view distance for the sake of completeness. Statistics Average FPS: 48.44 Duration: 37.14 sec CPU Usage: 72% System memory usage: 53% Video memory usage: 95% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Texture Filter Quality: Highest View Distance: 50 Detail Distance: 90 Hardware Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ Video Driver version: 185.20 Audio Adapter: Speakers (High Definition Audio Device) AMD Phenom II X4 805 Processor File ID: benchmark.cli 20 fps lower then patch 2. Great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
System796 Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Patch 3Statistics Average FPS: 51.06 Duration: 37.17 sec CPU Usage: 75% System memory usage: 53% Video memory usage: 95% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Texture Filter Quality: Highest View Distance: 45 Detail Distance: 90 This is patch 2 Statistics Average FPS: 65.91 Duration: 36.97 sec CPU Usage: 67% System memory usage: 51% Video memory usage: 96% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: Very High Water Quality: Medium Shadow Quality: High View Distance: 50 Detail Distance: 90 Definition: Off VSync: On View distance is 5 off in each comparison Also, where's the Definition, Vsync, Reflection Resolution Water Quality and Shadow Quality options for patch 3? Makle sure you make duplicate your settings for an accurate comparison Yes in patch 3 it was 5 lower that should improve fps. It doesnt save water quality and that stuff in the bm. Everything else thou is exactly the same I assure you I don't think view distance 5 less or more will affect fps by 15 frames. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P33t Posted March 21, 2009 Author Share Posted March 21, 2009 Here's my benchmark. Unfortunately I didn't do a similar one on Patch 2 Patch 1.0.3.0: Statistics Average FPS: 54.16 Duration: 37.16 Sek CPU Usage: 82% System memory usage: 71% Video memory usage: 80% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1680 x 1050 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Hoch Render Quality: Hoch View Distance: 32 Detail Distance: 70 Reflection Resolution: High Water Quality: Very high Shadow Quality: High Definition: On VSync: Off Hardware Microsoft® Windows Vista" Home Premium Service Pack 1 Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 Video-Driver version: 181.22 Audio Adapter: Lautsprecher (Creative SB Audigy 2 ZS (WDM)) Intel® Core2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john88z Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Patch 3Statistics Average FPS: 51.06 Duration: 37.17 sec CPU Usage: 75% System memory usage: 53% Video memory usage: 95% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Texture Filter Quality: Highest View Distance: 45 Detail Distance: 90 This is patch 2 Statistics Average FPS: 65.91 Duration: 36.97 sec CPU Usage: 67% System memory usage: 51% Video memory usage: 96% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: Very High Water Quality: Medium Shadow Quality: High View Distance: 50 Detail Distance: 90 Definition: Off VSync: On View distance is 5 off in each comparison Also, where's the Definition, Vsync, Reflection Resolution Water Quality and Shadow Quality options for patch 3? Makle sure you make duplicate your settings for an accurate comparison Yes in patch 3 it was 5 lower that should improve fps. It doesnt save water quality and that stuff in the bm. Everything else thou is exactly the same I assure you I don't think view distance 5 less or more will affect fps by 15 frames. Then it must be the patch. look at my post right above yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldoribeiro Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 How are the textures in this new patch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverTheBelow Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 How are the textures in this new patch? The same.. ? Why would they be different? They still disappear though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juscal Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Nothing's coming up relating to the patch. Methinks this is fake or region dependant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P33t Posted March 21, 2009 Author Share Posted March 21, 2009 Nothing's coming up relating to the patch. Methinks this is fake or region dependant. Come on, its saturday. R* doesn't work saturdays.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EXTR3m3 Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 i think this patch fix ugly shadow if you set shadow quality to very high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcrysis02 Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Nothing's coming up relating to the patch. Methinks this is fake or region dependant. I don't think it's fake.Why would it be?A fake patch that doesn't allow you to cheat?But Niko's gloves have been removed....he has so ugly bare hands...i need to cover them up quick.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
System796 Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Nothing's coming up relating to the patch. Methinks this is fake or region dependant. I don't think it's fake.Why would it be?A fake patch that doesn't allow you to cheat?But Niko's gloves have been removed....he has so ugly bare hands...i need to cover them up quick.... You can always draw on your monitor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EXTR3m3 Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Nothing's coming up relating to the patch. Methinks this is fake or region dependant. I don't think it's fake.Why would it be?A fake patch that doesn't allow you to cheat?But Niko's gloves have been removed....he has so ugly bare hands...i need to cover them up quick.... You can always draw on your monitor. the patch is real not fake confirm i just downloaded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FullMetal Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Haven't checked this out and when I read through this topic alot of people say the patch is a 'hoax'? (not appearing/downloading with their systems). By the way: I read that you couldn't go online with modified files... so not even with skinmods? Seriously, customisation isn't cheating... editing gamefiles (concerning handling/weapon wielding) is cheating and should be the only thing that isn't allowed. I hope I can still play online with my awesome skins... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts