thales100 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Please folks, take notice that only one quad was faster than all those dual cores. lol. Do my words ring accurate yet? Not for GTA 4 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm47 Posted February 8, 2009 Author Share Posted February 8, 2009 (edited) So far, I think GTA IV is one of few reasons for me to slap in a new Phenom II in my mobo & for the intel, well it's too pricey for my needs. I have the dual core optimizer installed with all the latest drivers. Windows 7 in my opinion runs games faster ONLY on nVidia, if your GPU is ATi, it will probably be slower than XP, dunno about Vista. Edited February 8, 2009 by Norm47 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ron123 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Please folks, take notice that only one quad was faster than all those dual cores. lol. Do my words ring accurate yet? Most of the modern CPUs are almost the same, you can't feel the defference anyway, it is just good to have quad (even cheap one) for GTAIV an few other games, anyway the CPUs is pertty dead market, new models won't make most of the users to buy them. You easily can OC them for better performance, no point in buying extreme CPU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djbootleg18 Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 Statistics Average FPS: 59.26 Duration: 37.06 sec CPU Usage: 79% System memory usage: 62% Video memory usage: 100% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1920 x 1080 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: Very High Water Quality: High Shadow Quality: High View Distance: 30 Detail Distance: 100 Definition: Off VSync: Off Hardware Microsoft® Windows Vista" Home Premium Service Pack 1 Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Video Driver version: 185.20 Audio Adapter: Speakers (Realtek High Definition Audio) AMD Phenom 9850 Quad-Core Processor File ID: Benchmark.cli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rapter Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 Statistics Average FPS: 61.52 Duration: 37.58 sec CPU Usage: 56% System memory usage: 49% Video memory usage: 100% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1680 x 1050 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: High Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: Very High Water Quality: Very High Shadow Quality: Very High View Distance: 100 Detail Distance: 100 Definition: On VSync: On Hardware Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 Video Adapter: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series Video Driver version: 6.14.10.6891 Audio Adapter: Realtek HD Audio output AMD Phenom II X4 940 Processor File ID: benchmark.cli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTA_XP Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 Could anyone please explain me between AMD and Intel? Whats so different between them? I have Intel C2D P8400 @ 2.26GHz, yeah I know, slow. But atleast I can play GTA4 smoothley wit 22-25fps. On a sh*tpc I have AMD 3000+ and SA plays with 15fps o neverything LOWEST Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhazzy Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 StatisticsAverage FPS: 61.52 Duration: 37.58 sec CPU Usage: 56% System memory usage: 49% Video memory usage: 100% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1680 x 1050 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: High Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: Very High Water Quality: Very High Shadow Quality: Very High View Distance: 100 Detail Distance: 100 Definition: On VSync: On Hardware Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 Video Adapter: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series Video Driver version: 6.14.10.6891 Audio Adapter: Realtek HD Audio output AMD Phenom II X4 940 Processor File ID: benchmark.cli Dude dont f*cking lie... With draw and detail at max not even the guys from the international space station can get 61 fps in that sh*ty bench on their super computers...get over amd's dick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunGt Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 Stats Average FPS: 23.96 Duration: 38.02 sec CPU usage: 96% System memory usage: 73% Video memory usage: 64% Graphics Settings Resolution: 1280 x 960 (75 Hz) Texture: Medium Rendering: High Reflections: Medium Water: High Shadows: High View distance: 10 Detail distance: 10 Definition: Off VSync: Off Hardware Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Video adapter: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series (Engineering Sample – WDDM v1.1) (4830) Driver: 8.14.10.630 Audio adapter: Speakers (High Definition Audio Device) AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thales100 Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 With draw and detail at max not even the guys from the international space station can get 61 fps in that sh*ty bench on their super computers...get over amd's dick This result seems to have been nuked, but in fact its possible to get 61 FPS at 1680 x 1050 all maxed - i think this is quite the limit due to 1 Gb VRAM, itll bottleneck the system, you can oc a quad to 4.5 Ghz that youll not get any extra FPS running this benchie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thales100 Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Bump - no more AMD benchies ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Taboga Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Could anyone please explain me between AMD and Intel?Whats so different between them? I have Intel C2D P8400 @ 2.26GHz, yeah I know, slow. But atleast I can play GTA4 smoothley wit 22-25fps. On a sh*tpc I have AMD 3000+ and SA plays with 15fps o neverything LOWEST I guess that is a Athlon 64 or even XP 3000+? It´s an outdated Single Core CPU that is equal to a Penitum 4 @3 GHz so no wonder that the Performance is so bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Taboga Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Stats Average FPS: 23.90 Duration: 37.32 sec CPU usage: 96% System memory usage: 73% Video memory usage: 64% Graphics Settings Resolution: 1280 x 1024 (85 Hz) Texture: Medium Rendering: High Reflections: High Water: Medium Shadows: High View distance: 21 Detail distance: 10 Definition: Off VSync: Off Hardware Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 Video adapter: ATI Radeon HD 3850 Driver: 6.14.10.6903 Audio adapter: SB X-Fi Audio [E000] AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gen0cide_ Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Will edit with my stats in an hour or so when my PC's done defragging but I will say that too many gamers are making the old mhz for mhz comparison that is so fundamentally wrong. Remember Sempron vs P4 back in the day, the Sempron 3000+ was equivalent to P4 3ghz but only running at 1.8ghz. Well keeping that same ethos, why don't we compare AMD to Intel using price point instead, my AMD $150 processor vs your Intel $150 processor. All of a sudden it looks a bit pear shaped for Intel. AMD/Nvidia FTW (And I know that ATi is currently killing Nvidia price wise with the 4800 range, but until its time for me to buy a new card, I don't care. ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gen0cide_ Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 StatisticsAverage FPS: 61.52 Duration: 37.58 sec CPU Usage: 56% System memory usage: 49% Video memory usage: 100% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1680 x 1050 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: High Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: Very High Water Quality: Very High Shadow Quality: Very High View Distance: 100 Detail Distance: 100 Definition: On VSync: On Hardware Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 Video Adapter: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series Video Driver version: 6.14.10.6891 Audio Adapter: Realtek HD Audio output AMD Phenom II X4 940 Processor File ID: benchmark.cli Its 51.52. Divide the duration to work it out EDIT: oops sorry for double post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now