Norm47 Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 If you're like me can't stand intel or can't afford it, you probably game on AMD systems. Post your benchmarks here so we can show those intel fanboys we had enough. =Benchmark= Statistics Average FPS: 30.52 Duration: 37.58 sec CPU Usage: 95% System memory usage: 75% Video memory usage: 100% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (85 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: Medium Water Quality: Medium Shadow Quality: Medium View Distance: 1 Detail Distance: 100 Definition: On VSync: On Hardware Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 3 Video Adapter: ATI Radeon HD 3850 Video Driver version: 6.14.10.6903 Audio Adapter: Realtek HD Audio output AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5200+ File ID: benchmark.cli ================================= This is benched on patch 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cacarla Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 I understand this an "AMD Benchmark" topic but all benchmarks, either Intel or AMD, should be posted in the below topic. Thanks. http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=378412 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverTheBelow Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 Lol, I have the equivelent processor as yours but its intel and I get 10fps more. XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diryboy Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 cpu usage is kinda low, but fps won't grow if i lower the setting Statistics Average FPS: 24.55 Duration: 37.63 sec CPU Usage: 83% System memory usage: 55% Video memory usage: 100% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1680 x 1050 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: Very High Water Quality: Very High Shadow Quality: Very High View Distance: 10 Detail Distance: 27 Definition: Off VSync: On Hardware Microsoft?Windows Vista" Ultimate Service Pack 1 Video Adapter: ATI Radeon HD 3800 Series Video Driver version: 7.14.10.636 Audio Adapter: ÑïÉùÆ÷ (Realtek High Definition Audio) AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+ File ID: Benchmark.cli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wuzzy Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 Hey Norm, I don't see why AMD can't have it's own benchmark thread. I'll post in both threads if it will make everyone happy. Have you installed AMD dual core optimizer? Here's mine: Statistics Average FPS: 34.65 Duration: 37.06 sec CPU Usage: 87% System memory usage: 49% Video memory usage: 57% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1152 x 864 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Render Quality: High Reflection Resolution: Medium Water Quality: Low Shadow Quality: Medium View Distance: 25 Detail Distance: 25 Definition: Off VSync: On Hardware Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 3 Video Adapter: ATI Radeon HD 4670 Video Driver version: 6.14.10.6903 Audio Adapter: SB Live! Wave Device AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+ My HD4670 is the dogs danglies if you ask me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StealMySoda Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 StatisticsAverage FPS: 46.94 Duration: 37.41 sec CPU Usage: 72% System memory usage: 54% Video memory usage: 75% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1680 x 1050 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Render Quality: High Reflection Resolution: High Water Quality: Very High Shadow Quality: High View Distance: 37 Detail Distance: 37 Definition: Off VSync: Off AMD Phenom II 920 + Asus Dark Knight 4870 'Tops' Edition Could probably squeze a lot more out of it, but those are just the settings it sets me + a little bit more view distance added to reach the 512mb. Will probably try some command lines later on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFkilla Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 Statistics Average FPS: 38.57 Duration: 37.39 sec CPU Usage: 95% System memory usage: 51% Video memory usage: 54% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1400 x 1050 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Render Quality: High Reflection Resolution: High Water Quality: High Shadow Quality: High View Distance: 24 Detail Distance: 36 Definition: Off VSync: Off Hardware Microsoft® Windows Vista" Home Premium Service Pack 1 Video Adapter: ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT Video Driver version: 7.14.10.636 Audio Adapter: Speakers (High Definition Audio Device) AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+ File ID: benchmark.cli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lem-Bert Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 at 3700mhz Statistics Average FPS: 50.16 Duration: 37.00 sec CPU Usage: 45% System memory usage: 89% Video memory usage: 80% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1600 x 1200 (85 Hz) Texture Quality: High Render Quality: Highest View Distance: 17 Detail Distance: 17 Hardware Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 Video Adapter: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series Video Driver version: 6.14.10.6903 Audio Adapter: Realtek HD Audio output AMD Phenom II X4 940 Processor File ID: benchmark.cli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john88z Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 Statistics Average FPS: 56.83 Duration: 37.06 sec CPU Usage: 81% System memory usage: 85% Video memory usage: 100% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (75 Hz) Texture Quality: High Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: High Water Quality: Medium Shadow Quality: High View Distance: 55 Detail Distance: 100 Definition: Off VSync: Off Hardware Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ (Prerelease - WDDM 1.1) Video Driver version: 179.23 Audio Adapter: Speakers (High Definition Audio Device) AMD Phenom 9750 Quad-Core Processor File ID: Benchmark.cli Playing for about 8 hours and frame rate never dipped below 35fps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shivanandrs Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 If you're like me can't stand intel or can't afford it, you probably game on AMD systems. Post your benchmarks here so we can show those intel fanboys we had enough. =Benchmark= Statistics Average FPS: 30.52 Duration: 37.58 sec CPU Usage: 95% System memory usage: 75% Video memory usage: 100% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (85 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: Medium Water Quality: Medium Shadow Quality: Medium View Distance: 1 Detail Distance: 100 Definition: On VSync: On Hardware Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 3 Video Adapter: ATI Radeon HD 3850 Video Driver version: 6.14.10.6903 Audio Adapter: Realtek HD Audio output AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5200+ File ID: benchmark.cli ================================= This is benched on patch 2. ....seems like you envy us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tantalus91 Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 ....seems like you envy us Only a little bit Anyway heres mine! Statistics Average FPS: 37.40 Duration: 37.53 sec CPU Usage: 66% System memory usage: 81% Video memory usage: 100% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1440 x 900 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: High Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: High Water Quality: High Shadow Quality: High View Distance: 30 Detail Distance: 41 Definition: On VSync: On Hardware Microsoft® Windows Vista" Ultimate Service Pack 1 Video Adapter: ATI Radeon HD 3800 Series Video Driver version: 7.14.10.630 Audio Adapter: Speakers (3- High Definition Audio Device) AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core Processor Im pretty much GPU limited lol but the game is still great ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kakarot_9 Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 Mine: Statistics Average FPS: 36.96 Duration: 37.80 sec CPU Usage: 71% System memory usage: 85% Video memory usage: 61% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (85 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Render Quality: High Reflection Resolution: High Water Quality: Medium Shadow Quality: High View Distance: 22 Detail Distance: 22 Definition: On VSync: On Hardware Microsoft® Windows Vista" Ultimate Service Pack 1 Video Adapter: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series Video Driver version: 7.14.10.636 Audio Adapter: Speakers (Realtek High Definition Audio) AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core Processor File ID: benchmark.cli My bottleneck: 2GB RAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ron123 Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 Can someone post a benchmark's comparison of many intel's and AMD's modern CPUs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mastercz Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 Sorry (German) Statistiken Durchschnittliche FPS: 28.65 Dauer: 37.31 Sek CPU-Auslastung: 85% Systemspeicher-Auslastung: 84% Videospeicher-Auslastung: 63% Grafikeinstellungen Videomodus: 1600 x 1200 (72 Hz) Texturenqualität: Hoch Renderqualität: Maximum Reflexionsauflösung: Sehr hoch Qualität Wasser: Sehr hoch Qualität Schatten: Sehr hoch Sichtdistanz: 100 Detaildistanz: 100 Detail-Level: On VSync: On Hardware Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 3 Grafikkarte: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Video-Driver Version: 178.13 Soundkarte: IDT Audio1 AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+ File ID: benchmark.cli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john88z Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 Oh yeah i envy intel users....... for being rich f*cks. jk. just think if AMD wasn't in business we'd be paying half a grand for a dual core celeron @ 1.8 ghz. people like me thank jebus for AMD. ie being able to have a quad core computer and still have money left to eat. If i had 2,000 dollars to buy a new intel system, id still buy AMD. And no hard feelings to intel fans i still you. They are both great cpu's dont get me wrong. Just being arragont and saying AMD doesnt even compare to intel is a misstatement. I get 60 fps, and my lowest fps is 39fps in gtaIv. With my specs and high textures. So, in all honesty im happy with my cpu/fps right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shivanandrs Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 just think if AMD wasn't in business we'd be paying half a grand for a dual core celeron @ 1.8 ghz. Thats true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thales100 Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 lol why did you create a separate thread for AMD benchmarks ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sebastian1802 Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 Dont waste money for intel,if u can get almost same for half price: Ask for High u got it: Statistics Average FPS: 58.90 Duration: 37.18 sec CPU Usage: 69% System memory usage: 75% Video memory usage: 96% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1440 x 900 (75 Hz) Texture Quality: High Render Quality: Very High Reflection Resolution: Very High Water Quality: Very High Shadow Quality: Very High View Distance: 55 Detail Distance: 55 Definition: Off VSync: On Hardware Microsoft® Windows Vista Black Edition" 2009 Service Pack 1 Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 Video Driver version: 181.20 Audio Adapter: Speakers (Creative SB X-Fi) AMD Phenom™ 9850 Quad-Core Processor File ID: benchmark.cli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowpope17 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 OK I'll add mine in here Statistics Average FPS: 62.03 Duration: 37.13 sec CPU Usage: 71% System memory usage: 88% Video memory usage: 84% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1280 x 1024 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: Medium Render Quality: High Reflection Resolution: High Water Quality: High Shadow Quality: High View Distance: 30 Detail Distance: 30 Definition: On VSync: On Hardware Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ Video Driver version: 181.20 Audio Adapter: Digital Audio Interface (SB Audigy) AMD Phenom 9950 Quad-Core Processor File ID: benchmark.cli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruXter Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 The benchmarks show a false read for me. I have most of my settings done with commandline.txt. So the results show everything at lowest setting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonFTL Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 I got to say. After patch #2 my performance greatly improved alot. I could barely get 20fps before. Statistics Average FPS: 38.53 Duration: 37.16 sec CPU Usage: 94% System memory usage: 75% Video memory usage: 99% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1680 x 1050 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: High Render Quality: Highest Reflection Resolution: Very High Water Quality: Very High Shadow Quality: Very High View Distance: 23 Detail Distance: 32 Definition: On VSync: On Hardware Microsoft® Windows Vista" Ultimate Service Pack 1 Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Video Driver version: 181.20 Audio Adapter: Headset Earphone (Logitech USB Headset) AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mook42 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 MINE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
syrdax Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Statistics Average FPS: 46.03 Duration: 37.31 sec CPU Usage: 79% System memory usage: 58% Video memory usage: 82% Graphics Settings Video Mode: 1280 x 1024 (60 Hz) Texture Quality: High Render Quality: High Reflection Resolution: High Water Quality: High Shadow Quality: High View Distance: 53 Detail Distance: 49 Definition: Off VSync: On Hardware Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Video Driver version: 180.48 Audio Adapter: Sound Blaster Audigy AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+ File ID: benchmark.cli While gaming for real, I'm not playing at lower than 35 or so. More than good enough for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ron123 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 To all the AMD CPUs fanboys: can you post a link to the modern AMD CPUs models with comparison to Intel's, I don't know much about AMD, because I used to look for Intel's only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
syrdax Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Don't know if this is what you looking for but here's some charts. The yellow mark shows mine: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ron123 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 thanx, I can't see the phenom 2 model, Can someone post a "link" for comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
syrdax Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 This should help, there are tons of charts: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/ Here's high end CPUs chart: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruXter Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 To all the AMD CPUs fanboys:can you post a link to the modern AMD CPUs models with comparison to Intel's, I don't know much about AMD, because I used to look for Intel's only. http://tinyurl.com/bs42dq Watch closely and look observantly, you will learn something . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruXter Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 yeah I read the disclaimer on cpubenchmark, they clearly do not claim any liability or stand behind anything they say. if it's a general statement. then it is my general opinion of their site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chngdman Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Please folks, take notice that only one quad was faster than all those dual cores. lol. Do my words ring accurate yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now