Jump to content

How to play GTA 4 on INTEL GMA X3100


Recommended Posts

Before I continue this tutorial, I can definitely promise you that your GTA IV will function, given that you have integrated x3100 enabled, 965 express chip set family graphics card, whether it be laptop (which I have) or desktop.

 

It can be said that this is a viable fix for RESC10 error, with the above named system criterion.

 

 

First here are my specs:

 

-intel GM965 mobile express chip set family Core 2 Duo, 2 CPU's @ 2.00 GHz

-Vram-256 mb

-RAM-1014

-front side bus-246

-clock speed-640 MHz

-dx 10 installed (don't know if it was wise to install dx 10 to integrated card or if it made any sense)

-.net framework 3.5 installed

-service pack 3 installed

 

 

 

Here are your instructions to get gta iv started and running!!!!!

 

1. make sure you have .net framework 3.5 installed

2. make sure you have service pack 3 installed

3. For the specific graphics card named above....download this specific driver, then update (crucial as game absolutely cannot start without this step)

 

here's link to card driver:

 

RESC10 ERROR FIX

 

4. If after you have done all the updates enlisted above, and you get a new error, only this time it's a TXP50 /TXP40 error , this is as a result of applying the first patch released by rockstar to "fix" game. So you know what this means right? yes you have to totally unistall gta iv ( I just deleted everything from C:\Rockstar\etc ) then re install everything, without applying any patch whatsoever whether it be patch 1 or 2, they both rendered the game un startable after application!!!!!

 

 

THIS IS A DEFINITE FIX, NO QUESTIONS ASKED, BUT WILL ONLY DELIVER 4-5 fps which is pretty slow!!!!!!!

 

 

 

Continue guide to get more fps!!!

 

**GETTING MORE FPS**

 

 

just use these commandline flags,

 

-noprecache

-percentvidmem 100

-availablevidmem 4.0 (this will enable RAM to take over for lack of VRAM, and you will actually see about um a 500 resource usage increase in graphics menu) (Only use if you have 3 gigs of ram and up)

 

you shoukd be getting 7-15 fps now!!!!

 

 

I KNOW IT'S PATHETIC, SOMEONE PLAYING GTA IV WITH 256 INTEGRATED VRAM, AND 1014 mb of RAM, AND A DUAL CORE 2.00 GHz, but it's actually astonishing that an integrated can deliver these frames.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

TEXTURE REPLACEMENT MOD TO GET MORE FPS FOR EVERYONE -TEXTURE_REPLACEMENT_MOD.RAR

Edited by GM965_X3100
Link to comment
https://gtaforums.com/topic/394222-how-to-play-gta-4-on-intel-gma-x3100/
Share on other sites

Oh srry about that meant 1.014 gigs of ram srry......

Sorry, still not correct. It's 1024MB or 1GB. 1GB = 1024MB, 1MB = 1024KB, 1KB = 1024B and so on and so forth.

Rather amazing that you've come this far without learning that... Makes me think you did a copy/paste job or some such.

 

Next we should converse about Bits and Bytes. confused.gif

 

Like this: 1024kbps = (roughly) 125KB/s. Bet you didn't know that, and you were blaming your crappy download speeds on the server rather than your ISP being less than completely honest with you. Sure the terminology they use is correct, it's that they don't educate you to the fact that 20mbps looks alot bigger than 2.5MB/s. wow.gif

not refering to that of the factum of what a megabyte is, but rather, not remembering on stage, that 1024 mb = 1 GIGABYTE.

 

Over the years, I've just gotten used to saying 1.013 GIGABYTES, and as such, what I previously stipulated is just mere regurgitation of what I've been saying, rather than my actual knowledge.

 

 

Of course I would have to know that 1024 mb = 1gig. Why because I am a novice/programmer creating programs for Computer Science course and Knowledge of such info is critical.

 

 

For example, the other day, I made a program that effectively displays CPU speed, or allow users to toggle speed up/down.

 

 

So with out a profound knowledge base of Capacity, clearly, I could not have created that program for comp science class. biggrin.gif

RadioactiveLobster
not refering to that of the factum of what a megabyte is, but rather, not remembering on stage, that 1024 mb = 1 GIGABYTE.

 

Over the years, I've just gotten used to saying 1.013 GIGABYTES, and as such, what I previously stipulated is just mere regurgitation of what I've been saying, rather than my actual knowledge.

 

 

Of course I would have to know that 1024 mb = 1gig. Why because I am a novice/programmer creating programs for Computer Science course and Knowledge of such info is critical.

 

 

For example, the other day, I made a program that effectively displays CPU speed, or allow users to toggle speed up/down.

 

 

So with out a profound knowledge base of Capacity, clearly, I could not have created that program for comp science class. biggrin.gif

Uhuh... Ok, whatever you say bub...

ayushisrocking
7-15 fps

 

 

 

That's really impressive for a mid-range intel card, it might be better if the person uses GMA X4500HD(hopefully), because that card is FULLY supported by NFS Undercover...

 

BUT, can you show some screenshots and/or a benchmark pleasE?

 

and, the FPS might be higher if you use the second patch..if you want to, then please refer to the pinned topic in the PC version sub-forum .

not refering to that of the factum of what a megabyte is, but rather, not remembering on stage, that 1024 mb = 1 GIGABYTE.

 

Over the years, I've just gotten used to saying 1.013 GIGABYTES, and as such, what I previously stipulated is just mere regurgitation of what I've been saying, rather than my actual knowledge.

 

 

Of course I would have to know that 1024 mb = 1gig. Why because I am a novice/programmer creating programs for Computer Science course and Knowledge of such info is critical.

 

 

For example, the other day, I made a program that effectively displays CPU speed, or allow users to toggle speed up/down.

 

 

So with out a profound knowledge base of Capacity, clearly, I could not have created that program for comp science class. biggrin.gif

Just shut up, ok? You're not making yourself sound any smarter.

I`m very sorry to report that my laptop won`t start because of wierd blue screen, and as a result, I`ll be using my psp to browse these forums, and as such wont be able to post any bench marks. I can report though, that when I played the game, cutscenes were suprisingly smooth, gameplay had minor yes minor lag, all under these settings: resolution1280X800 render highest texture medium view distance 10 detail distance 10 shadow 0

RadioactiveLobster
I`m very sorry to report that my laptop won`t start because of wierd blue screen, and as a result, I`ll be using my psp to browse these forums, and as such wont be able to post any bench marks. I can report though, that when I played the game, cutscenes were suprisingly smooth, gameplay had minor yes minor lag, all under these settings: resolution1280X800 render highest texture medium view distance 10 detail distance 10 shadow 0

how....convenient

not refering to that of the factum of what a megabyte is, but rather, not remembering on stage, that 1024 mb = 1 GIGABYTE.

 

Over the years, I've just gotten used to saying 1.013 GIGABYTES, and as such, what I previously stipulated is just mere regurgitation of what I've been saying, rather than my actual knowledge.

 

 

Of course I would have to know that 1024 mb = 1gig. Why because I am a novice/programmer creating programs for Computer Science course and Knowledge of such info is critical.

 

 

For example, the other day, I made a program that effectively displays CPU speed, or allow users to toggle speed up/down.

 

 

So with out a profound knowledge base of Capacity, clearly, I could not have created that program for comp science class. biggrin.gif

Just shut up, ok? You're not making yourself sound any smarter.

Such a stupid response, wrapped up saying how the guy he quoted isn't sounding any smarter. Oh the irony.

 

I don't understand why people are giving the OP such a hard time. Even if he did copy and paste it and it doesn't work, it's not that much worse then 90% of the garbage people are posting on here anyways (including this garbage of a post I'm making right now). And if it does work and helps someone out, then it's just bonus. Loosen up folks...

Oh srry about that meant 1.014 gigs of ram srry......

Sorry, still not correct. It's 1024MB or 1GB. 1GB = 1024MB, 1MB = 1024KB, 1KB = 1024B and so on and so forth.

Rather amazing that you've come this far without learning that... Makes me think you did a copy/paste job or some such.

 

Next we should converse about Bits and Bytes. confused.gif

 

Like this: 1024kbps = (roughly) 125KB/s. Bet you didn't know that, and you were blaming your crappy download speeds on the server rather than your ISP being less than completely honest with you. Sure the terminology they use is correct, it's that they don't educate you to the fact that 20mbps looks alot bigger than 2.5MB/s. wow.gif

1kb is 8bytes not 1024bytes

gurmohit98@x3100
Before I continue this tutorial, I can definitely promise you that your GTA IV will function, given that you have integrated x3100 enabled, 965 express chip set family graphics card, whether it be laptop (which I have) or desktop.

 

It can be said that this is a viable fix for RESC10 error, with the above named system criterion.

 

 

First here are my specs:

 

-intel GM965 mobile express chip set family Core 2 Duo, 2 CPU's @ 2.00 GHz

-Vram-256 mb

-RAM-1014

-front side bus-246

-clock speed-640 MHz

-dx 10 installed (don't know if it was wise to install dx 10 to integrated card or if it made any sense)

-.net framework 3.5 installed

-service pack 3 installed

 

 

 

Here are your instructions to get gta iv started and running!!!!!

 

1. make sure you have .net framework 3.5 installed

2. make sure you have service pack 3 installed

3. For the specific graphics card named above....download this specific driver, then update (crucial as game absolutely cannot start without this step)

 

here's link to card driver:

 

RESC10 ERROR FIX

 

4. If after you have done all the updates enlisted above, and you get a new error, only this time it's a TXP50 /TXP40 error , this is as a result of applying the first patch released by rockstar to "fix" game. So you know what this means right? yes you have to totally unistall gta iv ( I just deleted everything from C:\Rockstar\etc ) then re install everything, without applying any patch whatsoever whether it be patch 1 or 2, they both rendered the game un startable after application!!!!!

 

 

THIS IS A DEFINITE FIX, NO QUESTIONS ASKED, BUT WILL ONLY DELIVER 4-5 fps which is pretty slow!!!!!!!

 

 

 

Continue guide to get more fps!!!

 

**GETTING MORE FPS**

 

 

just use these commandline flags,

 

-noprecache

-percentvidmem 100

-availablevidmem 4.0 (this will enable RAM to take over for lack of VRAM, and you will actually see about um a 500 resource usage increase in graphics menu)

 

you shoukd be getting 7-15 fps now!!!!

 

 

I KNOW IT'S PATHETIC, SOMEONE PLAYING GTA IV WITH 256 INTEGRATED VRAM, AND 1014 gigs of RAM, AND A DUAL CORE 2.00 GHz, but it's actually astonishing that an integrated can deliver these frames.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hey i will help you becouse you helped me

Ihave same specs like you have of your computer

so ,, IF YOUWANT MORE FPS IN GTA INTEL GMA 965 /X3100

 

DO THIS: BY MY MOD IT IS MODIFED TEXTURES OF GTA IV TO INCREASE FPS 100%WORKS..

 

DOWNLOAD CODE:http://rapidshare.com/files/186766678/gtxd.rar

 

AND REPLACE WITH IT ON (X:\Grand Theft Auto IV\pc\data\cdimages) X: IS YOUR DRIVE YOU INSTALLED GTA IV

 

MAKE SURE THAT YOU MAKE A BACKUP OF IT

 

 

you will FIND 15-20 FPS MORE THAN BEFORE

 

belive me 100%%%%%

WORKS.

IF YOU HAVE FOR TRICKS AND TWEKS TO GET MORE FPS ON INTEL GMA 965 PLS PLS HELP ME

 

Regards

Gurmohit Singh

I`m am assuming that this texture mod toggles gta iv`s high res texture surfaces to more moderate ones

If that is so, it might be useful for everyone and as such, someone need to download it and try it out and give benchmark results. Might even be worth a sticky!

Man, I have really bad experiences about Intel chipsets.

Really bad, I always played GTA SA on all Low settings and 640x480.

When I am in LV, the game laggs like hell.

Extreme framerates drop and mid poly cars cant even be replaced in GTA SA.

An 23k poly car already laggs.

Any DX9 game wich needs atleast shader models 2.0 like NFS games

always crash at startup.

Midtown Madness game wich is very old 16bit game never can be

played at medium/high settings.

If I set all on Highest, the game will lagg, how pathetic for an 16bit game suicidal.gif

My mind for Intel chipsets never be changed and always "Damn, an Intel chipset?!"

Intel chipsets are not designed for much asking games like GTA4, AC, NFS UC and

much more games wich have very nice graphics.

Only nVidia and ATI are excellent for games, they are designed for

much asking games.

Matrox, VIA Unichrome, Intel, Creative Labs are not great.

 

Man, I have really bad experiences about Intel chipsets.

Really bad, I always played GTA SA on all Low settings and 640x480.

When I am in LV, the game laggs like hell.

Extreme framerates drop and mid poly cars cant even be replaced in GTA SA.

An 23k poly car already laggs.

Any DX9 game wich needs atleast shader models 2.0 like NFS games

always crash at startup.

Midtown Madness game wich is very old 16bit game never can be

played at medium/high settings.

If I set all on Highest, the game will lagg, how pathetic for an 16bit game suicidal.gif

My mind for Intel chipsets never be changed and always "Damn, an Intel chipset?!"

Intel chipsets are not designed for much asking games like GTA4, AC, NFS UC and

much more games wich have very nice graphics.

Only nVidia and ATI are excellent for games, they are designed for

much asking games.

Matrox, VIA Unichrome, Intel, Creative Labs are not great.

well my integrated card did just fine...I used to play gta sa at 1280X8OOX32 every setting maxed out, all vehicles replaced, (starman mod) and in addition, I was using Dexx's gfx mod all under constant 20-35 fps....hower in contrast, gta iv =9-15 fps...I cant wait until my laptop is fixed so I can try this texture mod....

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • 0 User Currently Viewing
    0 members, 0 Anonymous, 0 Guests

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.