Wanted Assailant Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 (edited) delete Edited March 23, 2010 by Wanted Assailant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drag_Drift Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 WTF? The term 'truth' and it's meaning is getting blurry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxidizer Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 I like Shotacat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanted Assailant Posted January 9, 2009 Author Share Posted January 9, 2009 WTF? The term 'truth' and it's meaning is getting blurry. Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonshield Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 Truth and reality is in the eye of the beholder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxidizer Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 Just like sanity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drag_Drift Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 No. Truth is what the stater makes of it. If one man, states 'I will change the world!' but does not have the will, nor the material aspects to do so, then it is not true. If a powerful, wealthy man states 'I will change the world!', it could be a possibility, or the truth. Seeing as he has the will and the material possessions to turn it into truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxidizer Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 Truth is, I really couldn't give a sh*t. xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanted Assailant Posted January 9, 2009 Author Share Posted January 9, 2009 No. Truth is what the stater makes of it. If one man, states 'I will change the world!' but does not have the will, nor the material aspects to do so, then it is not true. If a powerful, wealthy man states 'I will change the world!', it could be a possibility, or the truth. Seeing as he has the will and the material possessions to turn it into truth. But what if in the near future that the one man who had no will nor material aspects to change the world, suddenly had the will and the material aspects to change the world two seconds later? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drag_Drift Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 No. Truth is what the stater makes of it. If one man, states 'I will change the world!' but does not have the will, nor the material aspects to do so, then it is not true. If a powerful, wealthy man states 'I will change the world!', it could be a possibility, or the truth. Seeing as he has the will and the material possessions to turn it into truth. But what if in the near future that the one man who had no will nor material aspects to change the world, suddenly had the will and the material aspects to change the world two seconds later? Then truth ensues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanted Assailant Posted January 9, 2009 Author Share Posted January 9, 2009 No. Truth is what the stater makes of it. If one man, states 'I will change the world!' but does not have the will, nor the material aspects to do so, then it is not true. If a powerful, wealthy man states 'I will change the world!', it could be a possibility, or the truth. Seeing as he has the will and the material possessions to turn it into truth. But what if in the near future that the one man who had no will nor material aspects to change the world, suddenly had the will and the material aspects to change the world two seconds later? Then truth ensues. If one man, states 'I will change the world!' but does not have the will, nor the material aspects to do so, then it is not true. So how would you be so sure that it wasn't the truth in the beginning, if two seconds later 'truth ensured'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drag_Drift Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 No. Truth is what the stater makes of it. If one man, states 'I will change the world!' but does not have the will, nor the material aspects to do so, then it is not true. If a powerful, wealthy man states 'I will change the world!', it could be a possibility, or the truth. Seeing as he has the will and the material possessions to turn it into truth. But what if in the near future that the one man who had no will nor material aspects to change the world, suddenly had the will and the material aspects to change the world two seconds later? Then truth ensues. If one man, states 'I will change the world!' but does not have the will, nor the material aspects to do so, then it is not true. So how would you be so sure that it wasn't the truth in the beginning, if two seconds later 'truth ensured'? Because two seconds before he didn't have what it takes to make it true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanted Assailant Posted January 9, 2009 Author Share Posted January 9, 2009 If truth is what the stater makes of it, isn't it already true, seeing as he or she are their only proof of their truth somehow and in some way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Chris Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 i thought deception is like if a guy posed on the internet as a girl, you met him and he was like "hey im sarah from imlonely.com" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trip Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 i guess i need to go back to casual drug use in my mind truth is fact and facts are 100% proven and undisputable maybe i am just becoming cynicle and bitter but never ever take anything anyone says as truth until you are able to back it with a scientific source My crappy games at MyCrappyGames.com Free copy of Save The Puppies and Kittens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gutslab Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 i thought deception is like if a guy posed on the internet as a girl, you met him and he was like "hey im sarah from imlonely.com" No, I believe the term to describe that scenario is 'owned'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Chris Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 i thought deception is like if a guy posed on the internet as a girl, you met him and he was like "hey im sarah from imlonely.com" No, I believe the term to describe that scenario is 'owned'. Both terms apply there actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gutslab Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 i thought deception is like if a guy posed on the internet as a girl, you met him and he was like "hey im sarah from imlonely.com" No, I believe the term to describe that scenario is 'owned'. Both terms apply there actually. Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poopskin Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 Truth is something that is not false. False is something that is not true. I am not sure what a falsity that someone falls for is. False, most likely. For everything else, there's... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronnyboy Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 Truth is something that is not false.False is something that is not true. I am not sure what a falsity that someone falls for is. False, most likely. For everything else, there's... Mastercard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drag_Drift Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 Truth is something that is not false.False is something that is not true. I am not sure what a falsity that someone falls for is. False, most likely. For everything else, there's... Mastercard? Priceless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuff_luv_capo Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 Truth is something that is not false.False is something that is not true. I am not sure what a falsity that someone falls for is. False, most likely. For everything else, there's... Mastercard? Priceless. God, I was gonna say that but you guys are everywhere I want to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryuclan Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 How do you know that what someone says to you, or what you've seen is the truth? Is it all because of some giant minotaur-griffin-type-thing who f*cking barks like a headless dog, screaming in your ear so much that you just froth at the mouth?™ I thought this was clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deathly Visage Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 How do you know that what someone says to you, or what you've seen is the truth? Is it all because of some giant minotaur-griffin-type-thing who f*cking barks like a headless dog, screaming in your ear so much that you just froth at the mouth?™ how can a headless dog bark? wouldnt he just be gurgling blood? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 The being of understanding is to not understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deathly Visage Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 The being of understanding is to not understand. I dont understand this f*cking topic!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3niX Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 Well... The being of understanding is to not understand. No, the being of understanding is knowing that what you just wrote is a pointless contradiction which makes you look like an intellectual twat. Truth is a perspective composed by facts. Ironically, no definition of the truth can be considered as true or false since every person has his/her own view of it (or if you insist on being really thick - other persons view of it). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanted Assailant Posted January 9, 2009 Author Share Posted January 9, 2009 .Truth is a perspective composed by facts. Ironically, no definition of the truth can be considered as true or false since every person has his/her own view of it (or if you insist on being really thick - other persons view of it). So if I say Earth does not exist, simply because it's in my own perspective view, it's right, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monuriki. Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 .Truth is a perspective composed by facts. Ironically, no definition of the truth can be considered as true or false since every person has his/her own view of it (or if you insist on being really thick - other persons view of it). So if I say Earth does not exist, simply because it's in my own perspective view, it's right, right? It could be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3niX Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 Well... If you have the facts to back it up... then yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now