chesss Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 I got a mobo with AMD 690V with ATI Radeon X1200 integrated graphics. How well will this run gta 4 ? Information about this gpu - With an AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and 2GB of DDR2-667 memory, users should expect a 3DMark05 score above 1000, but under 1200-points. Synthetic benchmarks aside, users should expect 30-35-fps in Half Life 2 and 35-40-fps in Far Cry, according to AMD. AMD’s internal testing was conducted with a screen-resolution of 1024x768, anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering disabled. it doesn't support pixel shader 3.0 my cpu meets the minimum I do not care how the game looks , planning to run at 800x600 all settings set to lowest. Niko could like mario for all I care. Just want 18fps while running the game.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick McReary Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 The game won't even start up for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chesss Posted December 4, 2008 Author Share Posted December 4, 2008 ohh I guess loading files from the hard-disk is a very gpu intensive task?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spectre01 Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 ohh I guess loading files from the hard-disk is a very gpu intensive task?? No, go through all the codes and display the data to you is a GPU intensive task. Your card doens't support SM3.0, so when it reads sm3.0 code, it doesn't know what to do with it. Hence the game can't be ran at all on your rig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zach Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 ohh I guess loading files from the hard-disk is a very gpu intensive task?? Well, that's the point. The first thing any game does is query the hardware and it'll see that your video capabilities lack the required feature, and then the game will exit. With that said, honestly, though, I don't know. I doubt it, and even if it did manage to run, you'd be playing at 1-2 FPS even at the lowest settings. Would that really be any fun? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chesss Posted December 4, 2008 Author Share Posted December 4, 2008 a lil optimism plz? With that said, honestly, though, I don't know. I doubt it, and even if it did manage to run, you'd be playing at 1-2 FPS even at the lowest settings. Would that really be any fun? well I have played vice-city on a PIII 550Mhz 8mb IGP .. it was a slideshow but ignorance is(was) bliss. I completed the damn thing as well!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverTheBelow Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 The game won't even start up for you. 74% of people can't run GTA4 atm, even with the recommended requirements. Only 5% of people can run it perfectly (poll on a german forum). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Ruthless Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 The game won't even start up for you. 74% of people can't run GTA4 atm, even with the recommended requirements. Only 5% of people can run it perfectly (poll on a german forum). And I'm able to run it perfectly with a single core processor...I'm blessed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chesss Posted December 4, 2008 Author Share Posted December 4, 2008 (edited) Ok this guy has a " 8600M GT 256mb" in his laptop . he got 16fps at low settings.. So is my 690v/690g chip x1200 series whatever.. is better than his 8600M GT 256mb ??? Edit: no it isn't! dammit! Edited December 4, 2008 by chesss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now