crazymodder Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 Source what do you think? comment guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Picolini Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 Not much info to go on... sounds good, i guess? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazymodder Posted August 12, 2008 Author Share Posted August 12, 2008 more infos at here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SyphonPayne Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 Articles hardly give any info. No benches or anything. Looks good though even though that chip is huge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Democrab Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 We're at Nehalem with the Core i7 Processor, I'm going to buy a Penryn Quad then get a Westmere CPU, then Ivy Bridge, etc. Here's the First working Nehalem/Core i7 System, not run by Intel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jelly Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 Nehalem will be incredible for bandwidth-starved and multithreaded applications, it's not just an incremental increase. In those threaded loads (like for example a chess simulator, just throwing out one bench here) a single quad-core 2.93GHz Nehalem with hyper-threading enabled is faster than two Harpertown quad-cores at 3GHz, and those are Penryn quads. For single-threaded applications there will be a more moderate boost, and for games it's a fairly pointless upgrade since games are GPU-limited anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now