brOkeRxBoYxLC Posted August 18, 2008 Share Posted August 18, 2008 I hate Microsoft, and I hate Rockstar for being greedy, filth-fingered money-whores and screwing half of its fanbase out of content. Are Rockstar employees hungry? Perhaps their kids are in recycled diapers and they needed that few extra dollars to get a loaf of bread to eat for the next month. Dirty whores! There is absolutely no justification, no acceptable excuse, for Rockstar signing off exclusive content. I'm not the sort of fanboy who automatically screams that Microsoft taints all that it touches, but it certainly wipes a massive dirty Sanchez across Rockstar's lips... and Rockstar just smiles under it like a good little bitch. Filthy dirty whores! To be fair, if you was offered not asking but offered 50 million dollars to give Xbox epic content I don't think you would say no, they could always give PS3 owners something else to make it even but who knows, but I agree Microsoft sucks they are DEF. money hungry dirty whores are you joking? rockstar and microsoft are among the most richest companies in video games. there is no reason to say they are crap. i know they are rediculous with the prices, but thats not the topic. we keep buying the games, selling the most video games in the world, and have the most detailed games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLUGFly Posted August 18, 2008 Share Posted August 18, 2008 I'm not against exclusive content. I'm against R* (or Valve and Maxis) having exclusive content. These aren't normal cash-for-goods companies, these are people who are pushing the evolution of games design. And when you start bending to get more cash you stop pushing the evolution. @Maine: Sorry for your loss... next time you'll know better won't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAIV_Gangsta Posted August 18, 2008 Share Posted August 18, 2008 I hate Microsoft, and I hate Rockstar for being greedy, filth-fingered money-whores and screwing half of its fanbase out of content. Are Rockstar employees hungry? Perhaps their kids are in recycled diapers and they needed that few extra dollars to get a loaf of bread to eat for the next month. Dirty whores! There is absolutely no justification, no acceptable excuse, for Rockstar signing off exclusive content. I'm not the sort of fanboy who automatically screams that Microsoft taints all that it touches, but it certainly wipes a massive dirty Sanchez across Rockstar's lips... and Rockstar just smiles under it like a good little bitch. Filthy dirty whores! To be fair, if you was offered not asking but offered 50 million dollars to give Xbox epic content I don't think you would say no, they could always give PS3 owners something else to make it even but who knows, but I agree Microsoft sucks they are DEF. money hungry dirty whores are you joking? rockstar and microsoft are among the most richest companies in video games. there is no reason to say they are crap. i know they are rediculous with the prices, but thats not the topic. we keep buying the games, selling the most video games in the world, and have the most detailed games. So just because there rich that means if someone wants another 50mill theres no reason to say thats no excuse? please, today money is everything to them another 50mill is another 50mill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX2069 Posted August 18, 2008 Author Share Posted August 18, 2008 Microsoft annoys the HELL out of me they think they are so sweet just because they have there stupid 360(witch was proven to be the inferior system to the PS3) but yet they still think that it is for no reason and the PS3 keeps gettin screwed over over and over again sony needs to step the hell up and do something about this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAIV_Gangsta Posted August 18, 2008 Share Posted August 18, 2008 Microsoft annoys the HELL out of me they think they are so sweet just because they have there stupid 360(witch was proven to be the inferior system to the PS3) but yet they still think that it is for no reason and the PS3 keeps gettin screwed over over and over again sony needs to step the hell up and do something about this I think its funny how every time someone has a PS3 and there talking about 360 the first thing they say is the PS3 is proven to be better bla bla bla obviously if it was better it wouldn't keep getting screwed over, they lost FF to 360 DLC for both GTA IV and Fallout 3 whats next? Hell even Rock Band gets DLC every week before PS3. Sony killed Xbox with the PS2 when there was just a regular Xbox but since PS3 came out it they keep falling back and father back. The only reason I "want" a PS3 is to play MGS other than that I could care less because there online sucks and I know this because my cousin has a PS3 and he don't even like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX2069 Posted August 18, 2008 Author Share Posted August 18, 2008 Microsoft annoys the HELL out of me they think they are so sweet just because they have there stupid 360(witch was proven to be the inferior system to the PS3) but yet they still think that it is for no reason and the PS3 keeps gettin screwed over over and over again sony needs to step the hell up and do something about this I think its funny how every time someone has a PS3 and there talking about 360 the first thing they say is the PS3 is proven to be better bla bla bla obviously if it was better it wouldn't keep getting screwed over, they lost FF to 360 DLC for both GTA IV and Fallout 3 whats next? Hell even Rock Band gets DLC every week before PS3. Sony killed Xbox with the PS2 when there was just a regular Xbox but since PS3 came out it they keep falling back and father back. The only reason I "want" a PS3 is to play MGS other than that I could care less because there online sucks and I know this because my cousin has a PS3 and he don't even like it. how can you sit there and say that the online for PS3 sucks? its free what is better than that?? XBOX Live you have to pay for thats bull sh*t that they do that and DVD's???? do ppl even buy those anymore clearly the PS3 is the future and at some point the XBOX360 and the evil microsoft will conceed to sony and the PS3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAIV_Gangsta Posted August 18, 2008 Share Posted August 18, 2008 Microsoft annoys the HELL out of me they think they are so sweet just because they have there stupid 360(witch was proven to be the inferior system to the PS3) but yet they still think that it is for no reason and the PS3 keeps gettin screwed over over and over again sony needs to step the hell up and do something about this I think its funny how every time someone has a PS3 and there talking about 360 the first thing they say is the PS3 is proven to be better bla bla bla obviously if it was better it wouldn't keep getting screwed over, they lost FF to 360 DLC for both GTA IV and Fallout 3 whats next? Hell even Rock Band gets DLC every week before PS3. Sony killed Xbox with the PS2 when there was just a regular Xbox but since PS3 came out it they keep falling back and father back. The only reason I "want" a PS3 is to play MGS other than that I could care less because there online sucks and I know this because my cousin has a PS3 and he don't even like it. how can you sit there and say that the online for PS3 sucks? its free what is better than that?? XBOX Live you have to pay for thats bull sh*t that they do that and DVD's???? do ppl even buy those anymore clearly the PS3 is the future and at some point the XBOX360 and the evil microsoft will conceed to sony and the PS3 Lets see its slow, the setup is horrible, always connection errors GTA IV for example also GH3 I had issues with, and yea you pay 50 bucks a year which is like 4 bucks a month its really not that much seeing how there's updates everyday connections work fine and you get exclusive content, and everyone who doesn't have a PS3 buys DVDs blue ray sucks it doesn't even make that much of a difference in movies im fine with normal DVD player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ric-013 Posted August 18, 2008 Share Posted August 18, 2008 to thoses who said: "san andreas dlc is impossible...its too big,it would be like downloading a whole new game..etc." well,dont you guys remember going to liberty city in san andreas for the "st-mark bistro" mission ??...it can be done!! they only have to copy/paste some SA locations polish them to IV standard and put them into missions context with limited roaming,thats all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAIV_Gangsta Posted August 18, 2008 Share Posted August 18, 2008 to thoses who said: "san andreas dlc is impossible...its too big,it would be like downloading a whole new game..etc." well,dont you guys remember going to liberty city in san andreas for the "st-mark bistro" mission ??...it can be done!! they only have to copy/paste some SA locations polish them to IV standard and put them into missions context with limited roaming,thats all. its not impossible its just high unlikely to happen, there DLC for xbox that's over 2 GB and I dont think it will happen but with DLC they can make anything that's less than 120 GB because that's the biggest hard drive lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLUGFly Posted August 18, 2008 Share Posted August 18, 2008 I had (have) no intention of triggering a PS3 vs. XBox fan-war. They're both great systems and they both are very advanced (they're the flag-ships of the newest generation of consoles). I'm sure that I'd have loved GTA4 on XBox as much as I do on PS3. I just wanted to point out the poor business practices of R* lately. Perhaps, if I was bleeding cash, I would also get an XBox. But I'll not choose XBox over PS3, simply because of ethics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MtOlympus Posted August 18, 2008 Share Posted August 18, 2008 I can't stand people that say "OMG xbox is da bomb iz da best for gamez ps3 sux!!!" and vice versa with PS3 people insulting the 360. If 360 has exclusive DLC for GTA IV, good for them. I'm still perfectly happy with my PS3 version, and I'm not going to stay up crying all night because I won't get to play a few extra missions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RatmanIsReal Posted August 19, 2008 Share Posted August 19, 2008 it would be funny if R* put a ratman costume in the DLC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrgypsie Posted August 19, 2008 Share Posted August 19, 2008 (edited) Rockstar like putting small details referring to things in previous games. Small funny details. Don't take as such a big "sign". Edited August 19, 2008 by mrgypsie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pudge Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 SA is so overrated = = .played it , got bored after 10minutes due to graphics and boring countryside. it would be funny if R* put a ratman costume in the DLC lvl 10 costume in multiplayer !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
--Vega-- Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 SA is so overrated = = .played it , got bored after 10minutes due to graphics and boring countryside. it would be funny if R* put a ratman costume in the DLC lvl 10 costume in multiplayer !! That's probably because your first GTA was IV. San Andreas is classic, when it first came out it was and still is the best game ever made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX2069 Posted August 20, 2008 Author Share Posted August 20, 2008 SA is so overrated = = .played it , got bored after 10minutes due to graphics and boring countryside. it would be funny if R* put a ratman costume in the DLC lvl 10 costume in multiplayer !! That's probably because your first GTA was IV. San Andreas is classic, when it first came out it was and still is the best game ever made. that sir is a correct statement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaytow Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 Although I'm sure we wont be returning to san andreas through DLC unless it's just one city we need to remember in the world of IV San andreas may not be 12 times Liberty or whatever it was in the world of III, each city in SA could just be half the size of liberty. I wouldnt like the download of a new city. I would like a new borough, 15 or so story missions, new vigilante missions, ambulance missions, fire missions, a new clothes store, a decent sized house and maybe the ability to hire a few people to work for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slamman Posted August 25, 2008 Share Posted August 25, 2008 San Andreas was not over hyped, it had the same style of improvements GTA4 has, from one to the next, given the platforms it was on (engines) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boothy Posted August 27, 2008 Share Posted August 27, 2008 I hate Microsoft, and I hate Rockstar for being greedy, filth-fingered money-whores and screwing half of its fanbase out of content. Are Rockstar employees hungry? Perhaps their kids are in recycled diapers and they needed that few extra dollars to get a loaf of bread to eat for the next month. Dirty whores! There is absolutely no justification, no acceptable excuse, for Rockstar signing off exclusive content. I'm not the sort of fanboy who automatically screams that Microsoft taints all that it touches, but it certainly wipes a massive dirty Sanchez across Rockstar's lips... and Rockstar just smiles under it like a good little bitch. Filthy dirty whores! would you turn down 50 million dollars for a bit of extra work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnknownUser Posted August 27, 2008 Share Posted August 27, 2008 I hate Microsoft, and I hate Rockstar for being greedy, filth-fingered money-whores and screwing half of its fanbase out of content. Are Rockstar employees hungry? Perhaps their kids are in recycled diapers and they needed that few extra dollars to get a loaf of bread to eat for the next month. Dirty whores! There is absolutely no justification, no acceptable excuse, for Rockstar signing off exclusive content. I'm not the sort of fanboy who automatically screams that Microsoft taints all that it touches, but it certainly wipes a massive dirty Sanchez across Rockstar's lips... and Rockstar just smiles under it like a good little bitch. Filthy dirty whores! would you turn down 50 million dollars for a bit of extra work? If it was [email protected] I would Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX2069 Posted August 28, 2008 Author Share Posted August 28, 2008 oh my hahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonwalker1982 Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 A source close to Rockstar has told us that Microsoft is “wrong” to expect the 360 GTA IV DLC in 2008. “It’ll be in January or February,” we were told today. No official release date for the extra content, which is thought to be substantial, has been given as yet. The content was rumoured this week to be launching in November. Microsoft is currently saying the “first episodes” of the game’s DLC will ship this “autumn.” Take-Two itself has officially said that the content will arrive in its first quarter of its next fiscal year, running from November 2008 to January 2009. Fingers and thumbs. Peters and Pauls. Hopefully we’ll have something official soon. videogaming247 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WelcomeToLibertyCity Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 Doubt it. San Andreas is done. uhh not really R* even said there is going to be DLC and that they are working on SA and maybe VC Yeah, maybe re-making SA and VC, not putting it in the DLC. awesome hopfully SA first, i have high hopes of SA coming back soon, but i doubt in DLC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infidel77 Posted August 30, 2008 Share Posted August 30, 2008 first off before everyone is like there is already topics about this i dont care i wanted to make my own and to share this with everyone "New cities? Pfft! How about an entire state?! While rummaging through the Rockstar Social Club, a GTAForums poster uncovered the plane ticket pictured above (full view). Looks like Niko is headed to the fine state of San Andreas, famous for its lowriders and piping hot coffee. Whether it's the stuff of fan fiction or a not-so-subtle hint of content to come, your guess is as good as ours, but the ticket does rekindle last month's rumor that the exclusive GTA IV DLC for Xbox 360 will feature "new downloadable cities." What's curious is that the flight isn't destined for one of San Andreas' specific airports, but rather the state itself. What could it mean?" http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2008/05/gtaiv-san-andreas.jpg and i know all of you think this has nothing to do with anything but i really do i think that it has alot to do with the DLC and if not that then that will be the next game LOL you are so naive...you seriously think Rockstar would spent time rebuilding and renovating the whole of San Andreas and then release it as DLC? Do you have any idea on how long such a development would take...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WelcomeToLibertyCity Posted August 30, 2008 Share Posted August 30, 2008 first off before everyone is like there is already topics about this i dont care i wanted to make my own and to share this with everyone "New cities? Pfft! How about an entire state?! While rummaging through the Rockstar Social Club, a GTAForums poster uncovered the plane ticket pictured above (full view). Looks like Niko is headed to the fine state of San Andreas, famous for its lowriders and piping hot coffee. Whether it's the stuff of fan fiction or a not-so-subtle hint of content to come, your guess is as good as ours, but the ticket does rekindle last month's rumor that the exclusive GTA IV DLC for Xbox 360 will feature "new downloadable cities." What's curious is that the flight isn't destined for one of San Andreas' specific airports, but rather the state itself. What could it mean?" http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.joystiq....san-andreas.jpg (http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2008/05/gtaiv-san-andreas.jpg) and i know all of you think this has nothing to do with anything but i really do i think that it has alot to do with the DLC and if not that then that will be the next game LOL you are so naive...you seriously think Rockstar would spent time rebuilding and renovating the whole of San Andreas and then release it as DLC? Do you have any idea on how long such a development would take...? yah i agree R* would make tons of money putting re-modled SA out as a game not DLC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHatTrik Posted August 30, 2008 Share Posted August 30, 2008 If anything, I hope we at least get planes to fly, I want to harass people with my uber sky doom! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now