Fuzzknuckles Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 Why can I only take one friend out at a time? I'd like to strut drunkenly down the street with all of my Liberty City fraternity. Not just one of them at a time. Generally, when I meet with friends, I meet with more than one. They'd all get along really well, being all connected with crime and what not. This is a terrible injustice and I shall be asking Jack Thompson to help me make this fantasy a reality. Signatures are dumb anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTASIX Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 That would be hilarious. Imagine everyone stumbling about and falling over. I dont know how youd get them all home without being arrested or killed. If you got a taxi, then the taxi would drive off after it had gone to the first house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Algonquin Assassin Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 Hahahah that would be awesome getting drunk with Brucie, Dwayne, Roman, Packie, and Little Jacob all at the same time. Off topic- I really wish you could start a fight while you're drunk. Not when Niko walks normally, but when he's stumbling around. You could get one of your mates, and hang sh*t on some Russian, while you're pissed out of your face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_4130 Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 That would be pretty sweet. Also, it wouldn't hurt them to pick up the bill for things once in a while! Lazy freeloaders! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Algonquin Assassin Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 That would be pretty sweet. Also, it wouldn't hurt them to pick up the bill for things once in a while! Lazy freeloaders! Yeah me, and Little Jacob went to Clukin' Bell, and spent $120. It would've been nice if he paid half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzknuckles Posted June 4, 2008 Author Share Posted June 4, 2008 That would be pretty sweet. Also, it wouldn't hurt them to pick up the bill for things once in a while! Lazy freeloaders! Yeah me, and Little Jacob went to Clukin' Bell, and spent $120. It would've been nice if he paid half. He must be pretty greedy. That's like... 10 family buckets or something. Signatures are dumb anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_4130 Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 That’s the Colonels secret blend of 11 herbs and spices for you. You just can’t stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzknuckles Posted June 4, 2008 Author Share Posted June 4, 2008 That’s the Colonels secret blend of 11 herbs and spices for you. You just can’t stop. Jacob has his own blend of herbs and spices... Signatures are dumb anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rota Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 That’s the Colonels secret blend of 11 herbs and spices for you. You just can’t stop. Jacob has his own blend of herbs and spices... lol i'd let lj cook me some chicken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frip51 Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 That’s the Colonels secret blend of 11 herbs and spices for you. You just can’t stop. Jacob has his own blend of herbs and spices... the other day, I spent a similar amount at burger shot - also with lj. I was like what the heck happened in there? Did we get a clerk lapdance or have we been host to a charity event in there? I've never spent more than 1$ at die-with-a-smile-on-your-face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzknuckles Posted June 4, 2008 Author Share Posted June 4, 2008 Seriously though, as I said in my No Love in Liberty City thread a while ago, there's only ever people walking around alone, standing around in groups or driving in groups. What's so difficult about making more than one person (or more than 2 people) walk around in groups? Signatures are dumb anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_4130 Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 Nothing I guess, they had the people holding hands in San Andreas. Maybe Liberty City is just supposed to be a lonely place, where the only way to talk whilst moving is on the phone. If it’s a person you have stand deadly still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzknuckles Posted June 4, 2008 Author Share Posted June 4, 2008 Nothing I guess, they had the people holding hands in San Andreas. Maybe Liberty City is just supposed to be a lonely place, where the only way to talk whilst moving is on the phone. If it’s a person you have stand deadly still. So much for realism, then, I guess. I'm hoping that taking multiple friend out and seeing couples and groups on the streets will happen in the next one. Making peds behave realistically is the key to nailing atmosphere, I think. Signatures are dumb anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frip51 Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 (edited) Nothing I guess, they had the people holding hands in San Andreas. Maybe Liberty City is just supposed to be a lonely place, where the only way to talk whilst moving is on the phone. If it’s a person you have stand deadly still. So much for realism, then, I guess. I'm hoping that taking multiple friend out and seeing couples and groups on the streets will happen in the next one. Making peds behave realistically is the key to nailing atmosphere, I think. hmmm, but isn't NYC in fact a very lonely place? For usual, the larger a city is, the less people you find that you can call real friends - at least in reality. Maybe my mind plays tricks on me, but I thought I've seen a few couples holding hands in LC, as well... Or it's the parody speaking for itself - y'know: cellphone age, internet age... all that sh't, and people get lonelier and lonelier these days - hanging around in internet forums discussing about video games depicting a virtual reality... edit: forgot my actual reply... it would have been pretty decent to go bowling or drinking with more than one contact. But especially with the drinking, it'd be mayhem to bring everybody home again (even busses can only take four people...). What about getting drunk in multiplayer, that'd be great fun! Edited June 4, 2008 by frip51 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jew4Life Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 Or it's the parody speaking for itself - y'know: cellphone age, internet age... all that sh't, and people get lonelier and lonelier these days - hanging around in internet forums discussing about video games depicting a virtual reality... Yeah, what a bunch of sad noobs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_4130 Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 Could just get drunk and play multiplayer! Yeah, I agree. It’s the little things that make a difference. You can tell that they are moving towards this kind of thing with some of the behaviours, (like the broken down cars and road works) trying to give people a sense of purpose. But, it defiantly helps the atmosphere develop. I guess it is finding a way to incorporate these things into the game play. It’s like some of the ‘scripted’ chase scenes are done to show off detail and add to the atmosphere, but some people hate them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now