ryuclan Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 until some absolute tosser decides to shoot him to get noticed. This is my biggest fear. If I had to say Obama was one thing it would be brave, I wouldn't have the right mind-set to become the first black president. Also if he makes any mistakes then it's going to be magnified 30X. Which president doesn't make mistakes? You guys are also forgetting that the president has this one group called the Secret Service on his back...I heard they do a good job protecting people nowadays. I'm talking about MISTAKES, not oh sh*t I said the N-word on tv mistakes. Anyway I know about the secret service and just because he has a team of people dedicated to his safety doesn't mean he's always safe. I said I would be scared, I'm a worrisome person by heart, but you can't tell me that this fear is unwarranted. Yeah, why does everyone assume Obama is going to be assassinated? This isn't a Hollywood movie for God's sake. "Oh Noes! It's gonna be JFK all over again!" lol You say this as if it is impossible for him to get shot or something. There ARE nutcases out there that will take a shot at him, just like there are cases that will take one at any of our other past presidents. Also the Walken campaign needs more cow bell.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommy vs. claude Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 Dude the reason for invading Iraq was to enforce UN rules that Saddam was violating. That has never changed. He wouldnt let inspectors in to check and make sure he wasnt developing or owning any WMD's, and considering the fact he had used them before on his own citizens, everyone was sure he had them. He didnt, obviously, but that doesnt change the fact that invading his country was simply enforcing UN rules he was violating. That was the reason we went to war. I mean, f*ck, If you dont know that youre a complete f*cking moron. Bush violated countless numbers of UN protocols, you just don't hear fux fox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintJimmy Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 i think there is a higher risk of him being assassinated as he is black, and there are quite a few redneck psycho's out there that im sure will not be happy with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HolyGrenadeFrenzy Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 (edited) The only way that killing him would do any good I don't see any way for killing him to "do good"... On an individual basis I agree.....Killing someone like that will do no good what so ever. And we can attept to claim that "killing others" doesn't solve any kind of problem yet HISTORY will not support this aurgument. In truth, the only reason Humanity has become what it has is more about how deadly we are by our nature. Granted we get this deadlieness from our ablities of ingenuity which is compounded by things like the written word yet it has much to do with our use of the manipulation of our enviorment (&e things with it)as a means of furthering our ingenuity that makes us so deadly as a species. This point being made, killing things that are offensive to the species is something that is commonly done from a historical perspective. It comes down to a matter of perspective. "....I beleive in unity and I am willing to compermise but I am not going to lie or sell my soul" -Bad Religion My reason for saying that is one that requires much explanation yet it can be summed up as follows. It doesn't matter who becomes president if it is decided by "quality control and media manipulation" by anyone other than the entire voting populace. Any group that is interferring by manipulation of a situation behind closed doors and not in the open is conspiring against the public. The most dangerous kind of such people can even do these things with public knowledge if they are insulated by an uncaring public that is either blind or unaccepting of the truth. (There is much trouble because truth rears its ugly head every so often and then it gets shrouded by those desiring to hide it or it escapes because it is owned by no one) Knowing the truth is a far cry from owning it, ownership implies inherent control over and no one has that. That is the current situation. Edited June 10, 2008 by HolyGrenadeFrenzy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illspirit Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 until some absolute tosser decides to shoot him to get noticed. This is my biggest fear. If I had to say Obama was one thing it would be brave, I wouldn't have the right mind-set to become the first black president. Also if he makes any mistakes then it's going to be magnified 30X. Which president doesn't make mistakes? Its funny that when ever you bring up the fact that Obama is a liar or that his inexperience will lead to him making many mistakes liberals always say "What politicians dont lie!" and "Everyone makes mistakes!" Yet they are the same people who scream "BUSH LIED PEOPLE DIED" at the top of their lungs and constantly insult Bush based on mistakes he's made. Pathetic And I bet you're one of those that still defend Bush though he has changed why we invaded Iraq 3 times now. 1. WMDs 2. Spread Democracy 3. I haven't heard anything lately. As opposed to being one of those people who conveniently ignore that tons of Democrats (many of who now claim they were lied to) were shrieking about WMDs and beating the war drum before Bush was? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark3boyz Posted June 11, 2008 Share Posted June 11, 2008 Excellent point Illspirit. I love the people who bitch about Bush "going to war for Oil." You constantly hear them saying that we only helped Kuwait out in the first Gulf War because they have Oil. Yet they are the same people who would blame Bush, Sr. or Jr., for higher gas prices as the RESULT of conflicts between middle eastern countries. Just wait until Israel goes to war with Iran and gas prices shoot up. You can expect every liberal to blame Bush for this and request him to do everything in his power to make it stop. And if he does stop it and intervines then they will call him a war monger and go on and on about no blood for oil. Talk about damned if you do and damned if you dont. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tOuchmyBody Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 US Offshore Oil Drilling- McCain vs. Obama - It is not just about the offshore oil drilling but how about builds more refineries. Easy math is to look at 30 years ago and we have same number of refineries but the number of cars increased almost 4 times. Why do we have to spend money to the Middle East and let your own children starving when you have both the resources and capability to do so? Are you waiting to see the gasoline price reach $10 per gallon before doing something about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now