tigertoddy2008 Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 I know it's smaller than san andreas, yet more dense, since there's no wasted space. How does the map size measure up to SA, VC, etc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MXMAD Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 LOL.... For 1 its smaller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrownman Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 it is smaller than san andreas but with the detail they put into each building and street, it doesn't seem like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanilla Shake Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 It feels just as big as the San Andreas map to me. TC718 / <629 / CF5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigertoddy2008 Posted May 24, 2008 Author Share Posted May 24, 2008 I might walk (!) or drive the length and width of the map sometime and figure it out there (btw, i reckon the vehicle speed values here are pretty wrong - all the sports cars are exactly the same speed, and things like the bus and forklift sound way too fast..) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Prickles Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 This size comparison was done by lining up the runways, and scaling VC's map until the runway was the same size as the one in LC. LC looks to be about 3, maybe 4 times bigger than VC, which makes it about 80% of the size of VC; don't forget to note the greatly increased density of streets in LC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now