GTA IV 4EVER Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 (edited) Please dont burn my ass before reading: Vice city was a fun game with nice city, a nice mansion, you felt u owned the city. That is what future GTA should be like. Not all this f*cking survival, it ruins the fun of the game u cant go down and use 200K$ on weapons. And the music sucks compared to VC. But the 80s was the best and this s in the new millennium, so nothing to do about...EEHHH MAKE A REAL CLASSIC ROCK STATION FOR THE LOVE OF GOD! dang u know what i wanna go hook up my old PS2 of the closet and play GTA VC and resident evil 4! :^: This is my opinion, i dont care if u feel different i respect others opinion, this is just mine. sorry for spelling wrong in the title i mean VC of course Edited May 23, 2008 by GTA IV 4EVER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AntiPersonnel Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 GTA VI was better than GTA V Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovesoup101 Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 Vice City is THE REAL gta iv, SA is THE REAL gta v. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kallaN Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 Vice City is THE REAL gta iv, SA is THE REAL gta v. No. Gta III is the real Gta IV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SantiagoDomingo Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 . . . will the real GTA IV please stand up, please stand up . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrsDvl Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 you are all full of sh*t everyone knows that GTA 2 was GTA VIII Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtamodder Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 GTA VI was better than GTA V Yes I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fnorg Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 you are all full of sh*t everyone knows that GTA 2 was GTA VIII You're wrong, it's XIV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodgey. Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 What the f*ck im completley lost here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomAlec Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 Ok, in all seriousness, San Andreas and Vice City were essentially just expansions to GTAIII since they were still the same engine and all, Rockstar stated this themselves when speaking about the DLC size that should come out for the 360. I could directly quote it but I have the article in my favorites at home and I'm at work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Mozzarelli 80 Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 I think that was actually someone from Microsoft who said that. Obviously he would have a vested interest in wanting to mis-lead people in such a way Don't think Rockstar actually ever said that though, if i'm wrong please correct me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrel Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 you felt u owned the city. Niko never had plans to own the city. He didnt even have plans to fight until he knew the truth about Roman. He just wanted a good life away from his past life of crime. This in my opinion makes a far more interesting and believable story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illadelph0808 Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 Please dont burn my ass before reading: Vice city was a fun game with nice city, a nice mansion, you felt u owned the city. That is what future GTA should be like. Not all this f*cking survival, it ruins the fun of the game u cant go down and use 200K$ on weapons. And the music sucks compared to VC. But the 80s was the best and this s in the new millennium, so nothing to do about...EEHHH MAKE A REAL CLASSIC ROCK STATION FOR THE LOVE OF GOD! dang u know what i wanna go hook up my old PS2 of the closet and play GTA VC and resident evil 4! :^: This is my opinion, i dont care if u feel different i respect others opinion, this is just mine. sorry for spelling wrong in the title i mean VC of course i don't respect other peoples opinions, if i disagree with someones opinion then i put them down and bait them until either A. they change their opinion so it's the same as mine, or B. never voice their stupid f*cking opinion again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illadelph0808 Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 Please dont burn my ass before reading: Vice city was a fun game with nice city, a nice mansion, you felt u owned the city. That is what future GTA should be like. Not all this f*cking survival, it ruins the fun of the game u cant go down and use 200K$ on weapons. And the music sucks compared to VC. But the 80s was the best and this s in the new millennium, so nothing to do about...EEHHH MAKE A REAL CLASSIC ROCK STATION FOR THE LOVE OF GOD! dang u know what i wanna go hook up my old PS2 of the closet and play GTA VC and resident evil 4! :^: This is my opinion, i dont care if u feel different i respect others opinion, this is just mine. sorry for spelling wrong in the title i mean VC of course i don't respect other peoples opinions, if i disagree with someones opinion then i put them down and bait them until either A. they change their opinion so it's the same as mine, or B. never voice their stupid f*cking opinion again of course im being ironic, but people go on and on about the value of opinions here, but seriously if someone came on these forums after SA came out (and was unanamously loved as it waa no brainer game) said it sucked nobody would respect their opinion for a second. by the way did anyone criticise SA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creed Bratton Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 Ok, in all seriousness, San Andreas and Vice City were essentially just expansions to GTAIII since they were still the same engine and all, Rockstar stated this themselves when speaking about the DLC size that should come out for the 360. I could directly quote it but I have the article in my favorites at home and I'm at work. GTA3, VC and San Andreas had different engines. Just to point that out And in my opinion yes VC and SA were better games because they provided more fun. GTA4 is not a bad game. Its a great game. But you just have to compare it to other GTAs. And when you do, you realize previous titles were better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now