Jump to content

is gta4 REALLY the worst gta?


boothy

Recommended Posts

so some of you dont like it,

 

but do you think its the worst gta? and if not, what is?

 

just to let you know, i LIKE gta 4

Edited by boothy

99.98% of teenagers surround their minds with cod4, if your a part of the 00.02% that doesn't own the game, put this in your sig.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NO WAY. LCS was the worst

i like LCS, its so simple its great

99.98% of teenagers surround their minds with cod4, if your a part of the 00.02% that doesn't own the game, put this in your sig.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its missing SA features

 

every GTA has expanded & added to what came before it

 

now with IV , some features have been left out

 

that doesnt make it the worst

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.Up&Coming.

In my opinion (and don't freak out people), I think Vice City or Liberty City Stories was the worst. I hated Tommy, and the missions were pretty stupid. I didn't really feel that the city was alive like everyone else did, too. Liberty City Stories is just boring to me. GTA III is much better.

 

My favorites come in a tie between San Andreas and IV. I haven't finished IV yet, but I'm guessing it'll be my favorite since Niko is so badass and other obvious factors. San Andreas really was a great game, though the missions did get a little weird after awhile..Green Goo? I think R* ran out of ideas and got too attached to The Truth.

 

Oh yeah, after those two in first, I'd have to say III is next, and then VCS (haven't completed, but I do like it).

NEW ACCOUNT

Panz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DoubleOGJohnson

I never played GTAIII. I only been playing the series shortyl. Outta the 4 GTA's I got, I may put Vice City Stories as the "worse". I dont hate any of the GTA's Ive played. Liberty City Stories was good until you unlocked gay ass Shoreside Vale.

2325195c0b7762b2191eadda87e6c28cbf3bda8.2325218c50a8e1d2f1af95ac7ccc917f9fd128d.23251850600b7e9f86d85775c46818f9f0a54f7.23252522a342ec4e515d831c941fc3e25b69697.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never played GTAIII. I only been playing the series shortyl. Outta the 4 GTA's I got, I may put Vice City Stories as the "worse". I dont hate any of the GTA's Ive played. Liberty City Stories was good until you unlocked gay ass Shoreside Vale.

if you dont like shorside vale then dont go there

99.98% of teenagers surround their minds with cod4, if your a part of the 00.02% that doesn't own the game, put this in your sig.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldnt say it was the worst. Just think San Andreas was more fun.

 

 

 

Also didnt Rockstar say that they didnt want to give away all the features in GTAIV so we could find them out for ourselves? I dont think I've found one yet that wasnt spoken about in reviews/previews. Some of the features in reviews/previews aren't even in the game confused.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, you're dissapoint because you can't turn the character into Al Roker with pink hair? San Andreas is the worst GTA in the III series.




Yq5y51Y.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm disappointed because it could've been so much more. It seems like they rushed it.

 

And saying LCS was the worst is blasphemy. VCS is my least favorite. LCS is actually one of my favorites. Awesome on my PSP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only people who are dissapointed reply? Seems a bit biased...

well the people who like gta4 obviously aren't going to say its the worst

99.98% of teenagers surround their minds with cod4, if your a part of the 00.02% that doesn't own the game, put this in your sig.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The features were taken out becuase the game was getting stupid and childish, if they added anymore from what SA contained then it would just be stupid. GTA4 brings the series to a much more mature stand point i reckon. Yes, the humour is still there, but in many cases i think it's a lot more subtle, and really concentrates on a deep, gritty storyline that makes 4 so f*cking aweosme.

 

People who hate it becuase they expected San Andreas part 2 have only ever disappointed themselves as Rockstar didnt mention SA's features once to any previewer.

 

I feel VCS was the most lacking of the series becuase the formula was jsut getting stale and needed 4 to point it in a fresher direction.

 

EDIT: Rushed? Three and a half years and a 6 month delay is NOT rushed. You clearly have no idea how long it takes to develop a good game from scratch.

Edited by kippers.

kippers.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The features were taken out becuase the game was getting stupid and childish, if they added anymore from what SA contained then it would just be stupid. GTA4 brings the series to a much more mature stand point i reckon. Yes, the humour is still there, but in many cases i think it's a lot more subtle, and really concentrates on a deep, gritty storyline that makes 4 so f*cking aweosme.

 

People who hate it becuase they expected San Andreas part 2 have only ever disappointed themselves as Rockstar didnt mention SA's features once to any previewer.

 

I feel VCS was the most lacking of the series becuase the formula was jsut getting stale and needed 4 to point it in a fresher direction.

 

EDIT: Rushed? Three and a half years and a 6 month delay is NOT rushed. You clearly have no idea how long it takes to develop a good game from scratch.

here here

99.98% of teenagers surround their minds with cod4, if your a part of the 00.02% that doesn't own the game, put this in your sig.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ChuppyBear
Wouldnt say it was the worst. Just think San Andreas was more fun.

 

 

 

Also didnt Rockstar say that they didnt want to give away all the features in GTAIV so we could find them out for ourselves? I dont think I've found one yet that wasnt spoken about in reviews/previews. Some of the features in reviews/previews aren't even in the game confused.gif

SA was fun, but i think that R* aimed for realism in gta 4 instead of pink hair and pink street gangs tounge.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.Up&Coming.

I don't know why, but I liked VCS. I liked it more than Vice City.

The combat looked horrible, though. It was just...bad.

NEW ACCOUNT

Panz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DoubleOGJohnson

 

I never played GTAIII. I only been playing the series shortyl. Outta the 4 GTA's I got, I may put Vice City Stories as the "worse". I dont hate any of the GTA's Ive played. Liberty City Stories was good until you unlocked gay ass Shoreside Vale.

if you dont like shorside vale then dont go there

You must be from there. You Shoreside Vale people are so sensitive. All yall got small dicks and little fingers anyway. Come to Saunton and Portland when you wanna see the REAL city.

2325195c0b7762b2191eadda87e6c28cbf3bda8.2325218c50a8e1d2f1af95ac7ccc917f9fd128d.23251850600b7e9f86d85775c46818f9f0a54f7.23252522a342ec4e515d831c941fc3e25b69697.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The features were taken out becuase the game was getting stupid and childish, if they added anymore from what SA contained then it would just be stupid. GTA4 brings the series  to a much more mature stand point i reckon. Yes, the humour is still there, but in many cases i think it's a lot more subtle, and really concentrates on a deep, gritty storyline that makes 4 so f*cking aweosme.

 

People who hate it becuase they expected San Andreas part 2  have only ever disappointed themselves as Rockstar didnt mention SA's features once to any previewer.

 

I feel VCS was the most lacking of the series becuase the formula was jsut getting stale and needed 4 to point it in a fresher direction.

 

EDIT: Rushed? Three and a half years and a 6 month delay is NOT rushed. You clearly have no idea how long it takes to develop a good game from scratch.

here here

Thirded. Not to mention that GTA IV is the most expensive game (budget wise) to date.

zUd3j4P.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah it got way too over hyped so it was only gonna fail in most people opinions. Plus people aint really give it enough time still.

 

1. VC

2. IV

3. SA

4. LCS

5. III

6. VCS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick Papagiorgio

 

The features were taken out becuase the game was getting stupid and childish, if they added anymore from what SA contained then it would just be stupid. GTA4 brings the series  to a much more mature stand point i reckon. Yes, the humour is still there, but in many cases i think it's a lot more subtle, and really concentrates on a deep, gritty storyline that makes 4 so f*cking aweosme.

 

People who hate it becuase they expected San Andreas part 2  have only ever disappointed themselves as Rockstar didnt mention SA's features once to any previewer.

 

I feel VCS was the most lacking of the series becuase the formula was jsut getting stale and needed 4 to point it in a fresher direction.

 

EDIT: Rushed? Three and a half years and a 6 month delay is NOT rushed. You clearly have no idea how long it takes to develop a good game from scratch.

here here

Thirded. Not to mention that GTA IV is the most expensive game (budget wise) to date.

Fourth-ded

 

 

IV is a next step, gaming wise. SA's gameplay was awesome no doubt, but was overplayed. It was like a prototype to GTA:Sims (to an extent)

But that's just my opinion, man. wink.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The features were taken out becuase the game was getting stupid and childish, if they added anymore from what SA contained then it would just be stupid. GTA4 brings the series  to a much more mature stand point i reckon. Yes, the humour is still there, but in many cases i think it's a lot more subtle, and really concentrates on a deep, gritty storyline that makes 4 so f*cking aweosme.

 

I feel VCS was the most lacking of the series becuase the formula was jsut getting stale and needed 4 to point it in a fresher direction.

 

EDIT: Rushed? Three and a half years and a 6 month delay is NOT rushed. You clearly have no idea how long it takes to develop a good game from scratch.

if they couldnt add everything in that they already have made for previous GTA games , then yes , you could say it was rushed

 

the radio stations definantly are not as develpoed as well as SA

 

the new physics engine gives very floaty handeling . more gravity or weight needed

 

basically , IV could use more work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The features were taken out becuase the game was getting stupid and childish, if they added anymore from what SA contained then it would just be stupid. GTA4 brings the series to a much more mature stand point i reckon. Yes, the humour is still there, but in many cases i think it's a lot more subtle, and really concentrates on a deep, gritty storyline that makes 4 so f*cking aweosme.

 

People who hate it becuase they expected San Andreas part 2 have only ever disappointed themselves as Rockstar didnt mention SA's features once to any previewer.

 

I feel VCS was the most lacking of the series becuase the formula was jsut getting stale and needed 4 to point it in a fresher direction.

 

EDIT: Rushed? Three and a half years and a 6 month delay is NOT rushed. You clearly have no idea how long it takes to develop a good game from scratch.

Three and half years? The game was all graphics and story-line. Let's not forget they were working on Midnight Club and Manhunt 2.

 

Your reason for features being taken out is you're own assumption, considering I haven't heard or seen a link to such information. Assuming the content made the game childish is stupid, considering you don't know what the content was, or would be like.

 

Do you have an explanation for them claiming a good percent of the city's interior's to be accessible? That was a joke. The multi-player is a joke (for PS3 users anyways).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

darkgunner93

You want SA part 2? Then go play Saints Row 2 and GTFO the GTA IV forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The features were taken out becuase the game was getting stupid and childish, if they added anymore from what SA contained then it would just be stupid. GTA4 brings the series  to a much more mature stand point i reckon. Yes, the humour is still there, but in many cases i think it's a lot more subtle, and really concentrates on a deep, gritty storyline that makes 4 so f*cking aweosme.

 

People who hate it becuase they expected San Andreas part 2  have only ever disappointed themselves as Rockstar didnt mention SA's features once to any previewer.

 

I feel VCS was the most lacking of the series becuase the formula was jsut getting stale and needed 4 to point it in a fresher direction.

 

EDIT: Rushed? Three and a half years and a 6 month delay is NOT rushed. You clearly have no idea how long it takes to develop a good game from scratch.

Three and half years? The game was all graphics and story-line. Let's not forget they were working on Midnight Club and Manhunt 2.

 

Your reason for features being taken out is you're own assumption, considering I haven't heard or seen a link to such information. Assuming the content made the game childish is stupid, considering you don't know what the content was, or would be like.

 

Do you have an explanation for them claiming a good percent of the city's interior's to be accessible? That was a joke. The multi-player is a joke (for PS3 users anyways).

multiplayer is a joke when it works aswell, and by joke i mean FUNNY AS HELL!!!!

99.98% of teenagers surround their minds with cod4, if your a part of the 00.02% that doesn't own the game, put this in your sig.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not SA part 2

 

was SA really just VC part 2 ?

 

dont you think stupid statements help make for a hostile discussion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

darkgunner93
not SA part 2

 

was SA really just VC part 2 ?

 

dont you think stupid statements help make for a hostile discussion

Says the guy who just made a thread about how good Saints Row was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

casey-2pac

i belive that iv isnt the worst but is no wer near the best

 

 

gta has been known 4 its wildness and funness

 

 

i believe that most of that has been killed out in gta iv

 

its 2 realistic, stick 2 the basics R* we love the basic stuff just givve us new missions new cities but keep the gta style game!!

 

**my opinion** Shifty41s_beerhatsmilie2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not SA part 2

 

was SA really just VC part 2 ?

 

dont you think stupid statements help make for a hostile discussion

Says the guy who just made a thread about how good Saints Row was.

Coming from someone who probably has never even played Saints Row or 2.

 

You're an imbecile. Unless you can have a reasonable, intelligent discussion, go away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not SA part 2

 

was SA really just VC part 2 ?

 

dont you think stupid statements help make for a hostile discussion

Says the guy who just made a thread about how good Saints Row was.

SR was the first next gen GTA type game

 

comparisons between the 2 are valid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1 User Currently Viewing
    0 members, 0 Anonymous, 1 Guest

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.