boothy Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 (edited) so some of you dont like it, but do you think its the worst gta? and if not, what is? just to let you know, i LIKE gta 4 Edited May 10, 2008 by boothy Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apollo_33 Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 NO WAY. LCS was the worst Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064552 Share on other sites More sharing options...
boothy Posted May 10, 2008 Author Share Posted May 10, 2008 NO WAY. LCS was the worst i like LCS, its so simple its great Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064554 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raiden_8 Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 its missing SA features every GTA has expanded & added to what came before it now with IV , some features have been left out that doesnt make it the worst Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064557 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Apple Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 I would rate it like San Andreas III IV Vice City LCS VCS Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064559 Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Up&Coming. Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 In my opinion (and don't freak out people), I think Vice City or Liberty City Stories was the worst. I hated Tommy, and the missions were pretty stupid. I didn't really feel that the city was alive like everyone else did, too. Liberty City Stories is just boring to me. GTA III is much better. My favorites come in a tie between San Andreas and IV. I haven't finished IV yet, but I'm guessing it'll be my favorite since Niko is so badass and other obvious factors. San Andreas really was a great game, though the missions did get a little weird after awhile..Green Goo? I think R* ran out of ideas and got too attached to The Truth. Oh yeah, after those two in first, I'd have to say III is next, and then VCS (haven't completed, but I do like it). Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064560 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoubleOGJohnson Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 I never played GTAIII. I only been playing the series shortyl. Outta the 4 GTA's I got, I may put Vice City Stories as the "worse". I dont hate any of the GTA's Ive played. Liberty City Stories was good until you unlocked gay ass Shoreside Vale. Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064562 Share on other sites More sharing options...
boothy Posted May 10, 2008 Author Share Posted May 10, 2008 I never played GTAIII. I only been playing the series shortyl. Outta the 4 GTA's I got, I may put Vice City Stories as the "worse". I dont hate any of the GTA's Ive played. Liberty City Stories was good until you unlocked gay ass Shoreside Vale. if you dont like shorside vale then dont go there Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064572 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanRev Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 Wouldnt say it was the worst. Just think San Andreas was more fun. Also didnt Rockstar say that they didnt want to give away all the features in GTAIV so we could find them out for ourselves? I dont think I've found one yet that wasnt spoken about in reviews/previews. Some of the features in reviews/previews aren't even in the game Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064587 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haynesyb0y Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 Only people who are dissapointed reply? Seems a bit biased... Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064589 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fnorg Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 So, you're dissapoint because you can't turn the character into Al Roker with pink hair? San Andreas is the worst GTA in the III series. Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064599 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadShock Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 I'm disappointed because it could've been so much more. It seems like they rushed it. And saying LCS was the worst is blasphemy. VCS is my least favorite. LCS is actually one of my favorites. Awesome on my PSP. Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064601 Share on other sites More sharing options...
boothy Posted May 10, 2008 Author Share Posted May 10, 2008 Only people who are dissapointed reply? Seems a bit biased... well the people who like gta4 obviously aren't going to say its the worst Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064604 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kippers Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 (edited) The features were taken out becuase the game was getting stupid and childish, if they added anymore from what SA contained then it would just be stupid. GTA4 brings the series to a much more mature stand point i reckon. Yes, the humour is still there, but in many cases i think it's a lot more subtle, and really concentrates on a deep, gritty storyline that makes 4 so f*cking aweosme. People who hate it becuase they expected San Andreas part 2 have only ever disappointed themselves as Rockstar didnt mention SA's features once to any previewer. I feel VCS was the most lacking of the series becuase the formula was jsut getting stale and needed 4 to point it in a fresher direction. EDIT: Rushed? Three and a half years and a 6 month delay is NOT rushed. You clearly have no idea how long it takes to develop a good game from scratch. Edited May 10, 2008 by kippers. Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064609 Share on other sites More sharing options...
boothy Posted May 10, 2008 Author Share Posted May 10, 2008 The features were taken out becuase the game was getting stupid and childish, if they added anymore from what SA contained then it would just be stupid. GTA4 brings the series to a much more mature stand point i reckon. Yes, the humour is still there, but in many cases i think it's a lot more subtle, and really concentrates on a deep, gritty storyline that makes 4 so f*cking aweosme. People who hate it becuase they expected San Andreas part 2 have only ever disappointed themselves as Rockstar didnt mention SA's features once to any previewer. I feel VCS was the most lacking of the series becuase the formula was jsut getting stale and needed 4 to point it in a fresher direction. EDIT: Rushed? Three and a half years and a 6 month delay is NOT rushed. You clearly have no idea how long it takes to develop a good game from scratch. here here Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064625 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuppyBear Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 Wouldnt say it was the worst. Just think San Andreas was more fun. Also didnt Rockstar say that they didnt want to give away all the features in GTAIV so we could find them out for ourselves? I dont think I've found one yet that wasnt spoken about in reviews/previews. Some of the features in reviews/previews aren't even in the game SA was fun, but i think that R* aimed for realism in gta 4 instead of pink hair and pink street gangs Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064630 Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Up&Coming. Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 I don't know why, but I liked VCS. I liked it more than Vice City. The combat looked horrible, though. It was just...bad. Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064632 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoubleOGJohnson Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 I never played GTAIII. I only been playing the series shortyl. Outta the 4 GTA's I got, I may put Vice City Stories as the "worse". I dont hate any of the GTA's Ive played. Liberty City Stories was good until you unlocked gay ass Shoreside Vale. if you dont like shorside vale then dont go there You must be from there. You Shoreside Vale people are so sensitive. All yall got small dicks and little fingers anyway. Come to Saunton and Portland when you wanna see the REAL city. Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064634 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsuroki Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 The features were taken out becuase the game was getting stupid and childish, if they added anymore from what SA contained then it would just be stupid. GTA4 brings the series to a much more mature stand point i reckon. Yes, the humour is still there, but in many cases i think it's a lot more subtle, and really concentrates on a deep, gritty storyline that makes 4 so f*cking aweosme. People who hate it becuase they expected San Andreas part 2 have only ever disappointed themselves as Rockstar didnt mention SA's features once to any previewer. I feel VCS was the most lacking of the series becuase the formula was jsut getting stale and needed 4 to point it in a fresher direction. EDIT: Rushed? Three and a half years and a 6 month delay is NOT rushed. You clearly have no idea how long it takes to develop a good game from scratch. here here Thirded. Not to mention that GTA IV is the most expensive game (budget wise) to date. Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064639 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodgey. Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 Nah it got way too over hyped so it was only gonna fail in most people opinions. Plus people aint really give it enough time still. 1. VC 2. IV 3. SA 4. LCS 5. III 6. VCS Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064640 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Papagiorgio Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 The features were taken out becuase the game was getting stupid and childish, if they added anymore from what SA contained then it would just be stupid. GTA4 brings the series to a much more mature stand point i reckon. Yes, the humour is still there, but in many cases i think it's a lot more subtle, and really concentrates on a deep, gritty storyline that makes 4 so f*cking aweosme. People who hate it becuase they expected San Andreas part 2 have only ever disappointed themselves as Rockstar didnt mention SA's features once to any previewer. I feel VCS was the most lacking of the series becuase the formula was jsut getting stale and needed 4 to point it in a fresher direction. EDIT: Rushed? Three and a half years and a 6 month delay is NOT rushed. You clearly have no idea how long it takes to develop a good game from scratch. here here Thirded. Not to mention that GTA IV is the most expensive game (budget wise) to date. Fourth-ded IV is a next step, gaming wise. SA's gameplay was awesome no doubt, but was overplayed. It was like a prototype to GTA:Sims (to an extent) But that's just my opinion, man. Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064659 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raiden_8 Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 The features were taken out becuase the game was getting stupid and childish, if they added anymore from what SA contained then it would just be stupid. GTA4 brings the series to a much more mature stand point i reckon. Yes, the humour is still there, but in many cases i think it's a lot more subtle, and really concentrates on a deep, gritty storyline that makes 4 so f*cking aweosme. I feel VCS was the most lacking of the series becuase the formula was jsut getting stale and needed 4 to point it in a fresher direction. EDIT: Rushed? Three and a half years and a 6 month delay is NOT rushed. You clearly have no idea how long it takes to develop a good game from scratch. if they couldnt add everything in that they already have made for previous GTA games , then yes , you could say it was rushed the radio stations definantly are not as develpoed as well as SA the new physics engine gives very floaty handeling . more gravity or weight needed basically , IV could use more work Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064664 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadShock Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 The features were taken out becuase the game was getting stupid and childish, if they added anymore from what SA contained then it would just be stupid. GTA4 brings the series to a much more mature stand point i reckon. Yes, the humour is still there, but in many cases i think it's a lot more subtle, and really concentrates on a deep, gritty storyline that makes 4 so f*cking aweosme. People who hate it becuase they expected San Andreas part 2 have only ever disappointed themselves as Rockstar didnt mention SA's features once to any previewer. I feel VCS was the most lacking of the series becuase the formula was jsut getting stale and needed 4 to point it in a fresher direction. EDIT: Rushed? Three and a half years and a 6 month delay is NOT rushed. You clearly have no idea how long it takes to develop a good game from scratch. Three and half years? The game was all graphics and story-line. Let's not forget they were working on Midnight Club and Manhunt 2. Your reason for features being taken out is you're own assumption, considering I haven't heard or seen a link to such information. Assuming the content made the game childish is stupid, considering you don't know what the content was, or would be like. Do you have an explanation for them claiming a good percent of the city's interior's to be accessible? That was a joke. The multi-player is a joke (for PS3 users anyways). Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064672 Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkgunner93 Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 You want SA part 2? Then go play Saints Row 2 and GTFO the GTA IV forum. Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064700 Share on other sites More sharing options...
boothy Posted May 10, 2008 Author Share Posted May 10, 2008 The features were taken out becuase the game was getting stupid and childish, if they added anymore from what SA contained then it would just be stupid. GTA4 brings the series to a much more mature stand point i reckon. Yes, the humour is still there, but in many cases i think it's a lot more subtle, and really concentrates on a deep, gritty storyline that makes 4 so f*cking aweosme. People who hate it becuase they expected San Andreas part 2 have only ever disappointed themselves as Rockstar didnt mention SA's features once to any previewer. I feel VCS was the most lacking of the series becuase the formula was jsut getting stale and needed 4 to point it in a fresher direction. EDIT: Rushed? Three and a half years and a 6 month delay is NOT rushed. You clearly have no idea how long it takes to develop a good game from scratch. Three and half years? The game was all graphics and story-line. Let's not forget they were working on Midnight Club and Manhunt 2. Your reason for features being taken out is you're own assumption, considering I haven't heard or seen a link to such information. Assuming the content made the game childish is stupid, considering you don't know what the content was, or would be like. Do you have an explanation for them claiming a good percent of the city's interior's to be accessible? That was a joke. The multi-player is a joke (for PS3 users anyways). multiplayer is a joke when it works aswell, and by joke i mean FUNNY AS HELL!!!! Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064708 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raiden_8 Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 not SA part 2 was SA really just VC part 2 ? dont you think stupid statements help make for a hostile discussion Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064710 Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkgunner93 Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 not SA part 2 was SA really just VC part 2 ? dont you think stupid statements help make for a hostile discussion Says the guy who just made a thread about how good Saints Row was. Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064735 Share on other sites More sharing options...
casey-2pac Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 i belive that iv isnt the worst but is no wer near the best gta has been known 4 its wildness and funness i believe that most of that has been killed out in gta iv its 2 realistic, stick 2 the basics R* we love the basic stuff just givve us new missions new cities but keep the gta style game!! **my opinion** Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064751 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadShock Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 not SA part 2 was SA really just VC part 2 ? dont you think stupid statements help make for a hostile discussion Says the guy who just made a thread about how good Saints Row was. Coming from someone who probably has never even played Saints Row or 2. You're an imbecile. Unless you can have a reasonable, intelligent discussion, go away. Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064754 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raiden_8 Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 not SA part 2 was SA really just VC part 2 ? dont you think stupid statements help make for a hostile discussion Says the guy who just made a thread about how good Saints Row was. SR was the first next gen GTA type game comparisons between the 2 are valid Link to comment https://gtaforums.com/topic/345274-is-gta4-really-the-worst-gta/#findComment-1058064759 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now