shadoolaw Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 Pretty f*cking incredible if true, when you consider how small a part of GTA4 that car damage actually is, and how big it is in racing games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niko B3llic Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 i really look forward to better car damage....the previous gtas had obvious pre-modeled damage presets or whatever...they all looked similar if you did the same thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadoolaw Posted April 23, 2008 Author Share Posted April 23, 2008 i really look forward to better car damage....the previous gtas had obvious pre-modeled damage presets or whatever...they all looked similar if you did the same thing! I'm just glad that cars won't blow up after only a few shots this time around. It takes a lot more, which makes sense, especially since they can also be used as cover now. Love this pic: Look at those bulletholes! All varied and great-looking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NikeTalk023 Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 damn i cant wait Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruXter Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 Looks like the one hole with the best appearance, looks like it is floating next to the car. Typical grand theft auto image layers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty_matt_mattmatt Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 i am so Ghastered and flabbered its crazy man i wanna play bad its almost as bad as havin an itch on ur nuts and not being able to scratch it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebalrouser Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 I like the 2nd screen shot because look at the paint around the bullet holes, burnt away...awesomeness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flappy188 Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 complete and utter radness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick_j_2002 Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 Does anyone else not realize why the taillight is exploding in that first shot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadoolaw Posted April 23, 2008 Author Share Posted April 23, 2008 i am so Ghastered and flabbered its crazy man i wanna play bad its almost as bad as havin an itch on ur nuts and not being able to scratch it Six days, man. By the way, this same mag called GTA4 "perhaps the greatest videogame of all-time". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebalrouser Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 there is a bullet hole in the side see? he has an smg, not the most accurate weapon, so it probably skimmed the far and went a bit into tail light Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieDude Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 Does anyone else not realize why the taillight is exploding in that first shot? Either Niko hit his head on it or that guy has shot All the way through the car and it has come through the rear Light Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadoolaw Posted April 23, 2008 Author Share Posted April 23, 2008 Does anyone else not realize why the taillight is exploding in that first shot? Is it possible that a bullet(s) went through the car, and exited out through the taillight from the inside? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebalrouser Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 No read my post damnit there is a bullet hole in the side of the tail light see? he has an smg, not the most accurate weapon, so it probably skimmed the far and went a bit into tail light Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadoolaw Posted April 23, 2008 Author Share Posted April 23, 2008 No read my post damnit there is a bullet hole in the side of the tail light see? he has an smg, not the most accurate weapon, so it probably skimmed the far and went a bit into tail light That's more unlikely. The taillight looks too far in on the inside for a bullet to have hit it by skimming on the side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nadalcameron Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 I think your looking at the wrong picture. The one with the tail light exploding has him with a Pistol, and the other guy has a shotgun. No SMG involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebalrouser Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 he very first pic... my bad looks like an SMG in the distance. still plausible though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadoolaw Posted April 23, 2008 Author Share Posted April 23, 2008 That's definitely a shotgun that other guy is holding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardedbastard Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 No read my post damnit there is a bullet hole in the side of the tail light see? he has an smg, not the most accurate weapon, so it probably skimmed the far and went a bit into tail light That's more unlikely. The taillight looks too far in on the inside for a bullet to have hit it by skimming on the side. It turns out theres a law that says: "the easiest explanation is most likely the right one" The easiest explanation? There is another shooter off screen. It is all perspective people, this is a frozen tiny capture of an entire world. Think outside the: ________ l..............l l..............l l________l Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadoolaw Posted April 23, 2008 Author Share Posted April 23, 2008 No read my post damnit there is a bullet hole in the side of the tail light see? he has an smg, not the most accurate weapon, so it probably skimmed the far and went a bit into tail light That's more unlikely. The taillight looks too far in on the inside for a bullet to have hit it by skimming on the side. It turns out theres a law that says: "the easiest explanation is most likely the right one" The easiest explanation? There is another shooter off screen. It is all perspective people, this is a frozen tiny capture of an entire world. Think outside the: _____ l.........l l.........l l_____l Yeah, I already considered that earlier. And then I looked at the mini-map, and realized no, that's not the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex J. Ruffolo Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 i really look forward to better car damage....the previous gtas had obvious pre-modeled damage presets or whatever...they all looked similar if you did the same thing! I'm just glad that cars won't blow up after only a few shots this time around. It takes a lot more, which makes sense, especially since they can also be used as cover now. Love this pic: Look at those bulletholes! All varied and great-looking. NICE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardedbastard Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 No read my post damnit there is a bullet hole in the side of the tail light see? he has an smg, not the most accurate weapon, so it probably skimmed the far and went a bit into tail light That's more unlikely. The taillight looks too far in on the inside for a bullet to have hit it by skimming on the side. It turns out theres a law that says: "the easiest explanation is most likely the right one" The easiest explanation? There is another shooter off screen. It is all perspective people, this is a frozen tiny capture of an entire world. Think outside the: _____ l.........l l.........l l_____l Yeah, I already considered that earlier. And then I looked at the mini-map, and realized no, that's not the case. *Jurrasic Park impression*: "Clever girl..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebalrouser Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 actually yea look at the mini map there is a guy practicaly next to niko on the left Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieDude Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 No read my post damnit there is a bullet hole in the side of the tail light see? he has an smg, not the most accurate weapon, so it probably skimmed the far and went a bit into tail light That's more unlikely. The taillight looks too far in on the inside for a bullet to have hit it by skimming on the side. It turns out theres a law that says: "the easiest explanation is most likely the right one" The easiest explanation? There is another shooter off screen. It is all perspective people, this is a frozen tiny capture of an entire world. Think outside the: _____ l.........l l.........l l_____l Yeah, I already considered that earlier. And then I looked at the mini-map, and realized no, that's not the case. Ahh But your wrong. look at the Minimap closley. There is a guy behind the shooter. obviously off the screen. and he is at a better angle that that guy and probably has a much clearer Shot at niko. thus missing and shooting the tail light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadoolaw Posted April 23, 2008 Author Share Posted April 23, 2008 For someone off-screen to hit that taillight he would have to be either off to the side of or behind the arrow on the mini-map, which is Niko. I'm pretty sure the guy that Niko is practically on top of in the mini-map is that same guy shooting at him in the pic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick_j_2002 Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 Something tells me that JFK will factor into this theory at some point... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaunr Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 I like the 2nd screen shot because look at the paint around the bullet holes, burnt away...awesomeness not burnt away, chipped Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadoolaw Posted April 23, 2008 Author Share Posted April 23, 2008 Well, the simplest answer is that one or more of the bullets from the shotgun went through the car and exited out of the taillight. Why not? Especially since there's a bullet spread. And it busted the window, too, so the bullets are definitely going through the car. Okay, it's solved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick_j_2002 Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 Well, the simplest answer is that one or more of the bullets from the shotgun went through the car and exited out of the taillight. Why not? Especially since there's a bullet spread. And it busted the window, too, so the bullets are definitely going through the car. Okay, it's solved. Shotguns don't fire bullets... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadoolaw Posted April 23, 2008 Author Share Posted April 23, 2008 Well, the simplest answer is that one or more of the bullets from the shotgun went through the car and exited out of the taillight. Why not? Especially since there's a bullet spread. And it busted the window, too, so the bullets are definitely going through the car. Okay, it's solved. Shotguns don't fire bullets... I know. You know what I meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now