DLC a waste?

[Warlord Tasi]

Who cares about your opinion... DLC will be worth it and the creators of the game said that the 360 version is superior in their eyes because of it... this is an industry where people are trying to make money and microsoft knows that they have the edge...

Please provide me with an official source to where they said "The xbox version is superior."

Lazlo, the in-game alias one of the main writers and creators of the game stated in an interview with Opie and Anthony

that he preferred the 360 version because it offered the full experience over the ps3 version... if you serch you will be able to find it...

 

PS: If Microsoft wants to make GTA4 even better and will pay money for it, then i like the way they think... I find your lack of faith in R* disturbing...

True......employees from R* also say that graphically the ps3 is slightly better and with the 5 mins install runs smoother.......guess we'll see on launch day which verison is better

yeah if i had a ps3 i couldn't care less about the 5 minute install, i dont know why people even talk about it as a disadvantage, but content is what satisifies me and the 360 is where its at...

[trininickhaskell]

Who cares about your opinion... DLC will be worth it and the creators of the game said that the 360 version is superior in their eyes because of it... this is an industry where people are trying to make money and microsoft knows that they have the edge...

Please provide me with an official source to where they said "The xbox version is superior."

Lazlo, the in-game alias one of the main writers and creators of the game stated in an interview with Opie and Anthony

that he preferred the 360 version because it offered the full experience over the ps3 version... if you serch you will be able to find it...

 

PS: If Microsoft wants to make GTA4 even better and will pay money for it, then i like the way they think... I find your lack of faith in R* disturbing...

True......employees from R* also say that graphically the ps3 is slightly better and with the 5 mins install runs smoother.......guess we'll see on launch day which verison is better

yeah if i had a ps3 i couldn't care less about the 5 minute install, i dont know why people even talk about it as a disadvantage, but content is what satisifies me and the 360 is where its at...

Yeh......5 minutes is nothing compared to the 100+ hrs of gameplay......and if this install saves a few seconds on start-up, it will pay off ALOT in the long run

[goldsoundz]

Stop trolling you idiot.

[trininickhaskell]

Stop trolling you idiot.

i fail to see how im trolling....im addressing facts

[T.I.P.]

Yeah, it seams R* really doesn't seem interested in the DLC at all.

But, that's probably because they're so focused on the actual game that they haven't been able to even think about the DLC yet.

What would any thread like this be without fanboys?

[Matt87]

Dan Houser stated in an interview with "The Cut Scene" that the episodic content is "experimental". While Microsoft is making DLC a "big advantage", it doesnt seem that R* cares that much now. They've created a game that is close to perfect in their eyes and in the eyes of much of the press and in my opinion Microsoft is being greedy by making a big fuss about the DLC.

LOL, another PS3 owner who's dying to believe he's not getting screwed buying the PS3 version!

 

You're kinda cute and gay at the same time!

you called him gay? you just called him cute.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOL HOMO

[GloRy]

Dan Houser stated in an interview with "The Cut Scene" that the episodic content is "experimental". While Microsoft is making DLC a "big advantage", it doesnt seem that R* cares that much now. They've created a game that is close to perfect in their eyes and in the eyes of much of the press and in my opinion Microsoft is being greedy by making a big fuss about the DLC.

LOL, another PS3 owner who's dying to believe he's not getting screwed buying the PS3 version!

 

You're kinda cute and gay at the same time!

you called him gay? you just called him cute.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOL HOMO

its called sarcasm i kinda got it .

[trininickhaskell]

Dan Houser stated in an interview with "The Cut Scene" that the episodic content is "experimental". While Microsoft is making DLC a "big advantage", it doesnt seem that R* cares that much now. They've created a game that is close to perfect in their eyes and in the eyes of much of the press and in my opinion Microsoft is being greedy by making a big fuss about the DLC.

LOL, another PS3 owner who's dying to believe he's not getting screwed buying the PS3 version!

 

You're kinda cute and gay at the same time!

you called him gay? you just called him cute.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOL HOMO

[tooji]

I have a feeling that your getting jealous.....

 

 

It's experimental as in they have never done this sort of stuff before...You guys are seriously stupid thinking that "experimental" means "yeah were just trying it out and we don't really care about it...."

[DDR Midian]

GTA was experimental. So was GTAIII.

 

...and SA pretty much.

 

...come to think of it... so is GTA IV. No change there then.

[tooji]

Anyone think that DLC will come to ps3 later on?

only if Sony pays up

[tooji]

This thread is a waste.

 

Dan Houser has also said that they want to fry Microsoft's server with some killer DLC.

 

Put that in context with what you just said and it is still killer content. 

 

Log off the net, you have failed the interwebs.

R* has the ability to do many things with DLC that would definitley be F*cking kool.........but by microsoft making such a big fuss about it, theyre leading ppl to assumptions that there would be "added sections to the city".......im not doubting R* but this seems extemely unlikely looking at the storage space on 360's......microsoft may therefore be banking on false promises and assupmtions

stop fanboying you jealous fanboy

[DDR Midian]

This thread is a waste.

 

Dan Houser has also said that they want to fry Microsoft's server with some killer DLC.

 

Put that in context with what you just said and it is still killer content. 

 

Log off the net, you have failed the interwebs.

R* has the ability to do many things with DLC that would definitley be F*cking kool.........but by microsoft making such a big fuss about it, theyre leading ppl to assumptions that there would be "added sections to the city".......im not doubting R* but this seems extemely unlikely looking at the storage space on 360's......microsoft may therefore be banking on false promises and assupmtions

stop fanboying you jealous fanboy

Tell me about it, has he not heard of Shivering Isles? Burnout Paradise is also coming out with 3 new sets of DLC, each one adding new sections to the city. It's quite easily done.

[thor1to3for5]

Xbox Fanboy: My Niko gets to do more stuff than your Niko.

 

PS3 Fanboy: RROD.

 

That pretty much sums up this thread, wouldn't you say?

[GTAIV9409]

Microsoft was smart for paying to get DLC. Sony will get in the future but not as much as Microsoft due to Sony not paying for it. Microsoft was dumb though for going after Sony due to the 5 minutes loading time on the PS3. In conclusion, both are just a bunch of greedy companies.

[DDR Midian]

Xbox Fanboy: My Niko gets to do more stuff than your Niko.

 

PS3 Fanboy: RROD.

 

That pretty much sums up this thread, wouldn't you say?

True. Though I honestly don't see how that works. I've had the RROD, yet I've got 39 games here I've played the sh*t out of. Worth it? Hell yes. I'll spend longer on the DLC than I will waiting for my Xbox to be repaired.

[GTAser]

Xbox Fanboy: My Niko gets to do more stuff than your Niko.

 

PS3 Fanboy: RROD.

 

That pretty much sums up this thread, wouldn't you say?

delicious thread is delicious

[chitoryu12]

This thread is a waste.

 

Dan Houser has also said that they want to fry Microsoft's server with some killer DLC.

 

Put that in context with what you just said and it is still killer content. 

 

Log off the net, you have failed the interwebs.

R* has the ability to do many things with DLC that would definitley be F*cking kool.........but by microsoft making such a big fuss about it, theyre leading ppl to assumptions that there would be "added sections to the city".......im not doubting R* but this seems extemely unlikely looking at the storage space on 360's......microsoft may therefore be banking on false promises and assupmtions

stop fanboying you jealous fanboy

Tell me about it, has he not heard of Shivering Isles? Burnout Paradise is also coming out with 3 new sets of DLC, each one adding new sections to the city. It's quite easily done.

Yeah, but it's easy to do that with a fictional city. When you're trying to base your game off a real-life city, there's only so many places that can be added. Liberty City already consists of most of New York City, and any places that have been omitted have been omitted for a reason, like Staten Island.

 

The DLC is probably just going to be new missions and storylines. I heard somewhere that they would be like Vice City and San Andreas in fleshing out the storyline. If anything, the DLC will basically be like the Stories games. You're in the same city doing a different story.

[DDR Midian]

This thread is a waste.

 

Dan Houser has also said that they want to fry Microsoft's server with some killer DLC.

 

Put that in context with what you just said and it is still killer content. 

 

Log off the net, you have failed the interwebs.

R* has the ability to do many things with DLC that would definitley be F*cking kool.........but by microsoft making such a big fuss about it, theyre leading ppl to assumptions that there would be "added sections to the city".......im not doubting R* but this seems extemely unlikely looking at the storage space on 360's......microsoft may therefore be banking on false promises and assupmtions

stop fanboying you jealous fanboy

Tell me about it, has he not heard of Shivering Isles? Burnout Paradise is also coming out with 3 new sets of DLC, each one adding new sections to the city. It's quite easily done.

Yeah, but it's easy to do that with a fictional city. When you're trying to base your game off a real-life city, there's only so many places that can be added. Liberty City already consists of most of New York City, and any places that have been omitted have been omitted for a reason, like Staten Island.

 

The DLC is probably just going to be new missions and storylines. I heard somewhere that they would be like Vice City and San Andreas in fleshing out the storyline. If anything, the DLC will basically be like the Stories games. You're in the same city doing a different story.

Agreed, but then Liberty City is only based on NYC, it's not an exact representation, so there's still a lot of artistic license there. You're right though, although creating a whole new area is easily possible with DLC, I doubt it'll happen.

[Sgt-Smack]

lol I find it sooo funny how you can read posts and find out who has a 360 and who has a ps3 just buy the post is written lol Anyway well I wouldnt be so concerned with it either if the game hasnt been released yet.

[(Yakuza)]

Yeah, it seams R* really doesn't seem interested in the DLC at all.

But, that's probably because they're so focused on the actual game that they haven't been able to even think about the DLC yet.

If R* doesnt give 2 sh*ts about dlc why the f*ck they signed a contract to do it for 50 mil?

[trininickhaskell]

Yeah, it seams R* really doesn't seem interested in the DLC at all.

But, that's probably because they're so focused on the actual game that they haven't been able to even think about the DLC yet.

If R* doesnt give 2 sh*ts about dlc why the f*ck they signed a contract to do it for 50 mil?

ummmmm 50 mil

[derty]

Dan Houser stated in an interview with "The Cut Scene" that the episodic content is "experimental". While Microsoft is making DLC a "big advantage", it doesnt seem that R* cares that much now. They've created a game that is close to perfect in their eyes and in the eyes of much of the press and in my opinion Microsoft is being greedy by making a big fuss about the DLC.

In my controversial theory, they're not being greedy, they are using tact to hide the bigger picture: Once GTA was secured for 360, they had a new dillema. A launch date 3 days before halo3! The system seller was sure to become a halo killer this generation, and so 50 million dollars just to get the game, and to delay it, and a likely story with some DLC hooplah, bing bam, saved the 360. That's just one of my cents.

[(Yakuza)]

Yeah, it seams R* really doesn't seem interested in the DLC at all.

But, that's probably because they're so focused on the actual game that they haven't been able to even think about the DLC yet.

If R* doesnt give 2 sh*ts about dlc why the f*ck they signed a contract to do it for 50 mil?

ummmmm 50 mil

yes 50 mil.

[emigrating]

In my controversial theory, they're not being greedy, they are using tact to hide the bigger picture: Once GTA was secured for 360, they had a new dillema. A launch date 3 days before halo3! The system seller was sure to become a halo killer this generation, and so 50 million dollars just to get the game, and to delay it, and a likely story with some DLC hooplah, bing bam, saved the 360. That's just one of my cents.

Conspiracy theorize much?

 

I highly doubt that was [even part of] the reason as the Houser's themself even stated at one point part of the delay was to get the PS3 version up to speed (so to speak).

[trininickhaskell]

Yeah, it seams R* really doesn't seem interested in the DLC at all.

But, that's probably because they're so focused on the actual game that they haven't been able to even think about the DLC yet.

If R* doesnt give 2 sh*ts about dlc why the f*ck they signed a contract to do it for 50 mil?

ummmmm 50 mil

yes 50 mil.

u dont think 50 mil is a good enough reason to sign the contract?

[Niko>>>all]

Dan Houser stated in an interview with "The Cut Scene" that the episodic content is "experimental". While Microsoft is making DLC a "big advantage", it doesnt seem that R* cares that much now. They've created a game that is close to perfect in their eyes and in the eyes of much of the press and in my opinion Microsoft is being greedy by making a big fuss about the DLC.

In my controversial theory, they're not being greedy, they are using tact to hide the bigger picture: Once GTA was secured for 360, they had a new dillema. A launch date 3 days before halo3! The system seller was sure to become a halo killer this generation, and so 50 million dollars just to get the game, and to delay it, and a likely story with some DLC hooplah, bing bam, saved the 360. That's just one of my cents.

LOL u fail completely. R* has officially stated that the PS3 version was the cause for the Oct-April delay. Haha

 

Anyways, I find the OP hilarious. With the game not out yet, they're OBVIOUSLY still focusing on the launch

 

People don't think about anything anymore...

[tooji]

Yeah, it seams R* really doesn't seem interested in the DLC at all.

But, that's probably because they're so focused on the actual game that they haven't been able to even think about the DLC yet.

If R* doesnt give 2 sh*ts about dlc why the f*ck they signed a contract to do it for 50 mil?

ummmmm 50 mil

yes 50 mil.

u dont think 50 mil is a good enough reason to sign the contract?

no but your an idiot for creating this jealous fanboy thread

[atix]

People need to keep in mind that WE players care about if our needs are satisfied (gamewise obviously) but to Sony/microsoft in the end of the day we all are walking dollars/euros....we r money thats all.

 

if they decide something that 1 million of us dont like...screw it there are other 9 million that like! (random numbers ofc)

 

ppl need to stop defending that companies that dont even defend their costumers....they only defend their pockets. simple as that.

 

and in the end of the day we only have each other to talk about that awesome thing we did in the game.

 

dont trashtalk each other ppl...we all here to have fun and enjoy our maginific next-gen systems.

 

peace to all