GTA_dog Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 I own the Xbox 360 and am getting IV the very day it's released. I read in an article somewhere that over time, GTA IV will have downloadable cities like a new vice city, and some Liberty City island additions. I find it unfair for the Playstation 3 community and I really don't care what console I have. I don't want to download another city, I would rather buy the next game or the expansion pack that has you put in GTA IV and then GTA 'X'. I hate buying things via Xbox Marketplace! My question to you is (if this is true): Would you buy the expansion pack in a store, purchase and download the expansion pack, or (if you own a PS3) buy an Xbox 360. Just to say, I am on both sides of the story, PS3 and X360. Fanboys aren't allowed to express themselves by saying sh*t about their least favorite game console. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruxism Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 I agree, I always feel ripped off for some reason whenever I use the market place. However I would prefer to download the new cities (if the DLC is that) than buy them in a shop. Id rather have them integrated than on seperate discs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTA-US Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 It seems money drives everything. Including games. R* had a price and M$ met it. If I didn't have an XBOX and wanted the DLC then I might buy an XBOX. Capitalism at work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mykester Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Cuz ps3 is sh*t. Hope the clears it up. jk But seriously, M$ made a deal with Rockstar. So its totally fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chadders42 Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 I'm considering getting a 360 anyway but i'm not sure, if the DLC turns out to be amazing i might get one at the end of the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisbroxton Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 is that actually confirmed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iSam-D Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Erm, if you read the thread with the Dan Houser interview innit, he says they havent even thought about what will be in the DLC so up to now theres no real proof what the hell ittle be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTA_dog Posted April 20, 2008 Author Share Posted April 20, 2008 is that actually confirmed If i could find the site I would post it. I looked up on wikipedia along with this information. But that wasn't my main source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PicoDeath Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 I don't find it unfair, I'm sure sony could've offered that money too. It's bussiness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trooper911 Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 I don't find it unfair, I'm sure sony could've offered that money too. It's bussiness. Why dosent sony buy into it then? do downloadable content for the playstation store, SONY GIVE ROCKSTAR YOUR MONEY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garywobby Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 I don't think it's unfair, MS paid for this exclusive content and what would be unfair is if PS3 owners also got it. BTW, before I get called a fanboy i'll just say I have a PS3 and don't have a 360, when I bought my PS3 I knew that 360 were getting this content but that didn't stop me buying my console of choice. I simply got the console I wanted and i'm still very happy with my choice. Fanboys arguing over which is better really do my head right in, people have choices and they can choose to spend their money on whatever they like!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Up&Coming. Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 I'm getting a PS3. Personally, I don't care about the DLC. GTA IV is all I really need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chadders42 Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 I don't find it unfair, I'm sure sony could've offered that money too. It's bussiness. Why dosent sony buy into it then? do downloadable content for the playstation store, SONY GIVE ROCKSTAR YOUR MONEY Calm down. We're getting home which intergrates all games, for free, which compensates for SONY not spending 50 million on one game... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAIV9409 Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 I don't find it unfair, I'm sure sony could've offered that money too. It's bussiness. Why dosent sony buy into it then? do downloadable content for the playstation store, SONY GIVE ROCKSTAR YOUR MONEY Because Sony isn't a bunch of suck ups. They don't need to waste their money to sell games for their console with all this extra stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmellyBobIV Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 i'm always paranoid that my data will go corrupt when i buy from the market place. dont know why though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneyJ Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 i got 50,000,000 reasons why its fair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nlitement Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Awww poor PlayStation users, they've always been left behind when it'd come to GTA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsuroki Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 The downloadable cities rumour is a misconception based on some badly interpreted statements. There's no credibility behind it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rambone2007 Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 I'm not a ban-whore but I'm getting to the point where I'd wish the mods would prohibit any threads that bait people into console wars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlademanX Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Sony could have made a deal but they didnt. MS are like kids and candy. SOny seem to have taken the more mature approach and just chilled with their own 50 mil. They coulda paid that and got an extra city. They took the piss out of MS by just giving a paltry 10 hours of missions. 50 Mil??? People say PS3 is sh*t cuz they cant afford oen totally understandable. Add to that it never crashes mine hasnt.And HD DVD lost the battle. Buy a 360 because fo DLC LOLOLOL...thats as bad as paying 50 mil for 10 hours of gameplay and delay of GTA 4 apparently Im kool with the game..DLC a waste of time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chadders42 Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Awww poor PlayStation users, they've always been left behind when it'd come to GTA. I see your point, it is fair considering playstation users had exclusivity of the game for 5 years... Is that even a word.. exclusivity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glosoli Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Sony couldn't afford a bidding war with microsoft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinamo Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 I don't find it unfair, I'm sure sony could've offered that money too. It's bussiness. Why dosent sony buy into it then? do downloadable content for the playstation store, SONY GIVE ROCKSTAR YOUR MONEY Because M$ paid for the DLC to be exclusive. The PS3 will get its own DLC as time passes, I'm 99% sure of that, so don't worry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DQ_4944 Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 I don't find it unfair, I'm sure sony could've offered that money too. It's bussiness. I agree Money makes the world go round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlademanX Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Awww poor PlayStation users, they've always been left behind when it'd come to GTA. If it wasnt for playstation whos to say your fat behind will be eating popcorn playing GTA 4. Fanboys fanboys. make me laugh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chadders42 Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Sony couldn't afford a bidding war with microsoft Well yeah but sony don't have the most widely used OS on their books do they Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glosoli Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Sony couldn't afford a bidding war with microsoft Well yeah but sony don't have the most widely used OS on their books do they Well um exactly.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlademanX Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 MIcrosoft dont have the best HD TV on the market as well as the most reliable products. Sony stuff actually lasts and is good quality. I see theres a lot of Microsoft spokes men and women on here today. You guys might as well apply for jobs instead of just fantasising about how rich microsoft really are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apollo_33 Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Its fair. Sony could've paid 50Million if they wanted.... They did not... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nlitement Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Awww poor PlayStation users, they've always been left behind when it'd come to GTA. If it wasnt for playstation whos to say your fat behind will be eating popcorn playing GTA 4. Fanboys fanboys. make me laugh... Here we go again, "If" "if "if my ass, dumbass. If it wasn't for Microsoft -> DOS/Windows -> no platform to release GTA for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts