joe_bevis Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 (edited) does anybody here believe in conspiracies inparticular the illuminiti and the new world order and also MANBEARPIG Edited June 4, 2008 by joe_bevis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Tequeli Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lloydo Posted May 23, 2008 Share Posted May 23, 2008 (edited) Yes. US wants its sphere of influnce into Middle East and elsewhere, its not really a conspiracy, just a a fact that their big businesses and economic minsiters are looking for other means of survival. Edited May 23, 2008 by lloydo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 (edited) the secret reptilian race runs the world see the resemblence? Edited May 24, 2008 by Skins sysnode Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lt_yao Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 These are the aliens that started our human race, oh and also they are among us, so be careful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhus Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 I've heard several theories that a Parliament of Yorkshire Terriers controls the West Coast of America. Slowly they are working towards a poll wax. In order to line their pockest and score some hot Czechoslovakian ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vercetti21 Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 The only conspiracy theories I have ever taken seriously are the JFK conspiracies for the simple fact that there is no real concrete evidence if Oswald worked alone, as opposed to all the 9/11 bullsh*t. But there are already topics for both of those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seachmall Posted May 25, 2008 Share Posted May 25, 2008 The only conspiracy theories I have ever taken seriously are the JFK conspiracies for the simple fact that there is no real concrete evidence if Oswald worked alone As oppose to the concrete evidence that Oswald had an accompliance? The thread on JFK mentions how this theory was debunked by the same officer it was based on, it was also debunked by the fact that the 2 shots that hit JFK were at an angel that was only available to Oswald but its all mentioned in the post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vercetti21 Posted May 25, 2008 Share Posted May 25, 2008 The only conspiracy theories I have ever taken seriously are the JFK conspiracies for the simple fact that there is no real concrete evidence if Oswald worked alone As oppose to the concrete evidence that Oswald had an accompliance? The thread on JFK mentions how this theory was debunked by the same officer it was based on, it was also debunked by the fact that the 2 shots that hit JFK were at an angel that was only available to Oswald but its all mentioned in the post. Oh my god, you are so annoying to debate with. You just have to constantly question every little thing I say. It's generally accepted that Oswald was the lone gunman, while at the same time was not the only one who planned it. The question is, who else was involved? On that issue, we have no concrete evidence to ease our curiosity. You can't just claim that a conspiracy is true because you agree with it - it is still just a theory, no matter how "right" it sounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seachmall Posted May 25, 2008 Share Posted May 25, 2008 (edited) Oh my god, you are so annoying to debate with. You just have to constantly question every little thing I say. It's generally accepted that Oswald was the lone gunman, while at the same time was not the only one who planned it. The question is, who else was involved? On that issue, we have no concrete evidence to ease our curiosity. You can't just claim that a conspiracy is true because you agree with it - it is still just a theory, no matter how "right" it sounds. My point is that there was no evidence from day one that he didn't work alone. 3 scientists disected a tape, claimed there was another gun man but it was immediatly debunked. Why it carried on I don't know. There has never been any evidence that he didn't work alone, only evidence that he did (including the planning) so there for there is no conspiracy just bullsh*t pulled out of someones ass that believe whole-heartedly in (I know you don't but some do). You brought up a point and I questioned it, whats wrong with that? This is a debate forum. EDIT - Ya, never mind, I apolagise. Edited May 25, 2008 by Seachmall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lloydo Posted May 25, 2008 Share Posted May 25, 2008 From most users in the JFK debate i found Oswald to most probably be the lone shooter. But was he working as a patsy or for his own beliefs? I mean all of the things to do with JFK's body after the assassination don't add up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vercetti21 Posted May 25, 2008 Share Posted May 25, 2008 You brought up a point and I questioned it, whats wrong with that? This is a debate forum. EDIT - Ya, never mind, I apolagise. Apology accepted, but just to clarify, there is a difference between an intellectual debate and nitpicking. An intelligent debater will consider his opponent's opinions, and build on them with opinions of his own. A nitpicker will disregard the main focus of the debate and attack his opponent in unnecessary areas, such as concrete facts or general knowledge, for the sole purpose of making him seem wrong. Nevertheless, it's over and done with, and if we must continue this discussion, we should take it to PMs as to not sh*t up the thread with a personal quarrel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seachmall Posted May 25, 2008 Share Posted May 25, 2008 Apology accepted, but just to clarify, there is a difference between an intellectual debate and nitpicking. An intelligent debater will consider his opponent's opinions, and build on them with opinions of his own. A nitpicker will disregard the main focus of the debate and attack his opponent in unnecessary areas, such as concrete facts or general knowledge, for the sole purpose of making him seem wrong. Nevertheless, it's over and done with, and if we must continue this discussion, we should take it to PMs as to not sh*t up the thread with a personal quarrel. Well all my views are in the JFK thread so I don't think they need to be brought up again. @OT, I don't believe in many, if any, conspiracies. Can't think of any off the top of my head anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voyager Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 the earth is a biological computer designed to answer the great question about life, the universe and everything. the whole show is run by hyper-intelligent alien shades of blue disguised as lab mice; they are so clever that they have duped mankind into thinking they are doing experiments on them, while it is actually the mice doing experiments on us! the dolphins are in on it too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sona 175 Posted July 15, 2008 Share Posted July 15, 2008 (edited) Yes i do i believe in conspiracys i found out a few weeks ago that 62 people died after the JFK shooting people in the crowd his bodyguards and close friends were all found dead in some way within a year of his death means nothing to me really but gets you thinking Edited July 15, 2008 by sona 175 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HomoUniversalis Posted July 15, 2008 Share Posted July 15, 2008 Having been called a neo-conservative more than once, I guess I'm not the best source.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefan. Posted July 16, 2008 Share Posted July 16, 2008 The only conspiracy theory I believe in would probably be UFOs. I watched this one video from Haiti, unedited, and it almost definitely showed proof of UFOs. Also, after reading different stories of epople disappearing from UFOs, I'm convinced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Mozzarelli 80 Posted July 16, 2008 Share Posted July 16, 2008 It is well known that the illuminati exist. It's a conspiracy in so far as people meet together and plan events. The new world order? It depends on what exactly you are describing with that statement. But to believe that world leaders and heads of multinational corporations don't conspire and collude in some way or another is quite frankly, preposterous. As for ManBearPig...... I don't wanna discuss it..... you never know who's listening Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFatseas Posted July 16, 2008 Share Posted July 16, 2008 (edited) No, I really don't believe in them. Most conspiracy theories upon close inspection do not hold water. And the ones were evidence cannot be put against them don't have evidence going for them either. ETA:The worst ones are the 9/11 conspiracies. Edited July 16, 2008 by TFatseas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bates_GTA Posted July 16, 2008 Share Posted July 16, 2008 I never usually listen to Conspiracy Theories cause there is so much to them, but the one i looked at recently cause it concerned me was the 9/11 conspiracy theory, some scary stuff man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now