Spyran Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 hello i have questions about grand theft auto IV 1. will there be bicycles? 2. will there be parachutes? 3. will there be Jet Skis? 4. will there be custom soundtracks 5. do pedestrians turn their windsheild vipers on when it rains? 6. will you have the ability to turn sixaxis off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Californian Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 1. No 2. We don't know 3. We don't know 4. We don't know 5. We don't know 6. We don't know There you go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayt001 Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 hello i have questions about grand theft auto IV 1. will there be bicycles? 2. will there be parachutes? 3. will there be Jet Skis? 4. will there be custom soundtracks 5. do pedestrians turn their windsheild vipers on when it rains? 6. will you have the ability to turn sixaxis off? Maybe, not confirmed though. Nope Dunno yet, maybe. Probably, definately if you have 360. I believe so. Most likely. They aren't solid answers, I know, it's just to the best of my knowledge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoGoGadgetFlow Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 hooold on no bikes ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGameKisser Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Its a REAL step backward's if there's no bicycle's in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fitbikesbmx Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 hooold on no bikes ?? Where have you been? The only thing questionable is the jet skis, which I would doubt. Custom soundtracks will most likely be in, and I would say windshield wipers will be active during rain. Also, sixaxis was at least said to not be present in the game, but Dualshock will be. Parachutes are said to be out, but who knows. The fact is, unless Rockstar Games says it themselves, no info is truly confirmed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coons2k4 Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Its a REAL step backward's if there's no bicycle's in the game. Why exactly? Is the lack of bicycles really going to prohibit you from having fun? I highly doubt it. And if so, then you are playing this game for the wrong reasons. p.s.-no need to make backwards and bicycles possessive. The apostrophe is not necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCOUSE-FEAR Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 hello i have questions about grand theft auto IV 1. will there be bicycles? 2. will there be parachutes? 3. will there be Jet Skis? 4. will there be custom soundtracks 5. do pedestrians turn their windsheild vipers on when it rains? 6. will you have the ability to turn sixaxis off? 1. hope so 2. hope so 3. hope so 4. hope so 5. VIPERS hope so 6. hope so that ok for you ? can i go now ? please? bye. cya. chow bambino. in a bit see u round like a quarter pound.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave1927p Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 hello i have questions about grand theft auto IV 1. will there be bicycles? 2. will there be parachutes? 3. will there be Jet Skis? 4. will there be custom soundtracks 5. do pedestrians turn their windsheild vipers on when it rains? 6. will you have the ability to turn sixaxis off? 1. hope so 2. hope so 3. hope so 4. hope so 5. VIPERS hope so 6. hope so that ok for you ? can i go now ? please? bye. cya. chow bambino. in a bit see u round like a quarter pound.... not funny. Didn't it say in one of the previews (can't recall which one) that there will not be parachutes or jet skis in the game? PS: who gives a sh*t about Windshield wipers!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGameKisser Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 (edited) Its a REAL step backward's if there's no bicycle's in the game. Why exactly? Is the lack of bicycles really going to prohibit you from having fun? I highly doubt it. And if so, then you are playing this game for the wrong reasons. p.s.-no need to make backwards and bicycles possessive. The apostrophe is not necessary. Ok when your eating a meal i'll take away your knife and fork and you tell me if its a step backwards, but by the sounds of it you dont use them anyway, and also it will stop me having more fun, more fun on a bicycle, and im playing the game for the right reasons by the sound of it you'll be happy with tetris theres no bikes in there honest, oh and one last thing ''''''''''''' your a picky idiot. Edited March 13, 2008 by TheGameKisser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grekster Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Its a REAL step backward's if there's no bicycle's in the game. Why exactly? Is the lack of bicycles really going to prohibit you from having fun? I highly doubt it. And if so, then you are playing this game for the wrong reasons. p.s.-no need to make backwards and bicycles possessive. The apostrophe is not necessary. Ok when your eating a meal i'll take away your knife and fork and you tell me if its a step backwards, but by the sounds of it you dont use them anyway, oh and one last thing ''''''''''''' idiot. Haha thats got to be the most idiotic thing ive ever heard on this forum (and thats saying something). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGameKisser Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Its a REAL step backward's if there's no bicycle's in the game. Why exactly? Is the lack of bicycles really going to prohibit you from having fun? I highly doubt it. And if so, then you are playing this game for the wrong reasons. p.s.-no need to make backwards and bicycles possessive. The apostrophe is not necessary. Ok when your eating a meal i'll take away your knife and fork and you tell me if its a step backwards, but by the sounds of it you dont use them anyway, oh and one last thing ''''''''''''' idiot. Haha thats got to be the most idiotic thing ive ever heard on this forum (and thats saying something). Hey want quote my updated post geekster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noxiousd Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Its a REAL step backward's if there's no bicycle's in the game. Why? this isnt amsterdam Its friggin new york city See the difference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGameKisser Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Its a REAL step backward's if there's no bicycle's in the game. Why? this isnt amsterdam Its friggin new york city See the difference? I like the way you compared that, ok i just mean its not like no one in new york has a bicycle, i like the verity i mean no plane, parachute, jetpack, all of which i understand why there absent from the game but bicycle''''''s should be in GTAIV, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noxiousd Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Its a REAL step backward's if there's no bicycle's in the game. Why? this isnt amsterdam Its friggin new york city See the difference? I like the way you compared that, ok i just mean its not like no one in new york has a bicycle, i like the verity i mean no plane, parachute, jetpack, all of which i understand why there absent from the game but bicycle''''''s should be in GTAIV, I compared because amsterdam is a city where cyclists outnumber cars/motorbikes by a lot, new york theyre barely present at all... A few geeks in new york probably own segways (sp?) doesnt mean they should be in the game, same goes for skateboards... Its one tiny element thats missing, from what is already a crowded city with little park space for driving bicycles anyway... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGameKisser Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Its a REAL step backward's if there's no bicycle's in the game. Why? this isnt amsterdam Its friggin new york city See the difference? I like the way you compared that, ok i just mean its not like no one in new york has a bicycle, i like the verity i mean no plane, parachute, jetpack, all of which i understand why there absent from the game but bicycle''''''s should be in GTAIV, I compared because amsterdam is a city where cyclists outnumber cars/motorbikes by a lot, new york theyre barely present at all... A few geeks in new york probably own segways (sp?) doesnt mean they should be in the game, same goes for skateboards... Its one tiny element thats missing, from what is already a crowded city with little park space for driving bicycles anyway... Riding down a quite neighborhood early one moning would be cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RONIN1191 Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Its a REAL step backward's if there's no bicycle's in the game. Why exactly? Is the lack of bicycles really going to prohibit you from having fun? I highly doubt it. And if so, then you are playing this game for the wrong reasons. p.s.-no need to make backwards and bicycles possessive. The apostrophe is not necessary. Ok when your eating a meal i'll take away your knife and fork and you tell me if its a step backwards, but by the sounds of it you dont use them anyway, and also it will stop me having more fun, more fun on a bicycle, and im playing the game for the right reasons by the sound of it you'll be happy with tetris theres no bikes in there honest, oh and one last thing ''''''''''''' your a picky idiot. You equate bicycles with using a knife and fork at a meal? That's quite a stretch there; unless you're a bike messenger and want to relive your heyday dartin in and outta traffic then I could see the concern. There was only one game that had bicycles in it, and it wasn't that big a deal. You are not saying that doing bunny hops and attempting tricks off the quarterpipe was the highlight of SA for you, are you? I'm just going based on your post- since you equate bicycles in-game to a fork and knife (which are essential to eating a polite meal); now if you'd said the use of previous gen character models was a REAL step backwards, we'd all agree. Bikes not included as a real step backwards? LOL Edit: that damn noxiousd...good point; bad that you had to make it. Thought it was obvious, m'self. I think not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maddgamer2 Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Probably, definately if you have 360 l..m..a..o dumbest thing ever said on gta forums... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kool_J_rap Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Probably, definately if you have 360 l..m..a..o dumbest thing ever said on gta forums... How is that dumb ? Its true, on the 360 you can play your custom playlists at any time during any game, on the PS3 you cannot, which makes it almost pointless to upload any music at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maddgamer2 Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 How is that dumb ? Its true, on the 360 you can play your custom playlists at any time during any game, on the PS3 you cannot, which makes it almost pointless to upload any music at all i dont know if people have forgot that BOTH VERSIONS WILL BE EXACLY THE SAME exept for minor details such as picture brightness/colour...that my freind is why he is a idiot and why your a idiot for trying to put down the ps3. because it was a epic fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCLASS Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 bikes suck anyway.....who wants to pedal if you got a car. Aint exactly 'gangsta' is too be pedal your way to a mission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGameKisser Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Its a REAL step backward's if there's no bicycle's in the game. Why exactly? Is the lack of bicycles really going to prohibit you from having fun? I highly doubt it. And if so, then you are playing this game for the wrong reasons. p.s.-no need to make backwards and bicycles possessive. The apostrophe is not necessary. Ok when your eating a meal i'll take away your knife and fork and you tell me if its a step backwards, but by the sounds of it you dont use them anyway, and also it will stop me having more fun, more fun on a bicycle, and im playing the game for the right reasons by the sound of it you'll be happy with tetris theres no bikes in there honest, oh and one last thing ''''''''''''' your a picky idiot. You equate bicycles with using a knife and fork at a meal? That's quite a stretch there; unless you're a bike messenger and want to relive your heyday dartin in and outta traffic then I could see the concern. There was only one game that had bicycles in it, and it wasn't that big a deal. You are not saying that doing bunny hops and attempting tricks off the quarterpipe was the highlight of SA for you, are you? I'm just going based on your post- since you equate bicycles in-game to a fork and knife (which are essential to eating a polite meal); now if you'd said the use of previous gen character models was a REAL step backwards, we'd all agree. Bikes not included as a real step backwards? LOL Edit: that damn noxiousd...good point; bad that you had to make it. Thought it was obvious, m'self. I think not. Fair enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts