Isara Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 Sorry if this has been posted before. http://www.howmanyfiveyearoldscouldyoutakeinafight.com/ Some of the questions are entertaining. So what's your score? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unopescio Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 28. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyZimmzy Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 "You could take on 22 five year old kids in a fight" f*cking 5-year-olds man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dxk Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 24 kids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Deuce Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 "You could take on 23 five year old kids in a fight." Lol @ using a 5-year old as a weapon to throw into another one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trows Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 "You could take on 29 five year old kids in a fight." That was awesome. No dough this post will get questions and and maybe even some fighting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Girish Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 Only 18. Wait a minute...am I being too honest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bagga rabbit Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 28 of the little buggers. How 'bout that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAThomas Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 22 little punks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black-hawk Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 You could take on 27 five year old kids in a fight. Lil' demons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disco Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 "You could take on 9 five year old kids in a fight." Yeh, I'm a wuss. WANNA FIGHT ABOUT IT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OH NO Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 33 My experience with football crowds and the fact that i once fought a swarm of bees no doubt helping me to this grand total. I reckon i could take more, mind you. f*ck, theyre only 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aimee Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 Oh i did this a couple of months ago on MySpace. I could take 15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raresh_r Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 (edited) damn it only 23 i think this isn't true ... because a bunch of stupid small kids can come up to you and kick you in the nuts . Edited January 9, 2008 by raresh_r Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unopescio Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 This quiz does not take into full account the true viciousness of 5 year olds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berkley Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 23. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKELETOR. Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 400..I could take on 400 five year olds in a fight. Definitely. More if i had a staff. edit: Didnt realise there was a quiz. edit2: 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canoxa Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 21 one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papanesta Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 31 of those little sh*ts. Bring it on you three foot tall f*ckers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derty Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 Ha, this was great, thanks for sharing. I can smack around 25 of the little pecker heads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 "You could take on 31 five year old kids in a fight." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthypants Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 Only 20. I can take hundreds of new born babies, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HolyGrenadeFrenzy Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 (edited) I am going to assume some bizarre situation which makes this even a possiblity like rabbies becoming airborne or vast demonic possessions in a kindergarden class. You could take on 34 five year old kids in a fight. Wish I knew what to do with that code though. Edited January 9, 2008 by HolyGrenadeFrenzy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kippers Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 19 習うより慣れろ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creed Bratton Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 28 little f*cks. I would use them as weapons against others too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie280 Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 lol that was hilarious. I could take 20 of the f*ckers. Then be over come when they use the Barney theme song as psychological warfare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin2006rhs Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 New High: 36 When I first saw the topic, my mind went all retarded/semi-dyslexic and for some odd reason I thought the topic was titled "How many 5 year-olds Could You Take On A Flight?" I thought it was a test of child management and behavioral skills...wrong. It was just about kicking the sh*t out of little drool buckets called 5 year old children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swolo yaggins Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 I can take on 21 of the little sh*ts. Bleh. 5192:12.3.02LM/SSHmkl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pizza guy Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Svip Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 10, but mainly due to the fact that I find it wrong. I mean, come on! They are kids for pity's sake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now