Call of Duty 5 - World At War

[Rebel]

If you want Nam, play Black Hawk Down on the PC.

You could get it for around £5/$7 these days.

Get Shellshock: Nam '67 if you want that kind of game. Although I think it only came out for the PS2 ( Don't take my word though ) Its a good game for the price I got it at which was about £5. I haven't even got COD4 yet, and from what I've heard it's good. I hope COD5 will be good too. Well lets hope for the best.

[Carbine23]

I don't know....

I just don't see call of duty being set in Vietnam. Call of Duty will always have world war 2 games, because as technology gets better, world war 2 games can get bigger battles and multiplayer. If this is set in the pacific, then it better have some damn good multiplayer, with airplanes, naval ship battles, good A.I., ranks, a pearl harbor map, and it better have lots of violence to make it an M rated game like call of duty 4.

[TDP992]

I'd personally like to have another modern set game, not WWII era. Although Vietnam woudn't be bad since I've never played a game set in that war before. Also, I hope they bring the vehicles back from CoD 3.

[D Jones]

Vietnam or Desert Storm would be nice.

[Forty]

Has this been proven to be true yet? It seems ridiculous to revert back to past wars after you've made a huge leap already. And why wouldn't infinity ward make the sequel after this one was so successful? Dumb ideas. It seems fishy.

[YourNeighborhoodKiller]

Has this been proven to be true yet? It seems ridiculous to revert back to past wars after you've made a huge leap already. And why wouldn't infinity ward make the sequel after this one was so successful? Dumb ideas. It seems fishy.

Yep, hope this rumor about it taking place in WW2 is wrong.

 

Because I really enjoyed playing the game in "advanced".

[Kippers]

 

Has this been proven to be true yet? It seems ridiculous to revert back to past wars after you've made a huge leap already. And why wouldn't infinity ward make the sequel after this one was so successful? Dumb ideas. It seems fishy.

Well i assume it's becuase Infinity Ward wants to start work on the inevitable COD6?

Edited January 6, 2008 by kippers.

[Forty]

Has this been proven to be true yet? It seems ridiculous to revert back to past wars after you've made a huge leap already. And why wouldn't infinity ward make the sequel after this one was so successful? Dumb ideas. It seems fishy.

Well i assume it's becuase Infinity Ward wants to start work on the inevitable COD6?

That doesn't make any sense. Why would you finish CoD4, and then go "Nah we don't want to make the next one, we want to make the one two releases from now!". Pointless.

[darthYENIK]

Has this been proven to be true yet? It seems ridiculous to revert back to past wars after you've made a huge leap already. And why wouldn't infinity ward make the sequel after this one was so successful? Dumb ideas. It seems fishy.

Well i assume it's becuase Infinity Ward wants to start work on the inevitable COD6?

Bingo, and Activision wants a new game asap.

[Kippers]

 

Has this been proven to be true yet? It seems ridiculous to revert back to past wars after you've made a huge leap already. And why wouldn't infinity ward make the sequel after this one was so successful? Dumb ideas. It seems fishy.

Well i assume it's becuase Infinity Ward wants to start work on the inevitable COD6?

That doesn't make any sense. Why would you finish CoD4, and then go "Nah we don't want to make the next one, we want to make the one two releases from now!". Pointless.

It's a good plan becuase Infinity Wards now have twice as long to make COD6 amazing whilst Treyarch keep us interested in the series with 5, which has possibly been in production since they finished COD3?

[ryuclan]

If you want Nam, play Black Hawk Down on the PC.

You could get it for around £5/$7 these days.

Get Shellshock: Nam '67 if you want that kind of game. Although I think it only came out for the PS2 ( Don't take my word though ) Its a good game for the price I got it at which was about £5. I haven't even got COD4 yet, and from what I've heard it's good. I hope COD5 will be good too. Well lets hope for the best.

It is a good game but its very short. I'd say around 6 hours if you do it right. But the multiplayer is great if you dont mind the occasional 10 year screaming that your a newb.

[ISd3d]

I probably won't be getting COD5.

[Carbine23]

Has this been proven to be true yet? It seems ridiculous to revert back to past wars after you've made a huge leap already. And why wouldn't infinity ward make the sequel after this one was so successful? Dumb ideas. It seems fishy.

It's not Infinity Wards fault. Activision wants a call of duty game released every year, and it would be pressure on them to create another call of duty game every other 2 or 3 years. This way it'll be faster.

 

Expected Release Dates

 

Call of Duty 5 - Nov. 2008 - Treyarch

Call of Duty 6 - Nov. 2009 - Infinity Ward

Call of Duty 7 - Nov. 2010 - Treyarch

Call of Duty 8 - Nov. 2011 - Infinity Ward

Call of Duty 9 - Nov. 2012 - Treyarch

 

I won't continue because there's a theory that the worlds going to end on Dec. 21st, 2012

[beanmachine43]

 

Also, I hope they bring the vehicles back from CoD 3.

Yes.

 

Vietnam or Desert Storm would be nice.

Fu*k yes.

[Carbine23]

New Update for Call of Duty 5

http://planetcallofduty.gamespy.com/fullstory.php?id=147841

 

 

Call of Duty 4 DLC in development.

 

Call of Duty 5 to be released before 2009 for PC, PS3, Xbox 360, PS2, Wii.

[*gta star*]

I hope it's on PC, just pointless going console only.

[s-paco]

I hope it's on PC, just pointless going console only.

It's coming to the PC, it's been confirmed.

[Carbine23]

I hope it's on PC, just pointless going console only.

It's coming to the PC, it's been confirmed.

Yeah, unlike Call of Duty 3 (made by Treyarch, the developers of United Offensive) this ones going to be on the PC. Many PC Gamers were angry that COD3 wasn't on the PC, but luckily this one will be.

[Seddo]

Also, I hope they bring the vehicles back from CoD 3.

Yes.

Bringing vehicles back for the single player is fine but not for multiplayer, in Call of Duty 3 everyone just whored the tanks and you couldn't do nothing when one of them is on your back, you should of seen my death count on one of the games due to my getting my arsed whipped by a tank it was not pretty..

[Ronnyboy]

Has this been proven to be true yet? It seems ridiculous to revert back to past wars after you've made a huge leap already. And why wouldn't infinity ward make the sequel after this one was so successful? Dumb ideas. It seems fishy.

Would you ather fight like in Halo? In the future with laser guns and space ships? Becuase I wouldnt buy a Game that had that or a cover that had this on it:

[War-Lord]

Desert Storm would be boring nothing happened.

[*gta star*]

Vehicles then ey?

 

What type of vehicles? Any Heli's ?

[dragonrock]

I hate Treyarch. Its like EA trying to make a GTA game. ITS NOT GOOD

[The Killa]

I'm up for a Vietnam CoD. Just trying to imagine CoD in a Vietnam setting makes me want to play it so bad. Oh lawd.

 

A WW1 CoD wouldn't be too bad either. I'm up for some bayonet action.

[Uno Carb]

Call Of Duty: 'Nam

 

ALL YOUR ENEMIES LOOK THE SAME LOL AMIRITE

[MaroonZ28]

I'm up for a Vietnam CoD. Just trying to imagine CoD in a Vietnam setting makes me want to play it so bad. Oh lawd.

 

A WW1 CoD wouldn't be too bad either. I'm up for some bayonet action.

A WW1 Call of Duty would be killer. Trench warfare and Mustard Gas sounds good to me

[havoKXT]

What are those battles where everyone is in a huge open field and charge at each other?

 

Because they need a game like that, there isn't much to it but it could be fun...

Edited February 17, 2008 by havoKXT

[Seddo]

Call of Duty 9 - Nov. 2012 - Treyarch

 

2012 .

 

That will be something like Call of Duty: Battle on the Death Star.

 

Bringing a Call of Duty game each year is something EA will do.

[Don Garcia aka NjNakedSnake]

I'd much rather see a game that follows a US soldier during all of the war. That would ensure that the game isn't short and have a more human storyline a la Brothers In Arms, a far superior game in my opinion. Superior in the the campaign sense, not including online play. I hate splitting the war up into several games, just do the whole thing in one epic game. I'm still enjoying COD2, I'm probably the only one, but it's an awesome, althought short, game.

[Nikofan112]

I dont know about anyone else, but i want an alternate history game. Kinda like R:FOM, without the f*cking aliens. So we have no idea what happens at the end until it comes. The evil people could win. The Earth could be destroyed. Ok, im getting ahead of myself, but this would make an awesome game and good storyline.