Jump to content

Having some problems posting


Saggy

Recommended Posts

http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=300397

 

Well, I'm not sure if it's just that forum, that topic, or if this will even work, but for some reason I could not post my reply in that topic, it just came out blank. I reported it, but I wasn't exactly sure if it was evident what happened and I sort of borked the report.

 

What's going on?

 

This is the text I tried to post

 

 

 

I myself have never tried any illicit drugs and never will, as I know to myself I don't need drugs as they ruin your life or close to ruining your life.

 

The problem with that mentality is that, one day you might try an illicit drug and discover that you truly don't need it. Take cannabis for an example. If you try it one night at a party, have a wonderful time, don't die, don't feel like you're going to die when you come down, are you really going to think that pot is such a bad thing? People that carry this mentality are often the quickest to abuse pot when they try it, because somehow they get the idea that, "It was all lies, this is completely harmless, I can smoke and smoke and smoke and nothing will ever change." It's a worn out phrase, but Moderation is Key, as with all things in life. Some people can tend to take in the propaganda, and of course the misguided notion of addiction, and treat it as something that is somehow above any other vice or habit. There is a big difference between chemical dependency, and addiction. Addiction is defined as a behavior that you continue despite negative consequences. People who skate board all day long, may get bad grades, and do it anyway; it's because of this definition that things like "gambling addictions", "internet addictions" and so on are coming out of the mist of bullsh*t. What no one pays attention to is that, if you skate board all day long and get bad grades, that doesn't mean you won't be successful, it just means that you'll have bad grades. That won't effect your ability later in life to open up a skate-board shop later in life and be successful in business, or maybe if you're really lucky become a professional skater.

 

However, this is where the separation arrives. While legal things like the internet, gambling, skating, can lead to success and addiction, there's very rarely criminal charges going along with that. If a skate-boarder skates all day long and gets bad grades, he probably won't be arrested for it, and he'll probably be able to find a job very quickly. On the other hand, in America, a guy who smokes pot all day would quickly be arrested, and is also excluded from many jobs due to drug testing. Smoking marijuana does not make you a jobless criminal in the U.S., the U.S. makes you a jobless criminal if you smoke pot. This is where government snuffs out opportunity. If cannabis were a legal crop, the economy alone could expect to see enormous profits from potheads that smoke pot all day, growing pot and selling it in stores, to smoke pot all day--exactly what they're doing now. And in fact, they're doing it in SUCH a large scale now, that in the North American continent.. Hell, in Ontario alone, weed is a $20 billion a year crop. (Lost my citation on this, sorry)

 

All of that profit would not carry over if it were legal, I believe. If it were far more plentiful, far more accessible, without the possible criminal charges, it just could not be sold for the same outrageous prices; in many parts of the U.S., people are paying up to $600-$700 an ounce. The shear amount. and of course the other merchandise generated by it--bong shops, weed clothes, hemp, hemp-derived-cellulose products--could tip the scales to make it quite profitable. The DEA spends how many hundreds of millions of dollars a year to fight marijuana? Well, compared to the hundreds of billions the black-market nature facilitates, the mighty DEA is mostly digging up crops of ditch weed. Prohibition in the 1930's alone should show how completely futile and counter-productive drug prohibition really is. So why keep doing it? I have my own theories, though nothing as clearly as evident and ridiculous as drug-prohibition in history.

 

I simply believe that in the current state of drug scheduling, with the DEA and the FDA basically dictating the scheduling of all drugs, I believe it is more profitable for those agencies in question for marijuana to remain illegal than it would be it it were legal. It's the same at the end of alcohol prohibition in the 1930s, there were hundreds of cops laid off work because there just wasn't that much crime to fight anymore. The DEA is funded hundreds of millions a year to fight just marijuana alone, and in 2005 it put away 740k on possession alone; most of those people are probably also paying off fines and also engaging in prison-labor camps. How much would these people (DEA, NIDA, FDA, etc.) still make if all the sudden pot were legal? There would suddenly be hundreds of millions of dollars missing from their budget. It's foolish to have such agencies in charge, where it is in their best interest to keep drugs like cannabis illegal. Just research the current drug scheduling in the U.S., for some reason some of the most tame, non-addictive, non-toxic drugs are Shedule I ( shrooms, lsd, cannabis), and under Sheduel II ( available by prescription) opium, cocaine, and many others that are just outrageously toxic and addictive. The DEA and FDA's reasoning for this is that they believe cannabis has no therapeutic value, despite tons and tons of research to the contrary, and even the former head of the DEA admitting to its medicinal benefits. Yet, the current DEA regards this as bunk, and really only pays attention to research done by the National Institute on Drug Addiction (NIDA) and the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). Who are these organizations? Well, NIDA is the organization that provides the gutter-science, such as the infamous flawed research experiments on Rhesus monkeys that caused brain damage by asphyxiation. The ONDCP specializes mostly in those ridiculously stupid Public Service Announcements, though usually through subsidiaries like Partnership For a Drug Free America. In the end, the DEA only really pays attention to the research that NIDA gives them, and this research is heavily scrutinized by just about everyone else in the scientific community abroad. While there's really no strong evidence, and I doubt there will ever be an investigation lead into it, I really think that agencies like the DEA and NIDA are benefiting by having cannabis illegal, because they simply wouldn't make as much money off of it if it were legal. Cannabis is one hell of a cash crop yes, , but if by legislation and mandate, you make a plant more valuable than its weight in gold, you will never see the same revenue if it were suddenly as plentiful and accessible as cannabis could be. Years ago, I found a website called MAPS, it was an organization that was seeking legally obtained cannabis to do research on. They could not get any however, because the NIDA believed that their research was sufficient enough. What this lead to over time, was me finding many other research labs, professors, and in fact a very broad group of professionals that would pretty much be denied anything to test legally if their goal was to test the effects on brain development, IQ, lungs and lung-cancer, and basically anything they feel would refute their own current research. Many of them have also complained that when they are supplied weed by the NIDA, it is usually comprised mostly of sticks and seeds and does not actually represent anything that is bought and smoked by the public; some of the people in this group have actually accused them of just sending them "hemp", cannabis grown of industrial purposes with very little THC. The bottom line is that the cannabis NIDA supplies is about 2.5% THC by gram, where as most street cannabis is between 8-10%, and most very potent strains which are becoming more comment are anywhere between 15-20%. The bottom line is that we will probably never see any true research with the DEA only accepting NIDA's reports, and we won't see the drug scheduling reflect the true nature of the drugs ( as demonstrated by scientific studies broad ) until there is some true research. Who knows if there is actually corruption in the DEA and the FDA, the only thing that people can truly point out is that the science the NIDA is supply them is completely false.

 

I tell you all of this snot to spout my immense knowledge, because I left many things out. What's really going on with people getting into heavier stuff over here? The relentless campaigns by the ONDCP to make pot seem harmful and bad is actually having the undesirable effect of leading more and more teens to other drugs such as methamphetamine, heroin, ecstasy, or cocaine. A lot of younger teens I talk to see pot as a loser drug, and are into coke and meth because they see it as a "party" drug, and of course with coke the issue of it being "extravagant" comes into play. I recall reading a poll many years back that asked teens whether they thought trying marijuana once was more dangerous than drinking everyday, doing cocaine regularly, and LSD occasionally, and the majority of them thought that trying marijuana once was much more dangerous than drinking everyday and doing coke occasionally. However, I think the real problem with this is that most of the information that teens are made aware of is geared towards pot because it is still the most abused illicit drug nationally. Thus, most of the "research" (see: gutter science) that teens are being shown in health classes are pertinent mostly to cannabis. There's also the issue of drug testing; what a lot of teens are finding out now is that drugs like alcohol, cocaine, and methamphetamine, are very hard to find in drug tests, whereas cannabis is quite easy to find and stays in ones urine stream for a long time. Add more to this, it's much easier to easily conceal the use of a drug like cocaine or meth by snorting.

 

I think that explains a lot of the reason why kids are turning to harder drugs, but I think it also explains why we won't really know what these harder drugs are going to do to their developing minds, at least in the U.S. With most of the science pertinent to cannabis, and most of that science gutter-science, I doubt we're going to know what effects these drugs have on their brains. The other thing that doesn't help this, is that many of these drugs are comprised of different chemicals, and that can be hard to track.

QUOTE (K^2) ...not only is it legal for you to go around with a concealed penis, it requires absolutely no registration!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I edited it in without a problem, so it cannot be a thread error (user permissions withstanding)... Does it breach a character limit? According to MS Word, you have 10,300 some characters. I think 10,000 may be the maximum character limit. We'll see what GT-1 says.

 

Speed edit :: It just occured to me that you posted it here. Wow. Im going to get some coffee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh, that'd be kind of funny if I just went over the limit. I haven't tried replying to any of the other threads in D&D yet. Should I?

 

Edit

 

I just tested the "preview" which was what first thing that tipped me off it wasn't working, and it worked for a small string of text, so maybe it is the size limit. Didn't actually post, though, considering all I had to say was, "Itty bitty titty comittee".

Edited by SagaciousKJB

QUOTE (K^2) ...not only is it legal for you to go around with a concealed penis, it requires absolutely no registration!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I edited it in without a problem, so it cannot be a thread error (user permissions withstanding)... Does it breach a character limit? According to MS Word, you have 10,300 some characters. I think 10,000 may be the maximum character limit. We'll see what GT-1 says.

 

Speed edit :: It just occured to me that you posted it here. Wow. Im going to get some coffee.

I would be surprised if the limit was actually 10000 characters, I would guess around 63k characters at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the limit was actually a defined value of data (so many kB) and not a specific character limit. But then, I'm probably way off the mark.

 

I know a similar thing happened in Sports Discussion with Seddo I believe. The table hack on these forums can be problematic and in Sed's case it was causing absolutely nothing to be posted. Clearly that can't be the cause here as Sag hasn't been using tables, but there you go.

 

Also, dear old SIP posted nothing intentionally in GC, but wouldn't reveal the secret of his ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I would be surprised if the limit was actually 10000 characters, I would guess around 63k characters at least.

I'm pretty sure I remember reading somewhere that the limit was 65,535 characters.

 

I thought the limit was actually a defined value of data (so many kB) and not a specific character limit. But then, I'm probably way off the mark.

I'm pretty sure I read that too. That the limit was actually the same number of bytes, but that use of code and certain characters lowers the amount of characters you'd be able to post.

 

No idea which is actually correct.

 

(edit)

Either way you should be way under it. Also, as Mercie pointed out, you posted it here with no problem. So yeah, I have no idea what the problem is.

Edited by Sweets
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1 User Currently Viewing
    0 members, 0 Anonymous, 1 Guest

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.