One month left and no rating?

[xygtaxy]

OMG it's a nipple,I'm only 14 years old and I shouldn't be seeing this since i'm a inoccent kid who haven't ever seen a women's nipple in my life,I hope I don't go to hell.

If I remember right there was a game called Singles flirt up your life or something and there was full nudity in that one,it was the sims like but more adult,thank god my soul was saved.Before I sent two women to fornicate my trial of the game ended(those were you get 30 minutes or something for the full game) .And I think the game was rated M(atleast the trial I got said that).

I've Played that game it's rated Adult. And yes there is ( Penises, vaginas, Boobs, asses ) hardcore butt sex, Pussy sex, orgasms, sperm, sex noices, blow jobs, and everything elce thats sexual.

 

Back on topic, Who cares about rockstars bad graphiced tit! the game will not be rated A.

[GTAThomas]

 

[K-DST]

Good point. Nicely done. Well, you see my point, with GTA moving more toward AO with kids, realtime nips, and more realistic violence it could eventually get there even if its not VCS.

Instead of talking about this though somehow it has turned into a discussion of some porno sims game. WTF

[the ninja]

I forgot about that. And unless there's somehow a way to harm the baby, which I seriously doubt, I don't think the game will be rated AO.

[xygtaxy]

There Yeah Go, Tities, and No A rating! Good job man!

[topdogkiller]

this titty post should have ended. who gives a f*ck about titties and breast feeding, dont women do that in real life. And we've seen plenty of games with titties and they got the m rating. Now unless you guys think theres some sort of secret mini game where you grab and suck titties, this shouldn't be a big deal. Like i said before we're giving those fags ideas to blow into 's face. A TITTY's A TITTY.

[XXXmags]

xygtaxy i don't look at XXX mags you perv and my nick is from gta3.

[zeppelincheetah]

 

this whole topic is ridiculous. it takes a while for the rating to be made because the game has to be completely finished for them to rate it. and even then, they have to play through it themselves after that. so an RP rating is no big deal. and it won't get an AO rating!

[RedGuy]

I forgot about that. And unless there's somehow a way to harm the baby, which I seriously doubt, I don't think the game will be rated AO.

being able to killing a baby in the game will not effect the rating goddamn it

 

*goes on killing spree in VCS and kills children*

[Jamslice]

I forgot about that. And unless there's somehow a way to harm the baby, which I seriously doubt, I don't think the game will be rated AO.

in deus ex 2 you could murder many, many children

it was not rated AO

[the ninja]

 

I forgot about that. And unless there's somehow a way to harm the baby, which I seriously doubt, I don't think the game will be rated AO.

in deus ex 2 you could murder many, many children

it was not rated AO

F*ck you, too.

 

 

Titles in this category may include prolonged scenes of intense violence and/or graphic sexual content and nudity.

 

That's about the AO rating. So far, we haven't seen those associated with VCS.

[K-DST]

The next person that posts off topic.. I swear to god Im going to call the Boulder County Sheriff Department and say they admited killing Jon Benet Ramsey on the forums.

 

Listen. Im going to make this really really simple.

 

GTA appears to be taking a more mature direction.

Dont forget you can download a patch that lets you see nude sex in the Sims and its rated T. When San Andreas could be modified with a patch to include sex in the same manner it was re-rated AO.

Its obvious that the rating boards have it out for GTA.

I have said over and over again on this thread that I dont believe that GTA VCS will be rated AO. This topic is about how you guys would feel if GTA moved in the AO direction.

Even if GTA VCS was rated AO I do believe at this point Rockstar would remove the content. But with a big release like GTA4 Rockstar could probobly get away with it while still making as much if not more regardless of the AO rating.

 

Think about it.

 

This is the definition of an AO game taken from the ESRB website: "Titles in this category may include prolonged scenes of intense violence and/or graphic sexual content and nudity."

 

Notice how it says and/or. It doesnt have to even include graphic sexual content or nudity to be rated AO. It only needs to include prolonged scenes of intense violence. GTA4 will undoubtoubly include intense violence. The graphics will be much much better and the carnage surely more realistic. Its my opinion that if GTA were to even include the violence and carnage of manhunt (the super realistic gore and damage) it would be rated AO. The only reason Manhunt most likely escaped the AO rating is because you play as a good guy. He may be a convicted killer but in the game you only kill bad people that are trying to kill you. You even rescue a reporter. The cops that you have to kill are crooked and will only shoot you, not arrest you.

 

If the realistic violence, gore, and damage in Manhunt were to be in a GTA it would certianly be rated AO. That level of carnage against innocent people as opposed to the bad guys in Manhunt would honestly more then likely get GTA4 a big AO.

 

Also they are moving in more and more into drugs and nudity. Strippers, porno flicks, pornstars, and everyone and their mother smoking weed. GTA3 didnt even include real drugs. They just made up a drug. Now, I think its safe to say, GTA includes more references to drugs then any game series ever made. I think the game ratings board are just waiting to slap GTA with an AO rating and in my opinion it wouldnt be such a bad thing. GTA has explored the M rating just about as far as it will go and I wouldnt be bothered to see it go straight for AO and not having to worry about how far they push the bar.

[GTAThomas]

Yeah I don't care if it's rated AO. Even though I HIGHLY doubt it will be. The only problem with that is that Warez will increase because -18 year olds will be downloading because they aren't legally allowed to purchase it or find a store that would sell it. lol

[RedGuy]

The next person that posts off topic.. I swear to god Im going to call the Boulder County Sheriff Department and say they admited killing Jon Benet Ramsey on the forums.

 

Listen. Im going to make this really really simple.

 

GTA appears to be taking a more mature direction.

Dont forget you can download a patch that lets you see nude sex in the Sims and its rated T. When San Andreas could be modified with a patch to include sex in the same manner it was re-rated AO.

Its obvious that the rating boards have it out for GTA.

I have said over and over again on this thread that I dont believe that GTA VCS will be rated AO. This topic is about how you guys would feel if GTA moved in the AO direction.

Even if GTA VCS was rated AO I do believe at this point Rockstar would remove the content. But with a big release like GTA4 Rockstar could probobly get away with it while still making as much if not more regardless of the AO rating.

 

Think about it.

 

This is the definition of an AO game taken from the ESRB website: "Titles in this category may include prolonged scenes of intense violence and/or graphic sexual content and nudity."

 

Notice how it says and/or. It doesnt have to even include graphic sexual content or nudity to be rated AO. It only needs to include prolonged scenes of intense violence. GTA4 will undoubtoubly include intense violence. The graphics will be much much better and the carnage surely more realistic. Its my opinion that if GTA were to even include the violence and carnage of manhunt (the super realistic gore and damage) it would be rated AO. The only reason Manhunt most likely escaped the AO rating is because you play as a good guy. He may be a convicted killer but in the game you only kill bad people that are trying to kill you. You even rescue a reporter. The cops that you have to kill are crooked and will only shoot you, not arrest you.

 

If the realistic violence, gore, and damage in Manhunt were to be in a GTA it would certianly be rated AO. That level of carnage against innocent people as opposed to the bad guys in Manhunt would honestly more then likely get GTA4 a big AO.

 

Also they are moving in more and more into drugs and nudity. Strippers, porno flicks, pornstars, and everyone and their mother smoking weed. GTA3 didnt even include real drugs. They just made up a drug. Now, I think its safe to say, GTA includes more references to drugs then any game series ever made. I think the game ratings board are just waiting to slap GTA with an AO rating and in my opinion it wouldnt be such a bad thing. GTA has explored the M rating just about as far as it will go and I wouldnt be bothered to see it go straight for AO and not having to worry about how far they push the bar.

*tells police that k-dst killed jonbonnet*

 

anyway if the game got rated AO and store's refused to sell it R* would just sell it on mailorder from there website which means they will get more money so it will be better for them to make it AO

[Victor Vance12]

I live in australia and there is no higher rating in a video game then MA15+

and one of my games god of war had the same rating it had tits and a child got slaughtered. So dont worry.

[K-DST]

 

*tells police that k-dst killed jonbonnet*

 

anyway if the game got rated AO and store's refused to sell it R* would just sell it on mailorder from there website which means they will get more money so it will be better for them to make it AO

 

You bastard, using my genious plots against me!!!!

 

No retailer in the world would not sell GTA no matter what it was rated. It would be like burning money. They would throw their policies out the window if it meant money for them. And that is what GTA means... Trust me! $$

[GTAThomas]

For a short while the local Walmart didn't sell SA while it was AO. but that's offtopic...

 

 

Sony Doesn't carry AO rated games. Says so in every sony gaming console manual or that slip of paper with the ratings on it.

[Jamslice]

the AO rating should be retired

it's dumb.

[K-DST]

There has never been a reason to. If GTA ever includes heads that explode like in Manhunt it will probobly be AO. I can see the pictures now on CNN. A cop with his head mid explosion and the main character shooting it with a shotgun. God knows I would love to see that! With the graphics that the next gen systems are capable of it would be silly to have heads just dissappear, like the do now in the GTA series, when shot.

[theflatulentpanda]

 

shock horror, a nipple!!!! now theyl surely push up the rating on a game in which you are encouraged to brutaly murder 1000s of people with weapons ranging from shotguns to chainsaws to rpgs. a game that you play a coke dealer. a game full of swearing. whats the big f*cking deal?ive seen nipples in movies rated pg13

[goholden1]

I hope its not 18+ or AO because Australia doesnt release games that are rated R or 18+.

[Brutuz]

It probably will be released in Aus with an M rating and cut down features like no tits.

[rebalrouser]

 

I dont exactly believe that VCS will be rated AO but it does include two new features never before seen in a GTA that is sure to piss off rating boards around the world.  There's a baby, the woman in the trailer holding the baby has her nipple hanging out of her shirt, and we are promised rag doll physics making the violence more realistic.  Also each GTA has included more and more drugs and adult material.  In GTA3 the only drug even mentioned was a made up one.  VC had a lot of coke and SA had the most drug use. 

 

 

It will get M15+ like other gta's. Yes there is more adult material and drugs but you have to admit the 21st century is becoming more smuttier and more drug and violence related

[Born Acorn]

It's no more than the 20th was. But Society, and their views on how nasty things are, it's changing

 

A good example of this is that the very first black and white movies would be banned if they showed a toilet in them, while these days, you can have a movie that takes part entirely in a Bathroom.

[Agent Ryder]

sh*t they should do the same in both GTA3 and LCS they dont have porno in Liberty City They should not put porn in GTA IV or my next generation is such bullsh*t since the game i only want is GTA

[Brutuz]

Agent Ryder is right, GTA doesn't need porn, It need kick*ss features and okish graphics

[K-DST]

Agent Ryder is right

How could he be right? I couldnt even understand what the hell he was saying.

[xygtaxy]

Agent Ryder is right

How could he be right? I couldnt even understand what the hell he was saying.

I Second on that! And Yes Liberty City doe's have porno in it.

Just the fact you dont ever get to see anything....Vice City had Tits asses and sexual refernces.

 

San Andreas had dicks, asses, tits, drugs, violence, sex, gimp suits and other sh*t.

 

All of the Gta games have very very very strong vulgar language.

 

Gta deserves to be M. No A!!! Thankyou

[Parky.]

Sorry, but that isn't a nipple. Maybye a stray pixelin the final stages of the game making. After Hot Coffee, do you really think R* can afford anymore scandal

[Pat]

If one more god damn person.

Says anything about that god damn nipple.

I will personally make a case in court over them getting banned from this site.

IP and all.

It's getting really f*cking old people. It's a boob. Who gives a f*ck?!

 

Staying on topic (Like some f*cktards here are unable to do)

I wouldn't be affected if VCS got an A rating.

Sure, I'm only 14, but my parents know how much I love GTA. That and my dad has litterally sat down and played multiplayer on San Andreas with me. I dont get these dumbasses at ESRB. A little animated violence, hurting someone? PAH-LEASE! Oh yeah, some kids killed someone with a chainsaw imitating VC. HELLO, HOW WAS THIS GTA'S FAULT?! What, did GTA have a msg that said "Your next mission is to kill someone in real life with a chainsaw". They cant blame that sh*t on R*!

 

That's the end of my post.

And I swear.

If one more person posts about that MOTHER F*CKING BOOB, I F*CKING SWEAR I WILL PERSONALLY MAKE SURE THEY ARE BANNED FROM THIS SITE IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM FIVE SECONDS AFTER THEY POST IT. I'M REAL TIRED OF THIS BULL SH*T. FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT HAVEN'T BEEN ON THAT MANY FORUMS, BACK IN THE DAY GOING OFF TOPIC WAS A SERIOUS RULE. I SAW PEOPLE GET BANNED FOR IT EVERY DAY. AND NOW, MODS DONT GIVE A SH*T. DOES THAT MEAN YOU SHOULD DO IT? HELL NO. GOING OFF TOPIC SHOULD STILL BE A SERIOUS RULE, IT SHOULD BE COUNTED AS SPAM.

 

Oops, my bad. I guess THIS is the end of my post.

But seriously... (Just kidding)