Jump to content

Signature Size Rules


Recommended Posts

 

i've red the rules and everything but i dont see why my sig says its been disabled? i havnt had a pm off a mod saying why its disabled and i still have green lines is there something im missing??

You've bumped (sort of) an awfully old topic here, makes it look like this is the most recent news according to the index, there's a re-enable thread in GTANet Team, but your signature isn't disabled anyway.

Edited by Smithers
  • 2 weeks later...

In response to the new rules as of January 8, 2005:

 

ADDENDUM (8th Jan 2005): Sexual imagery is banned in signatures and avatars. Women or men in signatures is no problem, including bikinis, hotpants, the usual glamour modelling outfits, and all the other stuff we see in the everyday media. However sexually suggestive images, even if they don't technically contain nudity, are not considered appropriate for this forum.

 

 

Excuse me for being so blunt, but women in bikinis, in general, are sexual. That is the whole point of bikinis.

 

In Fact, girls in teddies are more covered and less sexual than girls in bikinis.

 

And to be quite frank, the rules aren't being enforced too well as of today. Phutile, Chunky Monkey and Demarest still have girls doing seductive things in their sigs and avatars.

 

And to be honest, I think the new rules applied today is utter sh*t.

 

 

Chunky Monkey's

user posted image

 

 

All 9 of Dem's avatars

user posted image 213 KB (217,794 bytes)

user posted image 134 KB (137,196 bytes)

user posted image 202 KB (205,893 bytes)

user posted image 165 KB (167,971 bytes)

user posted image 151 KB (154,366 bytes)

user posted image 267 KB (273,019 bytes)

user posted image 161 KB (164,728 bytes)

user posted image 327 KB (334,529 bytes)

user posted image 291 KB (297,259 bytes)

 

 

And i dont feel the need to post his signature.

 

Again, this rule is utter bullsh*t

Edited by QuikSilvr
Hence why the rules have been changed, I really don't see what the hell you're moaning about. You complain about the rules not being enforced, but you've not really given it much time have you. You're complaining that a rule made less than 24 hours ago wasn't enforced? I also wasn't informed such a rule about the filesize of avatars existed, it's not mentioned anywhere in this topic at least, not that I can see, so why was posting the avatars and sizes of Demarest etc needed?

Smithers, i just had it in a *.txt laying around on my pc.

 

As for the filesize postings.

I once got warned for having one single avatar that was 400KB small.

 

Also, a mod whispered in my ear that any avatar above 100KB is a definate no-no. Dem has had these sizes for a long long time.

immessedup17

Stop whining. Dem > you. smile.gif

 

I don't know how bad these graphics slow down 56k'ers and such, but they don't effect me at all. If they do slow them down a lot though, I guess the rules do make sense, and they should apply to everyone. Whatever the case is, my avatars are never bigger than like 20kb

Excuse me for being so blunt, but women in bikinis, in general, are sexual. That is the whole point of bikinis.

Really? So when you go to the beach with family/friends and see women in bikinis, you look at them sexually?

 

A fully clothed woman lying on a table spreading her legs suggestively and rubbing her breast would be sexual. A woman just standing around in a bikini is most definately not.

 

Okay, Quik. You made the topic, leave the discussion there. Even though you missed the 1st time it was addressed.
You addressed the fact that he posted the same topic for a second time. If he has to leave discussions in one place, you should too. Don't whine at him about posting something twice when you did the same.
Excuse me for being so blunt, but women in bikinis, in general, are sexual. That is the whole point of bikinis.

Really? So when you go to the beach with family/friends and see women in bikinis, you look at them sexually?

 

A fully clothed woman lying on a table spreading her legs suggestively and rubbing her breast would be sexual. A woman just standing around in a bikini is most definately not.

Yes, indeed i do. Why do you see two piece sets everywhere instead of one-piece? If you do a simple Google Image Search with safe search on, you'll see a lot of lude poses.

 

A two-piece suit was designed for 1 thing really, to show skin.

 

http://www.azcentral.com/style/articles/0717skimpy.html

 

http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/biki/hd_biki.htm

 

The natural thing girls want to do is show lots of skin to get lots of boys. A beach is basically a way for girls to wear the least amount of clothes, and still be considered "decent."

 

Yet when girls where low-cut shirts in most schools, or wear too short skirts, they get in trouble. Why? Trying to get boys. It's only natural.

 

The natural thing girls want to do is show lots of skin to get lots of boys. A beach is basically a way for girls to wear the least amount of clothes, and still be considered "decent."

 

Yet when girls where low-cut shirts in most schools, or wear too short skirts, they get in trouble. Why? Trying to get boys. It's only natural.

You chauvinist pig.

 

 

This avatar is turning me on and offending me.

Riiight.

The natural thing girls want to do is show lots of skin to get lots of boys. A beach is basically a way for girls to wear the least amount of clothes, and still be considered "decent."

 

Yet when girls where low-cut shirts in most schools, or wear too short skirts, they get in trouble. Why? Trying to get boys. It's only natural.

You chauvinist pig.

This coming from a young teen who names himself Communist Jesus?

 

lol. rah.gif

  • 3 weeks later...
Long Haired Freaky Guy

 

Chunky Monkey

 

Chunky Monkey's

user posted image

 

Chunky Monkey left absolutely ages ago, or so i believe as i no longer see him posting here.

 

You sh*t me up for a second there, as i thought some new, even stricter, sig rules had been enforced...

Edited by Long Haired Freaky Guy
  • 4 weeks later...

Some sigs sow up correct in IE and red in FF or vice-versa (especially when text is involved), what is the official line on this?

 

I would also again like to ask about my sig, here you can see it is too big, but I made it in the green box and it fits into the box, but due to the text being on multiple lines in the box, it expands onto one line when out the box (ie on a page), making itself too big, I did not design it like this so I am just checking whether its OK or not.

SWEETSAPRIK
my signature is f*cked how do i fix im not good on english??

bumping and jumping is not allowed here

and what is your problem with sig?

its disabled again and its aint to big this time!

Yes it is.

I can tell just by looking at your profile.

Take out the words, since they count towards the size.

Then post in the sig re-enable thread.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • 1 User Currently Viewing
    0 members, 0 Anonymous, 1 Guest

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.